sphinxcontrib-napoleon 0.2

Sphinx "napoleon" extension.

Napoleon - Marching toward legible docstrings

Are you tired of writing docstrings that look like this:

:param path: The path of the file to wrap
:type path: str
:param field_storage: The :class:`FileStorage` instance to wrap
:type field_storage: FileStorage
:param temporary: Whether or not to delete the file when the File
   instance is destructed
:type temporary: bool
:returns: A buffered writable file descriptor
:rtype: BufferedFileStorage

ReStructuredText is great, but it creates visually dense, hard to read docstrings. Compare the jumble above to the same thing rewritten according to the Google Python Style Guide:

Args:
    path (str): The path of the file to wrap
    field_storage (FileStorage): The :class:`FileStorage` instance to wrap
    temporary (bool): Whether or not to delete the file when the File
       instance is destructed

Returns:
    BufferedFileStorage: A buffered writable file descriptor

Much more legible, no?

Napoleon is a Sphinx extension that allows you to write readable API documentation in your source code. Napoleon understands both NumPy and Google style docstrings - the style recommended by Khan Academy.

Getting Started

1. After setting up Sphinx to build your docs, install the sphinxcontrib-napoleon package:

   $ pip install sphinxcontrib-napoleon

2. Enable napoleon in the Sphinx conf.py file:

   # conf.py
   
   # Add autodoc and napoleon to the extensions list
   extensions = ['sphinx.ext.autodoc', 'sphinxcontrib.napoleon']

3. Use sphinx-apidoc to build your API documentation:

   $ sphinx-apidoc -f -o docs/source projectdir

Docstrings

Napoleon interprets every docstring that Sphinx autodoc can find, including docstrings on: modules, classes, attributes, methods, functions, and variables. Inside each docstring, specially formatted Sections are parsed and converted to reStructuredText.

All standard reStructuredText formatting still works as expected.

Google vs NumPy

Napoleon supports two styles of docstrings: Google and NumPy. The main difference between the two styles is that Google uses indention to separate sections, whereas NumPy uses underlines.

Google style:

def func(arg1, arg2):
    """Summary line.

    Extended description of function.

    Args:
        arg1 (int): Description of arg1
        arg2 (str): Description of arg2

    Returns:
        bool: Description of return value

    """
    return True

NumPy style:

def func(arg1, arg2):
    """Summary line.

    Extended description of function.

    Parameters
    ----------
    arg1 : int
        Description of arg1
    arg2 : str
        Description of arg2

    Returns
    -------
    bool
        Description of return value

    """
    return True

NumPy style tends to require more vertical space, whereas Google style tends to use more horizontal space. Google style tends to be easier to read for short and simple docstrings, whereas NumPy style tends be easier to read for long and in-depth docstrings.

The Khan Academy recommends using Google style.

The choice between styles is largely aesthetic, but the two styles should not be mixed. Choose one style for your project and be consistent with it.

Sections

All of the following section headers are supported:

• Args (alias of Parameters)

• Arguments (alias of Parameters)

• Attributes

• Example

• Examples

• Keyword Args (alias of Keyword Arguments)

• Keyword Arguments

• Methods

• Note

• Notes

• Other Parameters

• Parameters

• Return (alias of Returns)

• Returns

• Raises

• References

• See Also

• Warning

• Warnings (alias of Warning)

• Warns

• Yields

For full documentation see http://sphinxcontrib-napoleon.readthedocs.org