FLToptim 0.7.0

Fast Legendre-transform convex optimisation for energy-storage operation and spatial economic dispatch

FLToptim — Fast Legendre Transform Optim

Fast convex optimisation for energy-storage operation and spatial economic dispatch, built around the Legendre-transform dynamic program for convex piecewise-linear (and quadratic) value functions.

What's inside

• cplfunction / cpqfunction — the convex piecewise-linear/quadratic value-function DP (OptimMargInt). Each function is stored as a map<position, slope-increment>, so the inf-convolutions of the Legendre / dynamic-programming recursion stay near-linear. This is the original dynprogstorage core (Girard, Barbesant, Foucault, Kariniotakis, 2013).
• param_simplex — a bespoke parametric right-hand-side dual simplex that traces the exact injection-cost curve φ_n(y) of a small dense network LP in a single pass (one dual pivot per breakpoint), carrying its basis across hours.
• elec / mr_decompose — the spatial-LP ↔ storage-DP decomposition for perfect-foresight annual dispatch: alternate a per-hour spatial network LP with the per-node storage DP, passing each node's convex injection-cost curve (not a scalar price) so the scheme is curvature-damped and converges to the monolithic optimum. Handles reservoirs, batteries (efficiency kink) and coupled multi-energy (electricity + hydrogen) networks, with optional parallelism (hour-chunk curve build; Jacobi across storages).

Install / build

pip install fltoptim          # from PyPI (builds from source on platforms without a wheel)
# or, from a checkout:
pip install -e .              # builds the Cython DP extension + the parametric-simplex shared library
# or
python setup.py build_ext --inplace

Building from source needs a C++17 compiler (Linux/macOS); numpy and highspy are the runtime dependencies. The reference frontal solves in the decomposition use Gurobi when available (optional).

DP value-function storage

The linear storage DP uses the sorted-array backend by default (flat=True, and dp_flat=True in elec.decompose / mr_decompose). It runs the same algorithm and produces schedules bit-for-bit identical to the historical std::map backend, while measured annual workloads are about 4.5--6 times faster in the DP itself. Pass flat=False or dp_flat=False to retain the historical backend for comparison or diagnostics.

The array backend is the recommended choice while intermediate value functions contain the usual handful to few dozen breakpoints. The map can theoretically become preferable when functions retain hundreds or thousands of breakpoints and the recursion performs many insertions in their middle, because array insertion is linear in the number of breakpoints. No such crossover has been observed in the supported electricity or multi-resource annual workloads; benchmark both backends before opting out rather than using a fixed breakpoint threshold.

For the spatial decomposition, stop_rel_cost=tol optionally stops the outer sweeps when two consecutive system costs differ by at most tol relatively, after min_sweeps passes. The default remains a fixed number of sweeps because larger networks can oscillate rather than converge monotonically. A tolerance of 1e-6 reduced the measured 3-node annual case from eight to four passes, but did not trigger within 30 passes on the 10-node case.

reuse_basis=True is retained as an experimental diagnostic: it carries the parametric-simplex basis between outer sweeps and removes repeated HiGHS seeds. Those seeds are already negligible, however, and degenerate optima can send the outer iteration along a different trajectory. It is therefore disabled by default and is not currently recommended as a performance option.

For multi-node cases with one storage direction per node, shared_hourly_bases=True builds one optimal basis per hour at the common current dispatch and uses this atlas to seed every nodal/storage trace. Complete injection-cost curves are still retraced, so this is a seed/factorisation experiment rather than curve caching. Annual measurements reduced trace time by roughly 29% at 3 nodes, 26% at 8 nodes and 38% at 10 nodes. Degenerate hourly optima can nevertheless change the outer Gauss--Seidel trajectory. The option is therefore off by default.

The implementation compares two atlas candidates at each hour: the basis propagated from hour t-1 and the basis of hour t from the preceding outer sweep. hourly_basis_selection exposes five policies: longitudinal, certain (switch only when the previous-hour candidate is infeasible and the previous- sweep candidate is feasible), predict (fewest violated basic variables, then least normalised violation), canonical (the predictor plus a lexicographic, candidate-order-independent signature when both bases are feasible optima), and min_pivots (run both reoptimisations). On the first annual transition, primal admissibility gives a certain zero-pivot choice for 55% / 26% / 20% of hours at 3 / 8 / 10 nodes when the longitudinal candidate is already feasible; the reverse certain choice adds 15% / 14% / 16%. Among the remaining neither-feasible cases, the violation predictor identifies the actual minimum-pivot candidate 72% / 77% / 80% of the time. canonical is the default selection inside the atlas: paired annual runs gave 0.386 s at +0.00258% (3 nodes), 7.84 s at +0.06004% (8 nodes), and 11.17 s at +0.33686% (10 nodes), versus 18.18 s at +0.32719% for the standard 10-node engine. Fewer spatial pivots still do not mathematically guarantee a better outer Gauss--Seidel trajectory; the canonical rule makes the observed degeneracy reproducible rather than perturbing the economic objective.

Keep the atlas disabled for one-node problems, a single curve per hour, ramp-aware or multi-resource decompositions, or whenever constructing it costs more than the repeated reoptimisations it replaces. It is most useful once several nodal storage curves are rebuilt at every outer sweep (the annual 8- and 10-node benchmarks are representative); measure both modes on smaller systems.

The test suite ships with the package:

pip install "fltoptim[test]"
python -m pytest --pyargs FLToptim.tests -m "not slow" -q

Reference

R. Girard, V. Barbesant, F. Foucault, G. Kariniotakis, Fast dynamic programming with application to storage planning, 2013. Please cite it if you use this software (see CITATION.cff).