evax.bitten.tools
evax.bitten.tools is a Bitten plugin adding support for check and lcov
evax.bitten.tools is provided under a BSD-style license.
Installation
easy_install evax.bitten.tools
Usage
In order to use the plugin in a build configuration, you must define the plugin namespace as follows:
<build
(...)
xmlns:evax="http://www.evax.fr/bitten/tools"
(...)>
then use it like this:
<step id="tests" description="Automated tests">
<c:make file="Makefile" target="check" />
<evax:check reports="tests/*_check.xml" />
<evax:lcov directory="src" />
</step>
Please note that the plugin expects check’s xml output format.
Changelog
1.0
Initial release
Release files for evax.bitten.tools 1.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| evax.bitten.tools-1.0.tar.gz | 4.1 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| evax.bitten.tools-1.0-py2.6.egg | Legacy Egg format | - | - | Details |
Total release size: 14.7 kB
Release files / evax.bitten.tools-1.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | evax.bitten.tools-1.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 4.1 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
d54f3f90ee8f0dd8ec461f077986a7bd0f12c12698ccb71e690271c0b4723fa4
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
aba5798671cc34be11369cc306ccd96d4f84c5865e305954b09b55c58262d86c
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
No |
Release files / evax.bitten.tools-1.0-py2.6.egg
| Download URL | evax.bitten.tools-1.0-py2.6.egg |
|---|---|
| Size | 10.6 kB |
| Tags | Egg |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
564d36c5cbc0ea2a42e39b3d91e5e69b3d09e3c4aded4361a75432916cab314b
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
0ae3f16b3e5f2d8eec83faec4bc28fb444f91d15fbde4b30b371a2e59d6d91d1
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
No |