Combine arguments inside your blargument parser.

## How to use

Install from PyPI.

pip install blargparse


Here’s the simplest way to use it.

b = BlargParser()
b.add_argument('--left', '-l', type = int, default = 0)
b.add_argument('--right', 'r', type = int, default = 100)

b.parse_args([]).numbers == range(0, 100)


You can get a bit fancier.

b = BlargParser()
b.add_argument('--left', '-l', type = int, default = 0)
b.add_argument('--right', 'r', type = int, default = 100)
def f(args):
output = range(args.left, args.right)
del(args.left, args.right)

b.parse_args([]).numbers == range(0, 100)


## Why

I wrote Blargparse because I found myself doing stuff like this.

# Construct the parser.
a = argparse.ArgumentParser()
a.add_argument('--left', '-l', type = int, default = 0)
a.add_argument('--right', 'r', type = int, default = 100)

# Parse the arguments
import sys
ns = a.parse_args(sys.argv)

# Convert them into the form I want for my application.
numbers = range(ns.left, ns.right)


The input argument that made most sense to me while programming the thing was the numbers range, but I thought it was easiest if the end user could specify this range as a combination of --left and --right flags. And I might want to change that based on what users seem to prefer.

The above approach is fine because it’s small, but I had several arguments like this spread across several subparsers in different places, and the construction, parsing, and conversion of the arguments thus wound up spread across functions and even files.

With vanilla argparse I wound up doing stuff like this.

def _build_subparsers(argparser):
'This adds subparsers to the parser.'
# ...

def _apply_aggregates(args):
args.range = range(args.left, args.right)
del(args.left, args.right)

argparser = argparser.ArgumentParser()
_build_subparsers(argparser)
args = argparser.parse_args()
_apply_aggregates(args)


This is a bit better except that it groups subparsers together and aggregates together. I wanted subparsers to be grouped with relevant aggregates, and I did not want to group by whether something was a subparser or an aggregate; I think of the aggregates as components of the subparsers.

A more confusing alternative would have been to come up with my own non-argparse interface on top of this for specifying groupings of subparsers and aggregates.

## Project details

Uploaded source