ma5-expert 1.0.0

MadAnalysis 5 interpreter for Expert mode

MadAnalysis 5 Interpreter For Expert Mode

MadAnalysis 5 output interpreter for expert mode. Parses the cutflow collection and constructs it with an interactable interface (histogram interpreter coming soon).

Installation

pip install ma5_expert

Cutflow Collection

• Parse all the signal regions and construct an object-base, interactable cutflow.
• Write combined LaTeX tables for different samples.
• Compare samples and construct validation tables which allow you to calculate the difference of the relative efficiencies for each given sample with respect to a reference sample.
• Compare signal and background samples and calculate the figure of merit.
• Possibility to include experimentally available cutflow data and compare it against MadAnalysis 5 cutflow output.
• Calculate Monte Carlo uncertainty per cut on the fly

Examples can be found in examples folder.

• Simple cutflow:

CutFlowCollection needs CutFlows path of your sample in MadAnalysis 5 Analysis folder. We provide an ma5 directory in examples folder so we will go through and the code using that. Parsing a cutflow simply requires the path of the CutFlows folder and optionally xsection [pb], lumi [1/fb] and/or Nevents. Note that xsec overwrites the number of events option, if provided number of events are always calculated using the cross section.

import ma5_expert as ma5
sample = ma5.cutflow.Collection(
    "examples/mass1000005_300.0_mass1000022_60.0_mass1000023_250.0_xs_5.689/Output/SAF/defaultset/atlas_susy_2018_31/Cutflows",
    xsection=5.689, lumi=139.
)

Here the first input is the path of the CutFlows folder and the rest are simply cross section and luminosity information. One can see the signal regions by simply printing the keys of the CutFlowCollection object;

print(sample.SRnames)
# Output: 
# ['SRC_28', 'SRA_M', 'SRA_L', 'SRA_H', 'SRA', 'SRC', 'SRB', 'SRC_26', 'SRC_24', 'SRC_22']

Each signal region is accessible through CutFlowCollection object. For instance one can get the names of the cuts applied in one of the signal regions.

print(sample.SRA.CutNames)
# Output: 
# ['Initial', '$N_{lep} = 0$', '$N_{j} \\geq 6$', '$N_{b} \\geq 4$', 
# '$\\slashed{E}_T > 350$ [GeV]', '$min(\\Delta\\phi(j_{1-4},\\slashed{E}_T))>0.4$ [rad]', 
# '$\\tau^h$ veto', '$p^{b_1}_T > 200$ [GeV]', '$\\Delta R_{max}(b,b)>2.5$', 
# '$\\Delta R_{max-min}(b,b)<2.5$', '$m(h_{cand})>80$ [GeV]', '$m_{eff} > 1$ [TeV]']

Or simply print the entire cutflow;

print(sample.SRA)
# Output: 
# * SRA :
#  * Initial :
#   - Number of Entries    : 200000
#   - Number of Events     : 790771.000 ± 0.000(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 1.000, 1.000
#  * $N_{lep} = 0$ :
#   - Number of Entries    : 156651
#   - Number of Events     : 499908.962 ± 609.064(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.632, 0.632
#  * $N_{j} \geq 6$ :
#   - Number of Entries    : 65546
#   - Number of Events     : 209971.179 ± 362.184(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.266, 0.420
#  * $N_{b} \geq 4$ :
#   - Number of Entries    : 19965
#   - Number of Events     : 63883.202 ± 123.205(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.081, 0.304
#  * $\slashed{E}_T > 350$ [GeV] :
#   - Number of Entries    : 191
#   - Number of Events     : 755.117 ± 1.688(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.001, 0.012
#  * $min(\Delta\phi(j_{1-4},\slashed{E}_T))>0.4$ [rad] :
#   - Number of Entries    : 72
#   - Number of Events     : 284.658 ± 0.636(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.000, 0.377
#  * $\tau^h$ veto :
#   - Number of Entries    : 68
#   - Number of Events     : 268.850 ± 0.601(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.000, 0.944
#  * $p^{b_1}_T > 200$ [GeV] :
#   - Number of Entries    : 33
#   - Number of Events     : 130.474 ± 0.292(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.000, 0.485
#  * $\Delta R_{max}(b,b)>2.5$ :
#   - Number of Entries    : 25
#   - Number of Events     : 98.836 ± 0.221(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.000, 0.758
#  * $\Delta R_{max-min}(b,b)<2.5$ :
#   - Number of Entries    : 25
#   - Number of Events     : 98.836 ± 0.221(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.000, 1.000
#  * $m(h_{cand})>80$ [GeV] :
#   - Number of Entries    : 10
#   - Number of Events     : 39.543 ± 0.088(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.000, 0.400
#  * $m_{eff} > 1$ [TeV] :
#   - Number of Entries    : 10
#   - Number of Events     : 39.543 ± 0.088(ΔMC)
#   - Cut & Rel Efficiency : 0.000, 1.000

As can be seen, it shows number of entries (MonteCarlo events), number of events (lumi weighted), cut efficiency and relative efficiency. The error in number of events is the MonteCarlo uncertainty.

It is also possible to access practical information

print(sample.SRA.isAlive)
# Output: True

which simply checks the number of entries in the final cut. Hence one can remove the SRs which does not have any statistics;

alive = sample.get_alive()
print(f"Number of cutflows survived : {len(alive)},\nNames of the cutflows : { ', '.join([x.id for x in alive]) }")
# Output: 
# Number of cutflows survived : 8,
# Names of the cutflows : SRA_M, SRA_L, SRA_H, SRA, SRC, SRB, SRC_24, SRC_22

Each cut is accessible through the interface;

fifth = sample.SRA[5]
print(f"Efficiency : {fifth.eff:.3f}, Relative MC efficiency {fifth.mc_rel_eff:.3f}, number of events {fifth.Nevents:.1f}, sum of weights {fifth.sumW:.3f}")
# Output: 
# Efficiency : 0.0004, Relative MC efficiency 0.377, number of events 284.7, sum of weights 0.008

One can also construct independent signal regions for sake of comparisson with Ma5 results;

SRA_presel = [319.7,230.5,192.3,87.9,45.1,20.9,19.3,18.2,17.6,15.0,13.7]

ATLAS = ma5.cutflow.Collection() 

ATLAS.addSignalRegion('SRA',   ma5.SRA.CutNames,   SRA_presel+[13.7])
ATLAS.addSignalRegion('SRA_L', ma5.SRA_L.CutNames, SRA_presel+[0.4])
ATLAS.addSignalRegion('SRA_M', ma5.SRA_M.CutNames, SRA_presel+[6.4])
ATLAS.addSignalRegion('SRA_H', ma5.SRA_H.CutNames, SRA_presel+[7.0])

where all properties shown above applies to this new object as well.

Citation

Developed for arXiv:2006.09387

@article{Araz:2020lnp,
    author = "Araz, Jack Y. and Fuks, Benjamin and Polykratis, Georgios",
    title = "{Simplified fast detector simulation in MADANALYSIS 5}",
    eprint = "2006.09387",
    archivePrefix = "arXiv",
    primaryClass = "hep-ph",
    doi = "10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09052-5",
    journal = "Eur. Phys. J. C",
    volume = "81",
    number = "4",
    pages = "329",
    year = "2021"
}

TODO

• Clean cutflow reader needs optimization and clarity

• Generalize table writer and add latex writer

• Histogram reader

• Overall Ma5 Analysis parser

• Some experimental analysis requires MC event comparison table. This needs to be added.

• Combine collections with + operator and normalize to a certain luminosity with * operator.

• Add MC uncertainties

• Add theoretical uncertainties