A powerful & Pythonic command-line parsing library. Give your program Appeal!
Project description
Copyright 2021-2023 by Larry Hastings
Quickstart
import appeal
import sys
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def hello(name):
print(f"Hello, {name}!")
app.main()
Here's a simple fgrep
utility:
import appeal
import sys
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def fgrep(pattern, *files, ignore_case=False):
if not files:
files = ['-']
print_file = len(files) > 1
if ignore_case:
pattern = pattern.lower()
for file in files:
if file == "-":
f = sys.stdin
else:
f = open(file, "rt")
for line in f:
if ignore_case:
match = pattern in line.lower()
else:
match = pattern in line
if match:
if print_file:
print(file + ": ", end="")
print(line.rstrip())
if file != "-":
f.close()
if __name__ == "__main__":
app.main()
Overview
Appeal is a command-line argument processing library for
Python, like argparse
, optparse
, getopt
,
docopt
, Typer
, and click
. But Appeal takes a
refreshing new approach.
Other libraries have complicated, cumbersome interfaces that force you to repeat yourself over and over. Appeal leverages Python's rich function call interface, making it effortless to define your command-line interface. You write Python functions, and Appeal translates them into command-line options and arguments.
Appeal provides amazing power and flexibility--but it's also intuitive, because it mirrors Python itself. If you understand how to write Python functions, you're already halfway to understanding Appeal!
Appeal has only one dependency, my big library.
Appeal is currently only supported for POSIX platforms (UNIX, Linux, BSD, OS X, etc). It might work on Windows but this has not yet been tested.
A New And Appealing Approach
Appeal isn't like other command-line parsing libraries. In fact, you really shouldn't think of Appeal as a "command-line parsing library" per se. And, although you work with Appeal by passing in functions for Appeal to call, you shouldn't think of these functions as "callbacks".
Appeal lets you design APIs callable from the command-line. It's just like any other Python library API--except that the caller calls you from the command-line instead of from Python. Appeal is the mechanism converting between these two domains: it translates your API into command-line semantics, then translates the user's command-line back into calls to your API.
This raises another good point: the API you build using Appeal also often makes for a very nice automation API, allowing your program to also be used as a library by other programs with minimal effort.
Basics
Taxonomy
Let's start by establishing the terminology we'll use for command-lines, based on command-line idioms established by POSIX and by popular programs. Here's a sample command-line, illustrating all the various types of things you might ever see:
% ./script.py --debug add --flag ro -v -xz myfile.txt
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | argument
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | multiple short options
| | | | | |
| | | | | short option
| | | | |
| | | | oparg
| | | |
| | | long option
| | |
| | command
| |
| global long option
|
program name
Command-lines are a sequence of strings separated by whitespace. The meaning of each string can depend both on the position of the string and the characters in the string itself.
An argument is any whitespace-delimited string on the
command-line that doesn't start with a -
(minus sign).
Unless it's an oparg--which we'll talk about in a minute--the
meaning of an argument is defined by its position. For example,
if you ran:
fgrep WM_CREATE window.c
WM_CREATE
and window.c
would be arguments; the first argument, WM_CREATE
,
would be the string you wanted to search for, and window.c
would be the name of the file you wanted to search.
A command is a special kind of argument some programs
use to specify what function you want the program to perform.
A good example of a program that uses commands is git
;
when you run git add
or git commit
, add
and commit
are both commands. The command is always the first
argument to a program that uses them.
If a string on the command-line starts with a -
(minus
sign), that's an option. There are two styles of
option: short options and long options.
Short options start with a single dash, -
. This is
followed by one or more individual characters, which
are the short option strings. In the above example,
we specify two sets of short options: the first is -v
,
the second is -xz
. You can combine options togther,
and it's the same as specifying them separately. We
could have said -vxz
, or -v -x -z
; these both do
the same thing. When we talk about short options, we
say the word "dash" followed by the letter. For example,
-v
would be pronounced "dash v".
Long options start with two dashes, --
. Everything
after the two dashes is the name of the option. In the
above example, we can see one long option, --flag
.
Again, when we talk about long options, we say the
dashes out loud, followed by the words from the option.
For example, --flag
would be pronounced "dash dash flag".
Both types of options can optionally take one (or more)
arguments of their own. An argument to an option is
called an oparg. In the above example, the long option
--flag
takes the oparg ro
.
Finally, there are global options and command options. Global options apply to the entire program, are always available, and are specified before the command. Command options are command-specific, and appear after the command. Global options can be long options or short options; command options can be long options or short options, too.
Remapping Python To The Command-Line
Now let's consider a Python function call:
def fgrep(pattern, filename, *, ignore_case=False):
...
We can draw some similarities between Python function calls and command-lines.
For example, they both support arguments where position is significant. A command-line argument is similar to a Python function positional parameter, in that they're both identified by position.
Python function calls and command-lines also both support arguments identified by name. A command-line option is similar to a Python keyword-only argument.
This leads us to the fundamental concept behind Appeal. With Appeal, you write a Python function, and tell Appeal that it represents a command. Appeal examines the function, translating its parameters into command-line features. Positional parameters become command-line arguments, and keyword-only parameters become options.
(Technically, Appeal translates both positional parameters and positional-or-keyword parameters into arguments. For the sake of clarity and consiseness, I'll always refer to these collectively as positional parameters.)
Hello, World!
Let's see Appeal in action, with our first example.
In all our examples we're going to assume your program
is called script.py
. Let's say script.py
looked like
this:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def hello(name):
print(f"Hello, {name}!")
app.main()
If you now ran python3 script.py help hello
, you'd
see usage information for your hello
command.
It'd start like this:
usage: script.py hello name
Already, a lot has happened! Let's go over it piece by piece:
- We created an
Appeal
object calledapp
. This object will handle processing the command-line and calling the appropriate command function. - We decorated the function
hello()
with@app.command()
, a method call on our Appeal object. This tells Appeal thathello()
should be a command, using the name of the function as the command string, and translating the function's parameters into the command-line parameters. So our command-line command is calledhello
. We call a function decorated with@app.command()
a command function. - Our
hello()
command function takes one positional parameters,name
. Therefore, ourhello
command on the command-line takes one positional argument, which we identify asname
in the usage string. - Appeal also automatically created simple help for our program, displaying usage information. Usage shows you what command-line options and arguments the command will accept.
So! If you ran this command at the command-line:
% python3 script.py hello world
Appeal would call your hello()
function like this:
hello('world')
and you'd be rewarded with:
Hello, world!
The return value from your command function is the return
code for your program. If you return None
or 0
, that's
considered success; returning a non-zero integer indicates
failure. (And if your function exits without a return
statement, Python behaves as if your function ended with
return None
.)
Default Values And *args
Let's change up our example, and add an optional parameter:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def fgrep(pattern, filename=None):
print(f"fgrep {pattern} {filename}")
app.main()
Now our command is called fgrep
, and it takes two parameters.
The second one, filename
, is optional, with a default value of None
.
You can of course specify both parameters yourself. Running this:
% python3 script.py fgrep WM_CREATE window.c
results in Appeal calling your fgrep()
function like this:
fgrep('WM_CREATE', 'window.c')
But you can also omit the filename
parameter.
If you run this command at the command-line:
% python3 script.py fgrep WM_CREATE
Appeal would call fgrep()
like this:
fgrep('WM_CREATE', None)
Actually that's not 100% accurate. When Appeal
builds the arguments to call your fgrep()
function,
it only passes in the arguments you passed in on the
command-line. So actually Appeal calls your fgrep()
function like this:
fgrep('WM_CREATE')
And it's Python that sets the filename
parameter to None
.
What else can Appeal command functions do? Well, they can
have a *args
parameter. Naturally, a command function that
takes *args
(internally called a var_positional
parameter) can accept as many positional arguments as the
user wants to supply. Here's a demonstration:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def fgrep(pattern, *filenames):
print(f"fgrep {pattern} {filenames}")
app.main()
Now the user could pass in no filenames, one filename,
fifty filenames--as many as they want! They'd all be
collected in a tuple and passed in to fgrep()
in the
filenames
parameter.
Options, Opargs, And Keyword-Only Parameters
Now let's examine what Appeal does with keyword-only parameters. Let's add three keyword-only parameters to our example:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def fgrep(pattern, *filenames, color="", number=0, ignore_case=False):
print(f"fgrep {pattern} {filenames} {color!r} {number} {ignore_case}")
app.main()
Now the fgrep
command-line usage looks like this:
usage: script.py fgrep [-c|--color str] [-n|--number int] [-i|--ignore_case] pattern [str]...
Again, a lot just happened.
First, I'll remind you, keyword-only parameters
are presented as options on the command-line.
Appeal automatically took each keyword-only parameter,
added '--'
to the front of the parameter name,
and turned that into an option. (Also, if the parameter
name has any underscores, Appeal turns those into dashes.)
Second, Appeal also automatically uses the first letter of a
keyword-only argument as a short option. So the
color
keyword-only parameter becomes both the --color
and -c
options. When running your program, the user
can use -c
or --color
interchangably. The same goes
for -i
and --ignore_case
, and for -n
and --number
.
(What if you have two keyword-only parameters that start
with the same letter? The first one gets the short option.
If we added a keyword-only parameter named credit
to the
end of fgrep()
's parameter list, Appeal would map color
to --color
and -c
, but only map credit
to --credit
.)
Third, options are always optional. (As a pedantic wag might put it--"the clue's right there in the name.") Therefore, in Appeal, keyword-only parameters to command functions must always have a default value. (Python programmers usually have default values for their keyword-only parameters anyway, so this requirement isn't a big deal.)
Fourth, notice that --color
takes an argument, or oparg.
Appeal noticed that the color
parameter had a default
value of ""
--its default value is a str
.
So Appeal infers that you want the user to supply an oparg
to --color
. If the user specifies --color
on the
command-line, it must be followed by an oparg, and Appeal
will take the string off the command-line and pass it
straight into the color
parameter.
Fifth, --number
also takes an oparg, but it has a default of 0
.
Appeal infers from that that --number
should be an int
.
Appeal automatically converts the string from the command-line
into a Python object for you, using the type of the default value.
(Appeal did that for --color
too--except --color
takes a str,
so no conversion is necessary.) When the user provides an oparg
to --number
on the command-line, it must be followed by an
oparg; Appeal will take that oparg, pass it in to int
, then take
the return value from int
and pass it in to the number
parameter.
Finally, ignore_case
has a default value of False
.
Boolean values for options are a special case: they don't
take an oparg. All they do is negate the default value.
So if the user specifies -i
once on the command-line,
Appeal would pass True
in to the ignore_case
parameter.
(By the way, a default value of None
is a second
special case. If a positional or keyword-only parameter
has a default value of None
, Appeal behaves as if the
type of the default is str
. It consumes an argument
or oparg from the command-line and passes it in unchanged
to that parameter.)
Let's put it all together! If you ran this command at the command-line:
% python3 script.py fgrep -i --number 3 --color blue WM_CREATE window.c
Appeal would call fgrep()
like this:
fgrep('WM_CREATE', 'window.c', color='blue', number=3, ignore_case=True)
And if you ran this command at the command-line:
% python3 script.py fgrep --color green boogaloo
Appeal would call fgrep()
like this:
fgrep('boogaloo', color='green')
The Global Command, Subcommands, And The Default Command
Many programs that support "commands" also have
"global options". Global options are options
specified on the command-line before the command.
For example, in the example command-line at the top
of this document, script.py
takes a --debug
option specified before the command--which makes it
a "global option".
Appeal supports global options, too. It's simple:
write your command function like normal, but
instead of decorating it with Appeal.command()
, decorate
it with Appeal.global_command()
. Appeal will process all
those options before the command, and call your global
command function.
Appeal.global_command()
also gets used for programs that
don't use "commands". Although the "command" command-line
paradigm is popular these days, most programs don't bother
with them. For example, ls
, grep
, and... hey! python
itself! None of these programs support commands, but they
all support command-line arguments and options.
Naturally, Appeal supports this behavior. Simply decorate
one function with Appeal.global_command()
and don't add
any command functions.
On the flip side of this coin, Appeal also supports subcommands. This is a common feature of command-line parsing libraries, though it's rarely-used in practice. The idea is, your command can itself be followed by another command.
To add a subcommand to your Appeal instance, just decorate your command function with two chained command calls, specifying the name of the existing command in the first call, like so:
@app.command()
def db(...):
...
@app.command("db").command()
def deploy(...):
...
This adds a deploy
subcommand under the db
command.
So now the whole command-line looks something like this:
script.py [global arguments and options] db [db arguments and options] deploy [deploy arguments and options]
Finally, what should Appeal do if your program
takes commands, but the user doesn't supply one?
That's what the default command is for. The
default command is a command function Appeal will
run for you if your Appeal instance has commands,
and the user doesn't supply one. For example,
if script.py
has ten different commands, but the
user just runs
script.py
without any arguments, Appeal would run the default command.
If you don't specify a default command, Appeal has a built-in default default command. The default default command raises a usage error, which means it prints basic help information and exits.
To specify your own default command, just decorate a
command function with the Appeal.default_command()
decorator.
For example, if you wanted your program to run the status
command when the user didn't specify a command, you could
do this:
@app.default_command()
def default():
return status()
Notice that the default command doesn't take any arguments or options. It simply can't accept any, by definition.
(If the user specified options without a command, they'd be considered "global options" and would be processed by the global command. And if the user specified an argument, that would automatically be the name of the command to run.)
And yes, subcommands can have a default command too:
@app.command('db').default_command()
def db_default():
return db_status()
Annotations And Introspection
Python 3 supports annotations for function parameters, meant to conceptually represent types. Appeal supports annotations too; they explicitly tell Appeal what type of object a parameter requires. For example:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def fgrep(pattern, *filenames, id:float=None):
print(f"fgrep {pattern} {filenames} {id}")
app.main()
Here id
has a default value of None
, but it also has
an explicit annotation of float
. If the user uses --id
on the command-line, it must be followed by an oparg,
which Appeal will convert to a Python object by calling float
.
(And, as you can see, the annotation and the type of the default
don't necessarily have to agree... although it's usually a
good idea.)
Although annotations are meant to represent types, Appeal actually accepts any callable--it can be a type, or a user-defined class, or just a regular function. Appeal calls these annotations converters.
Here's how Appeal decides on the converter for a parameter, from highest-priority to lowest-priority:
- If the signature for that parameter has an annotation, Appeal uses the annotation as the converter.
- If the signature for that parameter doesn't have an
annotation, but does have a default value, Appeal
will use
type(default)
as the converter in most cases. The exceptions:- If
type(default)
isNoneType
, Appeal will usestr
instead. - If
type(default)
isbool
, and the parameter is a keyword-only parameter, Appeal will use a special internal class that implements the special-case "negate the default" behavior for options with boolean default values.
- If
- If the signature for that parameter lacks both an annotation
and a default value, Appeal uses
str
as the converter.
Converters are surprisingly flexible. For example, Appeal will introspect the converter for a keyword-only parameter and map all its positional arguments into opargs. That's how Appeal supports options that take multiple opargs: you simply annotate the keyword-only parameter with a converter that takes multiple arguments. Appeal will also pay attention to the annotations for the converter's own arguments, and use those to convert the strings from the command-line into Python objects.
Let's tie it all together with another example:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
def int_and_float(integer: int, real: float):
return [integer*3, real*5]
@app.command()
def fgrep(pattern, *filenames, position:int_and_float=(0, 0.0)):
print(f"fgrep {pattern} {filenames} {position}")
app.main()
Here, Appeal would introspect fgrep()
, then also
introspect int_and_float()
. The resulting usage
string would now look like this:
usage: script.py fgrep [-p|--position integer real] pattern [filenames]...
--position
takes two opargs. Appeal would
call int
on the first one and float
on the second
one. It would then call int_and_float()
with those
values, and the return value of int_and_float()
would
be passed in to the position
parameter on fgrep()
.
So now if you ran:
% python3 script.py fgrep -p 2 13 funkyfresh
Appeal would call:
fgrep('funkyfresh', position=[6, 65.0])
Finally, let's change the example to demonstrate something else: although converters can be any callable, user-defined classes work fine too. And Appeal can correctly infer the type based on the default value for any type. So consider this example:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
class IntAndFloat:
def __init__(self, integer: int, real: float):
self.integer = integer * 3
self.real = real * 5
def __repr__(self):
return f"<IntAndFloat {self.integer} {self.real}>"
@app.command()
def fgrep(pattern, *filenames, position=IntAndFloat(0, 0.0)):
print(f"fgrep {pattern} {filenames} {position}")
app.main()
This example behaves essentially the same as the previous example
in this section, except the formatting of position
is slightly
different. But the command-line usage is exactly the same!
Appeal inferred the converter for position
based on the type
of its default value, then introspected that type to determine
how many opargs it should consume from the command-line and how
to convert them.
An important note about annotations
If you use static type analysis in your project, your static type analyzer may not enjoy analyzing Python code using Appeal. Static type analyzers are designed to understand "type hints", a means of specifying static type information introduced in Python 3.5 with the
typing
module. But Appeal doesn't use type hints, and there are some ways Appeal uses annotations that static type analyzers may not like.Fortunately, there are ways to get static type analyzers to work alongside Appeal.
First, you can decorate your Appeal command functions and converters with
@typing.no_type_check()
. This should only be necessary if you use functions as annotations; if you only ever use types and classes, this shouldn't be necessary.Second, if you're using Python 3.9 or newer, you can use
typing.Annotated
with your annotations.typing.Annotated
allows you to specify an ordered list of values, and static type hints only ever use the first value. Appeal also handlestyping.Annotated
, but Appeal only ever uses the last value. This makes it easy--you can have both types of annotations, side by side, and both static type checkers and Appeal are perfectly happy.
Converter Flexibility
You can use almost any function as an annotation... within reason. Appeal will introspect your annotation, determine its input parameters, and call it to convert the command-line argument into the argument it passes in to your command function.
For example, what if you wanted an option that accepted
a string which gets broken up based on a delimiter substring?
This is a common idiom for configure
scripts on UNIX-like
platforms; for example,
Python's own configure
script
supports this option:
--with-dbmliborder=db1:db2:...
Happily that's easy to do in Appeal. Just write a converter function that accepts a string, breaks it into substrings however you like, and returns the list.
Although... you don't need to bother! Appeal also provides
a converter that does it for you, called appeal.split()
.
You pass in as many delimiter strings as you want, and
appeal.split()
will split the command-line across all of
them. (If you don't specify any delimiters, appeal.split()
will split at every whitespace character.)
Specifying An Option More Than Once
One thing you might have noticed by now: the interfaces
you've seen only allow Appeal to handle command-lines
where an option can be specified either zero times or
one time. What if you want the user to be able to
specify an option three times? Or ten? That's what the
MultiOption
class is for. MultiOption
objects
are converters that allow options to be specified
multiple times.
MultiOption
isn't useful by itself; it's only an
abstract base class. To make use of it you'll
need to use a subclass--or create your own.
This time, let's start with some examples. Appeal
provides three useful subclasses of MultiOption
:
counter
, accumulator
, and mapping
.
First, let's look at counter
. counter
simply counts the number of times an option is
specified on the command-line. This is a somewhat
common idiom for "verbose" options; a program
that supports -v
to mean verbose may allow
you to specify -v
more than once to make
it more verbose. Here's how you'd do that
with Appeal:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def fgrep(*, verbose:appeal.counter()=0):
print(f"fgrep verbose={verbose!r}")
app.main()
If the user ran
% python3 script.py fgrep
Appeal would call
fgrep()
allowing Python to pass in the default value of 0
to verbose
.
And if the user ran
% python3 script.py fgrep -v --verbose -v
Appeal would call
fgrep(verbose=3)
accumulator
handles options that take a single oparg.
It remembers them all and returns them in a single array.
Like so:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def fgrep(*, pattern:appeal.accumulator=[]):
print(f"fgrep pattern={pattern!r}")
app.main()
If the user ran
% python3 script.py fgrep --pattern three -p four --pattern fiv5
Appeal would call
fgrep(pattern=['three', 'four', 'fiv5'])
What if you don't want strings, but another type? Using crazy
science magic from the future, accumulator
is actually
parameterized. You can say:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def fgrep(*, pattern:appeal.accumulator[int]=[]):
print(f"fgrep pattern={pattern!r}")
app.main()
and now the opargs to --pattern
will all be converted using int.
You can even specify multiple types as arguments to the
parameterized version of accumulator
, separated by commas.
The option will then require multiple opargs and convert
them to the types specified.
mapping
is like accumulator
except it returns a
dict
instead of a list
. An option annotated with mapping()
consumes two positional arguments from the command-line;
the first one is the key, the second one is the value.
(You can also parameterize mapping
the same way you parameterize
accumulator
, though you can only specify exactly two types.)
Of course, you can also subclass MultiOption
to make your own
converter classes with custom behavior. MultiOption
subclasses
can override these three methods:
class MultiOption:
def init(self, default):
...
def option(self, ...):
...
def render(self):
...
Well, actually, subclasses are required to override
option()
and render()
. But init()
is optional.
If you then specify a subclass of MultiOption
as an
annotation on a keyword-only parameter of an
Appeal command function, several things happen:
- If that option is specified one or more times on
the command-line, Appeal will instantiate exactly
one of these objects and call its
init()
method. - Every time the user specifies that option on
the command-line, Appeal will call the
option()
method on the object. - After finishing processing the command-line,
Appeal will call the
render()
method on the object, and pass the value it returns as the argument to that keyword-only parameter.
The most powerful part of this interface: you can
redefine option()
to suit your needs--it supports
the same sort of polymorphism as annotations do.
Appeal will introspect your option()
method to
determine how many opargs to consume from the
command-line, and how to convert them.
Let's demonstrate all this with another example.
If you want your option to take two opargs,
with one being an int
and the other being
a float
, you would define option()
in your
subclass as:
class MyMultiOption(appeal.MultiOption):
def option(self, a:int, b:float):
....
Every time the user specified your option,
it would take two opargs, and they would be
converted into an int
and a float
before
calling your option()
method. It's up to
you to decide how to store them, and how to
render them into a single value returned
by your render()
method.
MultiOption
is a subclass of a general
Option
class. Option
behaves identically
to MultiOption
, except it only permits
specifying the option once on the command-line,
which means it will only your option()
method once.
You usually don't need to bother with making subclasses
of Option
--it's usually better to just use a class
directly, like our class IntAndFloat
example.
The only feature you get by subclassing Option
is,
you get the default value for the parameter passed in
to your constructor.
(The downside of subclassing Option
and MultiOption
is that it makes exporting your Appeal API as an automation
API a little less convenient for the user, because your
users will have to construct these objects and feed
values into them by calling the option
method.)
Data Validation
What if you want to restrict the data the user provides on the command-line? That's simple, just use a converter! Appeal provides a couple sample converters for data validation, but it's easy to write your own.
The classic example is a parameter where you can only use one
of a list of values. For that, you can use Appeal's validate()
converter. For example, this command restricts the direction
parameter to one of six canonical directions:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
def go(direction:appeal.validate('up', 'down', 'left', 'right', 'forward', 'back')):
print(f"go direction={direction!r}")
app.main()
You can pass in an explicit type using a type=
named argument to validate()
; if you omit it,
it uses the type of the first argument.
Appeal also has a built-in range validator
called validate_range()
. It takes start
and stop
arguments the same way Python's
range()
function does. Note that validate_range()
differs from Python's range()
in one subtle way:
values equal to stop
are allowed.
If you prefer, you can "clamp"
the value the user passed in to the range,
by supplying the argument clamp=True
to
validate_range()
. In that case, if the value
the user specifies is outside the range, validate_range()
will return the closest value of either start
or stop
.
(That's why validate_range()
allows the
value to be equal to stop
. clamp
would
be annoying to use if stop
itself was an
illegal value--particularly if the types
were floats.)
Appeal validation functions are straightforward to write.
So, if these are insufficient to your needs,
you can easily write your own. Take a look
at the implementations of validate()
and
validate_range()
inside Appeal to see one way to do it!
Multiple Options For The Same Parameter
Some programs have a set of options on their command-line that are mutually exclusive. Consider this simple-minded command-line:
go [--north|--south|--east|--west]
That is, you want the user to be able to "go" in one of those four directions, but only one. How would you do that in Appeal?
Easy. You simply define multiple options that write to the same parameter. All the behavior you've seen so far is using the default way of mapping keyword-only parameters to options. But actually Appeal allows you to make your own mappings. You can map a parameter as many ways as you want, even using different converters!
To manually define your own options, use the Appeal.option()
method on your Appeal instance. It's a decorator you
apply to your command function. The first argument is
the name of the parameter you want the option to write
to. After that is one or more options you want to
map to this parameter. Appeal.option()
also takes
default
and annotation
keyword-only parameters,
allowing you to specify respectively the default value or
annotation for this option.
Here's a simple example of how to implement the above go
command with Appeal:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
@app.command()
@app.option("direction", "--north", annotation=lambda: "north")
@app.option("direction", "--south", annotation=lambda: "south")
@app.option("direction", "--east", annotation=lambda: "east")
@app.option("direction", "--west", annotation=lambda: "west")
def go(*, direction='north'):
print(f"go direction={direction!r}")
app.main()
All these annotations return a string. But actually you can
return any type you want--and you can even map multiple
annotations that return different types to the same parameter.
You can even annotate with a MultiOption
to allow specifying
that option multiple times!
Note that, whenever you use the option()
decorator
to map your own options onto a parameter, Appeal won't add
its default options for that parameter. It'll only have
the options you explicitly set. Which means, for example,
that in the sample code above, there aren't any short options
for the options we created. -n
won't work, only --north
.
One final thing. Your command function can accept **kwargs
too. The only things that will go into it are options you
create with Appeal.option()
, which map to parameters that
don't otherwise exist.
Recursive Converters
You already know that you can pass in a converter that takes multiple arguments, and Appeal will consume multiple arguments from the command-line to fill it. And if the arguments to that converter have annotations, Appeal will call those functions to convert the command-line argument into the type your converter wants.
But what if you did... this?
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
def int_float(i: int, f: float):
return (i, f)
def my_converter(i_f: int_float, s: str):
return [i_f, s]
@app.command()
def recurse(a:str, b:my_converter=[(0, 0), '']):
print(f"recurse a={a!r} b={b!r}")
app.main()
The my_converter()
parameter i_f
is a positional
parameter with an annotation that, itself,
takes two positional parameters.
Would it surprise you to know--yes, it actually works!
Converters have been fully recursive this whole time.
Actually this fact has been hiding in plain sight
all along--all the examples using int_and_float()
are recursive
too, because int_and_float()
has parameters annotated with
int
and float
. Of course, those functions only take
a single string argument; my_converter()
takes two
annotated positional parameters.
But the principles remain the same.
Still, this is a more complex situation than we've seen before.
recurse
takes a positional parameter b
that has a default
value, but its converter takes multiple positional parameters,
and one of those also has a converter that takes multiple
positional parameters. How does Appeal map this to the
command-line?
Appeal "flattens" the tree of converter functions into a linear series of arguments and options. In this case the usage string would look like this:
recurse a [i f s]
This tells you the recurse
command takes either one or four command-line
arguments. That optional group of three command-line arguments
has a special name in Appeal: it's an "argument group".
Technically, Appeal views this command-line as taking two
"argument groups": the first group is required, and consumes
one command-line argument; the second group is optional, and
consumes three command-line arguments.
(We actually saw our first "argument group" in the second example in the Annotations And Introspection section above, but that time the argument group was an oparg.)
Now let's add an option and see what changes:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
def int_float(i: int, f: float):
return (i, f)
def my_converter(i_f: int_float, s: str, *, verbose=False):
return [i_f, s, verbose]
@app.command()
def recurse2(a:str, b:my_converter=[(0, 0), '', False]):
print(f"recurse2 a={a!r} b={b!r}")
app.main()
Now the usage looks like this:
recurse2 a [i [-v|--verbose] f s]
Notice the way Appeal renders it in the usage string--the options aren't created until after the first argument in the optional argument group. This may seem strange but that's how it works. That's how it has to work.
Why? From a high conceptual level, Appeal doesn't know that you've "entered" the optional argument group until it sees the user supply the first argument for that group. So it doesn't create the options defined in that group until after the first argument.
This high conceptual level corresponds exactly to how Appeal calls your function. Consider, if the user runs this command:
recurse2 xyz
Appeal calls your function like so:
recurse2('xyz')
Since Appeal never called my_converter()
, it can't
map --verbose
. It can only map --verbose
once it
knows it's going to call my_converter()
, and that
only becomes true the moment you supply that second
command-line argument.
Once you do supply that second command-line argument, you have to supply two more, for a total of four.
recurse2 pdq 1 2 xyz
Appeal calls your function like so:
recurse2('pdq', my_converter(int('1'), float('2'), xyz))
recurse2 pdq 1 2 xyz
And in this example, you can supply the -v
or --verbose
anywhere after
the second parameter. So if your command-line looks like this:
recurse2 pdq 1 2 xyz -v
Appeal calls recurse()
like this:
recurse2('pdq', my_converter(int('1'), float('2'), xyz, verbose=True))
Take a look back at all the examples in this document, and consider that anywhere you specify a function or type, you can pass in nearly any callable you like.
For example, the parameterized version of mapping
isn't limited just to simple types.
If you used mapping[str, int_float]
as the annotation
for a keyword-only parameter, that option would consume
three arguments on the command line: a str
, an int
, and
a float
, and the dictionary would map strings to 2-tuples
of ints and floats.
Now you're starting to see how powerful Appeal's converters really are!
Now Witness The Power Of This Fully Armed And Operational Battle Station
But recursive converters are just the beginning!
Buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy--because Kansas is going bye-bye.
--Cypher, "The Matrix" (1999)
Options that map other options
What if you did... this?
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
def my_converter(a: int, *, verbose=False):
return [a, verbose]
@app.command()
def inception(*, option:my_converter=[0, False]):
print(f"inception option={option!r}")
app.main()
Woah, that works too! We've created an option that
itself takes an option. If you run fgrep --option
,
you can now also specify -v
or --verbose
--but only
after you've specified --option
.
In case you're wondering: Appeal.option()
must
decorate the function that takes the parameter you're
mapping an option to. So if you want to define
explicit options for the verbose
parameter to
my_converter
in the above example, you'd
decorate my_converter
with Appeal.option()
calls,
not inception
. (This also means, everywhere you
use my_converter
as a converter, it will behave
the same, including taking the same options.)
Multiple options that aren't MultiOptions
We're just getting started! How about this:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
def my_converter(a: int, *, verbose=False):
return [a, verbose]
@app.command()
def repetition(*args:my_converter):
print(f"repetition args={args!r}")
app.main()
That works too, and I bet you're already guessing what it
does. This version of weird
accepts as many int
arguments
as the user wants to specify on the command-line, and each one
can optionally take its own -v
or --verbose
flag.
Positional parameters that only consume options
I'll give you one more crazy example:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
class Logging:
def __init__(self, *, verbose=False, log_level='info'):
self.verbose = verbose
self.log_level = log_level
def __repr__(self):
return f"<Logging verbose={self.verbose!r} log_level={self.log_level}>"
@app.command()
def mixin(log:Logging):
print(f"mixin log={log!r}")
app.main()
Can you guess what usage for mixin
looks like? (Probably!)
It looks like this:
mixin [-v|--verbose] [-l|--log-level str]
Even though log
is a positional parameter, it doesn't consume
any positional arguments on the command-line. The Logging
converter only adds options! This is what object-oriented
programmers might call a "mix-in". With the Logging
converter,
you can add logging options to every one of your commands, without
having to re-implement it each time. (Though in most cases it's
probably better to add such options to a global command function.)
Internally this works exactly like you'd expect. Since the
log
parameter consumes no command-line arguments, Appeal will
always call its converter. Specifying any of the options will
set arguments for that call. And the resulting Logging
object
will be passed in as the argument to log
.
What's really going on here is that, from Appeal's perspective,
there's no difference between a "command function" and a
"converter". A command function is just a converter that
happens to be mapped to a command. So anything you can do
with a command function, you can do with a converter too.
A converter can define options, it can be decorated with
app.option()
(or app.argument()
which we haven't
discussed yet), it can have accept any kind of parameter defined
by Python, and any parameter can use (almost) any converter.
And those converters can recursively use other converters.
Realy, anything can be used with anything:
- Converters for positional parameters
can take positional parameters, or keyword-only parameters, or
*args
, or**kwargs
. - Converters for keyword-only parameters
can take positional parameters, or keyword-only parameters, or
*args
, or**kwargs
. - Converters for
*args
can take positional parameters, or keyword-only parameters, or*args
, or**kwargs
. - Command functions can use any converter.
- The global command function can use any converter.
By now you can see the expressive power Appeal gives you. Of course, you'll rarely use only a fraction of that power. But it's reassuring to know that, whatever command-line API metaphor you want to express, it's not just possible in Appeal--it's easy.
Classes, Instances, And Preparers
Maybe you've noticed--all the examples so far have used standard Python functions as Appeal commands. What about method calls? Can you use those for commands? The answer is, yes of course! But it's slightly more complicated.
Appeal's whole purpose in life is to call functions by pulling data from the command-line. Whenever it sees a positional parameter on a function, it thinks "okay, I'm gonna have to supply an argument to that". So if you map an unbound method call to a command:
class MyApp:
@app.command()
def sum(self, *operands: int):
return sum(*operands)
Appeal would see the self
parameter and think "aha! I
need to pass a string in there!" We need to prevent
Appeal from seeing that parameter in the first place.
There are two major techniques to handle this. The first
is straightforward, if a bit inflexible: create the instance
of your class first, then call app.command()()
on the
bound instances. Like this:
app = appeal.Appeal()
class MyApp:
def sum(self, *operands: int):
return sum(*operands)
o = MyApp()
app.command()(o.sum)
app.main()
Since you pass in the already-bound method to Appeal, it doesn't
even see the self
parameter in the signature. (The signature
of a bound method doesn't include the self
parameter.)
This works fine... but maybe it looks a little weird. We're no
longer decorating functions (or methods), instead we're calling
the decorator function directly and passing in the bound method.
It also restricts us to one instance of MyApp
per Appeal
instance, which might be restrictive.
The other technique uses a little magic to provide a convenient
and familiar-looking interface. Appeal.app_class()
gives you
two decorators; you use one to decorate your class, and the
other to decorate methods in the class. Appeal will instantiate
your class for you, and use your __init__
method as your app's
"global command" to handle global options!
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
app_class, command_method = app.app_class()
@app_class()
class MyApp:
def __init__(self, *, verbose=False):
print(f"MyApp init verbose={verbose!r}")
self.verbose = verbose
def __repr__(self):
return "<MyApp>"
@command_method()
def add(self, a, b, c):
print(f"MyApp add self={self!r} a={a!r} b={b!r} c={c!r} self.verbose={self.verbose!r}")
app.main()
Behind the scenes, this uses a CommandMethodPreparer
object
to handle late-binding the method to the object. Since
Appeal.app_class()
is a little inflexible, you may want
to use these objects directly. You can create one manually
by calling Appeal.command_method()
. Here's an example showing
how to use one:
import appeal
app = appeal.Appeal()
command_method = app.command_method()
class MyApp:
def __init__(self, id):
self.id = id
def __repr__(self):
return f"<MyApp id={self.id!r}>"
@command_method()
def add(self, a, b, c):
print(f"MyApp add self={self!r} a={a!r} b={b!r} c={c!r}")
my_app = MyApp("dingus")
p = app.processor()
p.preparer(command_method.bind(my_app))
p.main()
This is the first time you're seeing the Processor
object. All the runtime information for processing
a command-line lives in the Processor
object; in
fact, Appeal.main
and Appeal.process
are both
thin wrappers over their equivalent methods on the
Processor
object. Moving all the runtime information
into the Processor
object lets you process multiple
command-lines with the same Appeal object, even
simultaneously!
The CommandMethodPreparer
object is at the core of how Appeal
handles late-binding of methods to objects. First,
you decorate the method calls of your class with this object.
You then call the bind
method on that object to pass in the
instance of that class you want to bind those methods to--though
app_class()
takes care of that for you. bind()
returns a callable
you pass in to Processor.preparer
, which binds the method to that
instance before Appeal calls it.
Under the covers, CommandMethodPreparer
wraps the method
with a functools.partial
object, passing in a placeholder
object for the self
parameter. Then command_method.bind()
replaces the placeholder for the real instance. For maximum
compatibility, it actually uses getattr()
to bind the
instance to the method.
Writing Help
Appeal automatically generates usage for your command functions. But it's up to you to write the documentation explaining what those commands and arguments and options actually do.
There's very complete notes on how to write documentation in Appeal,
see appeal/notes/writing.documentation.txt
in the Appeal source
distribution. In a nutshell, you write docstring in a particular way,
and Appeal can mechanically parse them and combine them together.
So you document each converter separately, and Appeal smooshes all
these bits of documentation together to produce the help for your
command function.
(One note: the main help for your program should be the docstring for your Appeal instance's global command.)
API Reference
Appeal(help=True, version=None, positional_argument_usage_format="{name}", default_options=default_options)
Creates a new Appeal instance.
If help
is true, Appeal automatically adds help support to
your program:
- Adds hard-coded
-h
and--help
options that print basic help. - If your Appeal instance has any commands, and you haven't defined
a
help
command, automatically adds ahelp
command.
If version
is true, it should be a string denoting the version
of your program. Appeal will automatically add version support
to your program:
- Adds hard-coded
-v
and--version
options that print the version string. - If your Appeal instance has any commands, and you haven't defined
a
version
command, automatically adds aversion
command which prints the version string.
positional_argument_usage_format
is the format string used
to format positional arguments for usage. The only valid
interpolations inside this string are {name}
, which evaluates
to the name of the parameter, and {name.upper()}
, which evaluates
to the upper-cased name of the parameter. So if you want your usage
string to show arguments or opargs as <name>
or NAME
, you can
achieve that by setting positional_argument_usage_format
to
<{name}>
or {name.upper()}
respectively.
default_options
is a callable, called when a keyword-only parameter
for a command function or a converter doesn't have any options
explicitly mapped to it. The purpose of default_options
is to
call Appeal.option()
one or more times to create some default options
for that keyword-only parameter.
The API for a default_options
callable should be:
default_options(appeal, callable, parameter_name, annotation, default)
appeal
is the Appeal instance.callable
is the command function or converter the parameter is defined on.parameter_name
is the name of the keyword-only parameter that does not have any explicitly defined options.annotation
is the annotation for this parameter. This may be explicitly set on the function, or it may be inferred from the default parameter.default
is the default value for this parameter. Since Appeal requires that keyword-only parameters must always have default values, this may never beinspect.Parameter.empty
.
The return value of default_options
is ignored.
The default value of default_options
is Appeal.default_options()
,
documented below.
Appeal.command(name=None)
Used as a decorator. Returns a callable that accepts a single
parameter callable
, which must be a callable.
Adds the callable as a command
for the current Appeal instance. If name
is None
, the name of
the command will be callable.__name__
.
(Doesn't modify callable
in any way.)
Appeal.global_command()
Used as a decorator. Returns a callable that accepts a single
parameter callable
, which must be a callable.
Sets the global command for this Appeal object. This is the command that processes global options before the first command function.
Can only be set on the topmost Appeal object. (You can't
call app.command('foo').global_command()
.)
(Doesn't modify callable
in any way.)
Appeal.default_command()
Used as a decorator. Returns a callable that accepts a single
parameter callable
, which must be a callable.
Sets the default command for this Appeal object. The default command is run when your Appeal instance has subcommands, but the user doesn't supply the name of a command on the command-line.
Your default command function must not take any parameters.
(Doesn't modify callable
in any way.)
Appeal.option(parameter_name, *options, annotation=empty, default=empty)
Used as a decorator. Returns a callable that accepts a single
parameter callable
, which must be a callable.
Maps an option on the command-line to the parameter parameter_name
on the decorated function. All subsequent positional parameters
are options, like --verbose
or -v
. (Thus, they must be strings,
either exactly two characters long, or four or more characters long.)
annotation
is the converter that will be used if this
option is invoked. If no explicit annotation
is supplied,
Appeal.option()
will default to type(default)
.
default
is the default value for this option. Since this parameter
only comes into play if the user specifies this option, a default
value
here is nearly useless. But it does have two uses:
- If the type of the annotation is a subclass of
Option
, this default value will be passed in toOption.init()
. - If no
annotation
is specified, the annotation defaults totype(default)
.
It's illegal to call Appeal.option()
without specifying a value
for either annotation
or default
.
Raises AppealConfigurationError
if any option
has already been
mapped inside this Appeal
instance with a different signature.
(Doesn't modify callable
in any way.)
Appeal.argument(self, parameter_name, *, usage=None)
Used as a decorator. Returns a callable that accepts a single
parameter callable
, which must be a callable.
Allos for configuration of a positional (or positional-or-keyword)
parameter on a command function or converter. parameter_name
is the
name of the parameter; it must be a parameter of the decorated callable
.
Currently the only supported configuration is usage
, which specifies
the string that will represent this parameter in usage information.
(Doesn't modify callable
in any way.)
Appeal.main(args=None)
Processes a command-line and calls your command functions.
Stops at the first failure result and passes it in to sys.exit()
.
Catches usage errors; if it catches one, displays usage information.
The implementation calls Appeal.process()
.
Appeal.process(args=None)
Processes a command-line and calls your command functions.
Stops at the first failure result and returns that result.
Doesn't catch any errors. Useful mainly for automation,
particularly for testing, and as the main driver underlying
Appeal.main()
.
Appeal.default_options()
Appeal.default_long_option()
Appeal.default_short_option()
These functions create the default options for a keyword-only
parameter. They're all valid callbacks for the default_options
parameter for the Appeal()
constructor. Appeal.default_options()
is the default value for that parameter.
Appeal.default_long_option()
creates the option --{modified_parameter_name}
with the default annotation and default value. modified_parameter_name
is
parameter_name.lower().replace('_', '-')
.
Appeal.default_short_option()
creates the option -{parameter_name[0]}
with the default annotation and default value.
Appeal.default_options()
creates both.
In all three cases, if the function isn't able to map at least one option,
it raises an AppealConfigurationError
.
Notes on the default option semantics:
-
When
Appeal.default_option()
converts a keyword-only parameter into a long option and a short option, Appeal copies off the first character as the short option, and then runs a conversion function on the string. The conversion function lowercases the string and converts underscores into dashes. So for the the keyword-only parameterDefine
,Appeal.default_option()
would (attempt to) create the two options-D
and--define
. For the keyword-only parameterblock_type
, it would attempt to create-b
and--block-type
. -
What if you have multiple keyword-only parameters that have the same first letter? Only the first mapping succeeds. So if you use
def myoptions(*, block_type=None, bad_block=None)
as an Appeal command,-b
will map toblock_type
. If you want it to map tobad_block
, just swap the two keyword-only parameters sobad_block
is first, or explicitly define your options by decorating your function withAppeal.option()
. (As of some recent version, Python guarantees it will maintain the order of keyword-only parameters when introspecting a function--and it was accidentally true in every version of Python before that explicit guarantee anyway.)
AppealConfigurationError
An exception. Raised when the Appeal API is used improperly.
AppealUsageError
An exception.
Raised when Appeal processes an invalid command-line.
Caught by Appeal.main()
, which uses it to print usage
information and return an error.
AppealCommandError
An exception.
Raised when an Appeal command function returns a
result indicating an error. (Equivalent to SystemExit
.)
Caught by Appeal.main()
, which uses it to print usage
information and return an error.
Reference
The library inspects the parameters of your function and uses those for the arguments, options, and opargs of your subcommand:
-
Positional-only and positional-or-keyword parameters (parameters before
*,
or*args,
) map to positional arguments. This:@app.command() def fgrep(pattern, file, file2=None): ...
would take two required command-line arguments, "pattern" and "file", and an optional third command-line argument "file2".
-
Keyword-only parameters map to options. They must have a default value. The name of the parameter is the name of the option, e.g. this subcommand accepts a
--verbose
argument:@app.command() def foo(*, verbose=False): ...
-
If an argument to your function has an annotation, that value is called to convert the string from the command-line before passing in to your function. e.g.
@app.command() def foo(level:int): ...
would call
int
on the string from the command-line before passing it in to level. -
If a parameter to your function doesn't have an annotation, but does have a default value, it behaves as if you added an annotation of
type(default_value)
. e.g.@app.command() def foo(level=0): ...
would also call
int
on the string from the command-line before passing it in tolevel
.-
Keyword-only parameters with a
bool
annotation or a boolean default value are special: they don't take an argument. Instead, they toggle the default value. -
Parameters with a default value of
None
and no annotation are also slightly special, in that they take astr
argument (as taking aNoneType
argument doesn't make sense). -
Appeal automatically adds single-letter options for keyword-only parameters when possible. Since keyword-only parameters maintain their order in Python*++*, Appeal gives the single-letter shortcut to the first parameter that starts with that letter. e.g.
@app.command() def foo(*, verbose=False, varigated=0): ...
-v
would map to--verbose
, not--varigated
.
-
Putting it all together: if you wanted to write an "fgrep" subcommand with a "usage" string like this:
fgrep [-v|--verbose] [--level <int>] pattern [ file1 [ file2 ... ] ]
you'd write it as follows:
@app.command()
def fgrep(pattern, *file, verbose=False, level=0):
...
++ This is now guaranteed behavior in current Python, and even in the Python 3 series before that, it was always true anyway.
Appeal And POSIX Utility Semantics
The POSIX standard defines command-line behavior for all POSIX utility commands, in 1003.1, Chapter 12, currently at revision POSIX.1-2017:
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap12.html
Appeal isn't a perfect match for POSIX semantics; it disallows some things POSIX allows, and allows some things POSIX disallows.
- As per required POSIX semantics (1003.1-2017, Chapter 12), options can never be required. It therefore follows that in Appeal, keyword arguments to command functions must always have a default.
- The POSIX standard makes no mention of "long options", so it's not clear whether or not the standard permits them. (Presumably they will be permitted in a future standard.)
- POSIX requires that options that accept/require multiple opargs
should accept them as a single string with either spaces
or commas separating the opargs. Appeal supports this behavior
with
appeal.split
. But it also permits options that consume multiple separate opargs from the command-line. - POSIX requires that all options be specified before any positional arguments. Appeal doesn't enforce this, and will happily consume options and positional arguments in any order. In fact, "subcommands" require permitting options after positional arguments for anything beyond the simplest possible subcommand support.
Additional Subtle Features And Behaviors
- You can specify options and arguments in any order on a
command-line, Appeal doesn't care. If you want Appeal to
stop recognizing arguments starting with dashes as options,
specify
--
(two dashes with nothing else). All subsequent strings on the command-line will be used as arguments, even if they start with a-
. - Many built-in types are not introspectable. If you call
inspect.signature(int)
it throws aValueError
. Appeal has special-cased exactly five built-in types:bool
,int
,str
,complex
, andfloat
. Accumulator
actually allows parameterizing multiple types, separated by commas.Accumulator[int, float]
will take two opargs each time the option is specified, and the first will be anint
and the second will be afloat
. The list returned will contain tuples of ints and floats.- You can't call
main()
on an Appeal object more than once. TheAppeal()
instance you use has internal state that changes when you execute itsmain()
method. - Information about a particular converter is localized to
a particular
Appeal()
instance. If you decorate a converter with@app.option()
, every place inside thatAppeal()
instance that you use that converter will also pick up the changes you made with@app.option()
. - You shouldn't call
usage()
until you've added all the commands, options, and parameters information into your Appeal object. Why? Because, for example,usage()
computes the default options for keyword-only parameters that haven't gotten any explicitly defined options. But if you then define one of those options, Appeal will throw an error at you. - Almost any callable can be a converter. But not every
function. There are two limitations. First, as already
mentioned, in order for a function to be a legal converter,
every keyword-only parameter must have a default value.
The second requirement is more specific: in order to use
a function as a converter for a
*args*
parameter, somewhere in the annotations tree under that function, some function must take a required positional parameter.
Finally, the UNIX make
command has an interesting
and subtle behavior. The --jobs
and -j
options to make
specify how many jobs to run in parallel. If you run
make
without any parameters, it runs one job at a time.
If you run make -j 5
, it runs five jobs at a time. But!
If you specify make -j
, where -j
is the last thing on the
command-line it runs as many jobs at a time as it wants.
In a way, the -j
option has two default values.
Can you do this with Appeal? Naturally! Simply specify your keyword-only parameter with both an annotation and a default value, then design the annotation function to take one argument that also has a default value. Like so:
def jobs(jobs:int=math.inf):
return jobs
@app.command()
def make(*targets, jobs:jobs=1):
...
Restrictions on Appeal command functions:
- You may not use
inspect.Parameter.empty
as a default value for any keyword-only parameter to a converter or command function. - The converter for a var_positional (
*args
) parameter must require at least one positional argument.
Changelog
0.5.9
- Improved the error message generated when you have a
required parameter after a
VAR_POSITIONAL
parameter. (This command-line can never succeed, because theVAR_POSITIONAL
consumes all remaining arguments on the command-line, which means the subsequent required parameter can never be satisfied.) Fixes #6. - Changed README to use absolute instead of relative links for images, which means images should now render properly on the Appeal page at PyPI. Thanks for the PR, Hugo!
- Switched a bunch of internal classes to use Python "slots". Hopefully a tiny memory and speed optimization.
- Remove unused / unneeded stuff:
- unused
partial_replace*
functions - unused Charm bytecode instructions
jump_relative
andload_o_option
- unneeded CharmInterpreter register
option
(only used in one error message, obviated by instead using the program name directly)
- unused
- Now that Appeal depends on big
anyway, switch to
big's
PushbackIterator
.. - Add peephole optimizer step for jump-to-jump optimization. Honestly this was probably unnecessary, as I don't think Appeal's compiler can even generate code with jumps-to-jumps (yet).
0.5.8
- Fixed up the "name" of the program for options. We used to take
the name of the command, add all the option strings, and join it
together with commas, as in
'command, -o, --option'
. Now it looks like'command -o | --option'
. - Fixed presentation bug: if you didn't have enough positional arguments for your command function, but you ever invoked an option on the command-line, the usage text would contain the name of the last option invoked (aka the last Charm program run). Added a regression test for this.
- Cleaned up implementation a little: instead of using mystery
lists on the
CharmInterpreter
stack and context_stack, I now use instances of bespokeCharmStackEntry
andCharmContextStackEntry
classes.
0.5.7
- Rewrite the technology behind
accumulator[...]
andmapping[...]
. It previously usedexec()
, which was limiting; for example, you couldn't use your own types or converters. The new implementation should be much more robust; it now manually defines an explicit signature for theoption()
method of the subclass it creates. - This fixed a regression, where you couldn't use a locally-defined
class (e.g.
IntFloat
) as one of the types in the square brackets foraccumulator
andmapping
. Added a test for this.
0.5.6
- Fix formatting for usage when you have a global command and subcommands.
0.5.5
- Add support for
typing.Annotated
, new in Python 3.9. - Add dependency to
my big library.
This gives Appeal a much better implementation of
multisplit
, and I plan to switch to the big word wrapper and columnizer functions, which are a... "big" improvement over what's in Appeal right now. - Rename
SingleOption
to justOption
. (The nameSingleOption
is now deprecated, but I'll leave it as a redundant name forOption
... for now.)
0.5.3
- Fix compatibility back to Python 3.6.
0.5.2
- Fix compatibility with Python 3.11. Python's
inspect.Parameter
object no longer allows aname
that happens to be a keyword, which was a minor inconvenience (Appeal used to uselambda
here sometimes).
0.5.1
- Fixed regression, issue #5. If you didn't supply enough required
parameters, you'd get a
TypeError
instead of a proper usage error.
0.5
- Initial release!
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.