responder 0.3.3

A sorta familiar HTTP framework.

Responder: a familiar HTTP Service Framework for Python

The Python world certainly doesn't need more web frameworks. But, it does need more creativity, so I thought I'd spread some Hacktoberfest spirit around, bring some of my ideas to the table, and see what I could come up with.

import responder

api = responder.API()

@api.route("/{greeting}")
async def greet_world(req, resp, *, greeting):
    resp.text = f"{greeting}, world!"

if __name__ == '__main__':
    api.run()

That async declaration is optional. View documentation.

This gets you a ASGI app, with a production static files server pre-installed, jinja2 templating (without additional imports), and a production webserver based on uvloop, serving up requests with gzip compression automatically.

Testimonials

"Pleasantly very taken with python-responder. @kennethreitz at his absolute best." —Rudraksh M.K.

"ASGI is going to enable all sorts of new high-performance web services. It's awesome to see Responder starting to take advantage of that." — Tom Christie author of Django REST Framework

"I love that you are exploring new patterns. Go go go!" — Danny Greenfield, author of Two Scoops of Django

"Love what I have seen while it's in progress! Many features of Responder are from my wishlist for Flask, and it's even faster and even easier than Flask!" — Luna C.

More Examples

See the documentation's feature tour for more details on features available in Responder.

Installing Responder

Install the latest release:

$ pipenv install responder --pre
✨🍰✨

Or, install from the development branch:

$ pipenv install -e git+https://github.com/kennethreitz/responder.git#egg=responder

Only Python 3.6+ is supported.

The Basic Idea

The primary concept here is to bring the niceties that are brought forth from both Flask and Falcon and unify them into a single framework, along with some new ideas I have. I also wanted to take some of the API primitives that are instilled in the Requests library and put them into a web framework. So, you'll find a lot of parallels here with Requests.

• Setting resp.text sends back unicode, while setting resp.content sends back bytes.
• Setting resp.media sends back JSON/YAML (.text/.content override this).
• Case-insensitive req.headers dict (from Requests directly).
• resp.status_code, req.method, req.url, and other familiar friends.

Ideas

• Flask-style route expression, with new capabilities -- all while using Python 3.6+'s new f-string syntax.
• I love Falcon's "every request and response is passed into to each view and mutated" methodology, especially response.media, and have used it here. In addition to supporting JSON, I have decided to support YAML as well, as Kubernetes is slowly taking over the world, and it uses YAML for all the things. Content-negotiation and all that.
• A built in testing client that uses the actual Requests you know and love.
• The ability to mount other WSGI apps easily.
• Automatic gzipped-responses.
• In addition to Falcon's on_get, on_post, etc methods, Responder features an on_request method, which gets called on every type of request, much like Requests.
• A production static file server is built-in.
• Uvicorn built-in as a production web server. I would have chosen Gunicorn, but it doesn't run on Windows. Plus, Uvicorn serves well to protect against slowloris attacks, making nginx unnecessary in production.
• GraphQL support, via Graphene. The goal here is to have any GraphQL query exposable at any route, magically.
• Provide an official way to run webpack.

---