Skip to main content

ReviewMetric MCP Server

Know what reviewers will say before you submit — from inside Claude.
Then fix the text in one go, and see where your work sits on the map of science.


ReviewMetric is a pre-submission review service for researchers. This MCP server lets Claude send a local .docx manuscript to ReviewMetric's panel of specialist AI referees, bring the report back into your chat, prepare the text fixes Claude can apply to your file, and explore the ReviewMetric Atlas: landmark discoveries, their Nobel Prizes and the frontiers research groups are pushing now.

What the panel checks

Referee What it looks at
Novelty & positioning Your claims against the closest published, peer-reviewed work (retrieved from OpenAlex and ReviewMetric's vetted library), plus related papers you may have missed
Claims & evidence Whether each main claim is supported by your results; numbers that disagree between abstract, results and tables
Methods & reproducibility Design, controls, statistics, and a field-appropriate reproducibility checklist
Citation integrity Whether cited papers support the sentences they are attached to; retracted, uncited or missing references
Figures Captions, legibility, units, and agreement with the text
Clarity Title, abstract, structure, language, terminology
Handling editor Readiness recommendation, prioritised revisions and a referee-style report

Every issue points to a location in your manuscript. Scores come from fixed rubrics, not from a single AI guess.

Installation (Claude Desktop)

  1. Create an API key at https://www.reviewmetric.it.com/developers
  2. Add this to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "review-metric": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["reviewmetric-mcp"],
      "env": { "REVIEWMETRIC_API_KEY": "rvk_live_..." }
    }
  }
}
  1. Ask Claude: "Review my manuscript at /Users/me/papers/draft.docx with ReviewMetric."

Commands

Ask "What can ReviewMetric do?" (the help_me command) for the full list inside Claude.

Command What it does Cost
help_me Everything ReviewMetric can do in Claude, with examples Free
submit_manuscript(file_path) Sends the .docx to the referees; returns a Run ID 1 RM token
check_analysis_status(run_id) Progress; when done, the report, its place on the Atlas and the text fixes available Free
get_report_json(run_id) The complete report as JSON Free
list_my_reviews(limit) Your reviews with scores and Run IDs Free
get_text_fixes(run_id) Preview of the fixes that need no new experiment; the exact edits once prepared Free
prepare_text_fixes(run_id) Prepares the edits, which Claude can then apply to your manuscript 1 RM token
search_atlas(query, field, limit) Finds discoveries and frontiers on the Atlas Free
list_frontiers() The frontiers, what they build on, who is pushing them Free
place_on_atlas(run_id) Where your manuscript sits, the landmarks it cites, the frontier ahead Free
atlas_whats_new() This week's additions to the Atlas Free
trace_path(from, to) The chain of discoveries linking two stars Free
unlock_atlas_sources(confirm) The paper and research group behind every star, for 30 days 1 RM token
account_status() RM tokens left, Atlas access, prices Free

Spending tokens. RM tokens are ReviewMetric's one currency (1 for $9, 3 for $25, 10 for $70; your first is free). Claude never unlocks the Atlas sources on its own: it tells you the cost and waits for your explicit yes in the chat.

A review usually takes about 5 minutes. If the file cannot be reviewed (unreadable, too short, not a manuscript), the RM token is returned automatically.

Try asking

  • "Review my manuscript at ~/papers/draft.docx and tell me what to fix first."
  • "Prepare the text fixes of my last review and apply them to the draft."
  • "Where does my manuscript sit on the Atlas, and which frontier is ahead of it?"
  • "Who is pushing room-temperature superconductivity right now?"
  • "Trace the path from the double helix to AlphaFold."

Data

Manuscripts are processed by ReviewMetric's API and the AI providers it uses under their paid API terms (no training on your data). See the ReviewMetric website for the current data-retention policy.

Metadata

Release files for reviewmetric-mcp 1.2.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for reviewmetric-mcp 1.2.0
File Size Uploaded Provenance Actions
reviewmetric_mcp-1.2.0.tar.gz 4.1 MB Without provenance Details for reviewmetric_mcp-1.2.0.tar.gz

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for reviewmetric-mcp 1.2.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform Actions
reviewmetric_mcp-1.2.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details for reviewmetric_mcp-1.2.0-py3-none-any.whl

Total release size: 4.1 MB

Release files / reviewmetric_mcp-1.2.0.tar.gz

Download URL reviewmetric_mcp-1.2.0.tar.gz
Size 4.1 MB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
45fcdaf32fb4470275cdbb8515aa6cb3ec15e0ccd5ff54f010cf833774b3633f
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
4d8205824577fd34587d278be22dbea5bb7f4c6d5af896c7fccb811dd7022ce4
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via uv/0.13.5 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.13.5","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Ubuntu","version":"24.04","id":"noble","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}

Release files / reviewmetric_mcp-1.2.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL reviewmetric_mcp-1.2.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 12.7 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
02f52c02b42f6121e5d6b3b6ebfa189ac22ebc3a9032cf00d25db2270002f28f
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
e85ae718f100ac66058f77dea61ec2e85a76c499c8fe53037b944f8b46d2a68a
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via uv/0.13.5 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.13.5","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Ubuntu","version":"24.04","id":"noble","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}

Security for reviewmetric-mcp 1.2.0

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

No provenance found

None of the files in this release were uploaded with provenance metadata.

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page