AOI
Git-native governance for coding-agent teams.
Run Codex or Claude Code normally. AOI keeps ownership, delegation, decisions, checkpoints, and verification accountable when the work becomes parallel, long-running, or evidence-sensitive.
AOI is not another agent runtime. It sits between a coding-agent client and the repository:
you set the goal
|
Codex / Claude Code reasoning, tools, implementation
|
AOI skill + hooks lifecycle context and runtime observations
|
AOI core authority, ownership, evidence, recovery
|
Git + tests + build / EDA source of truth
It targets a recurring failure mode: delegation succeeds, several agents become busy, and nobody can later prove who owned a file, which result used the current baseline, or whether “tests passed” meant that a test actually ran.
Alpha status: AOI's lifecycle and integrity rules are tested, but AOI has not established general superiority over a strong single agent or a simpler supervisor. It is a cooperative procedural guardrail, not a security sandbox. Test it on your own workload before making it the default.
Install it with your coding agent
From the repository you want to govern, paste this into Codex or Claude Code:
Inspect https://github.com/Ryan529616/aoi-orgware, the latest published release at https://pypi.org/project/aoi-orgware/, and my current repository without modifying my project. Resolve that AOI release to an exact version, tag, and commit, then show me the proposed AOI revision, project files, user-scope files, hooks, and trust boundary. Wait for my approval. Install that exact published version in an isolated tool environment, use AOI's bootstrap flow when a project-specific profile is justified, bind this repository to the current coding-agent client, preserve unrelated settings, run AOI doctor and the integration smoke checks, and use AOI for future material work. Do not claim that hooks are trusted or that a model route was observed unless the runtime provides evidence for it.
That is the intended onboarding experience. The coding agent operates AOI's deterministic CLI internally; the user should not have to memorize lifecycle commands. The approval is deliberate because installing a package and adding persistent project hooks is a supply-chain and trust decision.
Direct install
AOI publishes alpha releases on PyPI. Install the current release as an isolated tool, or install it in an activated virtual environment:
uv tool install aoi-orgware
# or
pipx install aoi-orgware
# Inside an activated virtual environment:
python -m pip install aoi-orgware
# Run one of these from the repository you want to govern.
aoi codex-init --project-name "My Project" --json
# or
aoi claude-init --project-name "My Project" --json
For a repeatable deployment, pin the reviewed release as
aoi-orgware==<reviewed-version> instead of accepting a future update.
The onboarding commands initialize AOI when needed, preserve unrelated client
settings, install the generic AOI skill once at user scope, and wire the
repository-local lifecycle hooks. Re-running is idempotently resumable. Existing
AOI projects—and interrupted first runs that already published aoi.toml—
require the current Chief credential before the command is rerun.
| Client | Repository-local integration | User-scope skill |
|---|---|---|
| Codex | .codex/config.toml and .codex/hooks.json |
$HOME/.agents/skills/aoi/SKILL.md |
| Claude Code | .claude/settings.json |
$HOME/.claude/skills/aoi/SKILL.md |
Codex still requires the user to review and trust the exact hook definitions in
its own /hooks UI. AOI does not cross that boundary on the user's behalf.
For a Windows-hosted Codex client with AOI in WSL, codex-init may need both
an explicit Windows hook launcher and a Windows user-skill path. claude-init
exposes only the user-skill-root override for its supported cross-host setup.
See each command's --help output and the
configuration guide.
Requirements:
- Python 3.11+
- Git
- Linux/WSL with reliable POSIX metadata, or native Windows on an ordinary local filesystem
Do not alternate WSL and native-Windows writers against one AOI state tree; the two lock domains do not interoperate.
Daily use
After binding, ask for work normally:
Fix the intermittent refresh-token race and add a regression test.
For material work, the coding agent should detect the AOI-bound repository and perform the governed lifecycle itself: reconstruct or create the task, choose a task-appropriate topology, claim the exact mutation scope, dispatch bounded work, record real verification, checkpoint, and close only when every gate is accounted for.
Read-only questions do not need lifecycle ceremony. Small edits stay single; parallel lanes are used only when the work is genuinely independent.
| Work shape | AOI execution |
|---|---|
| Read-only explanation | No task required |
| Low-risk edit to 1–3 exact files | Mini / governed single |
| Coupled implementation | Single causal chain |
| Independent investigation or verification | Centralized parallel |
| Cross-lane contract work with bounded coordination | Hybrid |
The user keeps authority over goals, budgets, preferences, and irreversible risk. AOI should add organizational complexity only when the task earns it.
What AOI is for
Prevent overlapping cooperative work
AOI claims exact files, trees, contracts, Git merge surfaces, or external output roots before mutation. Overlapping ownership is rejected, and exact-file claims retain a SHA-256 baseline.
Make delegation inspectable
Delegated work receives a bounded packet: objective, scope, deliverable, validation boundary, capability tier, and a short-lived dispatch permit. AOI keeps requested routing separate from runtime-observed routing. A manual fallback remains explicitly unverified.
Refuse unsupported “done” claims
AOI distinguishes acknowledgement, engineering inference, compile acceptance, runtime evidence, independent review, and other configured evidence classes. Task closure requires current qualifying evidence plus complete accounting for claims, packets, jobs, delivery, escalations, and checkpoints.
Recover across sessions
Tasks bind the Git worktree, branch, configuration digest, plan, claims, decisions, dissent, verification, and a bounded semantic checkpoint. A resumed session reconstructs from the checkpoint and current repository state instead of relying on conversational memory.
Core capabilities
| Area | What AOI records or enforces |
|---|---|
| Authority | One durable Chief lease, monotonic epochs, explicit handoff/takeover, repo-external credentials |
| Ownership | Exact file/tree/contract/external locks, conflict detection, baseline hashes |
| Delegation | Bounded packets, one-time arms, dispatch provenance, unmanaged-start incidents |
| Organization | Lanes, dependencies, Steward synthesis, decisions, directives, dissent, user escalations |
| Evidence | Content-addressed artifacts, evidence-strength boundaries, independent verification, close gates |
| Recovery | Durable checkpoints, configuration binding, deterministic backup and integrity checks |
| Resource control | Task-global execution envelopes, bounded depth, requested role/model policy without invented telemetry |
| Improvement | Qualification, canary, rollback, adoption, and deprecation records for reusable skills |
The complete semantics live in the operating policy and architecture, not in marketing copy.
Runtime truth boundary
AOI is strict about distinguishing control from observation:
| Surface | Current boundary |
|---|---|
| Post-initialization lifecycle writes | Deterministic and Chief-fenced, except narrowly pre-authorized hook consumption and incident recording |
| Cooperative file ownership | Conflicts are rejected through AOI; AOI is not an OS sandbox |
| Codex sub-agent start | Observed after creation when the trusted hook runs; not a pre-spawn boundary |
Claude governed Agent dispatch |
PreToolUse can reject a missing or stale arm before that tool runs |
Claude paths that bypass PreToolUse |
Observed and accounted for at SubagentStart when that hook runs successfully; not hard-blocked |
| Model and capability tier | Requested policy unless the runtime exposes qualifying observation |
AOI does not launch a model, store provider API keys, or replace the client's sandbox, permissions, worktrees, conversation UI, provider routing, or billing. It also cannot stop a non-cooperating process under the same OS account from editing source, Git, tools, or AOI state directly.
Read SECURITY.md before relying on AOI for sensitive workflows.
When AOI should pay for itself
AOI is most likely to help when work is:
- parallel enough for ownership or baseline conflicts to matter;
- long-running enough to cross sessions or context compaction;
- risky enough to require independent verification or explicit user decisions;
- expensive enough that failed delegation, duplicate work, or false completion is worth measuring.
For a typo, a tightly coupled local edit, or a read-only question, a strong single agent is often the better tool. “More agents” is not a success metric.
Test whether it actually helps
AOI ships a closed-alpha A/C kit for comparing a strong single agent with the AOI-governed path under matched tasks, tools, models, time limits, and external oracles:
aoi pilot-init --output ./aoi-pilot-kit --json
On native Windows, the standard library cannot verify a POSIX-style private permission boundary. Review the destination ACL, then acknowledge that boundary explicitly:
aoi pilot-init --output .\aoi-pilot-kit --allow-unverified-windows-acl --json
Measure avoided ownership/baseline incidents, independent-review findings, regressions, rework, human intervention, tokens, cost, and wall time. Failed and abandoned runs stay in the denominator. A useful result is a better quality/cost frontier, not a larger state ledger.
See the evaluation protocol and closed-alpha guide.
Documentation
- Architecture
- Operating policy
- Configuration
- Resource control
- v0.2 migration
- Release runbook
- Security boundary
- Changelog
The full CLI remains available as a deterministic action surface for agent adapters, CI, recovery, audit, and power users:
aoi --help
aoi status --json
aoi doctor --json
Development
git clone https://github.com/Ryan529616/aoi-orgware.git
cd aoi-orgware
python -m venv .venv
# PowerShell: .\.venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
# POSIX: . .venv/bin/activate
python -m pip install -e .
python -m unittest discover -s tests -v
AOI is pure Python with no runtime dependencies. CI covers Linux and Windows on Python 3.11 and 3.12.
License
MIT. See LICENSE.
Metadata
Release files for aoi-orgware 0.2.3
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| aoi_orgware-0.2.3.tar.gz | 480.6 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aoi_orgware-0.2.3-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 804.0 kB
Release files / aoi_orgware-0.2.3.tar.gz
| Download URL | aoi_orgware-0.2.3.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 480.6 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
9f214d7daee37c3ce22162aa5ef81e0fbaa298422b89ad85c77ef905c1e6616a
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
db6307b107650fba53baa331ac05f25108750c64f757adb194e40d51bb0bd73c
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.13
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 16, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / aoi_orgware-0.2.3-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | aoi_orgware-0.2.3-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 323.4 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
5da5a0d7eee2190cd0343cb51df4c3f4b6ee3b3b9026d4fc247d8cb19a220d49
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c1ee6281b84d1efcb079263a7c0a7a3f3b85b10bede68251e0eaf02892149846
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.13
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 16, 2026.
Transparency log