Skip to main content

Cython project management like npm in nodejs

Project description

Cython project management like npm in nodejs. This project is inspired by npm in nodejs.

Installation

You can easily install by:

pip install cython-npm

What problems does it solve ?

When using cython, we face the problem of compile cython file. We can do it easily by:

import pyximport; pyximport.install()

But that it is not recommended to let pyximport build code on end user side as it hooks into their import system. The best way to cater for end users is to provide pre-built binary packages. So this project compiles .pyx file and provides pre-built binary packages for easy of use.

Quickstart:

Basic use to Complie file or folder

from cython_npm.cythoncompile import export
export('examplefile.pyx')
export('./examplefolder')
# then import them to use
import examplefile
from examplefolder import *

You should do this code once time only.

Create install file like package.json

You can also compile many files or folders at once time. Create a file name install.py in the root of your project/package and write the code below:

from cython_npm.cythoncompile import install
Manymodules = [
    # put your modules list here
    'examplefile.pyx',
    './examplefolder'
]
install(Manymodules)

Run the file before start your project

python install.py

Or add first line import install in startup file of your project. Use install or export in parent folder will compile all .pyx file in subdirectories. ### Using require(‘path’) as nodejs You can also relative or fullpath import in python by require function. For example:

from cython_npm.cythoncompile import require

# import .pyx file. Will cause error if it is not compiled by export() yet.
# Default value of recompile is True, only apply for .py file. To import .pyx, change recompile=False
examplefile = require('../parentpackage', recompile=False) # import cython package from parent folder
examplefile.somefunction()

# it also support relative import .py file
examplefile = require('../parentpackage')
examplefile.somefunction()

Using requirepyx(‘path’): requirepyx is simillar to require except: * Use for cython file (‘.pyx’) only * Equivalent to export(‘.pyx file’) and require(‘.pyx file’) Example:

from cython_npm.cythoncompile import export
export('examplefile')
require('examplefile',recompile=False)
# The code above is the same as:
from cython_npm.cythoncompile import requirepyx
requirepyx('examplefile')

Using typecheck

Another utils is typecheck support to raise error in typing module (from python 3.3):

from cython_npm.typecheck import typecheck

@type_check
def checkstr(s: Any)->(None, str):
    return None, s

x,y = checkstr('tuan')
print(x,y)

try:
    checkstr(120)
except Exception as error:
    print(error)
    traceback.print_exc()

# That will raise an error of TypeError
checkstr(200)

Example: Cython vs speed test battle

This example compare the speed between cython vs python, Swift, Go and Code differences in doing a short calculation. Cython_npm is used in the test. This test is forked from ‘marcinkliks’, the original code and test is here: Swift vs Go vs Python battle. Note: We use Swift and Go test results as pattern and do not retest them. Go to see in test folder in github for more examples

Testing condition: * Python version: Python 3.6.3 :: Anaconda, Inc.

  • About computer: MacBook Pro (13-inch, 2016, Two Thunderbolt 3 ports), 2 GHz Intel Core i5, 256GB SSD

Hypothesis:
* Is Cython really fast (compare to other language) ? * How does Code differences affect performance ?

Test process and results as shown below:

  1. Recall the speed of Swift: 0m0.416s, Go: 0m0.592s and Pypy: 0m2.633s

  2. Test pure python code:

    sum = 0
    
    for e in range(30):
        sum = 0
        x = []
    
        for i in range(1000000):
            x.append(i)
    
        y = []
        for i in range(1000000 - 1):
            y.append(x[i] + x[i+1])
    
        i = 0
        for i in range(0, 1000000, 100):
            sum += y[i]
    
    print(sum)

    Speed test result is same/similar to original test

    time python test_python.py
    9999010000
    
    real    0m12.825s
    user    0m11.721s
    sys     0m1.061s
  3. Test cython code: Create run.py with code:

    from cython_npm.cythoncompile import export
    export('test_cython.pyx') # will do once time
    import test_cython

    Code in test_cython.pyx:

    cdef long sum = 0
    cdef int i
    cdef int e
    for e in range(30):
        sum = 0
        x = []
    
        for i in range(1000000):
            x.append(i)
    
        y = []
        for i in range(1000000 - 1):
            y.append(x[i] + x[i+1])
    
        i = 0
        for i in range(0, 1000000, 100):
            sum += y[i]
    
    print(sum)

    Speed test result: time python run.py

    time python run.py
    9999010000
    
    real    0m5.803s
    user    0m4.496s
    sys     0m1.211s
  4. Test cython code with list optimization and cache: create similar run.py. Code in test_cythoncache.pyx:

    from functools import lru_cache
    @lru_cache(maxsize=128)
    def dotest():
        cdef long mysum = 0
        cdef int i
        cdef int e
        for e in range(30):
            mysum = 0
            x = [i for i in range(1000000)]
    
            y = [x[i] + x[i+1] for i in range(1000000-1)]
    
            i = 0
            for i in range(0, 1000000, 100):
                mysum += y[i]
    
        print(mysum)
    dotest()

    Speed test result:

    time python run.py
    9999010000
    
    real    0m3.373s
    user    0m2.360s
    sys     0m1.001s
  5. Test cython code with cache and C array: create similar run.py. Code in test_cythoncache.pyx:

    from functools import lru_cache
    @lru_cache(maxsize=128)
    def dotest():
        cdef long mysum = 0
        cdef int i
        cdef int e
        cdef int x[1000000]
        cdef int y[1000000]
        for e in range(30):
            mysum = 0
            for i in range(1000000):
                x[i] = i
    
            # y = []
            for i in range(1000000 - 1):
                y[i] = (x[i] + x[i+1])
    
            i = 0
            for i in range(0, 1000000, 100):
                mysum += y[i]
    
        print(mysum)
    dotest()

    Speed test result:

    time python run.py
    9999010000
    
    real    0m0.085s
    user    0m0.067s
    sys     0m0.015s

Conclusions

  • With a slight change, Cython make pure python code faster by 2X time. But it is very slow compare to Swift and Go

  • Appling some optimal technical, Cython make python nearly 4X time faster than the original code. It may be the acceptable result. Pypy result seems very attractive too.

  • Using C array, Cython make the code become very fast. It consumes only 0.085s to complete as 4X time faster than Swift, 6X time faster than Go. It maybe the fastest but it is unusable in real life.

  • After all, i wish cython and cython_npm could give you more usefull options in coding

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

cython_npm-0.2.4.tar.gz (7.7 kB view hashes)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

cython_npm-0.2.4-py3-none-any.whl (13.2 kB view hashes)

Uploaded Python 3

Supported by

AWS AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Datadog Monitoring Fastly Fastly CDN Google Google Download Analytics Microsoft Microsoft PSF Sponsor Pingdom Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Sentry Error logging StatusPage StatusPage Status page