Python docstring reStructuredText (RST) validator
This is an MIT licensed flake8 plugin for validating Python docstrings markup as reStructuredText (RST) using the Python library docutils. Is is available to install from the Python Package Index (PyPI):
This is based heavily off pydocstyle (which is also MIT licensed), which has a flake8 plugin called flake8-docstrings, see:
The reStructuredText (RST) validation is done by calling docutils via Todd Wolfson’s restructuredtext-lint code:
Flake8 Validation codes
Early versions of flake8 assumed a single character prefix for the validation codes, which became problematic with collisions in the plugin ecosystem. Since v3.0, flake8 has supported longer prefixes therefore this plugin uses RST as its prefix.
Internally we use docutils for RST validation, which has this to say in PEP258:
- Level-0, “DEBUG”: an internal reporting issue. There is no effect on the processing. Level-0 system messages are handled separately from the others.
- Level-1, “INFO”: a minor issue that can be ignored. There is little or no effect on the processing. Typically level-1 system messages are not reported.
- Level-2, “WARNING”: an issue that should be addressed. If ignored, there may be minor problems with the output. Typically level-2 system messages are reported but do not halt processing
- Level-3, “ERROR”: a major issue that should be addressed. If ignored, the output will contain unpredictable errors. Typically level-3 system messages are reported but do not halt processing
- Level-4, “SEVERE”: a critical error that must be addressed. Typically level-4 system messages are turned into exceptions which halt processing. If ignored, the output will contain severe errors.
The docutils “DEBUG” level messages are not reported, and the plugin currently ignores the “INFO” level messages.
Within each category, the individual messages are mapped to flake8 codes using one hundred times the level. i.e. Validation codes RST4## are severe or critical errors in RST validation, RST3## are major errors, RST2## are warnings, while if shown RST1## are information only.
Codes ending 99, for example RST499, indicate a previously unseen validation error for which we have yet to assign a unique validation code in the assocated range, which would be RST4## in this example.
Codes starting RST9## indicate there was a problem parsing the Python file in order to extract the docstrings, or in processing the contents.
|Code||Description (and notes)|
|RST901||Failed to parse file|
|RST902||Failed to parse __all__ entry|
|RST903||Failed to lint docstring (e.g. unicode encoding issue under Python 2)|
Installation and usage
Python 3.6 or later is recommended, but Python 2.7 is also supported.
We recommend installing this plugin and flake8 itself using pip:
$ pip install flake8 flake8-rst-docstrings
The new validator should be automatically included when using flake8 which may now report additional validation codes starting with RST (as defined above). For example:
$ flake8 example.py
You can request only the RST codes be shown using:
$ flake8 --select RST example.py
Similarly you might add particular RST validation codes to your flake8 configuration file’s select or ignore list.
Note in addition to the RST prefix alone you can use partial codes like RST2 meaning RST200, RST201, … and so on.
This plugin is on GitHub at https://github.com/peterjc/flake8-rst-docstrings
- Have the “INFO” level RST1## codes available but ignored by default?
- Can we call docutils rather than bundle a copy of their parser code?
- Create a test suite and use this for continuous integration.