agent-guard

Stop your agent before it burns $400 overnight
budget caps, loop detection and circuit breakers for AI agents
zero dependencies · no proxy · nothing leaves your process

An agent that stops making progress does not stop running. It calls the same tool with the same arguments, or bounces between two tools forever, buying a fresh context window on every pass. agent-guard is the part of your loop that notices — and the receipt that tells you what it cost.

pip install agent-budget-guard-py

from agentguard import Guard

guard = Guard(max_usd=1.00, max_steps=25)

with guard:
    while True:
        with guard.step() as step:
            response = client.chat.completions.create(...)
            step.record(response)                     # tokens and cost, extracted
            with step.tool("search", {"q": query}):   # fingerprinted for loop detection
                results = search(query)

print(guard.report())

Three things happen on their own: step.record(response) pulls tokens and the model out of any SDK response, step.tool(...) fingerprints the call so a repeat is caught before it runs a fourth time, and guard.report() prints the receipt. Python 3.10+, no runtime dependencies — not even a provider SDK.

Jump to: See it work · What it catches · Wired into your stack · Models it doesn't know · Running it in CI · Honest answers · All the details

The problem

A budget check that runs after the call can only tell you what you already spent. By the time a cap notices a stuck agent, the money is gone — and the usual failure is not a crash, it is a loop that looks busy.

Two things stop it, and they stop different things:

agent-guard does both, in your process, using the standard library. No proxy, no server, no account, and nothing is sent anywhere.

See it work

A research agent asked the same question three times. The third identical search_web call is where it stopped — not because the budget ran out, but because the call was identical to the two before it. This is the whole library in one run:

guard = Guard(max_usd=5.00, name="research-agent")
with guard.step(tag="search") as step:
    step.record("gpt-4o", input_tokens=8_000, output_tokens=400)
    with step.tool("search_web", {"query": "weather in oslo"}):
        results = search("weather in oslo")        # 3rd time: stopped here

turn 1: searched, spent $0.0240
turn 2: searched, spent $0.0480

LoopDetected: Loop detected [repeat]: the same call appeared 3 times in the
last 3 steps: search_web({"query":"weather in oslo"}).

agentguard  research-agent
================================================================
  wall time   0ms             steps     3
  llm calls   3               tokens    25,200  (in 24,000 / out 1,200)

  limits
    budget   $0.072 / $5                   1.4%  [................]

  by model
    gpt-4o   3 calls      $0.072      24,000 in / 1,200 out

  tripped: loop [repeat] the same call appeared 3 times in the last 3 steps: ...

The difference between that and an overnight bill is $0.07. Both output blocks are real — the exception line is wrapped to fit here and the report is truncated the same way. Two examples run offline and show the same machinery:

python examples/loop_detection.py   # all four detectors, plus a healthy run that must not trip
python examples/basic.py            # a budget cap instead: stopped at $0.057 of a $0.05 limit

What it catches

Every limit is optional and independent. A guard with no limits still detects loops and still produces a report.

The four detectors, and what each one is actually for:

Every verdict is a sentence, because "why did you kill my agent?" is the first question anyone asks. These are real, from examples/loop_detection.py:

exact repeat                     -> repeat
                                    the same call appeared 3 times in the last 3 steps: search_web({"query":"weather in oslo"})
two-step ping-pong               -> cycle
                                    a 2-step pattern repeated 2 times: read_file({"path":"app.py"}) -> write_file(...)
paraphrased calls                -> similarity
                                    4 near-identical calls (>= 95% similar) in the last 4 steps: search_web(...)
no progress                      -> no-progress
                                    the progress marker did not change for 6 consecutive observations: {"rows_written":0}

healthy varied work              -> clean, as it should be

That last line matters as much as the others: a detector that fires on healthy work is a detector you turn off. Each threshold is tuned so its scenario is reachable and nothing else is, and every one is adjustable per guard.

Wired into your stack

Three depths. Nothing is required beyond the first.

1. Manual — works with anything, including a while loop you wrote by hand:

guard = Guard(max_usd=1.0)
guard.record("gpt-4o", input_tokens=1200, output_tokens=300)
guard.check()

2. Structured — one step per iteration, tools fingerprinted for you. This is the Quickstart above.

3. Wrapped client — every call accounted with no call-site changes:

from openai import OpenAI
from agentguard.adapters.openai import guard_openai

client = guard_openai(OpenAI(), max_usd=1.0, max_steps=25)
response = client.chat.completions.create(...)   # recorded automatically

Adapters are pure duck-typing — they never import a provider SDK — so the same wrapper covers Anthropic, LiteLLM, OpenRouter, vLLM, Together, Groq and Azure OpenAI:

from agentguard.adapters.anthropic import guard_anthropic

client = guard_anthropic(Anthropic(), max_usd=2.0)

Streaming works. With stream=True the response is wrapped, chunks pass through untouched, and usage is recorded once when the stream drains. Anthropic's messages.stream() and async clients (async for) are covered the same way.

LangGraph takes one callback handler:

from agentguard.integrations.langgraph import guard_langgraph

handler = guard_langgraph(Guard(max_usd=1.0, max_steps=25))
graph.invoke(inputs, config={"callbacks": [handler]})

Or a decorator, for a request handler rather than a loop:

from agentguard import current_guard, guarded

@guarded(max_usd=0.50, max_steps=20)
def summarise(url: str) -> str:
    guard = current_guard()
    ...

@guarded(max_usd=...) creates a fresh guard per call — the right default when one caller exhausting a budget must not stop the next. Pass guard= a shared guard when spend should accumulate across calls.

Refuse a call before paying for it. A post-hoc check can only report overspend; preflight() refuses a call whose worst case will not fit in what is left:

client = guard_openai(OpenAI(), max_usd=0.05, preflight=True)
# BudgetExceeded: refused before spending: a gpt-4o call could reach $0.6,
# over the $0.05 limit (already spent $0)

Resume without refilling the budget. An agent that checkpoints its own state can checkpoint its spend too, so a restart does not hand it a fresh cap:

write_checkpoint({"cursor": 41, "guard": guard.snapshot()})

# later, in a new process
guard = Guard.from_snapshot(read_checkpoint()["guard"], max_usd=5.0)
guard.remaining_usd      # what is actually left, not the full budget

Three decisions worth knowing, all in the details: detector windows survive a checkpoint (a loop that spans one is still a loop); wall-clock time does not (max_seconds caps this process, and restoring elapsed time would trip on time you never spent); and a snapshot it cannot read exactly is refused rather than half-applied.

Models it doesn't know

The bundled table carries 119 models — current families from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, Mistral and Qwen, dated 2026-09 in PRICING_AS_OF. It cannot know your fine-tune, your gateway's aliases, or your negotiated rate:

agentguard config set my-finetune-v3 3 12 --cached 0.3
agentguard config alias acme/fast claude-3-5-haiku
agentguard config disable gpt-4          # do not trust this bundled price

A model it has never heard of is never billed at a guessed rate. It is counted as unpriced, kept out of the budget arithmetic, and reported loudly — because a safety tool that silently assumes $0.00 is worse than no safety tool at all:

  by model
    gpt-4o            1 call       $2.52   1,000,000 in / 2,000 out
    acme-rerank-v3    1 call    unpriced      40,000 in / 0 out

  ! 1 call(s) had no known price and are excluded from the budget:
      acme-rerank-v3
    Price them with `agentguard config set <model> <input> <output>`,
    or pass Guard(pricing={...}) in code.

A model disabled by disable becomes unpriced the same way, so the excluded spend is visible instead of quietly billed at a number you rejected. Everything is overridable in code, and code always beats a file.

Running it in CI

guard.save() in the worker, agentguard report in CI — the reading process needs nothing installed:

agentguard report run.json           # render a report saved by guard.save(...)
agentguard report run.json --json
agentguard pricing                   # effective table, with a source per model
agentguard pricing gpt-4o
agentguard config path               # where config is read from, what is ignored

Honest answers

Zero dependencies, and it stays that way. No pydantic, no httpx, no provider SDK — standard library only. CI fails the build if a runtime dependency ever appears in the wheel, so it can be dropped into a stack that vendors its dependencies, pinned to an old Python, or shipped inside a Lambda without touching a lockfile.

A price table goes stale. This one is dated, and a provider can change a rate or retire a model the day after. Retired models keep their last published price rather than being dropped, because removing a name silently turns every call to it unpriced. Anything you bill on should be verified, and anything you depend on should be configured. The honest fix — an opt-in, checksummed pricing --update — is not built yet; it is first on the roadmap.

What it is not. Not an observability platform (nothing is sent anywhere, there is no server and no background thread), not a proxy (it cannot see traffic it was not told about), not a tokenizer (pre-flight estimates are heuristic), and not a substitute for provider-side spend limits — use both. agent-guard stops your loop; the provider's limit is what saves you when your process dies with a request already in flight.

Limitations, stated plainly. A response that reports no usage cannot be priced: it warns once and counts as unpriced rather than inventing a number. A stream is priced when drained, so for OpenAI-compatible streams pass stream_options={"include_usage": True}. Pre-flight input counts are estimated from the serialised prompt.

Documentation

Every docstring example in the package runs as a test, so the documentation cannot drift from the behaviour. python -m unittest discover -s tests -t . runs the whole suite — 563 tests, no network, no fixtures.

License

MIT — see LICENSE.