evaluma
A small Python package for comparing machine learning models across benchmark suites. Given a CSV of per-model, per-dataset scores, evaluma computes eight complementary views of the results:
- Aggregate ranking — point-estimate ranking via trimmed mean, mean, or median
- IQM ranking — interquartile mean with bootstrapped confidence intervals, following Agarwal et al. (2021)
- ELO ranking — MLE ELO ratings from pairwise head-to-head battles with bootstrap CIs and a win-rate matrix, following Erickson et al. (2025)
- Improvability ranking — mean percent error reduction each model needs to match the per-dataset best, in raw error space, following TabArena / BeyondArena
- Bayesian pairwise comparison — posterior probabilities that model A beats model B (or is practically equivalent), via baycomp
- Frequentist comparison — Friedman + Nemenyi (all-pairs) or Wilcoxon + Holm (reference model), following Demšar (2006)
- Dolan-Moré performance profiles — cumulative distribution of performance ratios and area-under-profile scores, following Dolan & Moré (2002)
- Rank sensitivity — Kendall τ-b with bootstrap CI measuring whether rankings hold across two experimental conditions, following Kendall (1945)
Documentation
Full documentation, including tutorials and API reference, is available at evaluma.readthedocs.io.
Installation
pip install evaluma
For a development install from source:
git clone https://github.com/nilsleh/evaluma
cd evaluma
pip install -e ".[dev]"
Quick start
Python API
import evaluma
bench = evaluma.load_df(
"results.csv",
model="model",
dataset="dataset",
metric="metric",
score="score",
)
# Point-estimate aggregate ranking (trimmed mean)
agg = bench.aggregate_ranking()
print(agg.table)
# IQM ranking with 95% bootstrap CI (requires seed column)
iqm = bench.iqm_ranking()
print(iqm.table)
fig = iqm.plot()
fig.savefig("iqm.png")
# ELO ranking with win-rate matrix
elo = bench.elo_ranking()
print(elo.table)
fig = elo.plot_winrate()
# Improvability ranking (mean % error reduction needed to match the best)
imp = bench.improvability_ranking()
print(imp.table)
fig = imp.plot()
# Bayesian pairwise probabilities
bayes = bench.bayesian_comparison()
print(bayes.table)
# Frequentist comparison (Friedman + Nemenyi)
freq = bench.frequentist_comparison()
print(freq.table)
# Dolan-Moré performance profiles
profiles = bench.performance_profiles()
fig = profiles.plot()
# Rank sensitivity across two conditions
bench_b = evaluma.load_df("results_b.csv", model="model", dataset="dataset",
metric="metric", score="score")
sens = bench.rank_sensitivity(bench_b, cond_a="condA", cond_b="condB")
print(f"Kendall τ = {sens.tau:.3f}, 95% CI = {sens.tau_ci}")
CLI
# Run aggregate, Bayesian, frequentist, and performance-profile analyses
evaluma report results.csv \
--model model --dataset dataset --metric metric --score score \
--output results/
# Individual subcommands
evaluma aggregate results.csv --model model --dataset dataset --metric metric --score score --output results/
evaluma rank results.csv --model model --dataset dataset --metric metric --score score --seed seed --output results/
evaluma compare results.csv --model model --dataset dataset --metric metric --score score --output results/
evaluma frequentist results.csv --model model --dataset dataset --metric metric --score score --output results/
evaluma profiles results.csv --model model --dataset dataset --metric metric --score score --output results/
Each subcommand writes a .csv table and a .png figure to --output. ELO ranking and rank sensitivity are available via the Python API only.
Column mapping
If your CSV uses different column names, pass them explicitly:
evaluma report results.csv \
--model experiment --dataset task --metric measure --score value \
--output results/
Or put them in a YAML config file:
# config.yaml
model: experiment
dataset: task
metric: measure
score: value
evaluma report results.csv --config config.yaml --output results/
Lower-is-better metrics
bench = evaluma.load_df(
"results.csv",
model="model", dataset="dataset", metric="metric", score="score",
metric_direction={"rmse": "min"},
)
evaluma report results.csv ... --metric-direction rmse:min
Filtering models or datasets
bench_ab = bench.select_models(["ModelA", "ModelB"])
bench_core = bench.select_datasets(["dataset1", "dataset2", "dataset3"])
Input format
evaluma expects a long-format CSV with one row per (model, dataset) combination:
model,dataset,metric,score
ModelA,dataset1,acc,0.91
ModelA,dataset2,acc,0.87
ModelB,dataset1,acc,0.84
...
Multiple seeds are supported — pass --seed seed_col and evaluma aggregates by mean before analysis.
Contributing
git clone https://github.com/nilsleh/evaluma
cd evaluma
pip install -e ".[dev]"
# Run tests
pytest --cov=evaluma --cov-report=term-missing
# Lint and format
ruff check .
ruff format .
# Type checking
ty check
Bug reports and pull requests are welcome on GitHub.
License
Apache License 2.0. See LICENSE for the full text.
Citation
If you use evaluma in your research, please cite:
@software{lehmann2026evaluma,
author = {Lehmann, Nils},
title = {evaluma: ML Benchmark Ranking Tools},
year = {2026},
url = {https://github.com/nilsleh/evaluma},
version = {0.1.0},
}
also cite the works of the underlying methods and frameworks used:
@inproceedings{agarwal2021deep,
title = {Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipice},
author = {Agarwal, Rishabh and Schwarzer, Max and Castro, Pablo Samuel
and Courville, Aaron and Bellemare, Marc G.},
booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
year = {2021},
}
@inproceedings{erickson2025tabarena,
title = {{TabArena}: A Living Benchmark for Machine Learning on Tabular Data},
author = {Erickson, Nick and Purucker, Lennart and Tschalzev, Andrej
and Holzm{\"u}ller, David and Mutalik Desai, Prabhant
and Salinas, David and Hutter, Frank},
booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
year = {2025},
}
@article{benavoli2017time,
title = {Time for a Change: a Tutorial for Comparing Multiple Classifiers
Through Bayesian Analysis},
author = {Benavoli, Alessio and Corani, Giorgio and Dem{\v{s}}ar, Janez
and Zaffalon, Marco},
journal = {Journal of Machine Learning Research},
volume = {18},
number = {77},
pages = {1--36},
year = {2017},
}
@article{demsar2006statistical,
title = {Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets},
author = {Dem{\v{s}}ar, Janez},
journal = {Journal of Machine Learning Research},
volume = {7},
pages = {1--30},
year = {2006},
}
@article{dolan2002benchmarking,
title = {Benchmarking Optimization Software with Performance Profiles},
author = {Dolan, Elizabeth D. and Mor{\'e}, Jorge J.},
journal = {Mathematical Programming},
volume = {91},
pages = {201--213},
year = {2002},
}
@article{kendall1945treatment,
title = {The Treatment of Ties in Ranking Problems},
author = {Kendall, Maurice G.},
journal = {Biometrika},
volume = {33},
number = {3},
pages = {239--251},
year = {1945},
doi = {10.1093/biomet/33.3.239},
}
Metadata
Release files for evaluma 0.3.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| evaluma-0.3.0.tar.gz | 600.6 kB | With provenance | Details for evaluma-0.3.0.tar.gz |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| evaluma-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for evaluma-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl |
Total release size: 652.1 kB
Release files / evaluma-0.3.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | evaluma-0.3.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 600.6 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
71c22d8f265ad6fa3dfdbf643fc618c3e96420152afea17eae8f66baa7af824a
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
03cc30d7d2a19ebbfc0bbab4d73d529c4ce2892dc35a0349b9aafe032837c9c8
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 9, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / evaluma-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | evaluma-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 51.5 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
5f3c677407dbe267c794aa54d42e3699e3a0d824f22568d1f77c333be4e786cb
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
71de1a10c1758d8c4bef9706deeb3f946507db0ce8c8e0535be0fba56386aa0c
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 9, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for evaluma 0.3.0
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for evaluma-0.3.0.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 9, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.