Introduction
django-workflows provides a generic workflow engine for Django.
Documentation
For more documentation please visit: http://packages.python.org/django-workflows/
Code
The code can be found on github: http://github.com/diefenbach/django-workflows
Implementations
If you want to see a comprehensive implementation of django-workflows take a look at the CMS LFC
Changes
1.1.1 (2014-06-26)
Pins version for django-permissions to 1.1
1.1 (2014-06-25)
Cleanup and performance improvements
1.0 (2010-08-24)
First final release
1.0 beta 4 (2010-07-23)
Changed: State.get_allowed_transitions: try to use the object’s has_permissions method before using the one from the utils
1.0 beta 3 (2010-07-07)
Bugfix utils.get_allowed_transitions; issue #2
Bugfix: get_workflow_for_object method; issue #3
1.0 beta 2 (2010-05-19)
Bugfix: get_allowed_transitions; return only allowed permissions; issue #2.
Added license
1.0 beta 1 (2010-05-17)
First beta release.
1.0 alpha 4 (2010-04-16)
Added get_initial_state method
Moved WorkflowBase to __init__.py
Added related_name for permissions to WorkflowPermissionRelation
1.0 alpha 3 (2010-03-22)
Changes according to django-permissions 1.0a3 (Added roles)
1.0 alpha 2 (2010-03-22)
A lot of improvements
1.0 alpha 1 (2010-03-13)
Initial public release
Metadata
Release files for django-workflows 1.1.1
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| django-workflows-1.1.1.tar.gz | 11.7 kB | Details |
Release files / django-workflows-1.1.1.tar.gz
| Download URL | django-workflows-1.1.1.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 11.7 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
b0a5ef87de6e2307961c5ce49ee4f53269402c8382db02c3234a2cc3cbd3b365
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
bad0164babff8287c9148689c846341e7e3a05a79f3238be501e0357cfdaf99f
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
No |