torchsort 0.1.4

Differentiable sorting and ranking in PyTorch

Torchsort

Fast, differentiable sorting and ranking in PyTorch.

Pure PyTorch implementation of Fast Differentiable Sorting and Ranking (Blondel et al.). Much of the code is copied from the original Numpy implementation at google-research/fast-soft-sort, with the isotonic regression solver rewritten as a PyTorch C++ and CUDA extension.

Install

pip install torchsort

To build the CUDA extension you will need the CUDA toolchain installed. If you want to build in an environment without a CUDA runtime (e.g. docker), you will need to export the environment variable TORCH_CUDA_ARCH_LIST="Pascal;Volta;Turing;Ampere" before installing.

Usage

torchsort exposes two functions: soft_rank and soft_sort, each with parameters regularization ("l2" or "kl") and regularization_strength (a scalar value). Each will rank/sort the last dimension of a 2-d tensor, with an accuracy dependant upon the regularization strength:

import torch
import torchsort

x = torch.tensor([[8, 0, 5, 3, 2, 1, 6, 7, 9]])

torchsort.soft_sort(x, regularization_strength=1.0)
# tensor([[0.5556, 1.5556, 2.5556, 3.5556, 4.5556, 5.5556, 6.5556, 7.5556, 8.5556]])
torchsort.soft_sort(x, regularization_strength=0.1)
# tensor([[-0., 1., 2., 3., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9.]])

torchsort.soft_rank(x)
# tensor([[8., 1., 5., 4., 3., 2., 6., 7., 9.]])

Both operations are fully differentiable, on CPU or GPU:

x = torch.tensor([[8., 0., 5., 3., 2., 1., 6., 7., 9.]], requires_grad=True).cuda()
y = torchsort.soft_sort(x)

torch.autograd.grad(y[0, 0], x)
# (tensor([[0.1111, 0.1111, 0.1111, 0.1111, 0.1111, 0.1111, 0.1111, 0.1111, 0.1111]],
#         device='cuda:0'),)

Example

Spearman's Rank Coefficient

Spearman's rank coefficient is a very useful metric for measuring how monotonically related two variables are. We can use Torchsort to create a differentiable Spearman's rank coefficient function so that we can optimize a model directly for this metric:

import torch
import torchsort

def spearmanr(pred, target, **kw):
    pred = torchsort.soft_rank(pred, **kw)
    target = torchsort.soft_rank(target, **kw)
    pred = pred - pred.mean()
    pred = pred / pred.norm()
    target = target - target.mean()
    target = target / target.norm()
    return (pred * target).sum()

pred = torch.tensor([[1., 2., 3., 4., 5.]], requires_grad=True)
target = torch.tensor([[5., 6., 7., 8., 7.]])
spearman = spearmanr(pred, target)
# tensor(0.8321)

torch.autograd.grad(spearman, pred)
# (tensor([[-5.5470e-02,  2.9802e-09,  5.5470e-02,  1.1094e-01, -1.1094e-01]]),)

Benchmark

torchsort and fast_soft_sort each operate with a time complexity of O(n log n), each with some additional overhead when compared to the built-in torch.sort. With a batch size of 1 (see left), the Numba JIT'd forward pass of fast_soft_sort performs about on-par with the torchsort CPU kernel, however its backward pass still relies on some Python code, which greatly penalizes its performance.

Furthermore, the torchsort kernel supports batches, and yields much better performance than fast_soft_sort as the batch size increases.

The torchsort CUDA kernel performs quite well with sequence lengths under ~2000, and scales to extremely large batch sizes. In the future the CUDA kernel can likely be further optimized to achieve performance closer to that of the built in torch.sort.

Reference

@inproceedings{blondel2020fast,
  title={Fast differentiable sorting and ranking},
  author={Blondel, Mathieu and Teboul, Olivier and Berthet, Quentin and Djolonga, Josip},
  booktitle={International Conference on Machine Learning},
  pages={950--959},
  year={2020},
  organization={PMLR}
}