reasonable 0.1.47_alpha1

An OWL 2 RL reasoner with reasonable performance

Reasonable

An OWL 2 RL reasoner with reasonable performance

Performance

Comparing performance of reasonable with OWLRL and Allegro. Evaluation consisted of loading Brick models of different sizes into the respective reasoning engine and timing how long it took to produce the materialization. reasonable is about 7x faster than Allegro and 38x faster than OWLRL on this workload.

How to Use

Python

To facilitate usage, we use the pyo3 project to generate Python 3.x bindings to this project. Installing these should be as easy as pip install reasonable.

See also the brickschema package for working with Brick models. The package provides a generic interface to this reasoner and several others.

Usage looks like:

import reasonable

# import triples from an rdflib Graph
import rdflib
g = rdflib.Graph()
g.parse("example_models/ontologies/Brick.n3", format="n3")
g.parse("example_models/small1.n3", format="n3")

r = reasonable.PyReasoner()
r.from_graph(g)
triples = r.reason()
print("from rdflib:", len(triples))

# import triples from files on disk
r = reasonable.PyReasoner()
r.load_file("example_models/ontologies/Brick.n3")
r.load_file("example_models/small1.n3")
triples = r.reason()
print("from files:", len(triples))

Rust

See Rust docs

Example of usage from Rust:

use ::reasonable::owl::Reasoner;
use std::env;
use std::time::Instant;
use log::info;

fn main() {
    env_logger::init();
    let mut r = Reasoner::new();
    env::args().skip(1).map(|filename| {
        info!("Loading file {}", &filename);
        r.load_file(&filename).unwrap()
    }).count();
    let reasoning_start = Instant::now();
    info!("Starting reasoning");
    r.reason();
    info!("Reasoning completed in {:.02}sec", reasoning_start.elapsed().as_secs_f64());
    r.dump_file("output.ttl").unwrap();
}

OWL 2 Rules

Using rule definitions from here.

TODO: implement RDF/RDFS entailment semantics as described here

Note: haven't implemented rules that produce exceptions; waiting to determine the best way of handling these errors.

Equality Semantics

Completed	Rule name	Notes
no	eq-ref	implementation is very inefficient; causes lots of flux
yes	eq-sym
yes	eq-trans
yes	eq-rep-s
yes	eq-rep-p
yes	eq-rep-o
no	eq-diff1	throws exception
no	eq-diff2	throws exception
no	eq-diff3	throws exception

Property Axiom Semantics

Completed	Rule name	Notes
no	prp-ap
yes	prp-dom
yes	prp-rng
yes	prp-fp
yes	prp-ifp
yes	prp-irp	throws exception
yes	prp-symp
yes	prp-asyp	throws exception
yes	prp-trp
yes	prp-spo1
no	prp-spo2
yes	prp-eqp1
yes	prp-eqp2
yes	prp-pdw	throws exception
no	prp-adp	throws exception
yes	prp-inv1
yes	prp-inv2
no	prp-key
no	prp-npa1	throws exception
no	prp-npa2	throws exception

Class Semantics

Completed	Rule name	Notes
yes	cls-thing
yes	cls-nothing1
yes	cls-nothing2	throws exception
yes	cls-int1
yes	cls-int2
yes	cls-uni
yes	cls-com	throws exception
yes	cls-svf1
yes	cls-svf2
yes	cls-avf
yes	cls-hv1
yes	cls-hv2
no	cls-maxc1	throws exception
no	cls-maxc2
no	cls-maxqc1	throws exception
no	cls-maxqc2	throws exception
no	cls-maxqc3
no	cls-maxqc4
no	cls-oo

Class Axiom Semantics

Completed	Rule name	Notes
yes	cax-sco
yes	cax-eqc1
yes	cax-eqc2
yes	cax-dw	throws exception
no	cax-adc	throws exception

Other

• no datatype semantics for now