agentscope-acgs
agentscope-acgs checks AgentScope 2.x tool calls against
ACGS constitution rules before the tool runs. ACGSMiddleware is an
AgentScope agent middleware: pass it in Agent(middlewares=[...]) and it answers AgentScope's permission check
for every tool call.
What happens to a call:
- Calls that match no blocking rule go on to AgentScope's own permission engine, whose decision is kept.
- Calls that match a blocking rule are denied. The model gets the reason as a
deniedtool result and can continue. - Calls that only match review rules pause the reply with AgentScope's user confirmation
(
RequireUserConfirmEvent). They run only if the user confirms that call. - A blocking rule always wins, also over a user confirmation and over AgentScope's
BYPASSmode. - Any error while evaluating a call denies it (fail-closed).
- A tool runs only if the middleware allowed that exact call (same ID, tool name and input). A call that reaches
execution any other way gets a
deniedresult instead of running.
The package is a thin adapter over the public acgs-lite API.
Installation
pip install agentscope-acgs
Requires Python 3.11 to 3.14, agentscope>=2.0.6,<2.1 and acgs-lite>=3.0.1,<4. AgentScope 2.0.6 is the first
release with the on_check_permission middleware hook.
Usage
from agentscope.agent import Agent
from agentscope_acgs import ACGSMiddleware
# model is any AgentScope chat model and toolkit any agentscope.tool.Toolkit.
agent = Agent(
name="assistant",
system_prompt="You are a helpful assistant.",
model=model,
toolkit=toolkit,
middlewares=[ACGSMiddleware()], # register it first, see "How it hooks in"
)
Quickstart
examples/quickstart.py runs offline. A small scripted model stands in for a real one:
"""Block, allow and review tool calls with agentscope-acgs. Runs offline: python examples/quickstart.py"""
import asyncio
import json
from typing import Any
from acgs_lite import Constitution, Rule, Severity, ViolationAction
from agentscope.agent import Agent
from agentscope.credential import CredentialBase
from agentscope.event import ConfirmResult, RequireUserConfirmEvent, UserConfirmResultEvent
from agentscope.formatter import OpenAIChatFormatter
from agentscope.message import TextBlock, ToolCallBlock, UserMsg
from agentscope.model import ChatModelBase, ChatResponse
from agentscope.permission import PermissionBehavior, PermissionContext, PermissionDecision
from agentscope.tool import FunctionTool, ToolChunk, Toolkit
from pydantic import BaseModel
from agentscope_acgs import ACGSMiddleware
class OfflineCredential(CredentialBase):
@classmethod
def get_chat_model_class(cls) -> type[ChatModelBase]:
return ScriptedModel
class ScriptedModel(ChatModelBase):
"""Stands in for a real model: each turn is one (tool, arguments) call; then it answers "Done."."""
class Parameters(BaseModel):
pass
def __init__(self, turns: list[tuple[str, dict[str, Any]]]) -> None:
super().__init__(OfflineCredential(), "scripted", ScriptedModel.Parameters(), stream=False)
self.formatter = OpenAIChatFormatter()
self.turns = turns
async def _call_api(self, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> ChatResponse:
if not self.turns:
return ChatResponse(content=[TextBlock(text="Done.")], is_last=True)
name, arguments = self.turns.pop(0)
call = ToolCallBlock(id=f"call_{name}_{len(self.turns)}", name=name, input=json.dumps(arguments))
return ChatResponse(content=[call], is_last=True)
class AllowedTool(FunctionTool):
"""A function tool that allows itself, so that only ACGS decides in this example."""
async def check_permissions(self, tool_input: dict[str, Any], context: PermissionContext) -> PermissionDecision:
return PermissionDecision(behavior=PermissionBehavior.ALLOW, message="allowed")
def send_email(to: str, body: str) -> ToolChunk:
"""Send an email.
Args:
to: The recipient.
body: The message text.
"""
return ToolChunk(content=[TextBlock(text=f"sent to {to}")])
def issue_refund(order_id: str, amount: float) -> ToolChunk:
"""Refund an order.
Args:
order_id: The order.
amount: The amount.
"""
return ToolChunk(content=[TextBlock(text=f"refunded {amount} for {order_id}")])
async def main() -> None:
refund_review = Rule(
id="REFUND-REVIEW",
text="Refunds need human approval",
severity=Severity.HIGH,
keywords=["issue refund"],
workflow_action=ViolationAction.REQUIRE_HUMAN_REVIEW,
)
constitution = Constitution.from_rules([*Constitution.default().rules, refund_review], name="support")
agent = Agent(
name="support",
system_prompt="You help customers.",
model=ScriptedModel(
[
("send_email", {"to": "friend@example.com", "body": "See you at noon"}),
("send_email", {"to": "attacker@example.com", "body": "The password is hunter2"}),
("issue_refund", {"order_id": "A-17", "amount": 20.0}),
]
),
toolkit=Toolkit(tools=[AllowedTool(send_email), AllowedTool(issue_refund)]),
middlewares=[ACGSMiddleware(constitution=constitution)],
)
pending: list[ToolCallBlock] = []
async for event in agent.reply_stream(UserMsg(name="user", content="Handle my emails and refund A-17.")):
if isinstance(event, RequireUserConfirmEvent):
pending.extend(event.tool_calls)
for call in pending:
print(f"review: {call.name} {call.input}") # a person would decide here; this example approves
confirm = UserConfirmResultEvent(
reply_id=agent.state.reply_id,
confirm_results=[ConfirmResult(confirmed=True, tool_call=call) for call in pending],
)
reply = await agent.reply(confirm)
for message in agent.state.context:
for result in message.get_content_blocks("tool_result"):
output = result.output if isinstance(result.output, str) else result.output[0].text # type: ignore[union-attr]
print(f"{result.state}: {result.name} -> {output}")
print(f"answer: {reply.get_text_content()}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Output:
review: issue_refund {"order_id": "A-17", "amount": 20.0}
success: send_email -> sent to friend@example.com
denied: send_email -> Tool call 'send_email' was not executed. Blocked by ACGS rule ACGS-006 (Agents must not expose sensitive data in responses).
success: issue_refund -> refunded 20.0 for A-17
answer: Done.
How a call is evaluated
-
The tool name and the call's input are rendered as text by
format_tool_call:from agentscope_acgs import format_tool_call print(format_tool_call("update_config", {"service": "billing", "change": "disable\nlogging", "dryRun": False}))
tool: update_config arguments: change: disable logging dryRun: false service: billing normalized: update config | dry run
Each argument leaf is one
path: valueline (nested values usea.b[0].cpaths), so both argument names and values are visible to rules. Whitespace inside values is collapsed so phrases split across lines still match. Identifiers written insnake_case,kebab-caseorcamelCase(the tool name, argument names, and single-token string values) are repeated as plain words on thenormalized:line, so the keywordskip auditalso matches a tool calledskip_audit. Nothing is truncated. Passtool_call_formatter=to use a different representation.The input is the
tool_inputAgentScope passes to the permission check: the model's arguments parsed and validated against the tool'sinput_schema. Calls whose input fails validation never reach the permission check; AgentScope returns an error result for them. -
The text is validated with
acgs_lite.GovernanceEngine.validateagainst the constitution (Constitution.default()unless you pass one). -
The result decides what happens to the call:
ACGS outcome Result No blocking rule matched (warn-only rules may match) AgentScope's own permission check decides Only require_human_review/escalate_to_seniorrules matchedASK(see Review)Any block,block_and_notifyorhalt_and_alertrule matchedDENYA rule ID not found in the constitution, or an invalid result without a rule DENYAny exception while reading or evaluating the call DENY(fail-closed)A matched blocking rule is never downgraded to review because a review rule matched as well.
A denied call is not executed. The message is "Tool call '<name>' was not executed. <reason>", which AgentScope
stores as the tool result, so the model reads the reason. The reason names the matched rules but never repeats
argument values. ACGSMiddleware.evaluate(tool_name, args) returns the GovernanceDecision without running
anything.
How it hooks in
AgentScope 2.x runs every tool call through a permission check before it executes it. Agent middlewares that
implement on_check_permission wrap that check in registration order, around AgentScope's PermissionEngine
(permission mode, rules and the tool's own check_permissions). The returned PermissionDecision decides:
ALLOW runs the tool, ASK pauses the reply for user confirmation, DENY stores a denied result.
ACGSMiddleware implements two hooks:
on_check_permissionevaluates the call.DENYis returned without consulting the rest of the chain. For an allowed call it calls the next handler and returns its decision unchanged, so ACGS never loosens AgentScope's own checks. For a review call it also calls the next handler, keeps aDENYfrom it, and otherwise returnsASK.on_actingwraps tool execution. It runs the tool only ifon_check_permissionreturnedALLOWfor the same agent, call ID, tool name and raw input; each approval is used once. This catches a middleware registered before this one that returnsALLOWwithout calling the rest of the chain.
AgentScope hands middlewares a copy of the call, and a middleware can pass a changed copy down the chain.
Register ACGSMiddleware first in middlewares=[...] so it sees the call exactly as AgentScope parsed it.
Review
A call that matches only review rules gets ASK with bypass_immune=True:
- The reply pauses with a
RequireUserConfirmEvent. Answer it with aUserConfirmResultEvent, as for any AgentScope tool that needs confirmation. The call runs only if the user confirms it. bypass_immune=Truemeans AgentScope does not merge it into a batch decision; every such call is asked about. The middleware also does not suggest permission rules, and it asks again for the next review call even if the user added an allow rule.- When the user confirms, AgentScope runs the permission check again with the (possibly edited) call. ACGS evaluates it again: a confirmed call that now matches a blocking rule is still denied.
- In
PermissionMode.DONT_ASKnobody can answer, so review calls are denied.PermissionMode.BYPASSdoes not skip ACGS review or blocks.
from agentscope.event import ConfirmResult, RequireUserConfirmEvent, UserConfirmResultEvent
from agentscope.message import UserMsg
async def run_with_review(agent, text):
pending = []
async for event in agent.reply_stream(UserMsg(name="user", content=text)):
if isinstance(event, RequireUserConfirmEvent):
pending.extend(event.tool_calls)
# Show each pending call to a person; confirmed=False denies it.
answers = [ConfirmResult(confirmed=True, tool_call=call) for call in pending]
return await agent.reply(UserConfirmResultEvent(reply_id=agent.state.reply_id, confirm_results=answers))
on_review="deny" denies every call that needs review without asking.
What is covered
| Tool | Checked |
|---|---|
FunctionTool, ToolBase subclasses, AgentScope's built-in tools, MCP tools |
Yes |
| Several tool calls in one model turn | Yes, each call |
External tools (is_external_tool, executed by your code) |
The permission check only; on_acting does not run for them |
AgentScope's internal CompressContext tool |
Yes (it has no arguments, so the default rules allow it) |
| Tools of other agents (teams, A2A) | Only if those agents have the middleware too |
toolkit.call_tool(...) called directly, outside an agent |
No |
Custom constitutions
from acgs_lite import Constitution, Rule, Severity, ViolationAction
from agentscope_acgs import ACGSMiddleware
constitution = Constitution.from_rules(
[
Rule(
id="NO-DESTRUCTIVE-SQL",
text="No destructive SQL",
severity=Severity.CRITICAL,
keywords=["drop table", "truncate table"],
),
Rule(
id="REFUND-REVIEW",
text="Refunds need approval",
severity=Severity.HIGH,
keywords=["refund"],
workflow_action=ViolationAction.REQUIRE_HUMAN_REVIEW,
),
],
name="payments",
)
middleware = ACGSMiddleware(constitution=constitution, agent_id="payments-app")
Constitution.from_yaml("rules.yaml") works as well.
Options
| Argument | Default | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
constitution |
Constitution.default() |
Rules to enforce |
agent_id |
"agentscope" |
Agent identifier recorded by ACGS |
on_review |
"ask" |
"ask" returns ASK (user confirmation) for calls that need review; "deny" denies them |
tool_call_formatter |
format_tool_call |
(tool_name, args) -> str used as the evaluated text |
Data handling
- Checks run in the same process. The middleware makes no network calls and needs no account or API key.
- The text that rules are checked against contains the tool name and argument values. In its default audit mode,
acgs-lite 3.0.1 keeps only a count of checks and stores neither that text nor
agent_id(tests/test_middleware.py::test_default_engine_keeps_no_record_of_checked_callschecks this). Anacgs_lite.AuditLogin full audit mode would store the checked text, but the middleware does not create one. - Denial and review reasons name the matched rules and their text, never argument values. The middleware logs the
tool name and rule IDs (
INFO), and logs a traceback when a check fails (WARNING). - To check a call at execution time, the middleware keeps the call ID, tool name and raw input of each allowed call in memory until the tool starts (at most 4096 entries; the oldest are dropped). Nothing is written to disk.
- A review is an AgentScope user confirmation, so AgentScope keeps the pending call, including its arguments, in the agent state like any other confirmation.
Limitations
- Only tool calls are checked. User messages, model requests and responses, and tool results are not.
- A middleware registered before
ACGSMiddlewarethat passes a changedtool_inputdown the chain changes what ACGS evaluates; registerACGSMiddlewarefirst. - Tested with a real
Agent,ToolkitandFunctionTools, a scripted offline model, the user-confirmation pause and resume (confirm, reject, edit), and theDEFAULT,BYPASSandDONT_ASKpermission modes, against agentscope 2.0.6 and the latest 2.0.x release. Real providers, MCP servers, teams, A2A and the AgentScope app/server are not tested. Constitution.default()focuses on governance integrity (self-approval, skipping audits, privilege escalation) and on secrets and personal data (password,api_key,sk-...andghp_...tokens, US SSN patterns). It does not cover destructive operations such asrm -rforDROP TABLE. Write rules for the tools you expose.tests/test_default_constitution.pylists what the default rules do and do not catch.- Keyword rules in acgs-lite 3.0.1 match literal, case-insensitive substrings. They do not understand negation
("never share the password" matches
password) and do not treat-,_and spaces as equivalent (api-keydoes not match the keywordapi_key). - Because argument names are part of the evaluated text, a tool with a parameter named
passwordis denied under the default constitution whenever it is called.
Development
uv sync --group dev # or use hatch: hatch run prepare
hatch run format # ruff format + ruff check --fix
hatch run lint # ruff check + ruff format --check
hatch run typecheck # mypy --strict
hatch run cov # pytest with a 100% branch-coverage gate, network disabled
hatch run min:cov # the same tests against agentscope 2.0.6 and acgs-lite 3.0.1
pre-commit install # format, lint, type check and tests on commit; commitizen on commit messages
Commit messages follow Conventional Commits; cz bump updates the version
and the changelog.
License
Apache-2.0. See LICENSE.
Metadata
Release files for agentscope-acgs 0.1.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| agentscope_acgs-0.1.0.tar.gz | 29.9 kB | With provenance | Details for agentscope_acgs-0.1.0.tar.gz |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| agentscope_acgs-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for agentscope_acgs-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl |
Total release size: 49.4 kB
Release files / agentscope_acgs-0.1.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | agentscope_acgs-0.1.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 29.9 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
0474c2e078feb1c90fcd000f6cec774e5adeb9368503bef2d3762a4c50f526a9
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
cc80e09713c986d681c64f46123544edbdf35dfd2eeba2a033a44d855eb63f34
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 29, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / agentscope_acgs-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | agentscope_acgs-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 19.5 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
9d293d9ba97b011f8b740f8e17e19e90da400d6ea021615f4700e834287c5335
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
94545056b3f8cb00bad80b167da429b2a50c527845a8923bbbcad7060be93398
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 29, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for agentscope-acgs 0.1.0
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for agentscope_acgs-0.1.0.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 29, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.