Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware
repoze.tm2 (Transaction Manager, without ZODB3 dependencies)
Middleware which uses the “transaction” package’s transaction manager to wrap a call to its pipeline children inside a transaction. repoze.tm2 is equivalent to the package from which it was forked, repoze.tm, except it has no ZODB dependencies. It is an error to install both repoze.tm and repoze.tm2 into the same environment, as they provide the same entry points and import points.
When this middleware is present in the WSGI pipeline, a new transaction will be started once a WSGI request makes it to the repoze.tm middleware. If any downstream application raises an exception, the transaction will be aborted, otherwise the transaction will be committed. Any “data managers” participating in the transaction will be aborted or committed respectively. A ZODB “connection” is an example of a data manager.
Since this is a tiny wrapper around the ZODB transaction module, and the ZODB transaction module is “thread-safe” (in the sense that its default policy is to create a new transaction for each thread), it should be fine to use in either multiprocess or multithread environments.
Purpose and Usage
The ZODB transaction manager is a completely generic transaction manager. It can be used independently of the actual “object database” part of ZODB. One of the purposes of creating repoze.tm was to allow for systems other than Zope to make use of two-phase commit transactions in a WSGI context.
Let’s pretend we have an existing system that places data into a relational database when someone submits a form. The system has been running for a while, and our code handles the database commit and rollback for us explicitly; if the form processing succeeds, our code commits the database transaction. If it fails, our code rolls back the database transaction. Everything works fine.
Now our customer asks us if we can also place data into another separate relational database when the form is submitted as well as continuing to place data in the original database. We need to put data in both databases, and if we want to ensure that no records exist in one that don’t exist in the other as a result of a form submission, we’re going to need to do a pretty complicated commit and rollback dance in each place in our code which needs to write to both data stores. We can’t just blindly commit one, then commit the other, because the second commit may fail and we’ll be left with “orphan” data in the first, and we’ll either need to clean it up manually or leave it there to trip over later.
A transaction manager helps us ensure that no data is committed to either database unless both participating data stores can commit. Once the transaction manager determines that both data stores are willing to commit, it will commit them both in very quick succession, so that there is only a minimal chance that the second data store will fail to commit. If it does, the system will raise an error that makes it impossible to begin another transaction until the system restarts, so the damage is minimized. In practice, this error almost never occurs unless the code that interfaces the database to the transaction manager has a bug.
Mocking Up A Data Manager
The piece of code you need to write in order to participate in ZODB transactions is called a ‘data manager’. It is typically a class. Here’s the interface that you need to implement in the code for a data manager:class IDataManager(zope.interface.Interface): """Objects that manage transactional storage. These objects may manage data for other objects, or they may manage non-object storages, such as relational databases. For example, a ZODB.Connection. Note that when some data is modified, that data's data manager should join a transaction so that data can be committed when the user commits the transaction. """ transaction_manager = zope.interface.Attribute( """The transaction manager (TM) used by this data manager. This is a public attribute, intended for read-only use. The value is an instance of ITransactionManager, typically set by the data manager's constructor. """ ) def abort(transaction): """Abort a transaction and forget all changes. Abort must be called outside of a two-phase commit. Abort is called by the transaction manager to abort transactions that are not yet in a two-phase commit. """ # Two-phase commit protocol. These methods are called by # the ITransaction object associated with the transaction # being committed. The sequence of calls normally follows # this regular expression: tpc_begin commit tpc_vote # (tpc_finish | tpc_abort) def tpc_begin(transaction): """Begin commit of a transaction, starting the two-phase commit. transaction is the ITransaction instance associated with the transaction being committed. """ def commit(transaction): """Commit modifications to registered objects. Save changes to be made persistent if the transaction commits (if tpc_finish is called later). If tpc_abort is called later, changes must not persist. This includes conflict detection and handling. If no conflicts or errors occur, the data manager should be prepared to make the changes persist when tpc_finish is called. """ def tpc_vote(transaction): """Verify that a data manager can commit the transaction. This is the last chance for a data manager to vote 'no'. A data manager votes 'no' by raising an exception. transaction is the ITransaction instance associated with the transaction being committed. """ def tpc_finish(transaction): """Indicate confirmation that the transaction is done. Make all changes to objects modified by this transaction persist. transaction is the ITransaction instance associated with the transaction being committed. This should never fail. If this raises an exception, the database is not expected to maintain consistency; it's a serious error. """ def tpc_abort(transaction): """Abort a transaction. This is called by a transaction manager to end a two-phase commit on the data manager. Abandon all changes to objects modified by this transaction. transaction is the ITransaction instance associated with the transaction being committed. This should never fail. """ def sortKey(): """Return a key to use for ordering registered DataManagers. ZODB uses a global sort order to prevent deadlock when it commits transactions involving multiple resource managers. The resource manager must define a sortKey() method that provides a global ordering for resource managers. """ # Alternate version: #"""Return a consistent sort key for this connection. # #This allows ordering multiple connections that use the same storage in #a consistent manner. This is unique for the lifetime of a connection, #which is good enough to avoid ZEO deadlocks. #"""
Let’s implement a mock data manager. Our mock data manager will write data to a file if the transaction commits. It will not write data to a file if the transaction aborts:class MockDataManager: transaction_manager = None def __init__(self, data, path): self.data = data self.path = path def abort(self, transaction): pass def tpc_begin(self, transaction): pass def commit(self, transaction): import tempfile self.tempfn = tempfile.mktemp() temp = open(self.tempfn, 'wb') temp.write(self.data) temp.flush() temp.close() def tpc_vote(self, transaction): import os if not os.path.exists(self.tempfn): raise ValueError('%s doesnt exist' % self.tempfn) if os.path.exists(self.path): raise ValueError('file already exists') def tpc_finish(self, transaction): import os os.rename(self.tempfn, self.path) def tpc_abort(self, transaction): import os try: os.remove(self.tempfn) except OSError: pass
We can create a datamanager and join it into the currently running transaction:dm = MockDataManager('heres the data', '/tmp/file') import transaction t = transaction.get() t.join(dm)
When the transaction commits, a file will be placed in ‘/tmp/file’ containing ‘heres the data’. If the transaction aborts, no file will be created.
If more than one data manager is joined to the transaction, all of them must be willing to commit or the entire transaction is aborted and none of them commit. If you can imagine creating two of the mock data managers we’ve made within application code, if one has a problem during “tpc_vote”, neither will actually write a file to the ultimate location, and thus your application consistency is maintained.
Integrating Your Data Manager With repoze.tm
The repoze.tm transaction management machinery has an implicit policy. When it is in the WSGI pipeline, a transaction is started when the middleware is invoked. Thus, in your application code, calling “import transaction; transaction.get()” will return the transaction object created by the repoze.tm middleware. You needn’t call t.commit() or t.abort() within your application code. You only need to call t.join, to register your data manager with the transaction. repoze.tm will abort the transaction if an exception is raised by your application code or lower middleware before it returns a WSGI response. If your application or lower middleware raises an exception, the transaction is aborted.
When a repoze.tm is in the WSGI pipeline, a boolean key is present in the environment (‘repoze.tm.active’). A utility function named isActive can be imported from the repoze.tm package and passed the WSGI environment to check for activation:from repoze.tm import isActive tm_active = isActive(wsgi_environment)
If an application needs to perform an action after a transaction ends, the “after_end” registry may be used to register a callback. The after_end.register function accepts a callback (accepting no arguments) and a transaction instance:from repoze.tm import after_end import transaction t = transaction.get() # the current transaction def func(): pass # close a connection, etc after_end.register(func, t)
‘after_end’ callbacks should only be registered when the transaction manager is active, or a memory leak will result (registration cleanup happens only on transaction commit or abort, which is managed by repoze.tm while in the pipeline).
Many database adapters written for Zope (e.g. for Postgres, MySQL, etc) use this transaction manager, so it should be possible to take a look in these places to see how to implement a more real-world transaction-aware database connector that uses this module in non-Zope applications:http://svn.zope.org/ZODB/branches/3.7/src/transaction/ http://svn.zope.org/ZODB/branches/3.8/src/transaction/ http://mysql-python.sourceforge.net/ (ZMySQLDA) http://www.initd.org/svn/psycopg/psycopg2/trunk/ (ZPsycoPGDA)
The “repoze-dev maillist”:http://lists.repoze.org/mailman/listinfo/repoze-dev should be used for communications about this software.
Allow commit_veto hook to be specified within Paste config, ala:[filter:tm] use = repoze.tm:make_tm commit_veto = some.package:myfunction
myfunction should take three args: environ, status, headers and should return True if the txn should be aborted, False if it should be committed.
repoze.tm2 1.0a2 (2008/7/15)
Provide “commit_veto” hook point (contributed by Alberto Valverde).
Point easy_install at http://dist.repoze.org/tm2/dev/simple via setup.cfg.
Fork point: we’ve created repoze.tm2, which is repoze.tm that has a dependency only on the ‘transaction’ package instead of all of ZODB.
Better documentation for non-Zope usage in README.txt.
Relaxed requirement for ZODB 3.7.2, since we might need to use the package with other verions. Note that the tests which depend on transaction having “doom” semantics don’t work with 3.7.2, anyway.
Depend on PyPI release of ZODB 3.7.2. Upgrade to this by doing bin/easy_install -U ‘ZODB3 >= 3.7.1, < 3.8.0a’ if necessary.
after_end.register and after_end.unregister must now be passed a transaction object rather than a WSGI environment to avoid the possibility that the WSGI environment used by a child participating in transaction management won’t be the same one used by the repoze.tm package.
repoze.tm now inserts a key into the WSGI environment (‘repoze.tm.active’) if it’s active in the WSGI pipeline. An API function, repoze.tm:isActive can be called with a single argument, the WSGI environment, to check if the middleware is active.
Depend on rerolled ZODB 3.7.1 instead of zopelib.
Add license and copyright, change trove classifiers.
Depend on zopelib rather than ZODB 3.8.0b3 distribution, because the ZODB distribution pulls in various packages (zope.interface and ZEO most notably) that are incompatible with stock Zope 2.10.4 apps and older sandboxes. We’ll need to revisit this.
Provide limited compatibility for older transaction package versions which don’t support the ‘transaction.isDoomed’ API.
Provide after_end API for registering callbacks at transaction end.