MCPower 0.5.0

Monte Carlo Power Analysis for Statistical Models

███╗   ███╗  ██████╗ ██████╗ 
████╗ ████║ ██╔════╝ ██╔══██╗ ██████╗ ██╗    ██╗███████╗██████╗ 
██╔████╔██║ ██║      ██║  ██║██╔═══██╗██║    ██║██╔════╝██╔══██╗
██║╚██╔╝██║ ██║      ██████╔╝██║   ██║██║ █╗ ██║█████╗  ██████╔╝
██║ ╚═╝ ██║ ██║      ██╔═══╝ ██║   ██║██║███╗██║██╔══╝  ██╔══██╗
██║     ██║ ╚██████╗ ██║     ╚██████╔╝╚███╔███╔╝███████╗██║  ██║
╚═╝     ╚═╝  ╚═════╝ ╚═╝      ╚═════╝  ╚══╝╚══╝ ╚══════╝╚═╝  ╚═╝

MCPower

Simple Monte Carlo power analysis for complex models. Find the sample size you need or check if your study has enough power - even with complex models that traditional power analysis can't handle.

Desktop Application

It's a Python package, but prefer a graphical interface? MCPower GUI is a standalone desktop app — no Python installation required. Download ready-to-run executables for Windows, Linux, and macOS from the releases page.

Why MCPower?

Traditional power analysis breaks down with interactions, correlated predictors, categorical variables, or non-normal data. MCPower uses simulation instead of formulas — it generates thousands of datasets exactly like yours, then sees how often your analysis finds real effects.

Just write your formula. Define your model the way you'd write it in R — outcome = treatment + covariate + treatment*covariate. MCPower parses the formula, sets up the simulation, and handles interactions, factor coding, and dummy variables automatically. You focus on the research question, not the mechanics. More model types (logistic regression, ANOVA) are on the way.

Test your assumptions with scenarios. Real studies rarely match textbook conditions — effect sizes may be smaller than expected, distributions may be skewed, or variance may not be constant. Turn on scenarios=True and MCPower automatically tests your power under optimistic, realistic, and worst-case conditions. Instead of a single number, you get a range that shows how sensitive your design is to violated assumptions — so you plan for reality, not just the best case.

Track power for all your hypotheses at once. Most studies test more than one effect. By default, MCPower evaluates power for every effect in your model simultaneously. You can also narrow it down with target_test="effect1, effect2". Built-in multiple comparison corrections (Bonferroni, FDR, Holm, Tukey) keep false positive rates under control, so you see exactly which effects your study can reliably detect and which need more participants.

Use your own data. Upload a CSV and MCPower auto-detects variable types (continuous, binary, or categorical), preserves real distributions, and handles correlations between predictors. No need to overthink whether your data is normal, skewed, or categorical — just upload it and MCPower samples from the empirical distribution. This is especially useful when you have pilot data or a related dataset and want your power analysis to reflect actual conditions rather than idealized ones.

✅ Works with complexity: Interactions, correlations, multi-level factors, any distribution ✅ Multiple hypotheses: Test all effects at once with built-in multiple comparison corrections ✅ Two simple commands: find_sample_size() or find_power() — that's the entire API ✅ Minimal math required: Just specify your model formula and expected effect sizes

Get Started in 2 Minutes

Install

pip install mcpower

Update to the latest version.

pip install --upgrade mcpower

Your First Power Analysis

# 0. Import installed package
from mcpower import MCPower

# 1. Define your model (just like R)
model = MCPower("satisfaction = treatment + motivation")

# 2. Set effect sizes (how big you expect effects to be)
model.set_effects("treatment=0.5, motivation=0.3")

# 3. Change the treatment to "binary" (people receive treatment or not).
model.set_variable_type("treatment=binary")

# 4. Find the sample size you need
model.find_sample_size(target_test="treatment", from_size=50, to_size=200, summary="long")

Output: "You need N=75 for 80% power to detect the treatment effect"

That's it! 🎉

🎯 Scenario Analysis: Test Your Assumptions

Real studies rarely match perfect assumptions. MCPower's scenario analysis tests how robust your power calculations are under realistic conditions.

# Test robustness with scenario analysis
model.find_sample_size(
    target_test="treatment", 
    from_size=50, to_size=300,
    scenarios=True  # 🔥 The magic happens here
)

Output:

SCENARIO SUMMARY
================================================================================

Uncorrected Sample Sizes:
Test                                     Optimistic   Realistic    Doomer      
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
treatment                                75           85           100         
================================================================================

What each scenario means:

• Optimistic: Your ideal conditions (original settings)
• Realistic: Moderate real-world complications (small effect variations, mild assumption violations)
• Doomer: Conservative estimate (larger effect variations, stronger assumption violations)

💡 Pro tip: Use the Realistic scenario for planning. If Doomer is acceptable, you're really safe!

Understanding Effect Sizes

Effect sizes tell you how much the outcome changes when predictors change.

• Effect size = 0.5 means the outcome increases by 0.5 standard deviations when:
  • Continuous variables: Predictor increases by 1 standard deviation
  • Binary variables: Predictor changes from 0 to 1 (e.g., control → treatment)
  • Factor variables: Each level compared to reference level (first level)

Practical examples:

model.set_effects("treatment=0.5, age=0.3, income=0.2")

• treatment=0.5: Treatment increases outcome by 0.5 SD (medium-large effect)
• age=0.3: Each 1 SD increase in age → 0.3 SD increase in outcome
• income=0.2: Each 1 SD increase in income → 0.2 SD increase in outcome

Effect size guidelines:

• 0.1 = Small effect (detectable but modest)
• 0.25 = Medium effect (clearly noticeable)
• 0.4 = Large effect (substantial impact)

Effect size guidelines (binary variables):

• 0.2 = Small effect (detectable but modest)
• 0.5 = Medium effect (clearly noticeable)
• 0.8 = Large effect (substantial impact)

Your uploaded data is automatically standardized (mean=0, SD=1) so effect sizes work the same way whether you use synthetic or real data.

Copy-Paste Examples for Common Studies

Randomized Controlled Trial

from mcpower import MCPower

# RCT with treatment + control variables
model = MCPower("outcome = treatment + age + baseline_score")
model.set_effects("treatment=0.6, age=0.2, baseline_score=0.8")
model.set_variable_type("treatment=binary")  # 0/1 treatment

# Find sample size for treatment effect with scenario analysis
model.find_sample_size(target_test="treatment", from_size=100, to_size=500, 
                      by=50, scenarios=True)

A/B Test with Interaction

from mcpower import MCPower

# Test if treatment effect depends on user type
model = MCPower("conversion = treatment + user_type + treatment*user_type")
model.set_effects("treatment=0.4, user_type=0.3, treatment:user_type=0.5")
model.set_variable_type("treatment=binary, user_type=binary")

# Check power robustness for the interaction
model.find_power(sample_size=400, target_test="treatment:user_type", scenarios=True)

Multi-Group Study with Categorical Variables

from mcpower import MCPower

# Study with 3 treatment groups and 4 education levels
model = MCPower("wellbeing = treatment + education + age")
model.set_variable_type("treatment=(factor,3), education=(factor,4)")

# Set effects for each factor level (vs. reference level 1)
model.set_effects("treatment[2]=0.4, treatment[3]=0.6, education[2]=0.3, education[3]=0.5, education[4]=0.7, age=0.2")

# Find sample size for treatment effects
model.find_sample_size(target_test="treatment[2], treatment[3]", scenarios=True)

Survey with Correlated Predictors

from mcpower import MCPower

# Predictors are often correlated in real data
model = MCPower("wellbeing = income + education + social_support")
model.set_effects("income=0.4, education=0.3, social_support=0.6")
model.set_correlations("corr(income, education)=0.5, corr(income, social_support)=0.3")

# Find sample size for any effect
model.find_sample_size(target_test="all", from_size=200, to_size=800, 
                      by=100, scenarios=True)

Customize for Your Study

Different Variable Types

# Binary, factors, skewed, or other distributions
model.set_variable_type("treatment=binary, condition=(factor,3), income=right_skewed, age=normal")

# Binary with custom proportions (30% get treatment)
model.set_variable_type("treatment=(binary,0.3)")

# Factors with custom group sizes (20%, 50%, 30%)
model.set_variable_type("condition=(factor,0.2,0.5,0.3)")

Working with Factors (Categorical Variables)

# Factors automatically create dummy variables
model = MCPower("outcome = treatment + education")
model.set_variable_type("treatment=(factor,3), education=(factor,4)")

# Set effects for specific levels (level 1 is always reference)
model.set_effects("treatment[2]=0.5, treatment[3]=0.7, education[2]=0.3, education[3]=0.4, education[4]=0.6")

Your Own Data

Use upload_data() to preserve real-world distribution shapes and relationships:

import csv

# Load your data (no extra dependencies needed)
with open("my_data.csv") as f:
    reader = csv.DictReader(f)
    rows = list(reader)
data = {col: [float(r[col]) for r in rows] for col in ["hp", "wt", "cyl"]}

# Upload with automatic type detection
model = MCPower("mpg = hp + wt + cyl")
model.upload_data(data)
model.set_effects("hp=0.5, wt=0.3, cyl[2]=0.2, cyl[3]=0.4")
model.find_power(sample_size=100)

Or with pandas (optional: pip install pandas):

import pandas as pd
data = pd.read_csv("my_data.csv")
model.upload_data(data[["hp", "wt", "cyl"]])

Auto-Detection

Variables are automatically classified based on unique values:

• 1 unique value: Dropped (constant)
• 2 unique values: Binary variable
• 3-6 unique values: Factor/categorical variable
• 7+ unique values: Continuous variable

Correlation Preservation Modes

Control how correlations are handled with the preserve_correlation parameter:

# No correlation preservation
model.upload_data(data, preserve_correlation="no")

# Partial: Compute correlations from data, merge with user settings
model.upload_data(data, preserve_correlation="partial")

# Strict: Bootstrap whole rows to preserve exact relationships (default)
model.upload_data(data, preserve_correlation="strict")

Override Auto-Detection

Force specific variable types:

model.upload_data(
    data,
    data_types={"cyl": "factor", "hp": "continuous"}
)

Multiple Testing

# Testing multiple effects? Control false positives
model.find_power(
    sample_size=200,
    target_test="treatment,covariate,treatment:covariate",
    correction="Benjamini-Hochberg",
    scenarios=True  # Test robustness too!
)

Post-Hoc Pairwise Comparisons (Tukey HSD)

# Compare specific factor levels with Tukey correction
model = MCPower("outcome = group + covariate")
model.set_variable_type("group=(factor,3)")
model.set_effects("group[2]=0.4, group[3]=0.6, covariate=0.3")

# Use "vs" syntax for pairwise comparisons + correction="tukey"
model.find_power(
    sample_size=150,
    target_test="group[0] vs group[1], group[0] vs group[2]",
    correction="tukey"
)

Test Individual Assumption Violations

# Manually add specific violations (without full scenario analysis)
model.set_heterogeneity(0.2)        # Effect sizes vary between people
model.set_heteroskedasticity(0.15)  # Violation of equal variance assumption

# Run with your manual settings (no automatic scenario variations)
model.find_sample_size(target_test="treatment")

Mixed-Effects Models (Experimental)

from mcpower import MCPower

# Random intercept — clustered data
model = MCPower("satisfaction ~ treatment + motivation + (1|school)")
model.set_cluster("school", ICC=0.2, n_clusters=20)
model.set_effects("treatment=0.5, motivation=0.3")
model.set_variable_type("treatment=binary")
model.set_max_failed_simulations(0.10)
model.find_power(sample_size=1000)  # 1000/20 = 50 per cluster

# Random slopes — effect varies across clusters
model = MCPower("y ~ x1 + (1 + x1|school)")
model.set_cluster("school", ICC=0.2, n_clusters=20,
                   random_slopes=["x1"], slope_variance=0.1,
                   slope_intercept_corr=0.3)
model.set_effects("x1=0.5")
model.set_max_failed_simulations(0.30)
model.find_power(sample_size=1000)

# Nested random effects — students in classrooms in schools
model = MCPower("y ~ treatment + (1|school/classroom)")
model.set_cluster("school", ICC=0.15, n_clusters=10)
model.set_cluster("classroom", ICC=0.10, n_per_parent=3)  # 3 classrooms per school
model.set_effects("treatment=0.5")
model.set_max_failed_simulations(0.30)
model.find_power(sample_size=1500)

See the Mixed-Effects Models wiki page for detailed documentation on all model types, parameters, and design recommendations.

More precision

# To make a more precise estimation, consider increasing the number of simulations.
model.set_simulations(10000)

# Parallelization is enabled by default for mixed models ("mixedmodels" mode).
# To enable it for all analyses:
model.set_parallel(True)

# To disable parallelization entirely:
model.set_parallel(False)

Reproducibility & programmatic use

# Set a seed for reproducible results
model.set_seed(42)

# All set_* methods support chaining
model.set_effects("x1=0.5").set_variable_type("x1=binary").set_alpha(0.01)

# Get results as a Python dict for further processing
results = model.find_power(sample_size=200, return_results=True)

# Custom progress callback (useful in notebooks or GUIs)
model.find_power(sample_size=200, progress_callback=lambda cur, tot: print(f"{cur}/{tot}"))

# Disable progress output entirely
model.find_power(sample_size=200, progress_callback=False)

Quick Reference

Want to...	Use this
Find required sample size	model.find_sample_size(target_test="effect_name")
Check power for specific N	model.find_power(sample_size=150, target_test="effect_name")
Test robustness	Add scenarios=True to either method
Detailed output with plots	Add summary="long" to either method
Test overall model	target_test="overall"
Test multiple effects	target_test="effect1, effect2" or "all"
Binary variables	model.set_variable_type("var=binary")
Factor variables	model.set_variable_type("var=(factor,3)")
Factor effects	model.set_effects("var[2]=0.5, var[3]=0.7")
Correlated predictors	model.set_correlations("corr(var1, var2)=0.4")
Multiple testing correction	Add correction="FDR", "Holm", "Bonferroni", or "Tukey"
Post-hoc pairwise comparison	target_test="group[0] vs group[1]" with correction="tukey"
Mixed model (random intercept)	MCPower("y ~ x + (1|group)") + model.set_cluster(...) (experimental)
Random slopes	MCPower("y ~ x + (1+x|group)") + set_cluster(..., random_slopes=["x"], slope_variance=0.1) (experimental)
Nested random effects	MCPower("y ~ x + (1|A/B)") + two set_cluster() calls (experimental)
Reproducible results	model.set_seed(42)
Get results as dict	Add return_results=True to either method
Stricter significance	model.set_alpha(0.01)
Target 90% power	model.set_power(90)

When to Use MCPower

✅ Use MCPower when you have:

• Interaction terms (treatment*covariate)
• Categorical variables with multiple levels
• Binary or non-normal variables
• Correlated predictors
• Multiple effects to test
• Need to test assumption robustness
• Complex models where traditional power analysis fails

✅ Use Scenario Analysis when:

• Planning important studies
• Working with messy real-world data
• Effect sizes are uncertain
• Want conservative sample size estimates
• You need confidence in your numbers

❌ Use traditional power analysis for:

• For models that are not yet implemented
• For simple models where all assumptions are clearly met.
• For large analyses with tens of thousands of observations, tiny effects, or very low alpha levels.

What Makes Scenarios Different? (Be careful, unvalidated, preliminary scenarios)

Traditional power analysis assumes perfect conditions. MCPower's scenarios add realistic "messiness":

Scenario	What's Different	When to Use
Optimistic	Your exact settings	Best-case planning
Realistic	Mild effect variations, small assumption violations	Recommended for most studies
Doomer	Larger effect variations, stronger assumption violations	Conservative/worst-case planning

Behind the scenes, scenarios randomly vary:

• Effect sizes between participants
• Correlation strengths
• Variable distributions
• Assumption violations

This gives you a range of realistic outcomes instead of a single optimistic estimate. ⚠️ Important: Scenario analysis uses rule-of-thumb adjustments and may not be accurate in all settings, as it attempts to cover a wide range of real-world conditions across different fields.

📚 Advanced Features (Click to expand)

Advanced Options

All Variable Types

model.set_variable_type("""
    treatment=binary,           # 0/1 with 50% split
    ses=(binary,0.3),          # 0/1 with 30% split  
    condition=(factor,3),       # 3-level factor (equal proportions)
    education=(factor,0.2,0.5,0.3), # 3-level factor (custom proportions)
    age=normal,                # Standard normal (default)
    income=right_skewed,       # Positively skewed
    depression=left_skewed,    # Negatively skewed
    response_time=high_kurtosis, # Heavy-tailed
    rating=uniform             # Uniform distribution
""")

Factor Variables in Detail

# Factor variables are categorical with multiple levels
model = MCPower("outcome = treatment + education")

# Create factors
model.set_variable_type("treatment=(factor,3), education=(factor,4)")

# This creates dummy variables automatically:
# treatment[2], treatment[3] (treatment[1] is reference)
# education[2], education[3], education[4] (education[1] is reference)

# Set effects for specific levels
model.set_effects("treatment[2]=0.5, treatment[3]=0.7, education[2]=0.3")

# Or set same effect for all levels of a factor
model.set_effects("treatment=0.5")  # Applies to treatment[2] and treatment[3]

# Important: Factors cannot be used in correlations
# This will error: model.set_correlations("corr(treatment, education)=0.3")
# Use continuous variables only: model.set_correlations("corr(age, income)=0.3")

Complex Correlation Structures

import numpy as np

# Full correlation matrix for 3 CONTINUOUS variables only
# (Factors are excluded from correlation matrices)
corr_matrix = np.array([
    [1.0, 0.4, 0.6],    # Variable 1 with others
    [0.4, 1.0, 0.2],    # Variable 2 with others
    [0.6, 0.2, 1.0]     # Variable 3 with others
])
model.set_correlations(corr_matrix)

Performance Tuning

# Adjust for your needs
model.set_power(90)           # Target 90% power instead of 80%
model.set_alpha(0.01)         # Stricter significance (p < 0.01)
model.set_simulations(10000)  # High precision (slower)

Formula Syntax

# These are equivalent:
"y = x1 + x2 + x1*x2"        # Assignment style
"y ~ x1 + x2 + x1*x2"        # R-style formula  
"x1 + x2 + x1*x2"            # Predictors only

# Interactions:
"x1*x2"         # Main effects + interaction (x1 + x2 + x1:x2)
"x1:x2"         # Interaction only
"x1*x2*x3"      # All main effects + all interactions

Correlation Syntax (Continuous Variables Only)

# String format (recommended)
model.set_correlations("corr(x1, x2)=0.3, corr(x1, x3)=-0.2")

# Shorthand format  
model.set_correlations("(x1, x2)=0.3, (x1, x3)=-0.2")

# Note: Factor variables cannot be correlated
# Only use continuous/binary variables in correlations

Requirements

• Python ≥ 3.10
• NumPy, matplotlib, joblib
• C++ compiler (required for building the native backend during install)
• pandas (optional, for DataFrame input — install with pip install mcpower[pandas])
• statsmodels (optional, for mixed-effects models — install with pip install mcpower[lme])

Documentation

Full documentation is available on the MCPower Wiki, including:

• Quick Start
• Model Specification
• Variable Types
• Effect Sizes
• Mixed-Effects Models (random intercepts, slopes, nested effects)
• ANOVA & Post-Hoc Tests
• Scenario Analysis
• API Reference

Need Help?

• Issues: GitHub Issues
• Questions: [e-mail]

Roadmap

• ✅ Linear Regression
• ✅ Scenarios, robustness analysis
• ✅ Factor variables (categorical predictors)
• ✅ C++ native backend (pybind11 + Eigen, 3x speedup)
• ⚠️ Mixed Effects Models (random intercepts, random slopes, nested effects) — experimental
• 🚧 Logistic Regression (coming soon)
• 🚧 ANOVA (coming soon)
• 🚧 Guide about methods, corrections (coming soon)
• 📋 2 groups comparison with alternative tests
• 📋 Robust regression methods

License & Citation

GPL v3. If you use MCPower in research, please cite:

Lenartowicz, P. (2025). MCPower: Monte Carlo Power Analysis for Statistical Models. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16502734

@software{mcpower2025,
  author = {Pawel Lenartowicz},
  title = {MCPower: Monte Carlo Power Analysis for Statistical Models},
  year = {2025},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.16502734},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16502734}
}

---

🚀 Ready to start? Copy one of the examples above and adapt it to your study!

I created this project for free without receiving any payment, and if you'd like to support my work, donations are appreciated!

💖 Support this project