Skip to main content

allow definition of local permissions

Project description

Summary

This cube allows definition of local permissions using a generic CWPermission entity type which you should use in your schema definition.

A CWPermission entity type:

  • has a name and a label

  • means groups linked to it through the ‘require_group’ relation have the <name> permission on entities linked through the ‘require_permission’ object relation.

To speed-up things, a ‘has_group_permission’ relation is automatically maintained, so ‘P require_group G, U in_group G’ is equivalent to ‘U has_group_permission P’.

Client cubes should explicitly add ‘X granted_permission CWPermission’ and ‘X require_permission CWPermission’ for each type that should have local permission, the first one being explicitly granted and the other automatically propagated. Hence possible subjects of granted_permission should be a subset of require_permission possible subjects.

You should then use require_permission in your schema security definition, since this is the one which is automatically propagated.

Example of configuration

class granted_permission(RelationDefinition):
    subject = 'Project'
    object = 'CWPermission'

class require_permission(RelationDefinition):
    subject = ('Project', 'Version')
    object = 'CWPermission'

class Project(EntityType):
    """a project, only visible to managers and users having the 'view' local permission
    """
    __permissions__ = {
       'read':   ('managers', ERQLExpression('X require_permission P, P name "view", '
                                             'U has_group_permission P'),),
       'update': ('managers', 'owners',),
       'delete': ('managers', ),
       'add':    ('managers', 'users',),)
       }

class Version(EntityType):
    """a version defines the content of a particular project's release"""
    __permissions__ = {
       'read':   ('managers', ERQLExpression('X require_permission P, P name "view", '
                                             'U has_group_permission P'),),
       'update': ('managers', 'owners',),
       'delete': ('managers', ),
       'add':    ('managers', 'users',),)
       }

class version_of(RelationDefinition):
    """link a version to its project. A version is necessarily linked to one and
    only one project.
    """
    __permissions__ = {
       'read':   ('managers', 'users',),
       'delete': ('managers', ),
       'add':    ('managers', RRQLExpression('O require_permission P, P name "manage",'
                                             'U has_group_permission P'),)
                   }
    subject = 'Version'
    object = 'Project'
    cardinality = '1*'

This configuration indicates that we’ve two distinct permissions (forthcoming CWPermission entities):

  • one named ‘view’, which allows some users to view a particular project and its versions

  • another named “manage” which provides rights to create new versions on a project

Now the idea is that managers will grant permission on projects, and those will then be propagated as configured. You will want to use sets in cubicweb_localperms.hooks to configure how permissions should be propagated when desired. In our example, put in your cube’s hooks.py something like:

from cubicweb_localperms import hooks
# relations where the "main" entity is the object. We could also
# have modified hooks.S_RELS for relations where the "main" entity
# is the subject
hooks.O_RELS.add('version_of')

The permission given to a project will be automatically added/removed as version are created / deleted.

Last but not least, when defining the entity class for Project, defines __permissions__ as below:

class Project(AnyEntity):
    __permissions__ = ('view', 'manage',)

So that when going on the ‘security’ view for a project (in ‘more actions’ sub-menu by default), you should be proposed an interface to configurate local permissions with a combo-box prefilled with proper permission names instead of a free text input, which greatly reduces the risk of error.

Also, you’ll find in cubicweb_localperms some functions to ease building of rql expression in your schema definition. Those written in above example could be written as below using those functions:

from cubicweb_localperms import xexpr, oexpr

class Project(EntityType):
    __permissions__ = {'read':   ('managers', xexpr('view'),),
                       'update': ('managers', 'owners',),
                       'delete': ('managers', ),
                       'add':    ('managers', 'users',),)
                       }

class Version(EntityType):
    __permissions__ = {'read':   ('managers', xexpr('view'),),
                       'update': ('managers', 'owners',),
                       'delete': ('managers', ),
                       'add':    ('managers', 'users',),)
                       }

class version_of(RelationDefinition):
    __permissions__ = {'read':   ('managers', 'users',),
                       'update': ('managers', 'owners',),
                       'delete': ('managers', ),
                       'add':    ('managers', oexpr('manage'),)
                      }

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

cubicweb-localperms-0.4.0.tar.gz (33.0 kB view hashes)

Uploaded source

Supported by

AWS AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Datadog Monitoring Fastly Fastly CDN Google Google Download Analytics Microsoft Microsoft PSF Sponsor Pingdom Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Sentry Error logging StatusPage StatusPage Status page