Skip to main content

Accurate sums and dot products for Python

Project description

# accupy

Accurate sums and (dot) products for Python.

[![CircleCI](https://img.shields.io/circleci/project/github/nschloe/accupy/master.svg)](https://circleci.com/gh/nschloe/accupy/tree/master)
[![codecov](https://img.shields.io/codecov/c/github/nschloe/accupy.svg)](https://codecov.io/gh/nschloe/accupy)
[![Codacy grade](https://img.shields.io/codacy/grade/fe8097aff5cc48aca70f4b4475755126.svg)](https://app.codacy.com/app/nschloe/accupy/dashboard)
[![accurate](https://img.shields.io/badge/accurate-very-brightgreen.svg)](https://img.shields.io/badge/accurate-very-brightgreen.svg)
[![PyPi Version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/accupy.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/accupy)
[![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.1185173.svg)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1185173)
[![GitHub stars](https://img.shields.io/github/stars/nschloe/accupy.svg?logo=github&label=Stars)](https://github.com/nschloe/accupy)


### Sums

Summing up values in a list can get tricky if the values are floating point
numbers; digit cancellation can occur and the result may come out wrong. A
classical example is the sum
```
1.0e16 + 1.0 - 1.0e16
```
The actual result is `1.0`, but in double precision, this will result in `0.0`.
While in this example the failure is quite obvious, it can get a lot more
tricky than that. accupy provides
```python
p, exact, cond = accupy.generate_ill_conditioned_sum(100, 1.0e20)
```
which, given a length and a target condition number, will produce an array of
floating point numbers that is hard to sum up.

accupy has the following methods for summation:

* `accupy.kahan_sum(p)`: [Kahan
summation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahan_summation_algorithm)

* `accupy.fsum(p)`: A vectorization wrapper around
[math.fsum](https://docs.python.org/3/library/math.html#math.fsum) (which
uses Shewchuck's algorithm [[1]](#references) (see also
[here](https://code.activestate.com/recipes/393090/))).

* `accupy.ksum(p, K=2)`: Summation in K-fold precision (from [[2]](#references))

All summation methods sum the first dimension of a multidimensional NumPy array.

Let's compare them.

#### Accuracy comparison (sum)

![](https://nschloe.github.io/accupy/accuracy-sums.png)

As expected, the naive
[sum](https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#sum) performs very badly
with ill-conditioned sums; likewise for
[`numpy.sum`](https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.sum.html)
which uses pairwise summation. Kahan summation not significantly better; [this,
too, is
expected](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahan_summation_algorithm#Accuracy).

Computing the sum with 2-fold accuracy in `accupy.ksum` gives the correct
result if the condition is at most in the range of machine precision; further
increasing `K` helps with worse conditions.

Shewchuck's algorithm in `math.fsum` always gives the correct result to full
floating point precision.


#### Runtime comparison (sum)

![](https://nschloe.github.io/accupy/speed-comparison1.png)

![](https://nschloe.github.io/accupy/speed-comparison2.png)

We compare more and more sums of fixed size (above) and larger and larger sums,
but a fixed number of them (below). In both cases, the least accurate method is
the fastest (`numpy.sum`), and the most accurate the slowest (`accupy.fsum`).

### Dot products

accupy has the following methods for dot products:

* `accupy.fdot(p)`: A transformation of the dot product of length _n_ into a
sum of length _2n_, computed with
[math.fsum](https://docs.python.org/3/library/math.html#math.fsum)

* `accupy.kdot(p, K=2)`: Dot product in K-fold precision (from
[[2]](#references))

Let's compare them.

#### Accuracy comparison (dot)

accupy can construct ill-conditioned dot products with
```python
x, y, exact, cond = accupy.generate_ill_conditioned_dot_product(100, 1.0e20)
```
With this, the accuracy of the different methods is compared.

![](https://nschloe.github.io/accupy/accuracy-dot.png)

As for sums, `numpy.dot` is the least accurate, followed by instanced of `kdot`.
`fdot` is provably accurate up into the last digit

#### Runtime comparison (dot)

![](https://nschloe.github.io/accupy/speed-comparison-dot1.png)
![](https://nschloe.github.io/accupy/speed-comparison-dot2.png)

NumPy's `numpy.dot` is _much_ faster than all alternatives provided by accupy.
This is because the bookkeeping of truncation errors takes more steps, but
mostly because of NumPy's highly optimized dot implementation.


### References

1. [Richard Shewchuk, _Adaptive Precision Floating-Point Arithmetic and Fast
Robust Geometric Predicates_, J. Discrete Comput. Geom. (1997), 18(305),
305–363](https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009321)

2. [Takeshi Ogita, Siegfried M. Rump, and Shin'ichi Oishi, _Accurate Sum and Dot
Product_, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. (2006), 26(6), 1955–1988 (34
pages)](https://doi.org/10.1137/030601818)

### Dependencies

accupy needs the C++ [Eigen
library](http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Main_Page), provided in
Debian/Ubuntu by
[`libeigen3-dev`](https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libeigen3-dev).

### Installation

accupy is [available from the Python Package Index](https://pypi.org/project/accupy/), so with
```
pip install -U accupy
```
you can install/upgrade.

### Testing

To run the tests, just check out this repository and type
```
MPLBACKEND=Agg pytest
```

### Distribution

To create a new release

1. bump the `__version__` number,

2. publish to PyPi and GitHub:
```
$ make publish
```

### License
accupy is published under the [MIT license](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License).

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

accupy-0.1.2.tar.gz (10.0 kB view hashes)

Uploaded Source

Supported by

AWS AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Datadog Monitoring Fastly Fastly CDN Google Google Download Analytics Microsoft Microsoft PSF Sponsor Pingdom Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Sentry Error logging StatusPage StatusPage Status page