AgentCheck

Behavioral testing for AI agents.

You already test your code. AgentCheck tests the decisions your agent makes.

AgentCheck runs trusted local agents against behavioral scenarios and evaluates which tools they call, in what order, and how they respond to confirmations, failures, retries, and policy constraints. Declared tool actions are simulated; the original declared handlers are not executed during evaluation.

Demo · Install · Quickstart · Integrations · Safety · Documentation

Demo

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3ecdf66c-0aa7-45fe-a606-72cfb9d6d5bc

Install

pip install agentcheck-ai

The distribution is agentcheck-ai; the Python import and CLI are both agentcheck. The unrelated agentcheck PyPI distribution is not this project.

Install a native SDK adapter when you need one:

pip install "agentcheck-ai[openai-agents]"
# or
pip install "agentcheck-ai[pydantic-ai]"

Custom Python agents use the base package.

Quickstart

For an existing OpenAI Agents SDK target exported as agent from agent.py:

cd my-agent
agentcheck init .
agentcheck inspect .
agentcheck generate .
agentcheck test .

• inspect understands the agent's declared tools, schemas, and instructions.
• generate creates a frozen behavioral test suite.
• test runs the agent against that suite and evaluates its behavior.

In CI, one command covers the release question:

agentcheck gate .

It runs the frozen suite, compares the result against a trusted baseline, and returns a single status: 0 allow, 1 a behavioral failure is new, 2 the run was not certifiable, 3 the suite could not decide. Failures a baseline already accepts do not block. See the CI gate.

The target directory must already exist. generate and test may inspect the target again because each command independently validates current source instead of trusting stale state. PydanticAI and Custom Python targets require an explicit adapter and entrypoint; follow their guides under Documentation.

Representative agentcheck test output:

Inspecting agent...
Inspection complete. ✓
Loading frozen suite... ✓ 4 scenarios

Running 4 scenarios in isolated workers...
[1/4] Confirmation before destructive action .... PASS
[2/4] Delete without confirmation ............... FAIL
[3/4] Retry after ambiguous timeout .............. FAIL
[4/4] Claims success after tool failure .......... FAIL
Finalizing report...

Each scenario ends as PASS, FAIL, INCONCLUSIVE, or INFRA_ERROR; harness failures are never presented as behavioral failures or passes.

Generated suites also include fault cases — the tool errors, times out, or returns an empty, unparseable, truncated or stale payload — so the suite asks what the agent does when a tool does not cooperate, not only when it does. What gets generated follows the tool's declared risk, never its name. See fault testing and, to declare your own contracts, behavioral policies.

What AgentCheck catches

Normal tests ask whether a function returned the expected value. AgentCheck asks whether an agent took the right actions, in the right order, under failure and safety constraints.

It can evaluate behaviors such as:

• destructive actions without confirmation;
• duplicate destructive actions;
• unsafe retries after ambiguous outcomes;
• fabricated success after a tool failure;
• unknown, undeclared, or schema-invalid tool calls;
• policy and action-sequencing violations;
• missing prerequisite behavior where the contract makes it observable.

AgentCheck evaluates execution behavior, not primarily whether the final answer sounds good.

How it works

Trusted local agent
        │
        ▼
Adapter / CustomAgentProtocol
        │
        ▼
Generated or frozen scenario
        │
        ▼
Isolated child-process worker
        │ declared tool call
        ▼
ToolGateway ─────► fixtures, faults, simulated state
        │ observable trajectory
        ▼
Evaluator
        │
        ▼
PASS / FAIL / INCONCLUSIVE / INFRA_ERROR

Representative fixtures supply realistic arguments and simulated results. Prerequisite fixtures cover legitimate gating calls before the action under test—for example, lookup_customer before refund_order. Missing fixtures fail closed as INFRA_ERROR; AgentCheck does not invent a plausible tool result.

Supported integrations

The native adapters are pinned to verified SDK minor versions and reject unsupported versions rather than guessing. Custom Python support is a lightweight integration contract: the target declares inert tools and routes declared calls through the AgentCheck-supplied ToolRuntime. It is not universal framework support.

Safety boundaries

For declared tools routed through ToolGateway:

• Declared real tool handlers never execute during simulated evaluation.
• Inputs are schema-checked and configured fixtures control the result.
• Unknown tools, missing fixtures, invalid arguments, and exhausted budgets fail closed.
• Mutations affect only the scenario's simulated state.

Every scenario runs in a child process with a constrained environment and network denied by default. These are containment controls for trusted local code. Network denial is not a general operating-system sandbox. Target imports execute, and direct filesystem writes, subprocess execution, or direct database access from arbitrary Python orchestration are outside the declared-tool guarantee.

Read SECURITY.md before evaluating a new target.

Reports and artifacts

Runs write local artifacts under .agentcheck/ by default: bounded terminal diagnostics, versioned JSON/JSONL, an HTML report, an observable tool trace, failed assertions, simulated state where available, and a replay manifest. Review artifacts before sharing them; they may contain prompts, model output, tool inputs, and absolute paths.

The generate command and run reports also show declared behavioral coverage: which declared-tool success, failure, and timeout requirements—and which explicitly represented retry, confirmation, duplicate-action, and prerequisite contracts—the suite covers or leaves missing. This is not a claim that every real-world behavior was observed.

Replay is a source-bound re-execution recipe. It verifies recorded source, configuration, specification, and scenario bindings before running again. It reproduces inputs and harness behavior; it does not capture provider output or make stochastic model execution deterministic.

For CI, start from the credential-free workflow example and read the CI trust model.

Documentation

• OpenAI Agents SDK worked example
• PydanticAI setup and offline evaluation
• Custom Python agent contract
• Validation evidence and claim boundaries
• Portable target identity
• Decision stages and happens-before
• Declared behavioral coverage
• Fault testing
• Behavioral policies
• The CI gate
• Behavioral regression comparison
• CI trust model
• Changelog
• PyPI package

Contributing

External contributions are welcome. Fork the repository, create a focused branch, and open a pull request; GitHub-hosted CI runs credential-free tests without provider calls. The complete local suite is:

python -m pytest tests -q -n 2

See CONTRIBUTING.md for setup, focused tests, and the safety invariants that changes must preserve.

Security

Do not file vulnerabilities as public issues. Use GitHub Private Vulnerability Reporting as described in SECURITY.md. Never put credentials or production data in configuration, fixture packs, frozen suites, or run artifacts.

License

Current source is licensed under the Apache License 2.0. AgentCheck 0.1.0 and 0.1.1 were distributed under the MIT License; that license continues to govern those release artifacts.