AnnoMate 0.0.1

A general tool to create dashboards for manual review

AnnoMate

A package for using and creating interactive dashboards for manual review.

Quick Start

Install

Set up Conda Environment

This is highly recommended to manage different dependencies required by different reviewers.

1. Install conda

   Credit to Raymond Chu this article: https://medium.com/google-cloud/set-up-anaconda-under-google-cloud-vm-on-windows-f71fc1064bd7

   sudo apt-get update
   sudo apt-get install bzip2 libxml2-dev
   
   wget https://repo.anaconda.com/miniconda/Miniconda3-latest-Linux-x86_64.sh
   bash Miniconda3-latest-Linux-x86_64.sh
   rm Miniconda3-latest-Linux-x86_64.sh
   source .bashrc
   conda install scikit-learn pandas jupyter ipython
   

2. Create a conda environment

   If you do not already have a designated environment:

   conda create --name <your_env> python==<py_version>
   

   <your_env> is the name of your environment (ie purity_review_env). Check the corresponding reviewer's setup.py file to get the proper python version for py_version.

3. Add conda environment to ipykernel

   Credit to Nihal Sangeeth from StackOverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53004311/how-to-add-conda-environment-to-jupyter-lab.

   conda activate <your_env>
   conda install ipykernel
   ipython kernel install --user --name=<your_env>
   conda deactivate
   

   When you open a jupyter notebook, you can change the environment the notebook cells are run in to <your_env>

Install AnnoMate with pip

If you are developing a brand new reviewer, you can install from PyPi

conda activate <your_env>
pip install JupyterReviewer

Install with Git

AnnoMate and most prebuilt reviewers can be downloaded with git.

git clone [e-mail]:getzlab/AnnoMate.git
cd AnnoMate
conda activate <your_env> --file requirements.txt
pip install -e .

Tutorials and Documentation

See a more detailed tutorial in example_notebooks/Intro_to_Reviewers.ipynb

For developers, see example_notebooks/Developer_Jupyter_Reviewer_Tutorial.ipynb

Why Jupyter Reviewer

Why and how we review data

Part of any study is ensuring data are consistent and drawing conclusions about the data from multiple sources. Studies are often novel, so frequently there are steps along the way that do not have existing, validated automation techniques. Therefore, we must perform manual review.

Typically, the person reviewing all this data opens a bunch of windows to view data from different places (a clinical information spreadsheet from a collaborator, a few outputs from a Terra workflow, and/or previous notes from another reviewer, etc.). Next they look at all the data and keep notes in yet a separate document, such as a spreadsheet or digital/physical notes. Then, they go row by row, sample by sample, until they finish.

Why we need something better

While straightforward to do in theory, this review method is very brittle, error prone, and very time consuming.

Reviewing can take a very long time, such as reviewing large datasets on the order of hundreds to thousands of data points, or if the review needs to be repeated multiple times due to changes in processes upstream.

Some review processes are iterative, or new information is gained from some other source to inform the review process, or we need to pass off the review process to someone else. We should be able to easily incorporate old data with new data, and share that history and information with others.

Some reviews require calculations, or exploring the the data in ways that a static plot cannot provide. Some Terra workflows do produce some interactive html files, but this is rare. Sometimes, a reviewer realizes mid-way through the review process that a different kind of plot could be very informative. It should be easy to generate such a plot on the fly without having to modify or create a new Terra workflow, or opening a new notebook to calculate manually.

Lastly, humans are humans, and we make mistakes. It can be very tedious to maintain and update a large spreadsheet with hundreds of rows and multiple columns to annotate. Annotations are difficult to enforce in this setting, and changes (intentional or accidental) are difficult to track.

The Solution: Jupyter notebook and Plotly-Dash!

Most ACBs use jupyter notebooks for their analysis. So why not keep the review process in jupyter notebooks too? Additionally, there already exist great tools for making interactive figures and dashboards. We can use these packages to help automatically consildate information and create figures that will make it easier to review, enforce annotation standards, and track changes over time.

The JupyterReviewer package makes it simple to create dashboards for reviewing data. Developers and users can easily customize their dashboards to incorpate any data they like, and automatically provides a reviewer an easy way to annotate their data, track changes, and share their annotations with others.

Get Started

See example_notebooks/ for documentation and tutorials.