Skip to main content

AI Dev Workflow

Provider-neutral, automation-first software-development orchestration framework.

AI Dev Workflow orchestrates the entire software-development lifecycle across arbitrary software projects (web, API, desktop, mobile, infrastructure, libraries and more). It is not a particular coding agent, single-product tool, IDE or GitHub Action. Agents and workers should perform routine planning, execution, validation, review, integration and reporting autonomously; humans remain accountable for explicit decision gates such as product direction, material scope/architecture changes, security-sensitive actions and production/release policy.

The target is human-on-the-loop, policy-driven automation: an agent proposes decisions; the system automatically executes allowed work; the human approves only decisions whose risk or policy requires approval. Human approval must not be silently bypassed. Current behavior and unimplemented automation are distinguished in the roadmap.

Target end-to-end lifecycle

Idea / request
  -> PMAgent: product contract, classify Epic / Issue, Keep / Split / Merge
  -> Policy / human decision gate (when required)
  -> ArchitectAgent: technical spec, ADR when needed, dependencies
  -> Policy / human decision gate (when required)
  -> Publish provider-neutral work-item graph (Epic -> execution-leaf Issues)
  -> Ready / frozen acceptance contract
  -> Dispatcher: select eligible worker -> reserve -> offer -> accept -> claim
  -> TesterAgent: executable tests + RED evidence
  -> ImplementerAgent: code + GREEN / regression + PR
  -> Independent ReviewerAgent: approve or request changes
  -> Integration gate (CI + project policy)
  -> Optional release-scoped runtime verification batch
  -> Promote / close / release with traceable evidence

Workflow state is not agent session state: all transitions must be durable, auditable and recoverable. An Epic is a planning container; only a ready, dependency-unblocked leaf Issue may be claimed for execution.

Control plane and data plane

                         Human decision maker
                           (policy gates only)
                                   |
    Request -> PM/Architect -> Workflow Engine <-> WorkItemProvider
                                   |            (GitHub / Azure DevOps)
                            Planning & context
                                   |
                               Dispatcher <-> Worker Registry & Presence
                                   |
                        eligible worker / claim
                                   |
          +------------------------+-------------------------+
          |                        |                         |
     Local worker             Cloud worker              Human worker
     Codex/Claude/etc.        Codespaces/etc.           (exception)
          +------------------------+-------------------------+
                                   |
                          Tests / PR / review evidence
                                   |
                      Integration / runtime batch / release
                                   |
                       Workflow Engine updates work items
Component Owns Must not own
Workflow Engine State machine, approval policies, durable transitions, recovery Provider-specific API or agent model
WorkItemProvider Epic/Issue CRUD, hierarchy, dependencies, status mapping Worker execution
Workspace & Artifact Store Repository context, Spec/ADR/plan, test and review evidence Work-item canonical state
Worker Registry & Presence Provider, worker identity, roles, capabilities, capacity, location, liveness Agent role semantics
Dispatcher / Claim Journal Eligibility, queue order, reservation, acceptance, ownership and handoff Work before worker accepts
Execution Runtime Launch worker, isolate workspace, execute task, capture evidence Approval-policy decisions

Roles specify what must happen. Workers specify who performs it. A worker's provider/client specifies how it executes; the execution environment specifies where. Never bind an AI provider to an agent role.

Data flow, by phase

Phase Input Owner / operation Output and durable source
0. Setup Repository, GitHub/ADO connection, policy Setup wizard, metadata discovery, worker registration .ai-workflow.yml, optional .ai-workspace.yml, worker registry
1. Product planning Idea / request / existing work PMAgent, policy-aware approval Product contract, Epic/Issue proposal, approved decisions
2. Technical planning Approved product contract + repo context ArchitectAgent, Spec/ADR, dependencies, Ready Freeze Versioned spec/plan; canonical work item in GitHub/ADO
3. Dispatch/claim Ready leaf Issue + required role/capabilities Dispatcher + worker accept Durable dispatch/claim, ActiveWorkContext, active status
4. TDD/review Frozen contract + project test rules Tester -> Implementer -> independent Reviewer RED/GREEN evidence, PR, review findings, CI
5. Integration/release Approved PRs + release policy Integration + runtime verifier when needed Integration evidence, optional runtime batch, Done/release

AGENTS.md contains agent instructions; CURRENT.md is an optional minimal context router, never the system of record. Secrets stay in worker credential stores or environment references, not committed configuration.

Implementation boundaries: The core currently contains GitHub-specific claim and phase-completion paths; Azure DevOps-only execution is not yet fully end-to-end provider-neutral. Runtime handoff currently can enter runtime-verify directly after review; the target is a separate, user- or policy-triggered multi-Issue runtime batch. Routing does not yet fully enforce every capability/capacity/policy constraint. These are tracked as roadmap gaps, not advertised as completed capabilities.

Roles

  • SetupAgent: discover configuration, propose safe defaults and validate setup.
  • PMAgent: product intent, value, priority, scope, Epic/Issue classification and proposals.
  • ArchitectAgent: technical boundaries, spec, ADR, dependencies and acceptance criteria.
  • TesterAgent: derives tests from the frozen contract and proves RED before implementation.
  • ImplementerAgent: implements without changing the frozen test contract; must reach GREEN and run applicable regression checks.
  • ReviewerAgent: automatic semantic/architecture reviewer by default; must use a different worker_id from the Implementer. Separate credential/identity is optional.
  • RuntimeVerifierAgent: optional, project-specific runtime verification role.

A role is not a model. GPT, Codex, Claude, local models or future providers are replaceable adapters under these contracts.

Core rules

  • The WorkItemProvider is the source of truth for work items (GitHub Issues, Azure DevOps); code/docs/PR evidence remain in project repositories.
  • Ready is the commitment/freeze boundary.
  • Test design happens before implementation.
  • Implementer may report a bad test/spec as blocked, but must not rewrite expectations merely to make tests pass.
  • Deterministic CI gates run before automatic independent semantic review.
  • Runtime verification is separate from offline/CI verification.
  • Projects consume versioned reusable workflows such as @v1; they do not copy the engine.
  • Favor automatic execution within explicit policy boundaries; request human decisions only at configured risk/approval gates. Never silently approve high-impact actions.
  • Changes to frozen requirements require a reviewed revision, not an agent rewriting the contract.

Consumer project

A project keeps only project-specific context/config:

AGENTS.md
CURRENT.md (optional bootstrap/router)
.ai-workflow.yml
.github/workflows/ai-workflow.yml
project tests/runtime rules

Its caller workflow will reference this repository's reusable workflow.

The framework does not install its own CI/check workflow into consumer repositories, does not configure required status checks, and does not modify branch protection. Existing consumer-repository build, test, lint, security, approval, and merge policies remain authoritative. The generated .github/workflows/ai-workflow.yml is orchestration only.

See:

  • AGENTS.md
  • docs/lifecycle.md
  • docs/agent-contracts.md
  • docs/tdd-handoff.md
  • .ai-workflow.example.yml

Refs #1

Execution environments

Execution environments are provider-neutral. The first supported project contract is GitHub Codespaces with three modes:

  • off: never use Codespaces.
  • on-demand: provision/start a Codespace only when a routed task requires it.
  • always-on: keep a Codespace available according to project policy.

The recommended default is on-demand.

Agent role, provider and environment are independent dimensions. For example, ImplementerAgent may run through different provider adapters while using the same Codespaces workspace.

Project bootstrap

The central framework owns the shared repository metadata contract.

Consumer repositories can run the reusable bootstrap-project.yml workflow to create or update the managed workflow labels. Bootstrap is idempotent and does not delete project-specific labels.

Managed labels currently include:

  • workflow states: status:ready, status:in-progress, status:blocked, status:in-review, status:runtime-pending, status:release-pending;
  • priorities: priority:P0, priority:P1, priority:P2.

This keeps label semantics portable when the framework or a project is copied to another repository/account.

Workspace planning context

Multi-repository brainstorming uses a workspace registry in .ai-workspace.yml.

Before a work item is published, the Planning Context Resolver normalizes:

  • repositories and their purpose/ref/access;
  • context paths relevant to architecture/brainstorming;
  • the default target repository;
  • GitHub Project identity;
  • logical initiatives and repository-local milestone mappings.

ArchitectAgent then emits a planning decision identifying the correct target repository, affected repositories, initiative/release, dependencies, issue type, and runtime requirement.

This keeps brainstorming portable across ChatGPT, Claude, Codex, local models, or future providers and prevents repository selection from depending on model memory.

Azure DevOps initialization

Azure DevOps is supported through the provider-neutral WorkItemProvider boundary.

Run:

AZURE_DEVOPS_TOKEN=... ./bin/ai-workflow init-ado \
  --organization <org> \
  --project <project>

The initializer discovers the project's current process, Work Item Types, and all visible states through Azure DevOps REST API 7.1. It writes explicit per-WIT state mappings into .ai-workflow.yml; runtime execution does not guess custom state meanings.

Agent roles are provider-neutral. Register worker providers separately with setup or add-worker; the deprecated --role-provider flag is ignored.

Validate later with:

./bin/ai-workflow doctor \
  --config .ai-workflow.yml \
  --discovery .ai-workflow.yml.ado-discovery.json

Doctor reports unmapped visible ADO states, missing canonical ready/completed coverage, missing required agent roles and invalid worker/provider references.

Plugin-style repository initialization

Existing repositories can install the workflow with one command:

./bin/ai-workflow init \
  --work-items github-issues \
  --environment codespaces \
  --codespaces-mode on-demand

For Azure DevOps:

AZURE_DEVOPS_TOKEN=... ./bin/ai-workflow init \
  --work-items azure-devops \
  --ado-organization <org> \
  --ado-project <project> \
  --environment codespaces

The initializer updates only workflow-owned configuration sections and preserves unrelated custom YAML. It creates missing AGENTS.md, CURRENT.md, Codespaces devcontainer, and GitHub workflow caller stubs without overwriting existing project files unless --force is supplied. Doctor validation runs after init.

Agent roles and workers

Agent roles (SetupAgent, PMAgent, ArchitectAgent, TesterAgent, ImplementerAgent, ReviewerAgent and RuntimeVerifierAgent) define responsibilities only; they do not select an AI provider. Set each worker's provider and capacity when registering the worker. All roles are available automatically. Worker routing resolves which eligible worker handles each phase.

The setup wizard no longer asks for a provider for each agent role. Agent entries do not contain a provider. To change which model carries out a task, configure the worker's provider. The framework assigns roles dynamically by phase.

Guided setup wizard

For first-time installation, prefer the step-by-step setup flow over raw init flags:

GH_TOKEN=... ./bin/ai-workflow setup \
  --work-items github-issues \
  --github-repository owner/repo \
  --environment codespaces

For Azure DevOps:

AZURE_DEVOPS_TOKEN=... ./bin/ai-workflow setup \
  --work-items azure-devops \
  --ado-organization <org> \
  --ado-project <project> \
  --environment codespaces

Setup discovers repository/provider metadata, confirms mappings, configures policies and workspaces, registers workers with their providers and credentials, then validates and applies. There is no agent-role provider assignment step.

The setup context is exposed through a provider-neutral SetupAgent contract so an AI provider can recommend project-specific defaults after reading existing docs/tests/workflows. GitHub setup discovers existing labels and maps status-like labels; Azure DevOps setup discovers states per Work Item Type. Mapping is persisted explicitly and is never guessed during runtime.

Use --plan-only to generate .ai-setup-plan.yml without applying repository changes, or --non-interactive for automation.

Headless / cloud authentication

Interactive setup supports both GUI and headless environments.

  • GitHub: existing gh CLI session, browser login, token environment variable, or secure pasted token prompt.
  • Azure DevOps: browser login, device-code login, existing Azure CLI session, PAT/token environment variable, or secure pasted PAT/token prompt.
  • Tokens pasted into prompts are used only for the current setup validation and are not written to project configuration.
  • On cloud/headless Linux, prefer environment-variable credentials for unattended automation; device-code or secure token prompt is suitable for interactive terminal setup.
  • Every selected credential is live-validated immediately before setup continues.

AI provider registry

Setup validates each connection when it is configured, before Worker setup: GitHub must resolve the authenticated account through the GitHub API; Azure DevOps must resolve the authenticated identity and requested project; every AI provider must pass a live client/endpoint/authentication check. A failed validation stops setup at that step and the provider is not available to Workers. Local Workers share the already-validated project/machine GitHub and Azure DevOps credentials; setup does not create separate credentials per local Worker.

No providers are automatically created, including Codex or a manual provider. Register providers explicitly before creating workers. During initial setup the wizard offers provider types, then the Worker step lists only provider IDs configured in the preceding step. The operator must choose an item; there is no preselected Codex option. The add-worker wizard similarly lists only providers saved in the current project's configuration. If none are registered, configure at least one provider before adding a worker.

Workers, not agent roles, reference provider IDs. Provider type, endpoint, model and authentication are configured separately.

Examples:

./bin/ai-workflow setup ... \
  --ai-provider codex=chatgpt-codex,model=gpt-5.6-codex \
  --ai-provider openai=openai,model=gpt-5.6,auth=api-key-env,env=OPENAI_API_KEY \
  --ai-provider claude=anthropic,model=claude-sonnet,auth=api-key-env,env=ANTHROPIC_API_KEY \
  --ai-provider litellm=litellm,base_url=http://litellm:4000/v1,auth=bearer-env,env=LITELLM_API_KEY \
  --ai-provider local=local-openai-compatible,base_url=http://host.docker.internal:11434/v1,model=qwen-local,auth=none \
  --worker desktop=hybrid,provider=local,environment=local

Supported provider types are openai, chatgpt-codex, anthropic, litellm, openai-compatible, local-openai-compatible, and interactive.

Authentication is an independent strategy: chatgpt-oauth, api-key-env, bearer-env, or none. Secrets are never written into project configuration; configuration stores only the environment variable name or interactive auth strategy.

Connection-first setup

Guided setup now connects the source host before repository/provider discovery.

GitHub authentication supports:

  • gh-cli (default): reuse the authenticated GitHub CLI OAuth session from gh auth login;
  • token-env: read a PAT/token from an environment variable such as GH_TOKEN.

SSH keys remain valid for Git fetch/push but are not used as GitHub API/WorkItem authentication.

Example:

gh auth login
./bin/ai-workflow setup \
  --github-auth gh-cli \
  --github-repository owner/repo \
  --work-items github-issues

The WorkItemProvider is selected from a registry. Built-ins are currently github-issues and azure-devops; core validation is registry-based so future providers can be added without changing canonical workflow states.

Azure DevOps MCP

When Azure DevOps is the WorkItemProvider, setup can also configure Microsoft's Azure DevOps MCP connection for agents.

Remote MCP is the default:

./bin/ai-workflow setup \
  --github-repository owner/repo \
  --work-items azure-devops \
  --ado-organization contoso \
  --ado-project App \
  --ado-mcp-mode remote \
  --ado-mcp-auth interactive

Local stdio MCP remains available with --ado-mcp-mode local. Supported MCP auth modes are interactive, azcli, env, envvar, and pat. Secrets are represented only by auth strategy/environment requirements and are never written to project configuration.

Worker registration

Worker registration defaults: During initial setup, choose one shared local workspace root once (for example G:\\ai-workers). Then select a configured provider, choose how many workers to create, and capacity per worker. Worker IDs are generated automatically as worker-<provider>-<n>, and each workspace is created under the shared root, e.g. G:\\ai-workers\\worker-codex-1. No worker-name or per-worker workspace prompt is required.

Worker registration defaults: New workers operate in hybrid mode and automatically receive all seven Agent Roles (Setup, PM, Architect, Tester, Implementer, Reviewer and RuntimeVerifier). No role or mode selection is required in the wizard. Choose the AI provider and capacity; the wizard still gathers essential credentials, environment and workspace settings. Roles express workflow responsibilities, not unrestricted permissions: authentication, project policies, execution readiness and reviewer separation still apply. No Worker role selection or role migration is part of the new setup contract.

Setup can register local, Codespaces, or cloud workers separately from AI provider configuration. The registration wizard does not ask for a role or mode. Worker IDs are independent from credential identities, so multiple workers may share one credential reference.

Example local hybrid worker:

./bin/ai-workflow setup ... \
  --worker desktop=hybrid,provider=local,environment=local,assignee=my-github-login,planning_updates=approval-required

Example Codespaces executor:

./bin/ai-workflow setup ... \
  --worker cs=hybrid,provider=codex,environment=codespaces,capacity=2

Planner/hybrid workers can connect directly to the configured WorkItemProvider (for example Azure DevOps MCP) to read current work items, analyze repository/work-item context, brainstorm, and propose updates. Planning mutations default to approval-required; frozen ready contracts cannot be silently changed. Executor/hybrid workers project into the existing queue-dispatcher worker registry and follow the reservation → provider accepted → in-progress lifecycle.

Complete setup documentation

For the full first-run and customization guide, see:

  • docs/setup-guide.md — human-readable step-by-step setup, examples, credentials, providers, workers, ADO/GitHub, Codespaces/local and multi-repo.
  • docs/setup-agent-playbook.md — canonical AI-readable SetupAgent playbook, invariants, approval boundaries and customization contract.

Recommended workflow:

AI or user reads setup guide/playbook
→ run setup --plan-only
→ review discovered status/WIT mappings and recommendations
→ approve/customize
→ run setup/apply
→ configure required secrets/sign-ins
→ doctor

The setup flow is customizable, but provider-specific states, credential values and frozen-contract changes must never be silently guessed.

Updating the framework

Use ./bin/ai-workflow update --check to inspect the configured framework ref, and ./bin/ai-workflow update --to <ref> to update framework-managed files and schema metadata. Project-owned configuration and files are preserved; locally modified managed files are skipped unless --force is explicitly used. See docs/setup-guide.md for the full update and migration rules.

Install from PyPI

Consumers do not need to clone this repository:

python -m pip install --upgrade ai-dev-workflow

After installation, start with the built-in guide:

ai-workflow guide

Typical first-run flow:

cd /path/to/project
ai-workflow setup
ai-workflow doctor

The setup wizard detects the containing Git repository by default, shows the generated plan/configuration, and prints the next required steps after apply. Use ai-workflow setup --help for setup options and ai-workflow guide at any time for the end-to-end usage flow.

The GitHub repository may remain private because normal consumers install the built distribution from PyPI rather than cloning the source repository.

On another machine, install Python 3.10+ and run the same pip install ai-dev-workflow command. Project-specific configuration remains in each consumer repository.

Framework CLI/package upgrades and project installation upgrades are separate:

python -m pip install --upgrade ai-dev-workflow
ai-workflow update

The first command upgrades the installed CLI package. The second migrates/updates the workflow installation in the current project.

PM and architecture planning

Product planning and technical architecture are separate roles:

Idea / chat
→ PMAgent
→ product Keep/Split/Merge proposal
→ human approval
→ ArchitectAgent
→ technical Spec / ADR / decomposition
→ approval for structural architecture changes
→ Ready Freeze
→ TesterAgent

PMAgent owns what/why: intent, value, scope, priority, product acceptance boundaries, Epic/Issue classification and product-level decomposition. ArchitectAgent owns how: technical boundaries, interfaces, data model, Spec/ADR, technical dependencies and execution decomposition.

By default workflow.planning.approval_policy is always. Create, Split, Merge, Re-parent and Ready Freeze require explicit approval before provider mutation, and frozen contracts cannot be silently changed.

Active work and claims

A selected task is not considered started until its worker/provider acknowledges it:

ready/queued
-> reserved
-> offered
-> accepted by worker/provider
-> claim committed
-> active status

Local agents acknowledge with the registered worker identity (for example through ai-workflow claim). Phase completion can be recorded with ai-workflow complete-phase, which releases the current claim and reserves an eligible worker for the next role. Automatic review always excludes the implementation worker_id; identity separation is enforced only when the optional strict-review policy is enabled.

Azure DevOps configuration boundary

Azure DevOps project metadata and credentials are separate:

  • project configuration owns organization/project, logical Epic/Issue Work Item Type mappings, and Area/Iteration defaults;
  • worker configuration owns the Azure DevOps authentication strategy/credential reference;
  • setup may borrow a worker credential temporarily to discover project metadata, but never persists the raw token;
  • workers may share a credential reference when they intentionally act as the same ADO identity.

Area Path and Iteration Path options are discovered from the project's existing Azure DevOps classification nodes. Setup selects from existing values; it does not create or modify the project's classification hierarchy.

Worker credentials and identity

Worker IDs and credentials are separate concepts. Several workers may intentionally use the same credential reference and therefore operate as the same GitHub/ADO actor. This is valid for normal planning, testing, implementation, and runtime work.

The workflow verifies effective actor identity where possible. A distinct credential is not required merely because workers are different. By default, ReviewerAgent only needs a different worker_id from the Implementer. Projects that require stronger separation may enable reviewer.require_distinct_identity: true.

Local parallel workers

One local machine may register multiple workers that intentionally share the same GitHub/Azure DevOps credential sessions while using isolated working folders.

Example:

workers:
  - worker_id: codex-01
    environment: local
    provider: codex
    workspace:
      strategy: git-worktree
      root: G:\ai-workers\codex-01

  - worker_id: ccr-01
    environment: local
    provider: ccr
    workspace:
      strategy: git-worktree
      root: G:\ai-workers\ccr-01

Add another local worker after initial setup:

ai-workflow add-worker

or non-interactively:

ai-workflow add-worker `
  --worker-id codex-02 `
  --provider codex `
  --workspace G:\ai-workers\codex-02 `
  --workspace-strategy git-worktree

By default the new local worker inherits credential references from an existing local worker. It still receives its own worker_id and isolated workspace. Use --no-inherit-credentials when the worker must use a different identity.

At runtime, a local worker is resolved in this order:

  1. explicit --worker <id>;
  2. AI_WORKFLOW_WORKER_ID;
  3. current working directory contained by one configured workspace.root.

This makes it possible to open separate terminals in separate worker folders and run tasks concurrently without repeating the worker ID.

Claude Code Router local provider

Claude Code Router can be registered as a local provider:

providers:
  ccr:
    type: claude-code-router
    base_url: http://127.0.0.1:3456
    auth:
      type: none

The gateway defaults to http://127.0.0.1:3456. A client-key environment reference can be configured when the local router is protected. Claude Code Router uses the same CLAUDE.md instruction adapter as Claude Code, while AGENTS.md remains the shared workflow instruction source.

A local CCR worker can then be registered with its own workspace:

ai-workflow add-worker `
  --worker-id ccr-01 `
  --provider ccr `
  --workspace G:\ai-workers\ccr-01

Step-by-step add-worker wizard

Running ai-workflow add-worker with no --non-interactive flag now opens a structured wizard:

  1. review existing project/provider configuration;
  2. choose a worker id;
  3. choose an AI provider;
  4. choose a local machine/agent client;
  5. choose the local workspace and its isolation strategy;
  6. configure GitHub/ADO credential references;
  7. choose skills and capacity;
  8. review and confirm before saving.

The wizard never stores raw tokens. It only stores credential strategies/references already supported by the worker identity model.

For scripting/automation, keep the deterministic flag-based flow:

ai-workflow add-worker `
  --non-interactive `
  --worker-id codex-02 `
  --provider codex `
  --workspace G:\ai-workers\codex-02 `
  --workspace-strategy git-worktree

Use --no-inherit-credentials when the new worker must not reuse an existing local worker's credential references.

Consumer worker registry and live presence

When a GitHub Issues or composite project has execution workers, setup writes:

.github/ai-workflow-worker-registry.json

This committed registry contains routing metadata only:

  • worker id;
  • execution location;
  • provider id;
  • roles/capabilities;
  • capacity;
  • managed/unmanaged flag;
  • GitHub assignee when required.

It intentionally excludes machine-local paths, machine ids, client launch commands, credential references, tokens, identities, heartbeat data, and active sessions.

For local execution workers, setup also creates or reuses one closed coordination Issue marked with:

<!-- ai-dev-workflow:worker-presence -->

The Issue number is stored as project-level dispatcher metadata. Local workers publish the existing queue-dispatcher presence-v2 contract to that Issue using their own verified GitHub identity.

ai-workflow worker open <worker-id> keeps the local and central heartbeat alive while the configured Codex/Claude Code client process is running. When the client exits, the worker is reported offline.

For headless or daemon-style workers:

ai-workflow worker serve <worker-id>

A worker keeps one presence comment and updates it on each heartbeat; it does not append a new comment every interval. The central dispatcher reads the consumer registry plus live presence before reserving work.

The consumer orchestration workflow remains .github/workflows/ai-workflow.yml. This integration does not install framework CI/check workflows, does not configure required status checks, and does not modify branch protection.

Roadmap and automation maturity

See Architecture & Improvement Roadmap for phased milestones, acceptance criteria, priority fixes, compatibility/migration work, security gates and the distinction between existing components and the autonomous end state. The roadmap is software-domain agnostic: runtime checks mean validation in a real target environment (service, desktop, mobile, infrastructure, etc.), not any particular product domain.

Metadata

Release files for ai-dev-workflow 0.3.1.13

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for ai-dev-workflow 0.3.1.13
File Size Uploaded Provenance
ai_dev_workflow-0.3.1.13.tar.gz 128.8 kB With provenance Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for ai-dev-workflow 0.3.1.13
File Interpreter ABI Platform
ai_dev_workflow-0.3.1.13-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 214.9 kB

Release files / ai_dev_workflow-0.3.1.13.tar.gz

Download URL ai_dev_workflow-0.3.1.13.tar.gz
Size 128.8 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
70c3537205e068b55a382b75b74df2249a60e48e6cef3844623084079562f8e8
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
778ed3b781431e0e6e2b08233bfe4a57a2e59773adb055eeda02c20d55502d93
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 7, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / ai_dev_workflow-0.3.1.13-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL ai_dev_workflow-0.3.1.13-py3-none-any.whl
Size 86.1 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ff2b92b5055fd68b8974ce99e0fe40d7f4fb5e6da35951aca180ef95e90f2108
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
86739f112dbcc61c637fa510d1d88600f1725e3b0ef40d1b0b287b020238a895
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 7, 2026.

Transparency log

Security for ai-dev-workflow 0.3.1.13

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

Full provenance

All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.

Select from 2 files

Attestation for ai_dev_workflow-0.3.1.13.tar.gz

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 7, 2026.

Transparency log

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page