Consolidates and analyzes codebases for insights.
Project description
CodeConsolidator
CodeConsolidator is a command-line tool written in Python that helps you analyze and understand your codebase. It provides a structured overview of your project's directory structure, file sizes, token counts, and even consolidates the content of all text-based files into a single output for easy analysis with Large Language Models (LLMs).
Features
- Directory Tree Visualization: Generates a hierarchical tree view of your project's directory structure, optionally including file sizes and ignoring specified files/directories.
- Codebase Statistics: Calculates total files, directories, code size, and token counts for your project.
- File Content Consolidation: Consolidates the content of all text-based files into a single output file (useful for LLM analysis).
- .gitignore Support: Respects your .gitignore file to exclude unwanted files and directories from the analysis.
- Customizable Output: Choose between text or JSON output formats and customize the level of detail included.
- Colored Console Output: Provides a visually appealing and informative summary in the console.
Installation
pip install tiktoken colorama
python codeconsolidator.py [path_to_directory] [options]
Options
path_to_directory: Path to the directory you want to analyze.
-d, --max-depth: Maximum depth for directory traversal.
-o, --output: Output format (text or json). Default: text.
-f, --file: Output file name (default: codebase_analysis.txt or codebase_analysis.json).
--show-tree: Show directory tree in console output (always included in text file output).
--show-size: Show file sizes in directory tree.
--show-ignored: Show ignored files and directories in tree.
--ignore-ext: Additional file extensions to ignore (e.g., .pyc .log).
--no-content: Exclude file contents from the output.
--include-git: Include .git directory in the analysis.
--max-size: Maximum allowed text content size in KB (default: 10240 KB).
python codeconsolidator.py my_project -d 3 -o json --show-size --ignore-ext .pyc .log
10 LLM Prompts for Enhanced Codebase Analysis
I. Code Quality & Understanding:
1. Codebase Error and Inconsistency Analysis
**Objective:** Identify potential errors and inconsistencies within the provided codebase.
**Instructions:**
1. **Analyze the attached code** for the following:
* Syntax errors and logical flaws.
* Inconsistencies in variable and function naming conventions.
* Code duplication.
* Performance bottlenecks.
* Violations of established coding best practices.
2. **Structure your analysis clearly**, pinpointing specific code snippets and providing detailed descriptions of the identified issues.
3. **Prioritize clarity and conciseness** in your explanations.
**Expected Output:** A comprehensive report detailing errors and inconsistencies, organized by code section or error type, with actionable insights for improvement.
2. Codebase Risk Assessment
**Objective:** Identify code segments within the provided codebase that could potentially lead to future issues.
**Instructions:**
1. **Analyze the attached code** with a focus on:
* Code that is difficult to understand and maintain (code smells).
* Fragments that might cause errors under specific conditions (edge cases).
* Code that deviates from established coding standards.
2. **Provide detailed justifications for your concerns**, explaining the potential risks associated with each identified segment.
3. **Suggest potential solutions or mitigation strategies** to address the identified risks.
**Expected Output:** A report highlighting potential risk areas within the codebase, with clear explanations of the risks and actionable recommendations for improvement.
3. Codebase Documentation Generation
**Objective:** Generate comprehensive and user-friendly documentation for the provided codebase.
**Instructions:**
1. **Analyze the attached code** and identify key components, functionalities, and APIs.
2. **Generate documentation that includes:**
* API specifications with detailed descriptions of endpoints, parameters, and responses.
* Function descriptions with clear explanations of their purpose, inputs, and outputs.
* Usage examples demonstrating how to interact with the codebase effectively.
3. **Structure the documentation logically** and use a consistent format for clarity.
4. **Prioritize clarity, conciseness, and accuracy** in your documentation.
**Expected Output:** Well-structured and informative documentation that facilitates understanding and utilization of the codebase by developers and other stakeholders.
II. Learning & Knowledge Extraction:
4. User Story Reconstruction from Code
**Objective:** Reconstruct the user stories that likely served as the basis for the development of the provided codebase.
**Instructions:**
1. **Analyze the attached code** to identify the core functionalities of the application.
2. **Infer the user needs** that each functionality aims to address.
3. **Formulate user stories** using the following template: "As a [user role], I want [functionality], so that [benefit]."
4. **Identify potential missing user stories**. Suggest functionalities that could be added to the application to better meet user needs.
**Expected Output:** A list of reconstructed user stories based on the code's functionalities, along with insights into potential missing user stories and suggestions for application enhancements.
5. Code-Based Mini-Lesson Generation
**Objective:** Create a series of mini-lessons that explain the key concepts implemented within the provided codebase.
**Instructions:**
1. **Divide the code into logical sections** and create a separate lesson for each.
2. **Start with the simplest concepts** and gradually progress to more complex ones.
3. **Use code examples from the application** to illustrate the discussed concepts.
4. **Include exercises and quizzes** to help learners test their understanding.
5. **Focus on clarity and pedagogical effectiveness** in your lesson design.
**Expected Output:** A set of well-structured mini-lessons covering the key concepts of the application, with code examples, exercises, and quizzes to facilitate learning.
III. Code Improvement & Transformation:
6. Codebase Best Practice Analysis
**Objective:** Analyze the provided codebase and identify examples of both good and bad programming practices.
**Instructions:**
1. **Carefully review the attached code** and pinpoint instances of exemplary and problematic coding practices.
2. **For each example, provide a detailed analysis** that includes:
* **What is good/bad about the specific solution?**
* **What concepts or principles underpin the solution?**
* **What are the potential positive/negative consequences of using this solution?**
**Expected Output:** A comprehensive report highlighting both positive and negative coding practices within the codebase, with in-depth explanations and analysis of their impact.
7. Codebase Translation to Another Programming Language
**Objective:** Translate the provided codebase from [Source Language] to [Target Language] while preserving its functionality and structure.
**Instructions:**
1. **Analyze the attached code** written in [Source Language] and understand its logic and functionalities.
2. **Translate the code** into [Target Language], ensuring that the translated code performs the same tasks as the original code.
3. **Maintain the original code's structure and organization** as much as possible in the translated version.
4. **Adhere to the coding conventions and best practices** of the target language.
5. **Comment the translated code** to explain any significant changes or adaptations made during the translation process.
**Expected Output:** A functional codebase in [Target Language] that accurately reflects the functionality and structure of the original [Source Language] codebase.
8. Codebase Refactoring for Improved Readability and Performance
**Objective:** Refactor the provided codebase to enhance its readability, maintainability, and performance.
**Instructions:**
1. **Analyze the attached code** and identify areas that can be improved in terms of code clarity, structure, and efficiency.
2. **Suggest specific code transformations and optimizations** to address the identified areas for improvement.
3. **Prioritize refactoring techniques** that improve code readability without introducing unnecessary complexity.
4. **Consider performance implications** of your suggested refactoring and aim for solutions that enhance efficiency without sacrificing clarity.
5. **Provide clear explanations** for each refactoring suggestion, justifying its benefits and potential impact.
**Expected Output:** A set of actionable refactoring suggestions with detailed explanations of their benefits and potential impact on code quality and performance.
IV. Testing & Security:
9. Unit Test Generation for Codebase
**Objective:** Generate unit tests for the provided codebase to ensure code correctness and prevent regressions.
**Instructions:**
1. **Analyze the attached code** and identify its core functions and methods.
2. **Generate unit tests** that cover a wide range of input values and expected outputs for each function/method.
3. **Follow best practices for unit testing**, including:
* **Test one function/method per test case.**
* **Use descriptive test names.**
* **Assert expected outcomes clearly.**
* **Keep tests independent and isolated.**
4. **Prioritize test coverage for critical functionalities** and edge cases.
**Expected Output:** A comprehensive suite of unit tests that can be used to verify the correctness of the codebase and prevent regressions during future development.
10. Security Vulnerability Analysis of Codebase
**Objective:** Identify potential security vulnerabilities within the provided codebase.
**Instructions:**
1. **Analyze the attached code** with a focus on identifying common security weaknesses such as:
* SQL injection.
* Cross-site scripting (XSS).
* Cross-site request forgery (CSRF).
* Authentication and authorization bypasses.
* Data exposure.
2. **For each identified vulnerability, provide a detailed explanation** of:
* The nature of the vulnerability.
* The potential impact of exploitation.
* Recommendations for mitigation using secure coding practices.
3. **Prioritize vulnerabilities based on their severity and potential impact.**
**Expected Output:** A comprehensive security report highlighting potential vulnerabilities within the codebase, along with clear explanations of their risks and actionable recommendations for remediation.
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
File details
Details for the file codeconsolidator-0.1.8.tar.gz
.
File metadata
- Download URL: codeconsolidator-0.1.8.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 8.9 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/5.1.1 CPython/3.12.2
File hashes
Algorithm | Hash digest | |
---|---|---|
SHA256 | 9576f3d3e9446ffa67cb8ca3157600c9ff0a8cba97f102af78d45527d9870a10 |
|
MD5 | 0e8c2146127c00f419f620ba1fd19426 |
|
BLAKE2b-256 | 43a5f1059c21ff487c23aed01adb1c34557f6c069240f730692016dbb73d73b5 |
File details
Details for the file codeconsolidator-0.1.8-py3-none-any.whl
.
File metadata
- Download URL: codeconsolidator-0.1.8-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 8.9 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/5.1.1 CPython/3.12.2
File hashes
Algorithm | Hash digest | |
---|---|---|
SHA256 | f9e3cdb0d17cc49c5c49f75158ae73d849232cd663f4d754df1f7fbb076bbbff |
|
MD5 | 9a6c08654604e34fc77c729fba17077c |
|
BLAKE2b-256 | a9797a65cca9375869b36d01045d8e54507be01e7955129c5505d0474944bc0e |