a 3D electromagnetic FDTD simulator written in Python

## Project description

# Python 3D FDTD Simulator

A 3D electromagnetic FDTD simulator written in Python. The FDTD simulator has an optional PyTorch backend, enabling FDTD simulations on a GPU.

**NOTE: This library is under construction. Only some minimal features are
implemented and the API might change considerably.**

## Installation

The `fdtd`

-library can be installed with `pip`

:

```
pip install fdtd
```

The development version can be installed by cloning the repository

```
git clone http://github.com/flaport/fdtd
```

and linking it with pip

```
pip install -e fdtd
```

## Dependencies

- python 3.6+
- numpy
- matplotlib
- tqdm
- pytorch (optional)

## Contributing

The library is still in a very early stage of development, but all improvements or additions (for example new objects, sources or detectors) are welcome. Please make a pull-request 😊.

## Documentation

read the documentation here: https://fdtd.readthedocs.org

### Imports

The `fdtd`

library is simply imported as follows:

import fdtd

### Setting the backend

The `fdtd`

library allows to choose a backend. The `"numpy"`

backend is the
default one, but there are also several additional PyTorch backends:

`"numpy"`

(defaults to float64 arrays)`"torch"`

(defaults to float64 tensors)`"torch.float32"`

`"torch.float64"`

`"torch.cuda"`

(defaults to float64 tensors)`"torch.cuda.float32"`

`"torch.cuda.float64"`

For example, this is how to choose the `"torch"`

backend:

fdtd.set_backend("torch")

In general, the `"numpy"`

backend is preferred for standard CPU calculations
with `"float64"`

precision. In general, `"float64"`

precision is always
preferred over `"float32"`

for FDTD simulations, however, `"float32"`

might
give a significant performance boost.

The `"cuda"`

backends are only available for computers with a GPU.

### The FDTD-grid

The FDTD grid defines the simulation region.

# signature fdtd.Grid( shape: Tuple[Number, Number, Number], grid_spacing: float = 155e-9, permittivity: float = 1.0, permeability: float = 1.0, courant_number: float = None, )

A grid is defined by its `shape`

, which is just a 3D tuple of `Number`

-types
(integers or floats). If the shape is given in floats, it denotes the width,
height and length of the grid in meters. If the shape is given in integers, it
denotes the width, height and length of the grid in terms of the
`grid_spacing`

. Internally, these numbers will be translated to three integers:
`grid.Nx`

, `grid.Ny`

and `grid.Nz`

.

A `grid_spacing`

can be given. For stability reasons, it is recommended to
choose a grid spacing that is at least 10 times smaller than the *smallest*
wavelength in the grid. This means that for a grid containing a source with
wavelength `1550nm`

and a material with refractive index of `3.1`

, the
recommended minimum `grid_spacing`

turns out to be `50pm`

For the `permittivity`

and `permeability`

floats or arrays with the following
shapes

`(grid.Nx, grid.Ny, grid.Nz)`

- or
`(grid.Nx, grid.Ny, grid.Nz, 1)`

- or
`(grid.Nx, grid.Ny, grid.Nz, 3)`

are expected. In the last case, the shape implies the possibility for different
permittivity for each of the major axes (so-called *uniaxial* or *biaxial*
materials). Internally, these variables will be converted (for performance
reasons) to their inverses `grid.inverse_permittivity`

array and a
`grid.inverse_permeability`

array of shape `(grid.Nx, grid.Ny, grid.Nz, 3)`

. It
is possible to change those arrays after making the grid.

Finally, the `courant_number`

of the grid determines the relation between the
`time_step`

of the simulation and the `grid_spacing`

of the grid. If not given,
it is chosen to be the maximum number allowed by the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy
Condition:
`1`

for `1D`

simulations, `1/√2`

for `2D`

simulations and `1/√3`

for `3D`

simulations (the dimensionality will be derived by the shape of the grid). For
stability reasons, it is recommended not to change this value.

grid = fdtd.Grid( shape = (25e-6, 15e-6, 1), # 25um x 15um x 1 (grid_spacing) --> 2D FDTD ) print(grid)

```
Grid(shape=(161,97,1), grid_spacing=1.55e-07, courant_number=0.70)
```

### Adding an object to the grid

An other option to locally change the `permittivity`

or `permeability`

in the
grid is to add an `Object`

to the grid.

# signature fdtd.Object( permittivity: Tensorlike, name: str = None )

An object defines a part of the grid with modified update equations, allowing
to introduce for example absorbing materials or biaxial materials for which
mixing between the axes are present through `Pockels coefficients`

or many
more. In this case we'll make an object with a different `permittivity`

than
the grid it is in.

Just like for the grid, the `Object`

expects a `permittivity`

to be a floats or
an array of the following possible shapes

`(obj.Nx, obj.Ny, obj.Nz)`

- or
`(obj.Nx, obj.Ny, obj.Nz, 1)`

- or
`(obj.Nx, obj.Ny, obj.Nz, 3)`

Note that the values `obj.Nx`

, `obj.Ny`

and `obj.Nz`

are not given to the
object constructor. They are in stead derived from its placing in the grid:

grid[11:32, 30:84, 0] = fdtd.Object(permittivity=1.7**2, name="object")

Several things happen here. First of all, the object is given the space
`[11:32, 30:84, 0]`

in the grid. Because it is given this space, the object's
`Nx`

, `Ny`

and `Nz`

are automatically set. Furthermore, by supplying a name to
the object, this name will become available in the grid:

print(grid.object)

```
Object(name='object')
@ x=11:32, y=30:84, z=0:1
```

A second object can be added to the grid:

grid[13e-6:18e-6, 5e-6:8e-6, 0] = fdtd.Object(permittivity=1.5**2)

Here, a slice with floating point numbers was chosen. These floats will be
replaced by integer `Nx`

, `Ny`

and `Nz`

during the registration of the object.
Since the object did not receive a name, the object won't be available as an
attribute of the grid. However, it is still available via the `grid.objects`

list:

print(grid.objects)

```
[Object(name='object'), Object(name=None)]
```

This list stores all objects (i.e. of type `fdtd.Object`

) in the order that
they were added to the grid.

### Adding a source to the grid

Similarly as to adding an object to the grid, an `fdtd.LineSource`

can also be
added:

# signature fdtd.LineSource( period: Number = 15, # timesteps or seconds power: float = 1.0, phase_shift: float = 0.0, name: str = None, )

And also just like an `fdtd.Object`

, an `fdtd.LineSource`

size is defined by its
placement on the grid:

grid[7.5e-6:8.0e-6, 11.8e-6:13.0e-6, 0] = fdtd.LineSource( period = 1550e-9 / (3e8), name="source" )

However, it is important to note that in this case a `LineSource`

is added to
the grid, i.e. the source spans the diagonal of the cube defined by the slices.
Internally, these slices will be converted into lists to ensure this behavior:

print(grid.source)

```
LineSource(period=14, power=1.0, phase_shift=0.0, name='source')
@ x=[48, ... , 51], y=[76, ... , 83], z=[0, ... , 0]
```

Note that one could also have supplied lists to index the grid in the first
place. This feature could be useful to create a `LineSource`

of arbitrary
shape.

### Adding a detector to the grid

# signature fdtd.LineDetector( name=None )

Adding a detector to the grid works the same as adding a source

grid[12e-6, :, 0] = fdtd.LineDetector(name="detector")

print(grid.detector)

```
LineDetector(name='detector')
@ x=[77, ... , 77], y=[0, ... , 96], z=[0, ... , 0]
```

### Adding grid boundaries

# signature fdtd.PML( a: float = 1e-8, # stability factor name: str = None )

Although, having an object, source and detector to simulate is in principle
enough to perform an FDTD simulation, One also needs to define a grid boundary
to prevent the fields to be reflected. One of those boundaries that can be
added to the grid is a Perfectly Matched
Layer or `PML`

. These
are basically absorbing boundaries.

# x boundaries grid[0:10, :, :] = fdtd.PML(name="pml_xlow") grid[-10:, :, :] = fdtd.PML(name="pml_xhigh") # y boundaries grid[:, 0:10, :] = fdtd.PML(name="pml_ylow") grid[:, -10:, :] = fdtd.PML(name="pml_yhigh")

### Grid summary

A simple summary of the grid can be shown by printing out the grid:

print(grid)

```
Grid(shape=(161,97,1), grid_spacing=1.55e-07, courant_number=0.70)
sources:
LineSource(period=14, power=1.0, phase_shift=0.0, name='source')
@ x=[48, ... , 51], y=[76, ... , 83], z=[0, ... , 0]
detectors:
LineDetector(name='detector')
@ x=[77, ... , 77], y=[0, ... , 96], z=[0, ... , 0]
boundaries:
PML(name='pml_xlow')
@ x=0:10, y=:, z=:
PML(name='pml_xhigh')
@ x=-10:, y=:, z=:
PML(name='pml_ylow')
@ x=:, y=0:10, z=:
PML(name='pml_yhigh')
@ x=:, y=-10:, z=:
objects:
Object(name='object')
@ x=11:32, y=30:84, z=0:1
Object(name=None)
@ x=84:116, y=32:52, z=0:1
```

### Running a simulation

Running a simulation is as simple as using the `grid.run`

method.

grid.run( total_time: Number, progress_bar: bool = True )

Just like for the lengths in the grid, the `total_time`

of the simulation
can be specified as an integer (number of `time_steps`

) or as a float (in
seconds).

grid.run(total_time=100)

### Grid visualization

Let's visualize the grid. This can be done with the `grid.visualize`

method:

# signature grid.visualize( grid, x=None, y=None, z=None, cmap="Blues", pbcolor="C3", pmlcolor=(0, 0, 0, 0.1), objcolor=(1, 0, 0, 0.1), srccolor="C0", detcolor="C2", show=True, )

This method will by default visualize all objects in the grid, as well as the
power at the current `time_step`

at a certain `x`

, `y`

**OR** `z`

-plane. By
setting `show=False`

, one can disable the immediate visualization of the
matplotlib image.

grid.visualize(z=0)

## Background

An as quick as possible explanation of the FDTD discretization of the Maxwell equations.

### Update Equations

An electromagnetic FDTD solver solves the time-dependent Maxwell Equations

curl(H) = ε*ε0*dE/dt curl(E) = -µ*µ0*dH/dt

These two equations are called *Ampere's Law* and *Faraday's Law* respectively.

In these equations, ε and µ are the relative permittivity and permeability
tensors respectively. ε0 and µ0 are the vacuum permittivity and permeability
and their square root can be absorbed into E and H respectively, such that `E := √ε0*E`

and `H := √µ0*H`

.

Doing this, the Maxwell equations can be written as update equations:

E += c*dt*inv(ε)*curl(H) H -= c*dt*inv(µ)*curl(E)

The electric and magnetic field can then be discretized on a grid with interlaced Yee-coordinates, which in 3D looks like this:

According to the Yee discretization algorithm, there are inherently two types
of fields on the grid: `E`

-type fields on integer grid locations and `H`

-type
fields on half-integer grid locations.

The beauty of these interlaced coordinates is that they enable a very natural way of writing the curl of the electric and magnetic fields: the curl of an H-type field will be an E-type field and vice versa.

This way, the curl of E can be written as

curl(E)[m,n,p] = (dEz/dy - dEy/dz, dEx/dz - dEz/dx, dEy/dx - dEx/dy)[m,n,p] =( ((Ez[m,n+1,p]-Ez[m,n,p])/dy - (Ey[m,n,p+1]-Ey[m,n,p])/dz), ((Ex[m,n,p+1]-Ex[m,n,p])/dz - (Ez[m+1,n,p]-Ez[m,n,p])/dx), ((Ey[m+1,n,p]-Ey[m,n,p])/dx - (Ex[m,n+1,p]-Ex[m,n,p])/dy) ) =(1/du)*( ((Ez[m,n+1,p]-Ez[m,n,p]) - (Ey[m,n,p+1]-Ey[m,n,p])), [assume dx=dy=dz=du] ((Ex[m,n,p+1]-Ex[m,n,p]) - (Ez[m+1,n,p]-Ez[m,n,p])), ((Ey[m+1,n,p]-Ey[m,n,p]) - (Ex[m,n+1,p]-Ex[m,n,p])) )

this can be written efficiently with array slices (note that the factor
`(1/du)`

was left out):

def curl_E(E): curl_E = np.zeros(E.shape) curl_E[:,:-1,:,0] += E[:,1:,:,2] - E[:,:-1,:,2] curl_E[:,:,:-1,0] -= E[:,:,1:,1] - E[:,:,:-1,1] curl_E[:,:,:-1,1] += E[:,:,1:,0] - E[:,:,:-1,0] curl_E[:-1,:,:,1] -= E[1:,:,:,2] - E[:-1,:,:,2] curl_E[:-1,:,:,2] += E[1:,:,:,1] - E[:-1,:,:,1] curl_E[:,:-1,:,2] -= E[:,1:,:,0] - E[:,:-1,:,0] return curl_E

The curl for H can be obtained in a similar way (note again that the factor
`(1/du)`

was left out):

def curl_H(H): curl_H = np.zeros(H.shape) curl_H[:,1:,:,0] += H[:,1:,:,2] - H[:,:-1,:,2] curl_H[:,:,1:,0] -= H[:,:,1:,1] - H[:,:,:-1,1] curl_H[:,:,1:,1] += H[:,:,1:,0] - H[:,:,:-1,0] curl_H[1:,:,:,1] -= H[1:,:,:,2] - H[:-1,:,:,2] curl_H[1:,:,:,2] += H[1:,:,:,1] - H[:-1,:,:,1] curl_H[:,1:,:,2] -= H[:,1:,:,0] - H[:,:-1,:,0] return curl_H

The update equations can now be rewritten as

E += (c*dt/du)*inv(ε)*curl_H H -= (c*dt/du)*inv(µ)*curl_E

The number `(c*dt/du)`

is a dimensionless parameter called the *Courant number*
`sc`

. For stability reasons, the Courant number should always be smaller than
`1/√D`

, with `D`

the dimension of the simulation. This can be intuitively be
understood as the condition that information should always travel slower than
the speed of light through the grid. In the FDTD method described here,
information can only travel to the neighboring grid cells (through application
of the curl). It would therefore take `D`

time steps to travel over the
diagonal of a `D`

-dimensional cube (square in `2D`

, cube in `3D`

), the Courant
condition follows then automatically from the fact that the length of this
diagonal is `1/√D`

.

This yields the final update equations for the FDTD algorithm:

E += sc*inv(ε)*curl_H H -= sc*inv(µ)*curl_E

This is also how it is implemented:

class Grid: # ... [initialization] def step(self): self.update_E() self.update_H() def update_E(self): self.E += self.courant_number * self.inverse_permittivity * curl_H(self.H) def update_H(self): self.H -= self.courant_number * self.inverse_permeability * curl_E(self.E)

### Sources

Ampere's Law can be updated to incorporate a current density:

curl(H) = J + ε*ε0*dE/dt

Making again the usual substitutions `sc := c*dt/du`

, `E := √ε0*E`

and `H := √µ0*H`

, the update equations can be modified to include the current density:

E += sc*inv(ε)*curl_H - dt*inv(ε)*J/√ε0

Making one final substitution `Es := -dt*inv(ε)*J/√ε0`

allows us to write this
in a very clean way:

E += sc*inv(ε)*curl_H + Es

Where we defined Es as the *electric field source term*.

It is often useful to also define a *magnetic field source term* `Hs`

, which would be
derived from the *magnetic current density* if it were to exist. In the same way,
Faraday's update equation can be rewritten as

H -= sc*inv(µ)*curl_E + Hs

class Source: # ... [initialization] def update_E(self): # electric source function here def update_H(self): # magnetic source function here class Grid: # ... [initialization] def update_E(self): # ... [electric field update equation] for source in self.sources: source.update_E() def update_H(self): # ... [magnetic field update equation] for source in self.sources: source.update_H()

### Lossy Medium

When a material has a *electric conductivity* σe, a conduction-current will
ensure that the medium is lossy. Ampere's law with a conduction current becomes

curl(H) = σe*E + ε*ε0*dE/dt

Making the usual substitutions, this becomes:

E(t+dt) - E(t) = sc*inv(ε)*curl_H(t+dt/2) - dt*inv(ε)*σe*E(t+dt/2)/ε0

This update equation depends on the electric field on a half-integer time step
(a *magnetic field time step*). We need to make a substitution to interpolate
the electric field to this time step:

(1 + 0.5*dt*inv(ε)*σ/√ε0)*E(t+dt) = sc*inv(ε)*curl_H(t+dt/2) + (1 - 0.5*dt*inv(ε)*σe/ε0)*E(t)

Which, after substitution `σ := inv(ε)*σe/ε0`

yield the new update equations:

f = 0.5*dt*σ E *= inv(1 + f) * (1 - f) E += inv(1 + f)*sc*inv(ε)*curl_H

Note that the more complicated the permittivity tensor ε is, the more time
consuming this algorithm will be. It is therefore sometimes the right decision
to transfer the absorption to the magnetic domain by introducing a
(*nonphysical*) magnetic conductivity, because the permeability tensor µ is
usually just equal to one.

Which, after substitution `σ := inv(µ)*σm/µ0`

, we get the magnetic field update equations:

f = 0.5*dt*σ H *= inv(1 + f) * (1 - f) H += inv(1 + f)*sc*inv(µ)*curl_E

### Energy Density and Poynting Vector

The electromagnetic energy density can be given by

e = (1/2)*ε*ε0*E**2 + (1/2)*µ*µ0*H**2

making the above substitutions, this becomes in simulation units:

e = (1/2)*ε*E**2 + (1/2)*µ*H**2

The Poynting vector is given by

P = E×H

Which in simulation units becomes

P = c*E×H

The energy introduced by a source `Es`

can be derived from tracking the change
in energy density

de = ε*Es·E + (1/2)*ε*Es**2

This could also be derived from Poyntings energy conservation law:

de/dt = -grad(S) - J·E

where the first term just describes the redistribution of energy in a volume and the second term describes the energy introduced by a current density.

Note: although it is unphysical, one could also have introduced a magnetic source. This source would have introduced the following energy:

de = ε*Hs·H + (1/2)*µ*Hs**2

Since the µ-tensor is usually just equal to one, using a magnetic source term is often more efficient.

Similarly, one can also keep track of the absorbed energy due to an electric conductivity in the following way:

f = 0.5*dt*σ Enoabs = E + sc*inv(ε)*curl_H E *= inv(1 + f) * (1 - f) E += inv(1 + f)*sc*inv(ε)*curl_H dE = Enoabs - E e_abs += ε*E*dE + 0.5*ε*dE**2

or if we want to keep track of the absorbed energy by magnetic a magnetic conductivity:

f = 0.5*dt*inv(µ)*σ Hnoabs = E + sc*inv(µ)*curl_E H *= inv(1 + f) * (1 - f) H += inv(1 + f)*sc*inv(µ)*curl_E dH = Hnoabs - H e_abs += µ*H*dH + 0.5*µ*dH**2

The electric term and magnetic term in the energy density are usually of the
same size. Therefore, the same amount of energy will be absorbed by introducing
a *magnetic conductivity* σm as by introducing a *electric conductivity* σe if:

inv(µ)*σm/µ0 = inv(ε)*σe/ε0

### Boundary Conditions

#### Periodic Boundary Conditions

Assuming we want periodic boundary conditions along the `X`

-direction, then we
have to make sure that the fields at `Xlow`

and `Xhigh`

are the same. This has
to be enforced after performing the update equations:

Note that the electric field `E`

is dependent on `curl_H`

, which means that the
first indices of `E`

will not be updated through the update equations. It's
those indices that need to be set through the periodic boundary condition.
Concretely: `E[0]`

needs to be set to equal `E[-1]`

. For the magnetic field,
the inverse is true: `H`

is dependent on `curl_E`

, which means that its last
indices will not be set. This has to be done by the boundary condition: `H[-1]`

needs to be set equal to `H[0]`

:

class PeriodicBoundaryX: # ... [initialization] def update_E(self): self.grid.E[0, :, :, :] = self.grid.E[-1, :, :, :] def update_H(self): self.grid.H[-1, :, :, :] = self.grid.H[0, :, :, :] class Grid: # ... [initialization] def update_E(self): # ... [electric field update equation] # ... [electric field source update equations] for boundary in self.boundaries: boundary.update_E() def update_H(self): # ... [magnetic field update equation] # ... [magnetic field source update equations] for boundary in self.boundaries: boundary.update_H()

#### Perfectly Matched Layer

a Perfectly Matched Layer (PML) is the state of the art for introducing absorbing boundary conditions in an FDTD grid. A PML is an impedance-matched absorbing area in the grid. It turns out that for a impedance-matching condition to hold, the PML can only be absorbing in a single direction. This is what makes a PML in fact a nonphysical material.

Consider Ampere's law for the `Ez`

component, where the usual substitutions
`E := √ε0*E`

, `H := √µ0*H`

and `σ := inv(ε)*σe/ε0`

are
already introduced:

ε*dEz/dt + ε*σ*Ez = c*dHy/dx - c*dHx/dy

This becomes in the frequency domain:

iω*ε*Ez + ε*σ*Ez = c*dHy/dx - c*dHx/dy

We can split this equation in a x-propagating wave and a y-propagating wave:

iω*ε*Ezx + ε*σx*Ezx = iω*ε*(1 + σx/iω)*Ezx = c*dHy/dx iω*ε*Ezy + ε*σy*Ezy = iω*ε*(1 + σy/iω)*Ezy = -c*dHx/dy

We can define the `S`

-operators as follows

Su = 1 + σu/iω with u in {x, y, z}

In general, we prefer to add a stability factor `au`

and a scaling factor `ku`

to `Su`

:

Su = ku + σu/(iω+au) with u in {x, y, z}

Summing the two equations for `Ez`

back together after dividing by the respective `S`

-operator gives

iω*ε*Ez = (c/Sx)*dHy/dx - (c/Sy)*dHx/dy

Converting this back to the time domain gives

ε*dEz/dt = c*sx[*]dHy/dx - c*sx[*]dHx/dy

where `sx`

denotes the inverse Fourier transform of `(1/Sx)`

and `[*]`

denotes a convolution.
The expression for `su`

can be proven [after some derivation] to look as follows:

su = (1/ku)*δ(t) + Cu(t) with u in {x, y, z}

where `δ(t)`

denotes the Dirac delta function and `C(t)`

an exponentially
decaying function given by:

Cu(t) = -(σu/ku**2)*exp(-(au+σu/ku)*t) for all t > 0 and u in {x, y, z}

Plugging this in gives:

dEz/dt = (c/kx)*inv(ε)*dHy/dx - (c/ky)*inv(ε)*dHx/dy + c*inv(ε)*Cx[*]dHy/dx - c*inv(ε)*Cx[*]dHx/dy = (c/kx)*inv(ε)*dHy/dx - (c/ky)*inv(ε)*dHx/dy + c*inv(ε)*Фez/du with du=dx=dy=dz

This can be written as an update equation:

Ez += (1/kx)*sc*inv(ε)*dHy - (1/ky)*sc*inv(ε)*dHx + sc*inv(ε)*Фez

Where we defined `Фeu`

as

Фeu = Ψeuv - Ψezw with u, v, w in {x, y, z}

and `Ψeuv`

as the convolution updating the component `Eu`

by taking the derivative of `Hw`

in the `v`

direction:

Ψeuv = dv*Cv[*]dHw/dv with u, v, w in {x, y, z}

This can be rewritten [after some derivation] as an update equation in itself:

Ψeuv = bv*Ψeuv + cv*dv*(dHw/dv) = bv*Ψeuv + cv*dHw with u, v, w in {x, y, z}

Where the constants `bu`

and `cu`

are derived to be:

bu = exp(-(au + σu/ku)*dt) with u in {x, y, z} cu = σu*(bu - 1)/(σu*ku + au*ku**2) with u in {x, y, z}

The final PML algorithm for the electric field now becomes:

- Update
`Фe=[Фex, Фey, Фez]`

by using the update equation for the`Ψ`

-components. - Update the electric fields the normal way
- Add
`Фe`

to the electric fields.

or as python code:

class PML(Boundary): # ... [initialization] def update_phi_E(self): # update convolution self.psi_Ex *= self.bE self.psi_Ey *= self.bE self.psi_Ez *= self.bE c = self.cE Hx = self.grid.H[self.locx] Hy = self.grid.H[self.locy] Hz = self.grid.H[self.locz] self.psi_Ex[:, 1:, :, 1] += (Hz[:, 1:, :] - Hz[:, :-1, :]) * c[:, 1:, :, 1] self.psi_Ex[:, :, 1:, 2] += (Hy[:, :, 1:] - Hy[:, :, :-1]) * c[:, :, 1:, 2] self.psi_Ey[:, :, 1:, 2] += (Hx[:, :, 1:] - Hx[:, :, :-1]) * c[:, :, 1:, 2] self.psi_Ey[1:, :, :, 0] += (Hz[1:, :, :] - Hz[:-1, :, :]) * c[1:, :, :, 0] self.psi_Ez[1:, :, :, 0] += (Hy[1:, :, :] - Hy[:-1, :, :]) * c[1:, :, :, 0] self.psi_Ez[:, 1:, :, 1] += (Hx[:, 1:, :] - Hx[:, :-1, :]) * c[:, 1:, :, 1] self.phi_E[..., 0] = self.psi_Ex[..., 1] - self.psi_Ex[..., 2] self.phi_E[..., 1] = self.psi_Ey[..., 2] - self.psi_Ey[..., 0] self.phi_E[..., 2] = self.psi_Ez[..., 0] - self.psi_Ez[..., 1] def update_E(self): # update PML located at self.loc self.grid.E[self.loc] += ( self.grid.courant_number * self.grid.inverse_permittivity[self.loc] * self.phi_E ) class Grid: # ... [initialization] def update_E(self): for boundary in self.boundaries: boundary.update_phi_E() # ... [electric field update equation] # ... [electric field source update equations] for boundary in self.boundaries: boundary.update_E()

The same has to be applied for the magnetic field.

These update equations for the PML were based on Schneider, Chap. 11.

## License

© Floris laporte - MIT License

## Project details

## Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

## Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Filename, size | File type | Python version | Upload date | Hashes |
---|---|---|---|---|

Filename, size fdtd-0.0.2-py3-none-any.whl (28.9 kB) | File type Wheel | Python version py3 | Upload date | Hashes View |

Filename, size fdtd-0.0.2.tar.gz (34.5 kB) | File type Source | Python version None | Upload date | Hashes View |