AfterAction
AfterAction helps you understand why an agent run went wrong, what it missed, and what to change before the next attempt.
It captures runs, pulls in GitHub PR context, diagnoses repeat failure patterns, and turns that diagnosis into practical interventions such as prompt exports, repo instruction updates, and replay context.
Why this exists
Agent-assisted PR repair often fails in familiar ways:
- the agent keeps fixing the wrong files
- failing CI checks never make it into the plan
- review comments stay unresolved across attempts
- the next run starts without the lessons from the last one
AfterAction makes those mistakes visible and reusable. Instead of treating each run like a fresh start, it records the run, analyzes the failure surface, and prepares the next attempt with better context.
Who it's for
- engineers using coding agents to fix pull requests
- teams experimenting with Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, or plain CLI runners
- people who want a local audit trail for agent behavior
- anyone trying to turn trial-and-error repair loops into a more disciplined workflow
What it does
- captures command runs, output, exit codes, diffs, events, and artifacts
- ingests GitHub PR context including changed files, review threads, checks, workflow runs, and CI log excerpts
- diagnoses patterns like repeated failures, low overlap with failing files, ignored review comments, and broad edit drift
- exports interventions as task prompts, runner context, replay context, and repo instruction patches
- applies repo instruction updates to files like
AGENTS.md,CLAUDE.md,GEMINI.md,CURSOR.md, andCOPILOT.md - replays a prior run with intervention context injected into the environment
- scores replay outcomes so you can tell whether the next attempt improved or regressed
- serves a local UI for runs, findings, interventions, and replay comparisons
Runner support
AfterAction is runner-agnostic by default.
shell: fallback mode for any CLI commandopenclaw: OpenClaw-specific targeting and transcript parsingclaude-code: Claude Code instruction targeting and transcript parsingcodex: Codex instruction targeting and transcript parsing
If a runner exposes richer output, AfterAction can extract structured events such as tool.called, file.edited, and retry.detected. If not, the shell path still works.
Installation
Requires Python 3.11+.
pip install afteragent
For development:
git clone https://github.com/txmed82/afteragent.git
cd afteragent
pip install -e .
Quick start
Capture a simple run:
afteragent exec -- python3 -c "print('hello from afteragent')"
List runs and inspect one:
afteragent runs
afteragent show <run-id>
afteragent diagnose <run-id>
Open the local viewer:
afteragent ui
By default, AfterAction stores everything in .afteragent/ in the current repository.
Common use cases
1. Capture a local agent run
Use this when you already know what command you want to run and you want the full trace.
afteragent exec -- codex run "Fix the failing tests"
afteragent exec -- openclaw repair
afteragent exec -- python3 scripts/repair.py
2. Snapshot a live pull request before making changes
Use this when you want the failure surface first: changed files, review threads, checks, and CI evidence.
afteragent validate-pr --repo vega/sphinxext-altair --pr 16
afteragent diagnose <run-id>
3. Export or apply interventions from a prior run
Use this when a failed run surfaced useful guidance you want to preserve.
afteragent export-interventions <run-id>
afteragent apply-interventions <run-id>
Typical outputs include:
- a task prompt export
- runner policy context
- replay context JSON
- repo instruction patches
4. Replay a run with better context
Use this when you want to retry from a known failure with interventions already loaded.
afteragent replay <run-id> -- python3 -c "import os; print(os.environ['AFTERACTION_SOURCE_RUN'])"
afteragent replay --runner claude-code <run-id> -- claude "Fix the failing PR"
afteragent replay --runner codex <run-id> -- codex run "Address review comments"
5. Run the full repair loop in one command
Use this when you want to validate a PR, apply interventions, and launch the next attempt in one step.
afteragent attempt-repair --repo vega/sphinxext-altair --pr 16 -- python3 -c "print('repair')"
afteragent attempt-repair --run-id <run-id> --runner openclaw -- openclaw repair
Typical workflow
For a live pull request:
afteragent validate-pr --repo owner/name --pr 123
afteragent diagnose <validation-run-id>
afteragent apply-interventions <validation-run-id>
afteragent replay --runner claude-code <validation-run-id> -- claude "Fix the PR"
afteragent ui
For an existing failed local run:
afteragent diagnose <run-id>
afteragent export-interventions <run-id>
afteragent replay <run-id> -- python3 scripts/repair.py
What the replay score means
AfterAction compares a replay against its source run and records whether things improved or got worse.
The score takes into account signals such as:
- run status and exit code
- number of findings
- failing check count
- failure-file count
- unresolved review-thread surface
- overlap between edits and the known failure surface
That makes it easier to answer a simple question: did the intervention actually help?
Files you will see
Inside .afteragent/ you will typically find:
afteragent.sqlite3: run metadata and event historyartifacts/: stdout, stderr, git diffs, GitHub context, and CI logsexports/: exported intervention setsapplied/: applied instruction patches and manifestsreplays/: replay input bundles and manifests
You may also see repo instruction files updated in the project root, depending on the runner and what already exists:
AGENTS.mdCLAUDE.mdGEMINI.mdCURSOR.mdCOPILOT.md
End-to-end test matrix
The repository includes an end-to-end matrix that exercises the subprocess path and runner adapters.
./scripts/e2e_matrix.sh
That script runs:
- the full unit and integration suite
- the fixture-backed end-to-end tests for shell, OpenClaw, Claude Code, and Codex flows
Current shape
AfterAction is currently local-first:
- local SQLite storage
- filesystem artifacts
- GitHub context pulled through
gh - small built-in UI served from the CLI
That keeps the loop inspectable and easy to run in a normal repository without extra infrastructure.
LLM-driven diagnosis (sub-project 2)
AfterAgent can optionally run an LLM pass over each captured run to identify failure patterns the rule-based detector missed and to author interventions tailored to that specific run. Four providers are supported: Anthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter, and Ollama.
Zero-config: just set an API key
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...
afteragent enhance <run-id>
Auto-detect picks anthropic + claude-sonnet-4-5 by default.
Per-run override
afteragent exec --enhance -- claude "fix the failing test"
Forces LLM enhancement for this run even if auto_enhance_on_exec = false in config.
Auto-enhance every run
Create .afteragent/config.toml:
[llm]
provider = "anthropic"
model = "claude-sonnet-4-5"
auto_enhance_on_exec = true
Ollama dogfood (free, local, offline)
ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:7b
mkdir -p .afteragent && cat > .afteragent/config.toml <<EOF
[llm]
provider = "ollama"
model = "qwen2.5-coder:7b"
EOF
afteragent exec -- claude "fix the failing test"
afteragent enhance <run-id>
No API key required. Runs entirely on your machine. Recommended for local iteration before spending on hosted API tokens.
Installing provider SDKs
The anthropic and openai SDKs are optional dependencies:
pip install afteragent[anthropic] # Anthropic only
pip install afteragent[openai] # OpenAI / OpenRouter / Ollama
pip install afteragent[all] # Both SDKs
Release files for afteragent 0.3.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| afteragent-0.3.0.tar.gz | 97.9 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| afteragent-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 167.5 kB
Release files / afteragent-0.3.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | afteragent-0.3.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 97.9 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
33def6db8991c1a9e71e34d9166e9afb90750050db31d083524b4888603908f7
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c144d0741c6d65dd86fb11b3ef0a1591ac5879b848f886b5ea284f8152cf11f3
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Apr 11, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / afteragent-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | afteragent-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 69.6 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
3c6e86aec1108893759e9ea812fe973ba1bbbb8c0f5fb531e2d84468d2e1fd7d
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
4b15a34a927ba97d8bdbde12acdf4130c5558b2a38b37d4e7e56c4ad64c37bab
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Apr 11, 2026.
Transparency log