jevmem

Long-term memory for AI agents that costs fractions of a cent, never calls an LLM, and cleans up after itself.

Your agent forgets everything when the session ends. Most memory add-ons fix that by asking a big LLM to summarise, tag, deduplicate and re-rank on every write and read: slow, expensive, and one more thing that can hallucinate. jevmem takes the approach of the Jev-Mem paper (Jev-Mem: System-One-Controlled Agentic Memory for Efficient AI Agents): split the work.

• System One (fast, cheap): Jev answers typed questions with probabilities. Is this note safe? what kind is it? does it contradict an older one? which notes matter for this question? is that enough yet?
• System Two (slow, smart): your agent (Claude) writes the notes, synthesises patterns and answers.

jevmem is the memory layer built on that idea: an MCP server, Claude Code and Cursor configs, hooks and skill, a CLI and a Python library on top of one SQLite file. Install it from PyPI: pypi.org/project/jevmem.

Why you would want it

Your agent stops repeating itself. "We never use pip here", "the month-end job moved to 22:00 because the warehouse was downsized", "that flaky test is a timezone bug": decisions, gotchas and preferences survive across sessions and are injected when they matter, not dumped into every prompt.

It is cheap and fast enough to run on every prompt. A recall is about one Jev call (~0.25 s) in the common case, roughly $0.0002 in the heavy case, and zero generative tokens. A hook can decide per prompt whether memory is needed at all, and inject nothing when it is not.

It sends less, and the right thing. Plain vector search returns five notes and hopes. jevmem judges relevance, follows links between notes to find the why behind a fact, and returns one to three:

It knows when it does not know. Recall reports sufficient: false instead of returning five plausible notes for a question memory cannot answer (abstains on 94-98% of unanswerable questions), so the agent looks in the code instead of guessing.

Memory that stays clean. Newer facts supersede older ones, duplicates collapse, repeated episodes become proposals for a general rule that the agent writes. Nothing is deleted behind your back: stale notes just rank lower.

Safe by construction. Every write is screened: credentials are rejected, prompt-injection text aimed at the agent is rejected, near-duplicates are rejected, and "next step is X" status notes (which rot silently) are rejected too. Recalled notes are always presented to the agent as data, never as instructions.

Git-aware. Notes remember the branch and commit they were written on. All worktrees of a repository share one memory; notes from an abandoned branch rank lower.

It never gets in the way. Everything fails open: if Jev is down, hooks inject nothing and recall degrades to hybrid search. Your agent never blocks on its memory.

It scales down and up. Zero setup on a laptop (one SQLite file, in-RAM exact search). When you outgrow it, point JEVMEM_INDEX at Qdrant, LanceDB or Postgres/pgvector (sqlite-vec takes over automatically past 100k notes): SQLite stays the source of truth and the index is a rebuildable copy.

What it adds to an agentic workflow

It also ships a small Judge API (route a task to the right agent, prune tool output, screen untrusted text, decide when to stop) for using the same cheap typed decisions outside memory. See Python library.

How it works in 60 seconds

1. Write: your agent calls memory_write("On 2026-05-15 we moved the month-end job to 22:00 because the warehouse was downsized to Medium"). Code rejects secrets and duplicates; one batched Jev call types the note and screens it for injection and status rot; a second call links it to related notes. (write path)
2. Recall: a later question, "why does the month-end job run at night?", is answered by lite mode (one call), escalating to full mode (route, graph expansion, stop check) only when it looks multi-hop or temporal. The graph edge from the job note to the warehouse note finds the cause even though they share no words. (recall path)
3. Hooks inject pinned notes and the strongest conventions at session start, and relevant notes per prompt, with no effort from the agent. (hooks)
4. Consolidate: every 20 writes, Jev compares new notes with their neighbours and flags what is superseded, duplicated or repeated. (consolidation)

Quickstart

You need Python 3.12+, uv, an MCP host (Claude Code or Cursor), and a decision model: either a TypeSafe API key for hosted Jev (currently waitlisted, what the results were measured with) or a local or third-party model, which needs no key.

Create your settings file once; it holds the key (and, if you want, the database path) for every project and editor, and the CLI, MCP server and hooks read it automatically. It lives in ~/.jevmem/config.jsonc (Windows: %USERPROFILE%\.jevmem\config.jsonc), outside every repository:

uvx jevmem config init --api-key "..."     # omit --api-key to be prompted (hidden), or to skip it for a local model

Claude Code

claude mcp add --scope user jevmem -- uvx --from jevmem jevmem-mcp

No clone needed: uvx fetches jevmem from PyPI. Notes go to a per-project scope (project:<repository name>, found from the folder the agent works in) unless the agent says global (for personal preferences that apply everywhere) or you set -e JEVMEM_SCOPE=.... Recall searches the project plus global.

Cursor

Add a user-wide server in %USERPROFILE%\.cursor\mcp.json (Windows) or ~/.cursor/mcp.json (macOS/Linux), or a project file at .cursor/mcp.json.:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jevmem": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["--from", "jevmem", "jevmem-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

This repo already ships .cursor/mcp.json for working on jevmem itself. Reload MCP in Cursor after saving (Customize → MCP), then confirm memory_write / memory_recall appear under Available Tools.

The default install is the one the results were measured with: it includes a small local embedding model (fastembed, ONNX, no API) and the sqlite-vec index. The model (about 70 MB) downloads on first use, so run uvx --from jevmem jevmem warmup once while online. Optional vector backends (jevmem[qdrant], [lancedb], [pgvector], [all]) and the lighter JEVMEM_EMBEDDER=hash opt-out are in the installation guide.

Then ask the agent to remember something ("remember that we deploy through ops/deploy.sh, never by hand") and, in a new session, ask how to deploy. For the full experience:

• copy the jev-memory skill to ~/.claude/skills/ (Claude Code) or use this repo's .cursor/skills/jev-memory/ (Cursor);
• add the two Claude Code hooks for automatic injection (snippet);
• seed it from what you already have: uvx jevmem import-claude-memory or uvx jevmem import-markdown AGENTS.md.

Windows notes (paths, PowerShell, Cursor, no-bash MCP launch): see installation § Windows and Cursor.

Using a local or third-party model

jevmem only needs a server that speaks Jev's /v1/systemone API, so any compatible model works in place of hosted Jev, and the api_key in your settings file is not needed then. Example with jevk5:4b, run locally through ollaya (a runner for decision models; install it from there):

ollaya pull jevk5:4b      # one-time download, 4.5 GB
ollaya serve              # leave running; listens on http://localhost:11435
ollaya ps                 # after the first call: check the model is on cuda, not cpu (about 5.5 GB of VRAM)
ollaya stop               # when you are done: unloads the models and stops the server

Then point jevmem at the server and name the model:

claude mcp add --scope user jevmem \
  -e JEVMEM_BASE_URL=http://localhost:11435 -e JEVMEM_MODEL=jevk5:4b \
  -- uvx --from jevmem jevmem-mcp

Put them in ~/.jevmem/config.jsonc (base_url, model, api_key, timeout) instead of -e flags if you prefer. Run the model on its own: with a GPU shared with another model it can silently fall back to CPU, which is much slower. Things to know before relying on one:

• Thresholds are calibrated for hosted Jev. A model that scores differently needs its own cutoffs (Config); rerun jevmem eval and jevmem eval-injection against it before trusting the screens.
• Recall makes batched calls (up to ~30 questions per request). A model with a short context rejects them and recall quietly falls back to plain vector search.
• Measured so far: jevk5:4b on a local GPU is usable for recall but trims much less context than Jev and is a weaker injection and conflict screen; laya is not suitable. Numbers in docs/evaluation.md.

To work on the code, git clone this repo and uv sync. Full setup, every environment variable, the CLI and the hooks: docs/installation.md.

Use it with a memory bank

jevmem is a supplement to a markdown memory bank, not a replacement. Keep current state (focus, blockers, next steps) in a few git-tracked files the agent reads whole each session, so it follows the branch and shows in PR diffs; keep the dated facts that stay true (decisions with reasons, bug causes, gotchas, preferences) in jevmem, where they are recalled by relevance. Rules stay in AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md. Never put "next step is X" in jevmem: it goes stale silently, and memory_write rejects it.

If you do not have a memory bank yet, memory-bank is a ready-made one: an Agent Skill plus templates for Claude Code and Cursor, written to work alongside jevmem.

npx skills add illescasDaniel/memory-bank

Results

Measured live against Jev on small datasets we built ourselves, with real embeddings (bge-small). They are indications, not benchmarks; methodology, datasets and caveats are in docs/evaluation.md.

Documentation

Status

Beta (v0.4.0). Core library, MCP server and CLI, Claude Code / Cursor configs, skill and hooks, consolidation, an evaluation harness and pluggable vector indexes are in and tested (uv run pytest; CI runs Linux, macOS and Windows on Python 3.12 and 3.13). Expect rough edges: the tuning data is small and mostly from one project, and Jev itself is a waitlisted hosted service. Issues and experience reports are very welcome, especially from projects that are not ours.

Credits and license

Based on Jev-Mem: System-One-Controlled Agentic Memory for Efficient AI Agents (Jiang, Li and Li, arXiv:2609.23986). Typed decisions by Jev from TypeSafe. This project is not affiliated with the paper's authors or TypeSafe.

MIT, see LICENSE.