FSA/FST algorithms, intended to (eventually) be interoperable with PyTorch and similar.
Project description
k2
The vision of k2 is to be able to seamlessly integrate Finite State Automaton (FSA) and Finite State Transducer (FST) algorithms into autograd-based machine learning toolkits like PyTorch and TensorFlow. For speech recognition applications, this should make it easy to interpolate and combine various training objectives such as cross-entropy, CTC and MMI and to jointly optimize a speech recognition system with multiple decoding passes including lattice rescoring and confidence estimation. We hope k2 will have many other applications as well.
One of the key algorithms that we want to make efficient in the short term is pruned composition of a generic FSA with a "dense" FSA (i.e. one that corresponds to log-probs of symbols at the output of a neural network). This can be used as a fast implementation of decoding for ASR, and for CTC and LF-MMI training. This won't give a direct advantage in terms of Word Error Rate when compared with existing technology; but the point is to do this in a much more general and extensible framework to allow further development of ASR technology.
Implementation
A few key points on our implementation strategy.
Most of the code is in C++ and CUDA. We implement a templated class Ragged
,
which is quite like TensorFlow's RaggedTensor
(actually we came up with the
design independently, and were later told that TensorFlow was using the same
ideas). Despite a close similarity at the level of data structures, the
design is quite different from TensorFlow and PyTorch. Most of the time we
don't use composition of simple operations, but rely on C++11 lambdas defined
directly in the C++ implementations of algorithms. The code in these lambdas operate
directly on data pointers and, if the backend is CUDA, they can run in parallel
for each element of a tensor. (The C++ and CUDA code is mixed together and the
CUDA kernels get instantiated via templates).
It is difficult to adequately describe what we are doing with these Ragged
objects without going in detail through the code. The algorithms look very
different from the way you would code them on CPU because of the need to avoid
sequential processing. We are using coding patterns that make the most
expensive parts of the computations "embarrassingly parallelizable"; the only
somewhat nontrivial CUDA operations are generally reduction-type operations
such as exclusive-prefix-sum, for which we use NVidia's cub
library. Our
design is not too specific to the NVidia hardware and the bulk of the code we
write is fairly normal-looking C++; the nontrivial CUDA programming is mostly
done via the cub library, parts of which we wrap with our own convenient
interface.
The Finite State Automaton object is then implemented as a Ragged tensor templated on a specific data type (a struct representing an arc in the automaton).
Autograd
If you look at the code as it exists now, you won't find any references to autograd. The design is quite different to TensorFlow and PyTorch (which is why we didn't simply extend one of those toolkits). Instead of making autograd come from the bottom up (by making individual operations differentiable) we are implementing it from the top down, which is much more efficient in this case (and will tend to have better roundoff properties).
An example: suppose we are finding the best path of an FSA, and we need derivatives. We implement this by keeping track of, for each arc in the output best-path, which input arc it corresponds to. (For more complex algorithms an arc in the output might correspond to a sum of probabilities of a list of input arcs). We can make this compatible with PyTorch/TensorFlow autograd at the Python level, by, for example, defining a Function class in PyTorch that remembers this relationship between the arcs and does the appropriate (sparse) operations to propagate back the derivatives w.r.t. the weights.
Current state of the code
A lot of the code is still unfinished (Sep 11, 2020).
We finished the CPU versions of many algorithms and this code is in k2/csrc/host/
;
however, after that we figured out how to implement things on the GPU and decided
to change the interfaces so the CPU and GPU code had a more unified interface.
Currently in k2/csrc/
we have more GPU-oriented implementations (although
these algorithms will also work on CPU). We had almost finished the Python
wrapping for the older code, in the k2/python/
subdirectory, but we decided not to
release code with that wrapping because it would have had to be reworked to be compatible
with our GPU algorithms. Instead we will use the interfaces drafted in k2/csrc/
e.g. the Context object (which encapsulates things like memory managers from external
toolkits) and the Tensor object which can be used to wrap tensors from external toolkits;
and wrap those in Python (using pybind11). The code in host/ will eventually
be either deprecated, rewritten or wrapped with newer-style interfaces.
Plans for initial release
We hope to get the first version working in early October. The current short-term aim is to finish the GPU implementation of pruned composition of a normal FSA with a dense FSA, which is the same as decoder search in speech recognition and can be used to implement CTC training and lattice-free MMI (LF-MMI) training. The proof-of-concept that we will release initially is something that's like CTC but allowing more general supervisions (general FSAs rather than linear sequences). This will work on GPU. The same underlying code will support LF-MMI so that would be easy to implement soon after. We plan to put example code in a separate repository.
Plans after initial release
We will then gradually implement more algorithms in a way that's compatible
with the interfaces in k2/csrc/
. Some of them will be CPU-only to start
with. The idea is to eventually have very rich capabilities for operating on
collections of sequences, including methods to convert from a lattice to a
collection of linear sequences and back again (for purposes of neural language
model rescoring, neural confidence estimation and the like).
Quick start
Want to try it out without installing anything? We have setup a Google Colab.
Caution: k2 is not nearly ready for actual use! We are still coding the core algorithms, and hope to have an early version working by early October.
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
File details
Details for the file k2-nailuo-0.1.3.tar.gz
.
File metadata
- Download URL: k2-nailuo-0.1.3.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 145.4 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: poetry/1.1.4 CPython/3.8.6 Linux/4.9.2-3.0.0.std7b.el7.5.x86_64
File hashes
Algorithm | Hash digest | |
---|---|---|
SHA256 | 13942be25d0cdf5b2f2ecf8a4672e958fe5e582181546c5d1da2995617a1267f |
|
MD5 | bb099aaa7d59e94462d3219d97b183bc |
|
BLAKE2b-256 | e128577472f6c7991b04819ca53a1795ad89a57ea733c8629ee836d14d7169fa |
File details
Details for the file k2_nailuo-0.1.3-cp38-cp38-manylinux2014_x86_64.whl
.
File metadata
- Download URL: k2_nailuo-0.1.3-cp38-cp38-manylinux2014_x86_64.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 4.4 MB
- Tags: CPython 3.8
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: poetry/1.1.4 CPython/3.8.6 Linux/4.9.2-3.0.0.std7b.el7.5.x86_64
File hashes
Algorithm | Hash digest | |
---|---|---|
SHA256 | d870a8c096c29f008770c358518159a064288f027ac16456376542f3010de92b |
|
MD5 | c2d3889425bed52f9ce79518cf769718 |
|
BLAKE2b-256 | 7114a0af92339150b3e8f85044bc1431c6b56d6891a3d31d082b4ecba289e7f8 |