pydantic_core 0.18.0

No project description provided

pydantic-core

This package provides the core functionality for pydantic.

The package is currently a work in progress and subject to significant change.

There is, as yet, no integration with pydantic, so schemas can only be defined via dictionaries.

The plan is for pydantic to adopt pydantic-core in v2 and to generate the schema definition from type hints in pydantic, then create a SchemaValidator upon model creation.

pydantic-core will be a separate package, required by pydantic.

The public interface to pydantic shouldn't change too much as a result of this switch (though I intend to clean up quite a lot in the public API in v2 as well).

Example of usage:

from pydantic_core import SchemaValidator, ValidationError


v = SchemaValidator(
    {
        'type': 'typed-dict',
        'fields': {
            'name': {
                'type': 'typed-dict-field',
                'schema': {
                    'type': 'str',
                },
            },
            'age': {
                'type': 'typed-dict-field',
                'schema': {
                    'type': 'int',
                    'ge': 18,
                },
            },
            'is_developer': {
                'type': 'typed-dict-field',
                'schema': {
                    'type': 'default',
                    'schema': {'type': 'bool'},
                    'default': True,
                },
            },
        },
    }
)

r1 = v.validate_python({'name': 'Samuel', 'age': 35})
assert r1 == {'name': 'Samuel', 'age': 35, 'is_developer': True}

# pydantic-core can also validate JSON directly
r2 = v.validate_json('{"name": "Samuel", "age": 35}')
assert r1 == r2

try:
    v.validate_python({'name': 'Samuel', 'age': 11})
except ValidationError as e:
    print(e)
    """
    1 validation error for model
    age
      Input should be greater than or equal to 18
      [type=greater_than_equal, context={ge: 18}, input_value=11, input_type=int]
    """

Pydantic-core is currently around 17x faster than pydantic standard. See tests/benchmarks/ for details.

This relative performance will be less impressive for small models but could be significantly move impressive for deeply nested models.

The improvement will decrease slightly when we have to create a class instance after validation, but shouldn't change more.

The aim is to remain 10x faster than current pydantic for common use cases.

Getting Started

While pydantic-core is not yet released and not designed for direct use, you can still try it.

You'll need rust stable installed, or rust nightly if you want to generate accurate coverage.

With rust and python 3.7+ installed, compiling pydantic-core should be possible with roughly the following:

# clone this repo or your fork
git clone [e-mail]:pydantic/pydantic-core.git
cd pydantic-core
# create a new virtual env
python3 -m venv env
source env/bin/activate
# install dependencies and install pydantic-core
make install

That should be it, the example shown above should now run.

You might find it useful to look at pydantic_core/_pydantic_core.pyi and pydantic_core/core_schema.py for more information on the python API, beyond that, tests/ provide a large number of examples of usage.

If you want to contribute to pydantic-core, you'll want to use some other make commands:

• make build-dev to build the package during development
• make build-prod to perform an optimised build for benchmarking
• make test to run the tests
• make testcov to run the tests and generate a coverage report
• make lint to run the linter
• make format to format python and rust code
• make to run format build-dev lint test

Why not JSONSchema?

Looking at the above schema passed to SchemaValidator it would seem reasonable to ask "why not use JSONSchema?".

And if we could use JSONSchema, why not use an existing rust library to do validation?

In fact, in the very early commits to pydantic-core, I did try to use JSONSchema, however I quickly realized it wouldn't work.

JSONSchema does not match the schema for pydantic that closely:

• there are lots of extra checks which pydantic wants to do and aren't covered by JSONSchema
• there are configurations which are possible in JSONSchema but are hard or impossible to imagine in pydantic
• pydantic has the concept of parsing or coercion at it's core, JSONSchema doesn't - it assumes you either accept or reject the input, never change it
• There are whole classes of problem pydantic has to deal with (like python class instance validation) which JSONSchema has no idea about since it's dedicated to JSON

Even if we could use JSONSchema, it wouldn't help much since rust JSONSchema validators expect to know the schema at compile time, pydantic-core has no knowledge of the schema until SchemaValidator is initialised.

Still, it wouldn't be that hard to implement a conversion layer (either in python or rust) to convert JSONSchema to "pydantic schema" and thereby achieve partial JSONSchema validation.