Skip to main content

custmatch-server: operator guide

custmatch-server runs custmatch as a service next to your data: it keeps your customer records and their loads in one database, matches them in batch on a schedule, answers "who is this?" in real time, and gives data stewards a dashboard to review and correct matches. One image, one database (Postgres in production, SQLite for a trial). How it works is below; what it was measured at is in the report's chapter on the service (docs/report/12-the-service.md).

Process Command What it does
API and dashboard custmatch-server serve Lookups, real-time matching, overrides, the dashboard at /dashboard
Scheduler custmatch-server schedule ... Loads files dropped in an inbox, runs the batch at set times, checks health, alerts
One-off jobs load, batch, key, check The same work by hand

All processes share the database (CUSTMATCH_DB_URL) and a data directory for run files (CUSTMATCH_DATA_DIR). Run one API process and one scheduler; the API scales to more copies for lookups, but only one holds the write lease for real-time matching at a time.

How it works

                 ┌─────────────────────────── custmatch-server ──────────────────────────┐
  files ──► inbox│ scheduler ── load ──────────────┐                                     │
                 │     │                           ▼                                     │
                 │     └─ batch run ──publish──► ┌──────────── the database ───────────┐ │
                 │       (the custmatch          │ source records and every version,   │ │
                 │        library)               │ loads, runs (which one is current), │ │
  your apps ────►│ API: lookups, POST /match ◄──►│ customers, links, golden records,   │ │
                 │   matcher: one writer,        │ history, steward decisions,         │ │
                 │   index in memory             │ audit log, API keys                 │ │
  stewards ─────►│ dashboard ◄──────────────────►└─────────────────────────────────────┘ │
                 └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
  • One database holds everything shared: the source records and their loads, the runs and which one is current, the results, stewards' decisions and the matcher's lock. Postgres for production (many readers and writers, advisory locks, managed everywhere); SQLite on a persistent disk for a trial or one small team. The code targets both, so moving from trial to production is configuration.
  • Loads keep history. A load is full (records missing from it are marked deleted, not removed) or incremental. The current version of every record is kept, and every earlier version, so "what did this record look like at load N" has an answer. Only the mapped fields are stored.
  • The batch run is the truth. It is custmatch run over every live record - loaded from files or arrived through the API - with labels and stewards' decisions read from the database, and customer IDs carried over from the current run. It publishes in one transaction: readers see the old run or the new one, never a mix. The current run and one before it are kept.
  • Real-time matching is provisional. POST /match scores a record against the current run's model in memory - a compact index of hashed blocking keys, built from the batch blocker's own key definition - and joins it to the customer it fits: it must match at least half of that customer's records, not just one. It merges a second customer only on a link of 0.9 or more. Exactly one process writes (a lease); lookups keep working without it. Stewards' decisions, trusted IDs, the twin guard and duplicate-free sources apply at once; the next batch run reconciles everything, and changes reach users as merges and splits in the history.
  • The tables (custmatch_server/schema.py, created by versioned migrations):
Table Holds
loads Every load: source, origin (a file or api:<day>), full or incremental, and what it inserted, updated, deleted and left unchanged
source_records, source_record_versions The current version of every record, with a content hash and deleted_at; and every earlier version
runs, current_run The catalog of runs, and the one readers see
customers, record_customer, links, customer_events Per run: golden records, which customer each record is in, the accepted links with evidence, and merges and splits (partitioned by run on Postgres)
realtime_records, realtime_merges, realtime_moves The API's matching decisions, replayed when the matcher restarts, until a batch run reconciles them
overrides, steward_log, golden_pins, review_claims Stewards' decisions and their approval, the audit log (with each action's note), pinned golden values, and review pairs held by the steward working on them
api_keys, leases Hashed API keys with roles, and the matcher's write lease

Start it

A trial on your machine, with Postgres and the demo data:

docker compose -f server/docker-compose.yml up -d --build db api
docker compose -f server/docker-compose.yml run --rm api key create me --role admin   # shown once: keep it

Load the demo (or your own files, below) and run a first batch - one scheduler pass, done by hand:

for s in web app store; do cp examples/demo/$s.csv server/inbox/$s.full.csv; done
docker compose -f server/docker-compose.yml run --rm scheduler \
  schedule /demo/config.json --labels /demo/labels.csv --inbox /inbox --once

Then start the scheduler, which from now on loads what arrives in the inbox and runs the batch at 02:00 UTC (only one scheduler works at a time, so a --once pass while it runs does nothing and says so):

docker compose -f server/docker-compose.yml up -d scheduler

Then open http://localhost:8765/dashboard and paste a key with the steward (or admin) role.

The image holds the library's default model only. For the opt-in "matcher_model": "forest_catboost" (docs/report/03-which-matcher.md "Which classifier"), build it with CatBoost: CUSTMATCH_EXTRAS=catboost docker compose -f server/docker-compose.yml build, or docker build --build-arg CUSTMATCH_EXTRAS=catboost .... A run trained with it cannot be served by an image without it; the API says so.

For production, run the same image three ways (API, scheduler, and Postgres you already manage) on whatever runs containers for you, with your config and labels mounted where the commands point. Without Docker: pip install ./ ./server from the repository.

Configuration

Variable Default Meaning
CUSTMATCH_DB_URL sqlite:///custmatch.db The database. Postgres: postgresql+psycopg://user:password@host/db
CUSTMATCH_DATA_DIR data (/data in the image) Run files: each run's inputs, outputs and model. Shared by every process
CUSTMATCH_AUTH on off answers anyone who can reach the API: a local trial only
CUSTMATCH_ALERT_WEBHOOK none Where the scheduler posts alerts: any URL taking a JSON POST ({"text": ..., "checks": [...]}; Slack incoming webhooks read text)
CUSTMATCH_MAX_RUN_AGE_HOURS 36 Warn when the current run is older
CUSTMATCH_MAX_CUSTOMER_CHANGE 5 Warn when the customer count moves by more than this % between runs
CUSTMATCH_MAX_REVIEW 1000 Warn when the review queue is longer
CUSTMATCH_FOUR_EYES off on: a steward's decisions, merges, splits and revocations wait until a different steward approves them (Decisions tab). Needs authentication on
CUSTMATCH_DB_PASSWORD custmatch The Compose file's Postgres password: set it for anything but a local trial

The matching itself is configured by the custmatch config file (sources, columns, rules) and the labels file: see the guide. The database creates and upgrades its own tables when any process starts.

API keys

custmatch-server key create NAME --role ROLE   # prints the key once; only its hash is stored
custmatch-server key list
custmatch-server key revoke NAME               # stops working within 30 seconds
Role Can
read Look up records and customers, read runs, loads, decisions and health
match Also match records in real time (POST /match)
steward Also record decisions (POST /overrides): the dashboard's role
admin Everything

Give each person and each system its own key: a steward's decisions are recorded under their key's name. server/sql/roles.sql sketches least-privilege database roles for Postgres.

Getting records in

The inbox (with the scheduler running): drop a file named <source>.<mode>.<csv|parquet> - web.full.csv, store.incremental.2026-10-05.parquet - where source is a source in your config and mode is:

  • full: the source's complete contents. Records missing from it are marked deleted (kept, with their history, but left out of matching).
  • incremental: new and changed records only.

The scheduler waits until a file's size has stopped changing, loads it, and moves it to inbox/done/ (or inbox/failed/, with an alert). The image runs as user 10001: on Linux, make the inbox folder writable by it (chown 10001 inbox). Each load is recorded: what it inserted, updated, deleted and left unchanged, and every version of every record.

By hand: custmatch-server load CONFIG SOURCE FILE [--full].

Through the API: records matched with POST /match and "write": true are stored as that day's API load and included in the next batch run.

Batch runs and the schedule

custmatch-server schedule CONFIG --labels LABELS --inbox DIR --batch-at 02:00 loads the inbox as files arrive and runs the batch at 02:00 UTC daily (repeat --batch-at for more). A batch run matches every live record, keeps customer IDs stable from the previous run, publishes in one transaction (readers see the old run or the new one, never a mix), keeps the previous run for rollback, and runs the health checks. Only one scheduler works at a time, even if two are started.

With your own scheduler (cron, a Kubernetes CronJob, Airflow), run custmatch-server schedule ... --once instead: one pass - load the inbox, run a batch, check - exiting 0 (ok), 1 (warnings) or 2 (failed).

Stewards' decisions train the model. Each "same" or "different" a steward records overrides that pair at once, and the next batch run also trains on it. Measured on the demo (server/learning_test.py, research/results/server_learning.json): starting from 200 random labels, three rounds of answering the review queue lifted clustered F1 from 79.5 to 88.8 when decisions train the model, against 84.1 when they only override their own pairs.

The dashboard

/dashboard, with a steward key:

  • Overview: health, the current run, loads, recent decisions.
  • Model & data: the threshold and accuracy estimates, score distribution, what the model relies on, completeness and common values by source, records too sparse to link, blocking, runs compared.
  • Customers: search for a person; browse customers worth a second look (largest, weakest link, ...); sample links by score. A customer shows its golden record, its records as a network of links, and why each link scored what it did.
  • Review: the uncertain pairs, most uncertain first: same person, different people, or skip (keys S, D, K). Filter by source, the model's call or score; a list mode decides many at once; a note goes with each decision. Pairs shown to one steward are held from the others for 15 minutes.
  • Decisions: every decision with its author and note; revoke one, approve or reject proposals (with CUSTMATCH_FOUR_EYES=on), download them as CSV; steward activity, including how often each steward overturned the model.

In a customer: golden-record lineage (which records hold each value) and pinning a value, which beats survivorship in this and every later run; merging with another customer and splitting a record out, both previewed before they happen and applied at once; the household; every steward action on its records. Under Customers, Compare puts any two records side by side and says whether blocking would ever compare them (why they did not match); Find possible matches scores a person you type in, without saving anything. Every panel has an (i) explaining what it shows, how it is calculated and what good looks like.

Monitoring

GET /health (no key) says the process is up. GET /status and custmatch-server check run the health checks; the scheduler runs them after every batch and posts anything not ok to CUSTMATCH_ALERT_WEBHOOK.

Check Warns or fails when
run there is no published run, or the latest run failed
run_age the current run is older than CUSTMATCH_MAX_RUN_AGE_HOURS
customers the customer count moved more than CUSTMATCH_MAX_CUSTOMER_CHANGE % between runs: look at the run's merges and splits before trusting it
review the review queue is over CUSTMATCH_MAX_REVIEW, or growing fast
loads a load failed in the last day, or has run for over two hours
realtime a real-time record has waited longer than the run age limit for a batch run

Backup and restore

Back up two things together: the database and the data directory.

pg_dump -Fc "$DATABASE" > custmatch-$(date +%F).dump        # Postgres
tar czf custmatch-runs-$(date +%F).tgz -C "$CUSTMATCH_DATA_DIR" runs

With SQLite, stop the processes and copy the .db file (or use sqlite3 custmatch.db ".backup copy.db"). Restore both from the same time: the database names the run directories it uses. Only the current run and the one before it are kept, so older run directories can be deleted or archived.

Upgrading

  1. Back up (above).
  2. Stop the scheduler, so no batch run is in progress.
  3. Start the new image's processes: the database upgrades itself at start (migrations).
  4. Run custmatch-server check.

Migrations do not run backwards automatically; to go back, restore the backup and the old image.

Sizing

Measured with Postgres on a laptop (server/scale_test.py, research/results/server_scale.json), per million records: loads about 1 minute, a batch run about 2.5 minutes (2-3 GB of memory), the real-time matcher starts in 6 seconds and holds about 0.5 GB, a real-time match takes 24 ms (median) and a lookup 7 ms; the database grows by about 1.8 GB. The batch library has run 10 million records on one 16-core machine (docs/report/06-blocking-and-scale.md, "Larger files").

Troubleshooting

Symptom Look at
401 from every call The key: custmatch-server key list (revoked?); the header is Authorization: Bearer <key>
409 another matcher holds the write lease Another API process is the writer; send writes to one process, or wait 60 s after stopping the old one
A file stays in the inbox Its name: `.<full
A file lands in inbox/failed/ The scheduler's log and the alert: usually a missing column or an unknown source
"customers" warns after a run Customers' events in the dashboard (Customers, then a customer's history); a new source or a data problem can merge many customers at once
The review queue keeps growing More labels help most: answering the queue trains the next run

Metadata

Release files for custmatch-server 0.1.1

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for custmatch-server 0.1.1
File Size Uploaded
custmatch_server-0.1.1.tar.gz 93.1 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for custmatch-server 0.1.1
File Interpreter ABI Platform
custmatch_server-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 188.7 kB

Release files / custmatch_server-0.1.1.tar.gz

Download URL custmatch_server-0.1.1.tar.gz
Size 93.1 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
f5abc637d29cb0f7a77b0c1f755f0a497eb2f5e42a0c622f0f57a8c813606c4a
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
2547517574d0c9b427365724f96651ac675df394b854f1a8f286e05ce1be899d
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 11, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / custmatch_server-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL custmatch_server-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
Size 95.6 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
7b2fbfa4d358690924e9e8d224e625cecc305f800c9ce6d409853333dfd29052
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
772e8af7c186db9876f17770a372b8c7176cb0445720be44cc20d09b8cc3fb6e
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 11, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

This release

0.1.1 This release

2 release files

0.1.0

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page