a2a-bridge
Connect LibreChat — or any OpenAI-compatible chat client — to any A2A agent.
A2A agents speak JSON-RPC. Chat clients speak the OpenAI chat-completions API. This is the adapter in between: each configured A2A agent shows up as a selectable model, and the agent's answer lands on screen unchanged.
┌─────────────┐ POST /v1/chat/completions ┌────────────┐ JSON-RPC message/send ┌───────────┐
│ chat client │ ────────────────────────────► │ a2a-bridge │ ────────────────────────► │ A2A agent │
│ (LibreChat) │ ◄──────────────────────────── │ │ ◄──────────────────────── │ │
└─────────────┘ assistant message └────────────┘ Task + artifacts └───────────┘
Adding an agent is a config block, not a code change.
Why not MCP?
MCP exposes an agent as a tool, which means a model sits between the agent and the user and paraphrases whatever comes back. Fine for data lookups, destructive for anything where the agent's own voice, formatting, or cross-agent attribution matters — multi-agent responses that label which agent said what get flattened into a summary.
A2A treats the far side as a peer, not a function call. This bridge keeps that property: there is no model in the path. The user's text goes to the agent, and the agent's text is what renders.
Quickstart
pip install a2a-bridge # or from a checkout: pip install -e .
cp examples/agents.example.yml agents.yml
$EDITOR agents.yml # set card_url to your agent
A2A_BRIDGE_CONFIG=agents.yml python -m a2a_bridge.server
Verify without a chat client in the loop:
curl -s localhost:8600/healthz
curl -s localhost:8600/v1/models
curl -s localhost:8600/v1/chat/completions \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'X-Conversation-Id: test-1' \
-d '{"model":"myagent","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"hello"}]}'
Then send a second request with the same X-Conversation-Id and a follow-up that depends on
the first answer. If the agent remembers, sessions work — that is the part most likely to be
subtly broken, and the part hardest to notice later.
Docker
docker build -t a2a-bridge .
docker run -p 8600:8600 \
-v "$PWD/agents.yml:/app/agents.yml:ro" \
-v a2a_data:/data \
a2a-bridge
Keep /data on a volume. It holds the conversation → contextId map, and losing it means every
user starts over — including losing whatever the agent had decided about them.
Configure
store: "sqlite:///data/context.db" # memory:// | sqlite:///path | mongodb://...
api_keys_env: A2A_BRIDGE_API_KEYS # comma-separated; omit to leave the bridge open
agents:
- id: myagent # becomes the model name
card_url: https://agent.example.org/api/agent/
conversation_id_header: X-Conversation-Id # see "Sessions" below
Everything else — the JSON-RPC endpoint, protocol version, streaming support — is read from the
agent card. See examples/agents.example.yml for every option.
| Route | Purpose |
|---|---|
POST /v1/chat/completions |
blocking and streaming |
GET /v1/models |
one entry per configured agent, so clients self-populate |
GET /healthz |
liveness |
Using it with LibreChat
Short version:
endpoints:
custom:
- name: "My Agent"
apiKey: "${A2A_BRIDGE_API_KEY}"
baseURL: "http://a2a-bridge:8600/v1"
models: { default: ["myagent"], fetch: false }
headers:
X-Conversation-Id: "{{LIBRECHAT_BODY_CONVERSATIONID}}"
titleEndpoint: "bedrock" # anything BUT this endpoint
maxContextTokens: 200000
→ Full guide, including the @mention setup and a list of traps that do not announce
themselves: docs/librechat.md.
Read the traps section before debugging anything. Several of them fail silently — a wrong trailing slash, a title model that does not exist, a config file whose inode changed — and each one looks like a different problem than it is.
What the agent needs to support
Minimum for a working integration:
- An agent card, at
/.well-known/agent-card.jsonor served from the endpoint itself. message/send(JSON-RPC 2.0), returning a Task whose text lives inresult.artifacts[].parts[].text.- A server-minted
contextIdreturned on the first response and honoured on later ones.
Optional, and worth having:
message/stream— mainly for working-state notes, which turn a long blank wait into visible progress. Streaming does not imply incremental text; many agents send a whole artifact at once.- Working-state
status.messagecopy — "Searching…", "Handing off to X…" — forwarded to the user as it arrives.
Not used: Task lifecycle management, polling, push notifications. An agent needing those is not yet a fit for a synchronous chat UI.
Sessions
The single most important thing to get right.
The bridge omits contextId on the first turn, lets the server mint one, stores it against the
client's conversation id, and echoes it afterwards. Agents commonly bind session state to that
value — history, entitlement, subscription — so a rotated contextId can silently send a user
back to the beginning.
That is why conversation_id_header matters. Without it the bridge falls back to hashing the
first user message, which breaks the moment anyone edits or regenerates it.
Design notes
Behaviours that took real debugging to establish, in case they look arbitrary:
Only the newest user turn is sent. A2A agents are stateful per contextId and keep their own
transcript. Replaying the client's history would duplicate their context every turn and inflate
their token spend.
Parts within an artifact concatenate with nothing between them; separate artifacts get the separator. A streaming agent emits one part per chunk of a single string. Using a separator for both splits words and breaks markdown mid-token.
Two failure layers. JSON-RPC errors arrive as HTTP 200 with an error object. Rate limiting
arrives as a bare HTTP 429 with an empty body, from middleware above the JSON-RPC app — no
envelope, nothing to parse. Code that only inspects JSON-RPC errors mistakes one for the other.
429 is surfaced, never retried. A throttled request is information the operator wants, not something to hide in a retry loop.
Redirects are not followed. A 307 on a POST loses its body in most clients. Usually a missing
trailing slash, so it is reported as the configuration error it is.
Streaming is always available to the client. Chat clients request stream: true by default and
break on a plain JSON body, so a blocking agent's answer is emitted as a single delta.
Failures render in-chat by default. A non-2xx becomes a contextless red banner in most chat
UIs. Set on_error: http_error per agent for programmatic callers.
Per-turn ids are recorded even though nothing reads them. The agent's task id is emitted once and cannot be reconstructed later; without it, "which answer was this about?" is unanswerable for feedback, cost or audit.
Forwarding caller identity
Agents that rate-limit per IP see every user of a server-side bridge as one caller, so one busy user throttles everyone. If the agent supports it, forward a stable per-user id:
caller:
id_header: X-Caller-Id
auth_header: X-Caller-Auth
secret_env: MY_SHARED_SECRET
The bridge sends the id plus an HMAC-SHA256 of it under a shared secret, so the agent can verify rather than trust. An unsigned identity header is a rate-limit bypass waiting to be found, and the secret must stay server-side.
Use a secret scoped to this purpose. If the agent's operator offers you a key that also signs sessions or authorises billing, ask for a separate one — proving "this caller id came from me" needs far less authority than that.
Development
pip install -e '.[dev]'
pytest
ruff check src tests
Contract tests live in tests/. Recorded wire responses go in tests/fixtures/ — see the README
there. Recording rather than hand-writing them is the point: the tests should fail when a peer
changes its wire shape, which only works if the fixtures came off the wire.
The fixtures shipped here came off the wire from a live multi-agent publisher, and cover a paywall gate, a cross-agent handoff, both JSON-RPC error shapes, and streaming with progress notes. The envelopes are untouched; the prose inside them was rewritten to a fictional publisher, so nothing here reproduces a real organization's copy.
Status
Early, and deliberately small. Blocking message/send, optional message/stream, card discovery,
one request/response turn. No Task lifecycle management, no push notifications.
License
MIT
Metadata
Release files for a2a-bridge 0.1.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| a2a_bridge-0.1.0.tar.gz | 30.0 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a2a_bridge-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 53.0 kB
Release files / a2a_bridge-0.1.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | a2a_bridge-0.1.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 30.0 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
f07fc929f710a257be4c317ad097c08d2921ba2092f0f96554172adc7c53c529
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
e8034687c5ea02f36b2fea23efefbf29d726047cb8ed341e2a651f8ca22b2e94
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 4, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / a2a_bridge-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | a2a_bridge-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 22.9 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
76c933547c7b3cfcdc512fc1b4b91e92aeb5adaa17699f2f08425fefd89c1b97
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
200ce45c2e0de5e62302e32e10019a7696da85d0dd97e78c6189edb3c4488367
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 4, 2026.
Transparency log