universal-edit-distance 0.4.3

A package containing generic error-rate functions implemented in Rust

Universal Edit Distance

Universal Edit Distance (or UED)(sometimes called Universal Error Rate because I struggle to be consistent) is a project aimed at creating a simple Python evaluation library in Rust.

The universal part of the name comes from the fact that the Rust implementation is generic and works on any data type that implements PartialEq as opposed to most implementations that are limited to only strings.

✨ Features

• Much quicker than HuggingFace's evaluate library (see benchmarks below)
• Word-error-rate and Character-error-rate functions compatible and comparable with evaluate's wer and cer metrics.
• Functions that return the wer or cer for every test as an array within a fraction of second.
• Functions that return the edit distance for every test as an array of integers within the fraction of a second.
• Generic implementations of the mean-error-rate and error-rate metrics that can work with any* Python type
• Includes type-hints to make development easier.

* I am pretty sure it works with any type, but it is still being tested

⚡️ Quick start

You can now install the library using PyPI! All you need to do is to install the package universal-edit-distance using your favourite package manager.

Note: Pre-compied wheels exists for MacOS and Linux for Python version 3.9 -> 3.13. Builds are not currently working for Windows, so if you are on Windows the package has to be installed from source which requires cargo to be installed in your environment.

Using pip

pip install universal-edit-distance

Using uv

uv add universal-edit-distance

You should now be able to import the module universal_edit_distance in your Python project.

Example use-case

Since the library is able to work on arbitrary types, you are for example able to do the following. In the example, we create a class where we override the __eq__ function to match any word that is in the list of options. This code outputs [0, 0, 1] as expected since "coffi" is not in the list of options.

import universal_edit_distance as ued


class OptionType:
    def __init__(self, options: list[str]):
        self.options = options

    def __eq__(self, value):
        """Checks if the string is in the list of options"""
        if isinstance(value, str):
            return value in self.options
        return False


REFERENCE = ["dw", "i'n", "hoffi", OptionType(["ffotograffi", "photography"])]
HYPO1 = ["dw", "i'n", "hoffi", "ffotograffi"]
HYPO2 = ["dw", "i'n", "hoffi", "photography"]
HYPO3 = ["dw", "i'n", "hoffi", "coffi"]


print(
    ued.universal_edit_distance(
        [HYPO1, HYPO2, HYPO3], [REFERENCE] * 3
    )
)

🎯 Motivation and why this project exists

I love statistics, and I when I evaluate my speech-recognition models (and other models) I like to run t-tests etc. However, doing that with HuggingFace's evaluate library while possible is horrendously slow.

If you only require the mean CER or WER you could continue using evaluate and your life would be fine. If you want to be more rigorous in your testing and evaluation, you should consider using this library.

In addition, one thing that annoys me with a lot of Levenshtein implementations is that the algorithm can literally work on any data type that supports comparison. I have tried to make the implementation found here as generic as possible.

Benchmarks

You can find the benchmarking script here: prebens-phd-adventures/ued-benchmarks

Note that the single floating point result normally returned from evaluate is in this library and in these results called the mean-error-rate since it is effectively the mean across all tests as opposed to only a single test. The tests returning a floating point result for each row in the test case is simply called error-rate.

The tests in the table below were run using evaluate=0.4.3, jiwer=3.1.0, and universal-edit-distance 0.2.0 on a Polars DataFrame containing $n=12775$ entries. For the mean-error-rate results the tests were run 100 times per, and for the error-rate results they were only run once due to evaluate being too slow.

Metric	evaluate	jiwer	ued	Speed-up vs evaluate	Speed-up vs jiwer
Mean WER	0.31s	0.16s	0.02s	15.28x	7.75x
Mean CER	0.45s	0.24s	0.09s	5.01x	2.60x
WER	24.77s	0.27s	0.02s	1137.30x	12.61x
CER	25.34s	0.37s	0.09s	278.97x	4.03x

As can be seen in the table, ued beats evaluate and jiwer in basically every metric. The goal of the project was to make WER and CER faster, but I'll take the w for the other two. What you'll also notice is that the results for the mean-error-rates and error-rates are the same for ued. That is due to the way it is implemented and is expected.

👩‍💻👨‍💻 Contribute to the project

This is my first ever Rust project, so I while I have a vague idea about what I am doing, I am sure it can be improved. If you have any suggestions or requests please feel free to add an issue!