jamp 0.0.6

JAMP is a Mixed Precision library for JAX. Forked from DeepMind's JMP.

Mixed precision training in JAX

This library is a fork from DeepMind's JMP, which is unmaintained with known issue. This fork is a pip-installable version with fixes.

Installation | Examples | Policies | Loss scaling | Citing JMP | References

Mixed precision training [0] is a technique that mixes the use of full and half precision floating point numbers during training to reduce the memory bandwidth requirements and improve the computational efficiency of a given model.

This library implements support for mixed precision training in JAX by providing two key abstractions (mixed precision "policies" and loss scaling). Neural network libraries (such as Haiku) can integrate with jmp and provide "Automatic Mixed Precision (AMP)" support (automating or simplifying applying policies to modules).

All code examples below assume the following:

import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp
import jmp

half = jnp.float16  # On TPU this should be jnp.bfloat16.
full = jnp.float32

Installation

JMP is written in pure Python, but depends on C++ code via JAX and NumPy.

Because JAX installation is different depending on your CUDA version, JMP does not list JAX as a dependency in pyproject.toml.

First, follow these instructions to install JAX with the relevant accelerator support.

Then, install JMP using pip:

$ pip install jamp

Examples

You can find a fully worked JMP example in Haiku which shows how to use mixed f32/f16 precision to halve training time on GPU and mixed f32/bf16 to reduce training time on TPU by a third.

Policies

A mixed precision policy encapsulates the configuration in a mixed precision experiment.

# Our policy specifies that we will store parameters in full precision but will
# compute and return output in half precision.
my_policy = jmp.Policy(compute_dtype=half,
                       param_dtype=full,
                       output_dtype=half)

The policy object can be used to cast pytrees:

def layer(params, x):
  params, x = my_policy.cast_to_compute((params, x))
  w, b = params
  y = x @ w + b
  return my_policy.cast_to_output(y)

params = {"w": jnp.ones([], dtype=my_policy.param_dtype)}
y = layer(params, x)
assert y.dtype == half

You can replace the output type of a given policy:

my_policy = my_policy.with_output_dtype(full)

You can also define a policy via a string, which may be useful for specifying a policy as a command-line argument or as a hyperparameter to your experiment:

my_policy = jmp.get_policy("params=float32,compute=float16,output=float32")
float16 = jmp.get_policy("float16")  # Everything in f16.
half = jmp.get_policy("half")        # Everything in half (f16 or bf16).

Loss scaling

When training with reduced precision, consider whether gradients will need to be shifted into the representable range of the format that you are using. This is particularly important when training with float16 and less important for bfloat16. See the NVIDIA mixed precision user guide [1] for more details.

The easiest way to shift gradients is with loss scaling, which scales your loss and gradients by S and 1/S respectively.

def my_loss_fn(params, loss_scale: jmp.LossScale, ...):
  loss = ...
  # You should apply regularization etc before scaling.
  loss = loss_scale.scale(loss)
  return loss

def train_step(params, loss_scale: jmp.LossScale, ...):
  grads = jax.grad(my_loss_fn)(...)
  grads = loss_scale.unscale(grads)
  # You should put gradient clipping etc after unscaling.
  params = apply_optimizer(params, grads)
  return params

loss_scale = jmp.StaticLossScale(2 ** 15)
for _ in range(num_steps):
  params = train_step(params, loss_scale, ...)

The appropriate value for S depends on your model, loss, batch size and potentially other factors. You can determine this with trial and error. As a rule of thumb you want the largest value of S that does not introduce overflow during backprop. NVIDIA [1] recommend computing statistics about the gradients of your model (in full precision) and picking S such that its product with the maximum norm of your gradients is below 65,504.

We provide a dynamic loss scale, which adjusts the loss scale periodically during training to find the largest value for S that produces finite gradients. This is more convenient and robust compared with picking a static loss scale, but has a small performance impact (between 1 and 5%).

def my_loss_fn(params, loss_scale: jmp.LossScale, ...):
  loss = ...
  # You should apply regularization etc before scaling.
  loss = loss_scale.scale(loss)
  return loss

def train_step(params, loss_scale: jmp.LossScale, ...):
  grads = jax.grad(my_loss_fn)(...)
  grads = loss_scale.unscale(grads)
  # You should put gradient clipping etc after unscaling.

  # You definitely want to skip non-finite updates with the dynamic loss scale,
  # but you might also want to consider skipping them when using a static loss
  # scale if you experience NaN's when training.
  skip_nonfinite_updates = isinstance(loss_scale, jmp.DynamicLossScale)

  if skip_nonfinite_updates:
    grads_finite = jmp.all_finite(grads)
    # Adjust our loss scale depending on whether gradients were finite. The
    # loss scale will be periodically increased if gradients remain finite and
    # will be decreased if not.
    loss_scale = loss_scale.adjust(grads_finite)
    # Only apply our optimizer if grads are finite, if any element of any
    # gradient is non-finite the whole update is discarded.
    params = jmp.select_tree(grads_finite, apply_optimizer(params, grads), params)
  else:
    # With static or no loss scaling just apply our optimizer.
    params = apply_optimizer(params, grads)

  # Since our loss scale is dynamic we need to return the new value from
  # each step. All loss scales are `PyTree`s.
  return params, loss_scale

loss_scale = jmp.DynamicLossScale(jnp.float32(2**15))
for _ in range(num_steps):
  params, loss_scale = train_step(params, loss_scale, ...)

In general using a static loss scale should offer the best speed, but we have optimized dynamic loss scaling to make it competitive. We recommend you start with dynamic loss scaling and move to static loss scaling if performance is an issue.

We finally offer a no-op loss scale which you can use as a drop in replacement. It does nothing (apart from implement the jmp.LossScale API):

loss_scale = jmp.NoOpLossScale()
assert loss is loss_scale.scale(loss)
assert grads is loss_scale.unscale(grads)
assert loss_scale is loss_scale.adjust(grads_finite)
assert loss_scale.loss_scale == 1

Citing JMP

This repository is part of the DeepMind JAX Ecosystem, to cite JMP please use the DeepMind JAX Ecosystem citation.

References

[0] Paulius Micikevicius, Sharan Narang, Jonah Alben, Gregory Diamos, Erich Elsen, David Garcia, Boris Ginsburg, Michael Houston, Oleksii Kuchaiev, Ganesh Venkatesh, Hao Wu: "Mixed Precision Training", 2017; arXiv:1710.03740 https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.03740.

[1] "Training With Mixed Precision :: NVIDIA Deep Learning Performance Documentation". Docs.Nvidia.Com, 2020, https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/performance/mixed-precision-training/.