InsightMemory 0.1.5

InsightMemory service for Best-AI-Trader

InsightMemory

English | 简体中文

InsightMemory is an LLM-native long-term memory system that can think through, synthesize, and remember what it stores.

It does more than split text into chunks and put them into a vector database. It understands incoming content, automatically determines who each memory belongs to, represented as an entity, turns scattered inputs into durable structured memory records, builds support, update, conflict, derivation, and related edges between memories, and supports associated-memory queries with evidence-backed answers.

In short: InsightMemory gives LLM applications an entity-centered, evolvable, traceable, association-aware long-term memory layer.

License note: this project is licensed under the MIT License. See LICENSE.

At A Glance

• It thinks before it stores: incoming text is interpreted into entity-centered memory instead of being dropped into a flat chunk pool.
• It synthesizes, not only appends: new information can update, extend, conflict with, or support existing memory while preserving history.
• It recalls with reasoning context: retrieval can expand through memory edges to answer why/how questions, not only similarity matches.
• It keeps evidence attached: answers can return citations, supporting observations, and historical context.

Quick Start

The current API does not take a separate entity field. Instead, the text you write should explicitly state who the memory is about, and recall queries should also mention the target entity clearly.

See Getting Started for deployment options.

Write one memory:

curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8010/memory/ingest \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
    "memory_scope": "demo",
    "context": "For the Atlas rollout project, the blocker is a failed database migration and it needs rollback."
  }'

Recall one entity-centered memory with grounded evidence:

curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8010/memory/recall \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
    "memory_scope": "demo",
    "query": "For the Atlas rollout project, what is the current blocker?"
  }'

For the full deployment path, API examples, and evaluation workflow, see Getting Started.

Why It Is Different

Capability	Typical vector memory	InsightMemory
Same-name entity separation	Usually weak or custom	Built into entity resolution
Current vs historical answers	Often mixed together	Modeled as coexisting evolving memory
Why/how recall	Mostly similarity-based	Can expand through memory edges
Evidence-backed answers	Often indirect	Returns citations and observation traces
Long-running updates	Frequently append-only	Supports update, support, conflict, and derivation

Demo Scenarios

These text demos are distilled from the repository's own evaluation reports.

1. Same-name Entity Separation

Writes:

• Atlas is a release project. Its current blocker is a failed database migration.
• Atlas is a knowledge document. Its current gap is missing rollback notes.

Recall:

• Query: What is the current blocker for the Atlas release project?
• Answer: The current blocker for the Atlas release project is a failed database migration.

What it shows:

• the same surface form can resolve to different entities;
• recall stays on the correct entity instead of mixing project and document facts.

2. Current vs Historical Memory

Writes:

• Ashgrove handbook previously allowed teams to file fallback schedules within 24 hours after shift.
• Ashgrove handbook now requires incident lead approval for all fallback schedule changes.
• Ashgrove handbook supplement: approval records must also be attached to the change packet.

Recall:

• Query: What does Ashgrove handbook require now?

• Answer: It requires incident lead approval, and approval records must be attached to the change packet.

• Query: What did Ashgrove handbook allow before?

• Answer: It previously allowed fallback schedules to be filed within 24 hours after shift.

What it shows:

• current and historical memory can coexist;
• new details can be synthesized into current memory without erasing the old state.

3. Why/How Recall With Citations

Writes:

• Billing service cannot switch to the new template yet because the tax-rate validation workflow is incomplete.
• Tax template checklist explicitly requires the validation workflow to be complete before switching.

Recall:

• Query: Why can't Billing service switch to the new template yet?
• Answer: Because the tax-rate validation workflow is incomplete, and the checklist requires it before switching.

What it shows:

• the answer can pull both the blocker and its supporting requirement;
• citations trace the answer back to the original evidence.

Evaluation Snapshot

The numbers below are taken directly from repository eval reports under evals/reports, not from hand-written examples.

Evaluation slice	Cases	Full-pass rate	Grounded answer rate	Focus
Generic accuracy	39	97.4%	100%	broad memory accuracy baseline
Same-name disambiguation	2	100%	100%	same surface form, different entities
Rule evolution	6	100%	100%	current vs historical + additive updates
Cross-entity why recall	1	100%	100%	why/how answers with supporting requirements

Coverage at the repository level currently includes:

Asset	Count
Matrix manifests	11
Case files	60

Documentation

• Getting Started: image Docker Compose, local-build Docker Compose, pip install, source install, API examples, and evaluation commands.
• Product Overview: problem framing, positioning, comparisons, and use cases.
• System Overview: core concepts, features, architecture, and repo structure.
• Memory Design: deeper design notes for entity identity and memory modeling.
• Background Task Scheduling: background task runtime design.
• Generalization Test Expansion Plan: eval coverage plan and suite rules.
• Development Guide: bilingual LLM-first development principles for memory logic.
• Technical Blog Drafts: Chinese articles for explaining and promoting the project.

Support and Collaboration

InsightMemory is still under active development. Useful ways to help include:

• trying it in a real AI agent or copilot workflow and sharing failure cases;
• contributing evaluation cases for same-name entities, long-running evolution, and multi-entity documents;
• improving docs, examples, deployment guides, and benchmark reports;
• opening issues for bugs, regressions, and missing use cases;
• sharing LLM API keys, test credits, or sponsorship so the project can keep improving prompts, evaluation coverage, and long-running memory experiments;
• reaching out for collaboration, integration, or sponsorship.

If you want to collaborate around the project, contact:

[e-mail]

Please do not post API keys in public issues or comments. Contact privately if you want to support the project with LLM API access. Thank you for supporting InsightMemory.

License

This project is licensed under the MIT License.

See LICENSE for the full text.