Aggrete

The open-source proxy. Product site: https://aggrete.com. This repo is the proxy and nothing else: engine, accumulator, ingest CLI, Helm chart.

An MCP proxy that enforces a code of conduct document across connectors, with state that accumulates per user.

Every MCP gateway on the market authorizes tool calls and logs them. None of them answer the question that actually matters once an assistant can reach Glean, Salesforce, Slack and Drive at once: is this call, combined with everything this person has already pulled today, something the code of conduct forbids?

Four individually-authorized questions can assemble a layoff list. No guardrail fires, because no single question was sensitive. This proxy is the missing layer.

Run it

python -m venv .venv && .venv/bin/pip install mcp pyyaml pytest
.venv/bin/python -m pytest tests -q     # tests generated from coc.yaml
.venv/bin/python demo/run_demo.py       # the four-prompt sequence, end to end

Output:

turn 1  finance__headcount_plan   allowed
turn 2  finance__budget_roles     allowed
turn 3  hr__recent_joiners        allowed   (alert: COC-HR-011, 20 distinct > 8)
turn 4  ops__oncall_draft         DENIED    COC-HR-004

Turn 4 is denied before the upstream call, so the on-call data is never fetched. The two domains already held overlap on the same people, and this call would complete the forbidden set.

The document is the source of truth

coc.yaml holds clause text written by the clause owner, its enforcement, and its tests. Engineering owns the compiler, not the policy.

- rule_id: COC-HR-004
  clause: >
    Personnel records, compensation or budget records, and operational rosters
    may not be combined to derive the employment status, performance, or
    planned departure of identifiable individuals.
  owner: hr-privacy@example.com
  enforce:
    - layer: accumulation
      action: deny
      type: domain_join
      domains: [hr-personnel, finance-comp, ops-rota]
      require_entity_overlap: true
      scope: user
      window: 4h
  tests:
    - {name: four_prompt_layoff_list, expect: deny, sequence: [...]}

CI fails any rule without both an allow and a deny test. Clauses that compile to nothing are worth finding. Those are the parts of your code of conduct that were never enforceable.

Rule types: domain_join, entity_budget, domain_block, self_comparison, min_group (a result about fewer than k people is one person's data; pay transparency), wall (a domain open only to allowed_users, or closed to blocked_users, optionally until a date; privilege, embargoes, investigation subjects). domain_join and domain_block accept the same allowed_users, blocked_users, since, until scoping (quiet periods). self_comparison (the requester's own record plus colleagues' records in one domain. The precondition for "how do I compare"; decided post-call, since the colleague records have to be seen to be counted). Actions: deny, alert. Start everything at alert, tune against real traffic, then flip.

How it works

client ──MCP──▶ proxy ──MCP──▶ hr / finance / ops connectors
                  │
                  ├─ pre_call   deny before fetching where already decidable
                  ├─ post_call  extract entities, record, re-evaluate, redact
                  └─ audit      what was handed over, not just what was asked

• aggrete/policy.py. Deterministic evaluation. No model in this path.
• aggrete/accumulator.py. Per-user state, TTL'd. MemoryStore for tests, RedisStore for deployment, because state must be shared across clients.
• aggrete/entities.py. Pulls stable person IDs out of tool results.
• proxy.config.yaml. Maps tool name patterns to the domains clauses refer to.

Remote connectors

Upstreams are either local stdio processes (command:) or remote MCP servers over streamable HTTP (url:). The proxy holds the credential for the upstream; header values may reference ${ENV_VARS} so tokens never sit in the YAML. Because the end user never holds that token, the only path to the connector is through the proxy.

upstreams:
  ops:
    url: https://mcp.example.com/ops/mcp
    headers:
      Authorization: "Bearer ${OPS_MCP_TOKEN}"

tests/test_http_upstream.py runs the mock ops connector over HTTP (demo/mock_server.py --transport streamable-http) behind the proxy end to end.

Architecture: where the proxy lives and how the pieces connect

  people's assistants                 your network                          your systems
  (Claude, Copilot, Cursor)   |                                     |
                              |   mcp.example.com  (this proxy)     |   HR system (Workday)
   ── HTTPS + OAuth ────────► |   Starlette, streamable HTTP        | ─► Finance (budget lines)
                              |   identity from the token           | ─► On-call rotations
                              |   policy: coc.yaml                  | ─► Drive, Slack, CRM ...
                              |   state: Redis (or memory)          |   (reachable only from the proxy)
                              |         │ writes                    |
                              |         ▼                           |
                              |   audit.jsonl  ◄── read only ──  Aggrete Console (live.example.com)
                              |   coc.yaml                          HR / Legal / IT, behind SSO or basic auth

Three rules make this safe:

1. Only the proxy holds connector credentials. People sign in to the proxy (your IdP via mode: jwt, or the built-in sign-in via mode: builtin when you have no IdP yet); the proxy signs in to the connectors. Fence the connectors so they accept traffic only from the proxy host.
2. The console never touches the connectors. It reads two files the proxy writes, audit.jsonl and coc.yaml, on the same host or a shared volume, and it changes nothing the proxy enforces. Put it behind your SSO or, at minimum, HTTP basic auth; it shows who asked what.
3. The assistants may only talk to the proxy. Managed client policy (Claude Code managed settings, Claude Enterprise connectors, Copilot and Cursor org policies) allow-lists https://mcp.example.com/mcp and nothing else.

Connecting Claude (claude.ai): Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector → URL https://mcp.example.com/mcp. Claude discovers the sign-in from the proxy's OAuth metadata, registers itself, and sends you to /signin. From then on every question Claude asks on your behalf passes the policy.

Sample handbook: samples/northwind-handbook.docx; coc.yaml maps to its clauses 7.1 to 7.11 one to one (7.4 and 7.12 are not enforceable at a data proxy). aggrete-ingest samples/northwind-handbook.docx reproduces it.

Serving it to a whole company: streamable HTTP + OAuth

stdio is for one laptop. For everyone else, run Aggrete as a service and let identity come from the token:

python -m aggrete.proxy --config proxy.config.yaml --transport streamable-http --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8080

HTTP mode refuses to start without an auth: block. In jwt mode it validates bearer JWTs from your IdP (issuer, audience, expiry, signature via JWKS, required scopes) and derives the user from the email claim. Configurable with identity_claim. Every request without a valid token is a 401 with an RFC 9728 WWW-Authenticate pointer, and the user: line in the config is ignored entirely. builtin mode is a small OAuth server inside the proxy (dynamic client registration, a sign-in page, passcodes from the environment) for teams with no IdP yet. static mode (fixed tokens) exists for development and the test-suite. The accumulator keys state on the token identity, so the same person hitting Aggrete from Claude Code, Claude.ai and Cursor shares one history. Which is the point.

Register it in a client as a remote MCP server at https://<host>/mcp with the bearer token your IdP issues; keep the connectors themselves reachable only from the Aggrete host.

Inside a gateway you already run

If agentgateway, IBM ContextForge, Kong or your own gateway is already the control plane, don't add a second one. Embed Aggrete:

from aggrete.plugin import PolicyHook, AggreteMiddleware

hook = PolicyHook("coc.yaml", domains={"hr__*": "hr-personnel", "ops__*": "ops-rota"},
                  store=RedisStore(redis_client))
# as two calls from your plugin system
v = hook.before(user, tool)             # v.allow, v.message (clause + remediation)
v = hook.after(user, tool, result_text) # records entities, re-evaluates
# or as ASGI middleware around any MCP server that answers in JSON
app = AggreteMiddleware(app, hook, identity=lambda scope: scope["state"]["user"])

Identity is a callable over the request, so it composes with whatever auth the host performs. The middleware refuses at pre-call without forwarding and inspects JSON tools/call results for post-call recording.

Ways to deploy

Putting a real system behind the proxy: Google Drive

aggrete/connectors/drive.py is a Drive upstream the proxy runs itself. How it is done, in the order you do it:

1. A service account, not a person. In Google Cloud: enable the Drive API, create a service account (say aggrete-drive), download its JSON key. The proxy holds the key; nobody's personal Google login is involved, which is what makes the proxy the only road.
2. Share the folders, read only. In Drive, create a root folder (say Northwind) with one subfolder per kind of material (Restructuring plan, Legal hold, Team documents) and share the root with the service account email as Viewer. Service accounts own nothing; they only see what is shared with them.
3. One tool pair per folder. The connector lists the root's subfolders and exposes search_<folder> and read_<folder> for each, so the policy can name folders:

   upstreams:
     drive: {command: python3, args: [-m, aggrete.connectors.drive, --credentials, /opt/aggrete/drive-sa.json, --root, Northwind]}
   domains:
     "drive__*_restructuring_plan": restructuring-plan   # clause 7.9: embargo until announced
     "drive__*_legal_hold": legal-hold                    # clause 7.3: never for assistants
     "drive__*": drive-general
   

4. Results name people. Every file comes back with owner_email and editor_email, so the policy's tallies and joins work on Drive results like on HR records.
5. Remove the direct road. Disable the assistant's native Drive connector for governed accounts (Claude Enterprise: managed connectors; personal accounts: remove it). Otherwise the assistant has two ways to Drive and the policy only sees one.

python -m aggrete.connectors.drive --credentials sa.json --root Northwind --list prints the tools that will be exposed. If the root is not shared yet the connector still starts and exposes a single status tool that says what is missing, so the proxy never fails to boot because of Drive.

Starting from the document you already have

aggrete/ingest.py turns a code-of-conduct document into a draft coc.yaml:

python -m aggrete.ingest handbook.pdf --domains proxy.config.yaml -o coc.draft.yaml

PDFs go to the model as native document blocks; DOCX, Markdown and text as text. The model proposes rules in the exact coc.yaml schema with clause text verbatim, every action forced to alert, and each rule's own tests are run through the real Engine before the file is written. A draft that fails its tests is rejected. Clauses no data proxy can enforce (tone, harassment, expenses) are listed separately with the reason. Model set by AGGRETE_INGEST_MODEL. Needs ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or an ant auth login profile.

Purpose binding

A permanent block gets routed around. engine.grant_purpose(user, rule_id, purpose, ttl_s) opens a scoped window and stamps every retrieval made under it with the stated purpose. Wire it to an approval workflow owned by the clause owner named in the rule.

Honest limitations

• Entity extraction is the weak point. entities.py works on stable IDs and emails. Tune IDENTIFIER_KEYS against your own connectors before trusting any threshold, or Layer 4 will either never fire or fire constantly.
• Post-call denial redacts, it does not un-fetch. The data left the upstream. Prefer rules that can be decided pre-call.
• stdio identity is advisory. The user is whoever launched the process and the config is user-editable. Real enforcement needs streamable HTTP with OAuth, the subject taken from the token, and IdP-level blocking of direct connector grants so this proxy is the only path.
• Aggregation cannot be solved, only narrowed. A user who spaces requests beyond the window, or paraphrases across systems this proxy doesn't front, gets through. This raises the cost and creates the audit trail; it is not a ceiling.
• Not a gateway. No multi-tenancy, no token vault, no HA. For production, port this policy engine onto agentgateway or IBM ContextForge as a plugin rather than running it as your control plane.