AgentMarshal

Agent work attestation and merge governance: durable, vendor-neutral, SHA-bound evidence rails for agent-driven development.

Agents produce more changes than a human can read. AgentMarshal aims to make "this work was independently reviewed" a property of the repository rather than of someone's memory: task contracts, review verdicts bound to exact commits, and merge gates — with the evidence living in git, not in an ephemeral session log.

Trust boundary (0.2.0): the merge gate enforces that a review's recorded reviewer email differs from the commit authors', and binds the verdict to the exact commit SHA. It does not cryptographically authenticate who recorded a review or which checkout was gated — the recorder and the reviewed tree are operator-trusted. Signing/provenance is roadmap, not a 0.2.0 guarantee.

One consequence is worth stating outright, because the gate's output can read like more than it is: a human reviewer is a self-declaration. The gate compares an email string against the commit authors'; it establishes nothing about a person having read anything. A record an agent produced with --vendor human is indistinguishable from one a person created, and it passes the same check — we have seen exactly that happen in operation. Until review records are signed, vendor and model are labels the recorder chose, and the independence check is a string comparison, not evidence of human involvement.

Built in the open

AgentMarshal governs its own development. Everything under .agentmarshal/journal/ is real: the task contracts we worked to, the review verdicts bound to exact commit SHAs, the lifecycle records, and the token-economics measurements of what each task actually cost. The tool's guarantees are demonstrated on the tool's own history — not just described.

We opened this repository with its full history on purpose — the mistakes, the abandoned tasks (CR-036, CR-037), the multi-round reviews, the token spend. We do not rewrite history: the SHA-bound audit trail is the product, and rewriting it would destroy the very property AgentMarshal exists to provide.

That honesty cuts both ways — the shipped design docs are explicit about the historical 0.1.0 boundary and note what has changed since:

• ADR-0004 and ADR-0005 mark planned supplementary-artifact capture policy, the private store, and the in-toto/attestation projection as roadmap. They remain inactive in 0.2.0; ADR-0005 separately records the advisory leak-scan that has shipped.
• docs/migration-v1-to-v2.md records what the v1→v2 migration lost (contract prose) and that the machine-readable acceptance array was empty in every contract through CR-038 — without backfilling any historical record.

To see how the project actually evolved, token costs and all, read the journal.

Status

Pre-alpha. Version 0.2.0 ships the governed loop end to end: task contracts, review and operator-acceptance evidence, lifecycle repair, the fail-closed gate, completion, reporting, validation, advisory leak scanning, and local pruning. APIs, schemas, and CLI are subject to change without notice.

Install

The repository version is 0.2.0, which is not yet published to the package index. From a 0.2.0 source checkout:

pip install .

After publication, pip install agentmarshal==0.2.0 installs this release.

Requirements: Python >= 3.12 and git on PATH — the gate, review, and completion commands shell out to git. No Python dependencies.

AgentMarshal is model-agnostic and bundles no reviewer. To review a task, either set AGENTMARSHAL_REVIEWER_CMD to any reviewer command (for example a Codex or Claude CLI — it receives the prompt on stdin and prints the machine verdict, with {model} and {prompt_file} substituted), or record a verdict directly with agentmarshal submit-review. The latter runs no model; its --vendor/--model arguments are recorded provenance labels, not an invoked model (use e.g. --vendor human --model none for a human review).

(git archive-based review snapshotting currently assumes a POSIX host; Windows is untested.)

Quickstart

New to the idea? docs/overview.md explains the purpose, the design, and the vocabulary (host repo, task, gate, …) in a page. The whole loop, inside a git repository — see docs/quickstart.md for the annotated walkthrough with a full configuration reference:

agentmarshal init                                     # write .agentmarshal/
agentmarshal open --title "Add greeting" --scope src/ # -> task CR-001 + contract
git add .agentmarshal && git commit -m "open CR-001"
BASE=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

git switch -c feat/CR-001                              # do the work in scope
# ...edit files under src/...
git add src && git commit -m "implement CR-001"
IMPL=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

# record an INDEPENDENT review (reviewer email != commit author)
agentmarshal submit-review --task CR-001 --commit "$IMPL" \
  --verdict approved --role reviewer --vendor human --model none \
  --email reviewer@example.com

# the gate is the merge authority; it passes only when every check holds
AGENTMARSHAL_PIPELINE_OK_SHA="$IMPL" \
  agentmarshal gate --task CR-001 --commit "$IMPL" --base "$BASE"

AGENTMARSHAL_PIPELINE_OK_SHA="$IMPL" \
  agentmarshal complete --task CR-001 --commit "$IMPL" --base "$BASE"

agentmarshal status CR-001   # -> done, with the SHA-bound review evidence
agentmarshal validate        # -> whole-journal integrity check (run this in CI)

The gate only decides; performing the merge is your provider's job. Wiring it to block merges is covered in docs/self-hosting-workflow.md and docs/github-enforcement.md.

Development

Requires Python >= 3.12 and uv (development tooling only — not needed to install or run AgentMarshal).

uv sync
uv run pytest
uv run ruff check
uv run ruff format --check
uv run mypy

Initialize a git repository for AgentMarshal:

uv run agentmarshal init

License

Apache-2.0. The full text ships in the LICENSE file of the source distribution.