Skip to main content

Completion After Prompt Probability. Make your LLM make a choice

Project description

CAPPr: Completion After Prompt Probability

Python 3.8+ tests codecov PyPI - Package Version License

Make your LLM pick from a list of choices.
Or compute the probability of a completion given a prompt, which may be useful.
Squeeze more out of open source LLMs.

Usage

Use a GGUF model
from llama_cpp import Llama
from cappr.llama_cpp.classify import predict

model = Llama("./TinyLLama-v0.Q8_0.gguf", verbose=False)

prompt = """Gary told Spongebob a story:
There once was a man from Peru; who dreamed he was eating his shoe. He
woke with a fright, in the middle of the night, to find that his dream
had come true.

The moral of the story is to"""

completions = (
  "look at the bright side",
  "use your imagination",
  "eat shoes",
)

pred = predict(prompt, completions, model)
print(pred)
# use your imagination

See this page of the documentation for more info on using GGUF models.

Use a Hugging Face transformers model
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from cappr.huggingface.classify import predict

model_name = "gpt2"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)

prompt = "Which planet is closer to the Sun: Mercury or Earth?"
completions = ("Mercury", "Earth")

pred = predict(prompt, completions, model_and_tokenizer=(model, tokenizer))
print(pred)
# Mercury

See this page of the documentation for more info on using transformers models.

Cache instructions to save time

Many prompts start with the same set of instructions, e.g., a system prompt plus a handful of example input-output pairs. Instead of repeatedly running the model on common instructions, cache them so that future computations are faster.

Here's an example using cappr.huggingface.classify.cache_model.

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from cappr.huggingface.classify import cache_model, predict

# Load model and tokenizer
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("gpt2")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("gpt2")
model_and_tokenizer = (model, tokenizer)

# Create data
prompt_prefix = '''Instructions: complete the sequence.
Here are examples:
A, B, C => D
1, 2, 3 => 4

Complete this sequence:'''

prompts = ["X, Y =>", "10, 9, 8 =>"]
completions = ["7", "Z", "Hi"]

# Cache prompt_prefix because it's used for all prompts
cached_model_and_tokenizer = cache_model(
    model_and_tokenizer, prompt_prefix
)

# Compute
preds = predict(
    prompts, completions, cached_model_and_tokenizer
)
print(preds)
# ['Z', '7']
Compute token-level log-probabilities

Here's an example using cappr.huggingface.classify.log_probs_conditional.

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from cappr.huggingface.classify import log_probs_conditional

# Load model and tokenizer
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("gpt2")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("gpt2")

# Create data
prompts = ["x y", "a b c"]
completions = ["z", "d e"]

# Compute
log_probs_completions = log_probs_conditional(
    prompts, completions, model_and_tokenizer=(model, tokenizer)
)

# Outputs (rounded) next to their symbolic representation

print(log_probs_completions[0])
# [[-4.5],        [[log Pr(z | x, y)],
#  [-5.6, -3.2]]   [log Pr(d | x, y),    log Pr(e | x, y, d)]]

print(log_probs_completions[1])
# [[-9.7],        [[log Pr(z | a, b, c)],
#  [-0.2, -0.03]]  [log Pr(d | a, b, c), log Pr(e | a, b, c, d)]]

Efficiently aggregate these log-probabilities using cappr.utils.classify.agg_log_probs.

For a slightly more advanced demo, see ./demos/huggingface/dpo.ipynb.

Extract the final answer from a step-by-step completion

Step-by-step and chain-of-thought prompts are highly effective ways to get an LLM to "reason" about more complex tasks. But if you need a structured output, a step-by-step completion is unwieldy. Use CAPPr to extract the final answer from these types of completions, given a list of possible answers.

See this idea in action here in the documentation.

Run in batches, predict probabilities
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from cappr.huggingface.classify import predict_proba

# Load a model and its tokenizer
model_name = "gpt2"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)

prompts = [
    "Stephen Curry is a",
    "Martina Navratilova was a",
    "Dexter, from the TV Series Dexter's Laboratory, is a",
    "LeBron James is a",
]

# Each of the prompts could be completed with one of these:
class_names = ("basketball player", "tennis player", "scientist")
prior =       (      1/6,                1/6,            2/3    )
# Say I expect most of my data to have scientists

# Run CAPPr
pred_probs = predict_proba(
    prompts=prompts,
    completions=class_names,
    model_and_tokenizer=(model, tokenizer),
    batch_size=2,  # whatever fits on your CPU/GPU
    prior=prior,
)

# pred_probs[i,j] = probability that prompts[i] is classified as class_names[j]
print(pred_probs.round(1))
# [[0.5 0.3 0.2]
#  [0.3 0.6 0.2]
#  [0.1 0.1 0.8]
#  [0.8 0.2 0. ]]

# For each prompt, which completion is most likely?
pred_class_idxs = pred_probs.argmax(axis=-1)
preds = [class_names[pred_class_idx] for pred_class_idx in pred_class_idxs]
print(preds)
# ['basketball player',
#  'tennis player',
#  'scientist',
#  'basketball player']
Run in batches, where each prompt has a different set of possible completions

Again, let's predict probabilities.

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from cappr.huggingface.classify import predict_proba_examples
from cappr import Example

# Load a model and its tokenizer
model_name = "gpt2"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)

# Create a sequence of Example objects representing your classification tasks
examples = [
    Example(
        prompt="Jodie Foster played",
        completions=("Clarice Starling", "Trinity in The Matrix"),
    ),
    Example(
        prompt="Batman, from Batman: The Animated Series, was played by",
        completions=("Pete Holmes", "Kevin Conroy", "Spongebob!"),
        prior=      (     1/3      ,      2/3     ,      0      ),
    ),
]

# Run CAPPr
pred_probs = predict_proba_examples(
    examples, model_and_tokenizer=(model, tokenizer)
)

# pred_probs[i][j] = probability that examples[i].prompt is classified as
# examples[i].completions[j]
print([example_pred_probs.round(2) for example_pred_probs in pred_probs])
# [array([0.7, 0.3]),
#  array([0.03, 0.97, 0.  ])]

# For each example, which completion is most likely?
pred_class_idxs = [
    example_pred_probs.argmax() for example_pred_probs in pred_probs
]
preds = [
    example.completions[pred_class_idx]
    for example, pred_class_idx in zip(examples, pred_class_idxs)
]
print(preds)
# ['Clarice Starling',
#  'Kevin Conroy']

See the demos for demonstrations of slightly harder classification tasks.

For CAPPr, GPTQ models are the most computationally performant. These models are compatible with cappr.huggingface.classify. See this page of the documentation for more info on using these models.

Documentation

https://cappr.readthedocs.io

Installation

See this page of the documentation.

Related work

See this page of the documentation.

Motivation

Reduce engineering complexity.

See this page of the documentation for more info.

Performance

Statistical performance

Computational performance

How it works

You input a prompt string, a end_of_prompt string (a whitespace or empty) and a set of candidate completion strings such that the string—

{prompt}{end_of_prompt}{completion}

—is a naturally flowing thought. CAPPr picks the completion which is mostly likely to follow prompt by computing the—

Completion
After
Prompt
Probability

—as fleshed out in my question on Cross Validated.

Local development

See this page of the documentation.

Todo

I'm dumping todos here:

Code changes

Reseach experiments

Feel free to raise issues ofc

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

cappr-0.9.5.tar.gz (1.6 MB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

cappr-0.9.5-py3-none-any.whl (64.4 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file cappr-0.9.5.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: cappr-0.9.5.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 1.6 MB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/5.1.1 CPython/3.12.7

File hashes

Hashes for cappr-0.9.5.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 a39aed779318640abd69666bd3d3806ac8769533ebaf440b82f64a037dc73597
MD5 b66d3bdf92dd1012fdd85beaa6e57a1c
BLAKE2b-256 9fd8196f2cfb3232ec74078cef768fb17933422907477f2796394fec4beb15dd

See more details on using hashes here.

File details

Details for the file cappr-0.9.5-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: cappr-0.9.5-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 64.4 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/5.1.1 CPython/3.12.7

File hashes

Hashes for cappr-0.9.5-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 41cc805c09f5b8b56b1dda77eceedda12855f670ebeb499be54eae7b0c0a9ddc
MD5 5a0f2080507dce976f3034d57e9df040
BLAKE2b-256 ddab37f135f2ddde8d3b30549fb221381b5b41f1b29d25b5d3189313f336b3c3

See more details on using hashes here.

Supported by

AWS AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Datadog Monitoring Fastly Fastly CDN Google Google Download Analytics Microsoft Microsoft PSF Sponsor Pingdom Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Sentry Error logging StatusPage StatusPage Status page