Skip to main content

AGA Python SDK - Cryptographic governance receipts for AI agent tool calls

Reason this release was yanked:

Superseded by 0.2.6; genesis previous_receipt_hash:null cross-stack verdict split fixed.

Project description

AGA Python SDK

Cryptographic governance receipts for AI agent tool calls. This SDK emits the canonical SEP evidence bundle, the same offline-verifiable artifact the AGA gateway produces, so a governance decision sealed in Python re-derives, byte-for-byte, under the reference verifiers in three languages (JavaScript, Go, Python): mutually independent implementations, runnable offline without the producer.

PyPI distribution: aga-governance.

What the SDK emits

Each governed tool call becomes a signed, 15-field governance receipt. Receipts hash-link into an append-only chain, the chain's leaves bind into a Merkle root, and a gateway-signed checkpoint binds the root, leaf count, and chain head so truncation is detectable. The bundle uses standard primitives only:

  • Ed25519 receipt signatures (RFC 8032).
  • SHA-256 for hash chaining, Merkle trees, and leaf computation.
  • JCS-lineage canonicalization: deterministic, byte-compatible with the reference verifier and with the TypeScript and Go implementations.
  • A no-prefix binary Merkle tree with a mandatory signed checkpoint (the construction is frozen in the aga-receipt-spec repository).

Install

pip install aga-governance

Quick Start

from aga import AgentSession

SEED = bytes.fromhex("cc" * 32)  # 32-byte signing seed (provision securely)

with AgentSession(gateway_id="my-gateway", signing_key_seed=SEED) as session:
    session.record_tool_call(
        tool_name="read_file",
        decision="PERMITTED",
        reason="allowed by policy",
        request_id="req-001",
    )
    bundle = session.export_bundle()      # a canonical SEP evidence bundle (dict)
    result = session.verify()
    assert result["overall_valid"]

Verifying a bundle

Verification is producer-independent: any conformant verifier reaches the same verdict on the same bundle, offline. Start with the Python-native paths this package ships.

CLI:

aga verify bundle.json          # human-readable, check-by-check output
aga verify bundle.json --json   # the full result object as JSON
Bundle: bundle.json
Algorithm: Ed25519-SHA256-JCS
Receipts checked: 2
  Algorithm valid:     True
  Signatures valid:    True
  Chain integrity:     True
  Merkle proofs:       True
  Bundle consistent:   True
  Checkpoint valid:    True
  Envelope consistent: True

Verification: PASSED (integrity only: issuer not verified; pass --pubkey to verify provenance)

API:

import aga

result = aga.verify_bundle_file("bundle.json")
assert result["overall_valid"]

Pin the gateway public key to also prove who issued the bundle; without a pinned key you get an integrity-only result:

aga verify bundle.json --pubkey <64-hex-gateway-public-key>
# -> Verification: PASSED (provenance verified)
result = aga.verify_bundle_file("bundle.json", expected_public_key="<64-hex>")

Cross-checking with the other reference verifiers

A Python-produced bundle verifies under the reference verifiers in three languages (JavaScript, Go, and Python): mutually independent implementations, runnable offline without the producer. The SDK's canonicalization and leaf computation are pinned to the same cross-language conformance vectors, so a bundle sealed here re-derives byte-for-byte under each. This SDK's verifier enforces the same strict conformance rules (exact-key schema, canonical timestamps and ordering, envelope consistency, strict-hex Merkle proofs, and a mandatory signed checkpoint), so it agrees with them verdict-for-verdict rather than being a looser convenience check.

Check-name mapping vs the JS reference verifier

The two stacks decompose the same seven-check verification differently. Overall verdicts and exit codes agree on every conformance-corpus case (re-proven 2026-07-01: 10/10 cells across pristine/tampered bundles with unpinned, correct, and wrong keys); the sub-check that reports a given tamper can differ:

Python result field JS reference check What it covers
algorithm_valid (+ parts of bundle_consistent) structural algorithm id, key well-formedness, counts
receipt_signatures_valid receipt_signatures Ed25519 over canonical receipt bytes
chain_integrity_valid chain_and_ordering prev-leaf linkage, monotonic ids and timestamps
merkle_proofs_valid merkle_and_bijection leaf recompute, single-root walk, index bijection
checkpoint_valid signed_checkpoint gateway-signed root + count + chain-head binding
envelope_consistent envelope_consistency envelope metadata vs signed content
gateway_key_match / provenance gateway_key_match (with --pubkey) pinned issuer key

Known decomposition difference: the JS reference recomputes every Merkle leaf from full receipt content, so a receipt-signature tamper also fails its merkle_and_bijection; this SDK surfaces the same tamper in receipt_signatures_valid, chain_integrity_valid, and bundle_consistent while merkle_proofs_valid can remain true. Neither is looser: the bundle fails in both stacks, exit 1. A malformed --pubkey pin is a usage error (exit 2) here, while the JS reference treats a malformed pin as unpinned; the Python behavior is strictly tighter.

# JavaScript reference verifier, from the aga-receipt-spec repository
# (published with the npm package @attested-intelligence/aga-mcp-server on
# GitHub: https://github.com/attestedintelligence/aga-mcp-server):
node aga-receipt-spec/verify/verify-sep.mjs bundle.json --pubkey <gateway-public-key>

Scope: what a verified bundle proves

A verified bundle proves the integrity of the receipts present: each is authentic, correctly ordered, Merkle-included, and (when a key is pinned) provenance-bound. It does not prove the policy was correct, and it does not prove non-omission: completeness of capture is bounded by the tamper-evidence of the interception point, which is outside the bundle. The offline-verifiable artifact a counterparty receives is payload-excluded (it carries an arguments_hash, never the raw payload). We prove the record, not that the policy was correct.

Tests

The source repository carries the automated suite: 201 tests as of 2026-07-01 (python -m pytest), including the cross-stack conformance vectors that prove byte-for-byte agreement with the JavaScript and Go implementations. The published wheel and sdist ship the library only; the tests are not part of the installed package.

License

Apache-2.0. Patent Pending.

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

aga_governance-0.2.5.tar.gz (25.4 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

aga_governance-0.2.5-py3-none-any.whl (35.0 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file aga_governance-0.2.5.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: aga_governance-0.2.5.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 25.4 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.13.14

File hashes

Hashes for aga_governance-0.2.5.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 3bc452eea1117d9433e40f6c53187ca1dc0d317602cde27c6808d99da97b3c98
MD5 676f22ad7fe906590e7376c033eb1aaa
BLAKE2b-256 f69d19b7193128f1cf8a3daf69ac5ab3fcaa8df260fb1ed3f6e516009c686bd7

See more details on using hashes here.

File details

Details for the file aga_governance-0.2.5-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: aga_governance-0.2.5-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 35.0 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.2.0 CPython/3.13.14

File hashes

Hashes for aga_governance-0.2.5-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 e332871a8e6f6ac26e49291b69088636da975b6be7ca10e1c08c74ee749eb40b
MD5 e37e6d636a363946eb20ed487cfd4fb2
BLAKE2b-256 084fbfcfdf247c4f183bbd65c5607bd9929bcd133050d37ce76ec76dc7012344

See more details on using hashes here.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page