“By adding Article 11 to the requirements, saying it has jurisdicition over
genocide when it is after 2002, the prosecutor is actualy saying it has
jurisidition over the kings genocide and is missing the cooperation of
the netherlands to arrest it’s own king and stop the kings genocide.”
The prosecutor may, at any time, reconsider a decision whether to initiate an
investigation or prosecution based on new facts or information AND shall not
preclude the prosecutor from considering further information submitted to him
or her.
using the law to administer poison, the king of the netherlands commits genocide.
ICC-CPI
Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
Post Office Box 19519
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands
Hello Office of the Prosecutor,
i write you in the context of communications and claims under art.15 of the
Rome Statute. I want to inform the prosecutor that the king of the
netherlands and his government are commiting 3 of the 5 crimes defined in
the Rome Statute.I know the statute only provides juridistion over genocide
claims concerning nationalities or crimes based on etnicity. The crimes i
talk about are on generic parts of the population like all elderly of all
psychiatric patients.The kingdom of the netherlands uses law to provide
“care” with entails adminstering poison instead of non harmfull substances
(what medicine should be).
There is proof the medication used in forced treatements in the netherlands
are poison.
haloperiodol (haldol)
https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.000.142
clozapine (leponex)
https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.024.831
olanzapine (zyprexa)
https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.125.320
aripriprazole (abilify)
https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.112.532
The dutch government has introduced three new forced care laws, the
Wfz (wet forensische zorg) for criminals, the WvGGZ (Wet verplichte GGZ)
for the disturbed and addicted and the Wzd (Wet zorg en dwang) for the
Instead of groups with an nationaliteit or etnicity the laws targets the
following victim groups in the netherlands:
verslaafden (addicts)
bejaarden (elderly)
ggz patienten (psychiatric patients)
criminelen (criminials)
gehandicapten (handicapped)
I informed the eerste kamer (who votes for the laws to be signed by the
king) about the fact that these medicine as poison before the voted for
these laws, i also informed the king about the fact that these medicine
are poison before the law took effect. Confirmation by the greffe and
director of the kings cabinet are provided with this email (1).
With the laws that give instructions to “treat” certain groups in the
population and the medicine used in that treatement turns out to be poison,
the kingdom of the netherlands is, with the signature of the king,
committing the following crimes mentioned in article 6:
Killing members of the group
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
.
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
.
Since the members of the chamber and the king were aware that these
medicine are poison at the time they voted for this law and the day the Wfz
law took effect (1-1-2019) i ask the prosecutor to prosecute the king and
members of the chamber for three genocide crimes mentioned in article 6 on
the note that this does not entail etnicity or nationality but on general
groups in the population.
I hope you can stop the above mentioned crimes the king of the netherlands
and his government are doing.
RECONSIDER
Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
Post Office Box 19519
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands
Dear Mister Mark P. Dillon,
i received your writing to not to proceed with my request OTP-CR-117/19
on 20-05-2019.
i write you to ask you to reconsider now removed evidence has been restored
online again.
In chronological order:
11-12-2017 I informed the chamber of the fact that the medicine used in
treatements of psychiatric illnesses are poison. The proof exists of a
url to the European Chemical Agency, showing that Haldol is a toxic
substance (toxic if swallowed accompanied by a skull en bones).
This link worked a the time the chamber member were informed.
23-01-2018 The Chamber votes in favour of the Wet Forensische Zorg,
Wet verplichte GGZ, Wet Zorg en Dwang knowing that the medicine used
in these treatements are poison.
05-10-2018 I inform the King of the fact that these medicine are poison
01-01-2019 The Wet Forensische Zorg is activated
10-01-2019 I inform local authorities of the informednes of both the chamber
member and the king.
21-01-2019 I inform the Office of the Prosecutor with proof that these
medicine are poison and proof of the informedness of the King and the
chamber members.
23-01-2019 I withdraw the request to arrest king and chamber member from the
local authorities. They didn’t react at all.
06-02-2019 The information on the ECHA website about Haldol being a poison is
removed and a “nothing wrong with it” version is added
25-02-2019 After consideration i decided to formaly ask the king and chamber
members to be prosecuted.
27-02-2019 I noticed that the site was updated and informed the Office of the
Prosecutor about it.
20-05-2019 The Prosecutor informs me of his decision to not to proceed,
mentioning the he could reconsider if new evidence arises.
25-06-2019 I talk to members of ECHA on twitter and got the link to the proof
restored.
You can see the evidence that Haldol is a poison on
https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.000.142
Knowing that the proof that Haldol is a poison was offline when you reached
your conclusion to not to proceed, could you reconsider your conclusion now
this proof is back online again ?
Bart Thate - bthate@dds.nl/thatebart@gmail.com
