Skip to main content

Python implementation of solvers for differential algebraic equations (DAE's) and implicit differential equations (IDE's) that should be added to scipy one day.

Project description

scipy_dae - solving differential algebraic equations (DAE's) and implicit differential equations (IDE's) in Python

Actions Status Code coverage status badge License: BSD 3 PyPI

Python implementation of solvers for differential algebraic equations (DAE's) and implicit differential equations (IDE's) that should be added to scipy one day.

Currently, two different methods are implemented.

  • Implicit Radau IIA methods of order 2s - 1 with arbitrary number of odd stages.
  • Implicit backward differentiation formula (BDF) of variable order with quasi-constant step-size and stability/ accuracy enhancement using numerical differentiation formula (NDF).

More information about both methods are given in the specific class documentation.

To pique your curiosity

The Kármán vortex street solved by a finite element discretization of the weak form of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations using FEniCS and the three stage Radau IIA method.

Karman

Basic usage

The Robertson problem of semi-stable chemical reaction is a simple system of differential algebraic equations of index 1. It demonstrates the basic usage of the package.

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy_dae.integrate import solve_dae


def F(t, y, yp):
    """Define implicit system of differential algebraic equations."""
    y1, y2, y3 = y
    y1p, y2p, y3p = yp

    F = np.zeros(3, dtype=np.common_type(y, yp))
    F[0] = y1p - (-0.04 * y1 + 1e4 * y2 * y3)
    F[1] = y2p - (0.04 * y1 - 1e4 * y2 * y3 - 3e7 * y2**2)
    F[2] = y1 + y2 + y3 - 1 # algebraic equation

    return F


# time span
t0 = 0
t1 = 1e7
t_span = (t0, t1)
t_eval = np.logspace(-6, 7, num=1000)

# initial conditions
y0 = np.array([1, 0, 0], dtype=float)
yp0 = np.array([-0.04, 0.04, 0], dtype=float)

# solver options
method = "Radau"
# method = "BDF" # alternative solver
atol = rtol = 1e-6

# solve DAE system
sol = solve_dae(F, t_span, y0, yp0, atol=atol, rtol=rtol, method=method, t_eval=t_eval)
t = sol.t
y = sol.y

# visualization
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(t, y[0], label="y1")
ax.plot(t, y[1] * 1e4, label="y2 * 1e4")
ax.plot(t, y[2], label="y3")
ax.set_xlabel("t")
ax.set_xscale("log")
ax.legend()
ax.grid()
plt.show()

Robertson

Advanced usage

More examples are given in the examples directory, which includes

Work-precision

In order to investigate the work precision of the implemented solvers, we use different DAE examples with differentiation index 1, 2 and 3 as well as IDE example.

Index 1 DAE - Brenan

Brenan's index 1 problem is described by the system of differential algebraic equations

$$ \begin{aligned} \dot{y}_1 - t \dot{y}_2 &= y_1 - (1 + t) y_2 \ 0 &= y_2 - \sin(t) . \end{aligned} $$

For the consistent initial conditions $t_0 = 0$, $y_1(t_0) = 1$, $y_2(t_0) = 0$, $\dot{y}_1 = -1$ and $\dot{y}_2 = 1$, the analytical solution is given by $y_1(t) = e^{-t} + t \sin(t)$ and $y_2(t) = \sin(t)$.

This problem is solved for $atol = rtol = 10^{-(1 + m / 4)}$, where $m = 0, \dots, 45$. The resulting error at $t_1 = 10$ is compared with the elapsed time of the used solvers in the figure below. For reference, the work-precision diagram of sundials IDA solver is also added. Note that the elapsed time is scaled by a factor of 100 since the sundials C-code is way faster.

Brenan_work_precision

Clearly, the family of Radau IIA methods outplay the BDF/NDF methods for low tolerances. For medium to high tolerances, both methods are appropriate.

Index 2 DAE - knife edge

The knife edge index 2 problem is a simple mechanical example with nonholonomic constraint. It is described by the system of differential algebraic equations

$$ \begin{aligned} \dot{x} &= u \ \dot{y} &= v \ \dot{\varphi} &= \omega \ m \dot{u} &= m g \sin\alpha + \sin\varphi \lambda \ m \dot{v} &= -\cos\varphi \lambda \ J \dot{\omega} &= 0 \ 0 &= u \sin\varphi - v \cos\varphi . \end{aligned} $$

Since the implemented solvers are designed for index 1 DAE's we have to perform some sort of index reduction. Therefore, we transform the semi-explicit form into a general form as proposed by Gear. The resulting index 1 system is given as

$$ \begin{aligned} \dot{x} &= u \ \dot{y} &= v \ \dot{\varphi} &= \omega \ m \dot{u} &= m g \sin\alpha + \sin\varphi \dot{\Lambda} \ m \dot{v} &= -\cos\varphi \dot{\Lambda} \ J \dot{\omega} &= 0 \ 0 &= u \sin\varphi - v \cos\varphi . \end{aligned} $$

For the initial conditions $t_0 = 0$, $x(t_0) = \dot{x}(t_0) = y(t_0) = \dot{y}(t_0) = \varphi(t_0) = 0$ and $\dot{\varphi}(t_0) = \Omega$, a closed form solution is given by

$$ \begin{aligned} x(t) &= \frac{g \sin\alpha}{2 \Omega^2} \sin^2(\Omega t) \ y(t) &= \frac{g \sin\alpha}{2 \Omega^2} \left(\Omega t - \frac{1}{2}\sin(2 \Omega t)\right) \ \varphi(t) &= \Omega t \ u(t) &= \frac{g \sin\alpha}{\Omega} \sin(\Omega t) \cos(\Omega t) \ v(t) &= \frac{g \sin\alpha}{2 \Omega} \left(1 - \cos(2 \Omega t)\right) = \frac{g \sin\alpha}{\Omega} \sin^2(\Omega t) \ \omega(t) &= \Omega \ \Lambda(t) &= \frac{2g \sin\alpha}{\Omega} (\cos(\Omega t) - 1) , % (2 * m * g * salpha / Omega) * (np.cos(Omega * t) - 1) \end{aligned} $$

with the Lagrange multiplier $\dot{\Lambda}(t) = - 2g \sin\alpha \sin(\Omega t)$.

This problem is solved for $atol = rtol = 10^{-(1 + m / 4)}$, where $m = 0, \dots, 32$. The resulting error at $t_1 = 2 \pi / \Omega$ is compared with the elapsed time of the used solvers in the figure below.

knife_edge_work_precision

Index 3 DAE - Arevalo

Arevalo's index 3 problem describes the motion of a particle on a circular track. It is described by the system of differential algebraic equations

$$ \begin{aligned} \dot{x} &= u \ \dot{y} &= v \ \dot{u} &= 2 y + x \lambda \ \dot{v} &= -2 x + y \lambda \ 0 &= x^2 + y^2 - 1 . \end{aligned} $$

Since the implemented solvers are designed for index 1 DAE's we have to perform some sort of index reduction. Therefore, we use the stabilized index 1 formulation of Hiller and Anantharaman. The resulting index 1 system is given as

$$ \begin{aligned} \dot{x} &= u + x \dot{\Gamma} \ \dot{y} &= v + y \dot{\Gamma} \ \dot{u} &= 2 y + x \dot{\Lambda} \ \dot{v} &= -2 x + y \dot{\Lambda} \ 0 &= x u + y v \ 0 &= x^2 + y^2 - 1 . \end{aligned} $$

The analytical solution to this problem is given by

$$ \begin{aligned} x(t) &= \sin(t^2) \ y(t) &= \cos(t^2) \ u(t) &= 2 t \cos(t^2) \ v(t) &= -2 t \sin(t^2) \ \Lambda(t) &= -\frac{4}{3} t^3 \ \Gamma(t) &= 0 , \end{aligned} $$

with the Lagrange multipliers $\dot{\Lambda} = -4t^2$ and $\dot{\Gamma} = 0$.

This problem is solved for $atol = rtol = 10^{-(3 + m / 4)}$, where $m = 0, \dots, 24$. The resulting error at $t_1 = 5$ is compared with the elapsed time of the used solvers in the figure below.

Arevalo_work_precision

IDE - Weissinger

A simple example of an implicit differential equations is called Weissinger's equation

$$ t y^2 (\dot{y})^3 - y^3 (\dot{y}^2) + t (t^2 + 1) \dot{y} - t^2 y = 0 . $$

It has the analytical solution $y(t) = \sqrt{t^2 + \frac{1}{2}}$ and $\dot{y}(t) = \frac{t}{\sqrt{t^2 + \frac{1}{2}}}$.

Starting at $t_0 = \sqrt{1 / 2}$, this problem is solved for $atol = rtol = 10^{-(4 + m / 4)}$, where $m = 0, \dots, 28$. The resulting error at $t_1 = 10$ is compared with the elapsed time of the used solvers in the figure below.

Weissinger_work_precision

Nonlinear index 1 DAE - Kvaernø

In a final example, an nonlinear index 1 DAE is investigated as proposed by Kvaernø. The system is given by

$$ \begin{aligned} (\sin^2(\dot{y}_1) + \sin^2(y_2)) (\dot{y}_2)^2 - (t - 6)^2 (t - 2)^2 y_1 e^{-t} &= 0 \ (4 - t) (y_2 + y_1)^3 - 64 t^2 e^{-t} y_1 y_2 &= 0 , \end{aligned} $$

It has the analytical solution $y_1(t) = t^4 e^{-t}$, $y_2(t) = t^3 e^{-t} (4 - t)$ and $\dot{y}_1(t) = (4 t^3 - t^4) e^{-t}$, $y_2(t) = (-t^3 + (4 - t) 3 t^2 - (4 - t) t^3) e^{-t}$.

Starting at $t_0 = 0.5$, this problem is solved for $atol = rtol = 10^{-(4 + m / 4)}$, where $m = 0, \dots, 32$. The resulting error at $t_1 = 1$ is compared with the elapsed time of the used solvers in the figure below.

Kvaerno_work_precision

Install

An editable developer mode can be installed via

python -m pip install -e .[dev]

The tests can be started using

python -m pytest --cov

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

scipy_dae-0.0.5.tar.gz (61.5 MB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

scipy_dae-0.0.5-py3-none-any.whl (45.4 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file scipy_dae-0.0.5.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: scipy_dae-0.0.5.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 61.5 MB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/5.1.1 CPython/3.10.12

File hashes

Hashes for scipy_dae-0.0.5.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 0fc828784ef141609794b5232bb7a3620b255707c568dcbe84d5e64f9f659849
MD5 0d913c9b0a5fafffb14c9dc292b70dcc
BLAKE2b-256 d2975318c1f41b2ed396bcacf843a4eeec65b83f74c9e8e5aefa9835a44dec47

See more details on using hashes here.

File details

Details for the file scipy_dae-0.0.5-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: scipy_dae-0.0.5-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 45.4 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/5.1.1 CPython/3.10.12

File hashes

Hashes for scipy_dae-0.0.5-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 1e89da25363cf010ccf3bcb93ddec23db53c1502f1a376b02a5b3dcd9e997d23
MD5 15f9c9eaa386eabb803ec52da36697f4
BLAKE2b-256 717064c55140d65d93feba19689f956dee4991073871548dd59db7b69aab7a1d

See more details on using hashes here.

Supported by

AWS AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Datadog Monitoring Fastly Fastly CDN Google Google Download Analytics Microsoft Microsoft PSF Sponsor Pingdom Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Sentry Error logging StatusPage StatusPage Status page