Skip to main content

Agentic WER: WER/MER/WIL/WIP/CER plus RIR, HER, and n-best oracles for evaluating ASR error correctors and voice agents. Self-contained, single dependency (RapidFuzz).

Project description

AgWER: Agent-oriented Word Error Rate

agwer is a simple and fast Python package to evaluate speech recognition and voice agents. It is self-contained: one dependency (RapidFuzz, C++ edit distance), a 40 KB wheel, sub-20 ms import.

It supports the classic ASR similarity measures and the agentic ones:

  1. word error rate (WER) — also match error rate (MER), word information lost/preserved (WIL/WIP)
  2. character error rate (CER)
  3. Recoverable Information Ratio (RIR, the paper's ρ)
  4. Harmful Edit Rate (HER)

The agentic measures (3–4) evaluate systems that read $n$-best hypotheses and decide when to edit and when to abstain (LLM error correctors, dictation agents):

measure question it answers
RIR: Recoverable Information Ratio (ρ) How much of the 1-best→oracle gap did the correction close? ρ>1 beats the n-best oracle; ρ<0 is the damage regime.
HER: Harmful Edit Rate Of the edits actually made, what fraction broke a correct token? Isolates over-correction.
o_nb / o_cp The two HyPoradise oracles: best single hypothesis (reranking bound) / best token recombination (correction bound).

Installation

With uv:

uv add agwer             # as a project dependency
uv pip install agwer     # into the active environment

Or with pip (Python >= 3.9):

pip install agwer

Usage

The simplest use-case is computing the word error rate of a dictated utterance:

from agwer import wer

ref  = "please schedule the quarterly budget review for tuesday march twenty first at nine thirty and invite the design team"
asr_decoded = "please schedule the quarterly budget review for tuesday march twenty first at nine thirty and invite the desire team"

wer(ref, asr_decoded)   # 0.0526 one broken word in nineteen

All measures accept a single string or a list of strings; lists are pooled corpus-level (total errors / total reference words), and mer, wil, wip, cer work the same way:

import agwer

refs = ["send the revised contract to the legal team before the board meeting on friday afternoon",
        "remind me to pick up the prescription from the pharmacy after the dentist appointment"]
hyps = ["send the revised contract to the legal team before the bored meeting on friday afternoon",
        "remind me to pick up the prescription from the pharmacy after the dentist appointment"]

agwer.wer(refs, hyps)     # 0.0345: corpus WER
agwer.cer(refs, hyps)     # 0.0116: corpus CER

Evaluating a corrector / voice agent

With $n$-best input, one call computes everything. This is a real Whisper 5-best decode from the HyPoradise benchmark (WSJ, MIT-licensed): a 23-word dictated stock quote where the ASR merges the spelled ticker and garbles the fractions — "i b m" survives in no hypothesis:

ref = "i b m fell one and seven eighths to one hundred twenty and three eighths on more than two point five million shares"

nbest = [[   # real Whisper 5-best; nbest[i][0] is the 1-best
    "ibm fell one seven eight to one hundred and twenty three eight on more than two point five million shares",
    "ibm fell one point seven eight to one hundred and twenty point three eight on more than two point five million shares",
    "ibm fell one and seven eighths to one hundred and twenty and three eighths on more than two point five million shares",
    "ibm fell one point seven eights to one hundred and twenty point three eights on more than two point five million shares",
    "ibm fell one seven eighths to one hundred and twenty three eighths on more than two point five million shares",
]]
corrected = [ref]   # a corrector that resolves the ticker and fractions from context

out = agwer.evaluate([ref], corrected, nbest=nbest)
out.wer_1best            # 0.3478 -> the raw ASR broke a third of the quote
out.wer_oracle           # 0.1739 -> o_nb: the best single hypothesis still has 4 errors
out.wer_compositional    # 0.1304 -> o_cp: no token recombination can spell "i b m"
out.wer_corrected        # 0.0
out.rir                  # 2.0    -> twice the n-best headroom: generative correction
out.her                  # 0.0    -> and nothing broken

Real decodes also show why reranking alone cannot save a voice agent: in another HyPoradise utterance the command "leaving after noon" comes back as "leaving afternoon" in all five hypotheses — the query's meaning flips, every reranker is helpless, and only a corrector (and agwer's oracles) can see it.

Vibe-coding dictation: when the agent beats every hypothesis (ρ > 1)

Dictating to a coding agent is the hardest case: package names and code terms are exactly what ASR mangles. Here the 1-best hears "you v pip install ag where" and "pie test" — and the package name agwer appears in no hypothesis, so no reranker and not even the compositional oracle can fully recover the command. The coding agent can, because it knows the package from context:

ref = ("open a terminal run uv pip install agwer then write a pytest that checks "
       "the word error rate of the two transcripts stays below five percent")

nbest = [[  # 26-word dictation; ASR breaks the technical terms
    "open a terminal run you v pip install ag where then write a pie test that checks "
    "the word error rate of the two transcripts stays below five percent",
    "open a terminal run uv pip install a g wear then write a pytest that checks "
    "the word error rate of the two transcripts stays below five percent",
    "open a terminal run you've pip installed ag where then write a pie test that checks "
    "the word error rate of the two transcript stays below five percent",
]]
corrected = [ref]   # the agent reconstructs 'uv pip install agwer' and 'pytest'

out = agwer.evaluate([ref], corrected, nbest=nbest)
out.wer_1best            # 0.2308 -> the raw ASR broke almost a quarter of the command
out.wer_oracle           # 0.1154 -> the best single hypothesis still has 3 errors
out.wer_compositional    # 0.0385 -> even recombining all tokens cannot spell 'agwer'
out.wer_corrected        # 0.0
out.rir                  # 2.0    -> recovered TWICE the n-best headroom: generative
out.her                  # 0.0    -> and broke nothing

ρ > 1 is the signature of generative correction — the agent supplied truth that exists nowhere in the hypothesis list. This is what plain WER, reranking metrics, and even oracle bounds cannot see, and what RIR was built to measure.

HER comes in two granularities — her_granularity="utterance" (default; the accounting behind the paper's reported values) and "token" (the formal per-edit definition). A sentence where the corrector fixes one token and breaks another is neutral at utterance granularity but helpful=1, harmful=1 at token granularity; report which one you used.

Normalization

Normalization is the main reason WER numbers are incomparable across papers. Every entry point takes normalize= (any Callable[[str], str]); agwer ships the standards:

A dictation agent that says amounts out loud looks 87% wrong against the written form — until you normalize:

ref = "the invoice total came to $1,250.75 after the 15% discount was applied on march 3rd"
hyp = ("the invoice total came to one thousand two hundred fifty dollars "
       "and seventy five cents after the fifteen percent discount was applied on march third")

agwer.wer(ref, hyp)                                          # 0.867 (!)
agwer.wer(ref, hyp, normalize=agwer.EnglishTextNormalizer())  # 0.0
normalizer what
None (general measures' default) score strings exactly as given
agwer.default_normalize (agentic default) conservative: lowercase, keep apostrophes, strip other punctuation
BasicTextNormalizer() language-agnostic: symbols, brackets, optional diacritic folding
EnglishTextNormalizer() the Whisper English normalizer (numbers→digits, currency, contractions, British→American); cached=True adds an LRU for agent loops

The Whisper normalizers are vendored (MIT, © 2022 OpenAI, attribution included) with behavior pinned byte-identical to the original by golden tests. Report which normalizer you used; it is part of the metric.

CLI

agwer results.jsonl                 # {"reference","corrected","nbest"} per line
agwer results.jsonl --json --her-granularity token

Performance

Batched RapidFuzz hot path, and every aggregate agwer computes is count-additive, so large corpora parallelize exactly (identical results for any worker count): evaluate(..., workers=8).

Typical performance on Apple Silicon (M-series, 14 cores) — full agentic evaluation (WER×3 + both oracles + RIR + HER) of 5-best corpora:

scenario time
10k utterances (single-threaded) ~0.2 s
100k utterances (single-threaded) 2.6 s
100k utterances (8 workers) 0.48 s (5.5×)
1M utterances (single-threaded) 27.9 s
1M utterances (8 workers) 5.2 s (5.4×)

Workers pay process startup, so they win from roughly 100k utterances up; on macOS/Windows call from a if __name__ == "__main__" guard, as with any multiprocessing. Reproduce on your machine:

python -m agwer.bench --workers 8

Apple Silicon

agwer is native on Apple Silicon out of the box — no separate install: pip/uv select the arm64 wheel automatically, and RapidFuzz ships compiled arm64-darwin extensions, so the C++ edit-distance core runs natively on M-series. workers= then scales the whole pipeline across performance cores (table above). Planned next: an optional agwer[mlx] extra for embedding-based semantic metrics on the Apple Neural Engine / GPU via MLX — semantics inference is the one place extra hardware genuinely helps; edit distance does not need it.

Compatibility & reproducibility

Measure semantics match jiwer (validated bit-identical on 600-corpus goldens, pinned in tests/), and the default agentic settings reproduce the Voice Memory paper's published evaluation (golden-pinned in tests/test_paper_reference.py).

Citation

If you use RIR/ρ or HER, please cite the Voice Memory paper (Exploring Voice Memory for Agentic Speech Recognition, under review, 2026 — citation entry will be updated at camera-ready) and this package.

License

Apache-2.0. Vendored Whisper normalizers: MIT (see src/agwer/normalizers/LICENSE_WHISPER).

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

agwer-0.2.0.tar.gz (48.0 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

agwer-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl (43.8 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file agwer-0.2.0.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: agwer-0.2.0.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 48.0 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: uv/0.11.29 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.11.29","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Ubuntu","version":"24.04","id":"noble","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}

File hashes

Hashes for agwer-0.2.0.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 8b2685fb8bd86860ba146fd1dad302119ee5fc29f0a1e506f20f909db81d6d9e
MD5 90c5ecf88e3f171e8e8bab77ecf06a9b
BLAKE2b-256 715f84f2f0581430dc8d0d96b6429601c486f8301aa8507b9431c7a6d1b3627b

See more details on using hashes here.

File details

Details for the file agwer-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: agwer-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 43.8 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: uv/0.11.29 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.11.29","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Ubuntu","version":"24.04","id":"noble","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}

File hashes

Hashes for agwer-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 0993959f6f18a59b3944d958b3ca84bfe644b322ff85e10d11d02fa53238dac2
MD5 639d68e9d585799c266f99fd78775a64
BLAKE2b-256 21799069d739f673232d28b157bde41878836cb4419858aa53cc6ac3181c1b2b

See more details on using hashes here.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page