htmlcompare

A Python library to check whether two HTML documents are "the same". It ignores differences which do not change what the document means, so a test does not fail just because a template engine emitted the attributes in a different order or wrote margin: 0px instead of margin: 0.

Usage

import htmlcompare

result = htmlcompare.compare_html(expected_html, actual_html)
if not result:
    print(result)

compare_html() returns a ComparisonResult which is true when both documents are the same. result.differences contains one Difference per mismatch, including the path to the node which caused it.

For tests the library provides two assertions:

from htmlcompare import assert_different_html, assert_same_html

assert_same_html('<div />', '<div></div>')
assert_different_html('<br>', '<p>')

Two files can also be compared on the command line:

htmlcompare expected.html actual.html

What is ignored

• whitespace between tags, and <div /> written as <div></div>
• the order of HTML attributes, and the order of the CSS classes inside a class attribute
• an empty style or class attribute, which is treated like an absent one
• HTML comments
• the formatting of CSS. style attributes and <style> tags are parsed with a real CSS parser, so trailing semicolons, the order of declarations, the case of property, function and at-rule names, equivalent numeric spellings (.5px, 0.5px), the case of dimension units (1PX, 1px), the spelling of a URL (url(a.png), url("a.png")), a unit on a zero length and any whitespace CSS has no use for do not matter.

What is a difference

Something is only ignored when HTML and CSS guarantee that both spellings mean the same thing. Where the meaning can change, the documents differ:

• whitespace which CSS gives a meaning to: .a .b is the descendant combinator and not .a.b, font-family: Arial Black is not font-family: ArialBlack
• the order of declarations which can override each other, such as background and background-color
• custom CSS syntax beginning with --, whose names are case-sensitive, and custom-property values, which var() substitutes literally: --x: 0px is not the same as --x: 0
• conditional comments in both their forms, because dropping one changes which clients display the content

Malformed CSS never raises an exception. Whatever the CSS parser can not represent is compared as source text instead, which may report a difference which is not one but never hides one.

Options

compare_html() and both assertions take a CompareOptions instance:

Limitations / Plans

No validation of conditional comments. Their condition is compared but not checked for validity. Not sure which library I can use here but at some point I'll likely need this as well.

JavaScript - for obvious reasons it will be impossible to implement perfect JS comparison but it might be possible to run some kind of "beautifier" to take care of insignificant stylistic changes. However I don't need this feature so this is unlikely to get implemented (unless contributed by someone else).

Custom hooks could help adapting the comparison to your specific needs. However I don't know which API would be best so this will wait until there are real-world use cases.

Better API: The current API is very minimal and implements just what I needed right now. I hope to improve the API once I use this project in more complex scenarios.

Other projects

xmldiff is a well established project to compare two XML documents. However it seems as if the code does not contain knowledge about specific HTML semantics (e.g. CSS, empty attributes, insignificant attribute order).

Misc

The code is licensed under the MIT license. It requires Python 3.9+.