akgentic-agent

LLM-driven collaborative agents for the Akgentic multi-agent framework (open-source bundle). BaseAgent composes the actor runtime, LLM integration, and tool infrastructure into a single unit where agents communicate through a typed message protocol and route messages to each other via structured LLM output.

Table of Contents

• Overview
• Installation
• Quick Start
• Communication Model
• Message Protocol
• Team Composition
• Configuration
• Tool Channels
• Examples
• Documentation
• Development
• License

Overview

Each agent is an Akgent actor. When it receives an AgentMessage, it runs a REACT loop (ReactAgent.run_sync) and returns a StructuredOutput — a list of Request objects that each name a recipient and a message type. The framework resolves the recipients and delivers the messages; the LLM navigates the conversation graph.

Human
  │  AgentMessage(content, type="request")
  ▼
HumanProxy ──send()──► BaseAgent (Manager)
                             │
                    receiveMsg_AgentMessage()
                             │  prepend reply protocol to the prompt:
                             │  "You received a request from @Human. Carry out the
                             │   task, then respond to @Human. ..."
                             │
                    process_message(prompt, sender)
                             │
                    act(prompt, StructuredOutput)
                      │
                      ├─ expand !!glob_pattern refs (if WorkspaceTool present)
                      └─ ReactAgent.run_sync(prompt, output_type=StructuredOutput)
                             │
                    StructuredOutput.messages = [
                        Request(recipient="@Assistant", message_type="instruction", message="..."),
                        Request(recipient="Developer",  message_type="request",     message="..."),
                    ]
                             │
                    for each Request:
                      ├─ "@Name" → resolve to existing actor
                      └─ "Role"  → hire_member(role) → create actor
                             │
                    send AgentMessage(content=request.message,
                                      type=request.message_type)
                      └─ the RAW message — the sender does not enrich it.
                         The receiving agent prepends its own reply
                         protocol when it runs the loop above.

Installation

Published on PyPI. Python 3.12 or newer.

uv add akgentic-agent
# or
pip install akgentic-agent

That is the whole install. akgentic-core, akgentic-llm, akgentic-tool and pydantic-ai come with it as ordinary dependencies — no workspace checkout, no submodules.

As part of the framework bundle

akgentic-framework is the meta-distribution that pins every akgentic package at versions built and tested together. Install akgentic-agent through it when you want the release-wide pin rather than a single package:

pip install "akgentic-framework[agent]"   # this package + its closure, release-pinned
pip install "akgentic-framework[all]"     # the whole framework

Working on the package itself

To develop akgentic-agent rather than use it, clone the open-source bundle akgentic-framework, which carries every package together as submodules:

git clone git@github.com:b12consulting/akgentic-framework.git
cd akgentic-framework
git submodule update --init
# uncomment the two "SOURCE MODE" blocks in pyproject.toml
uv sync

Source mode resolves akgentic-* to the local checkouts, editable.

Quick Start

import time
from akgentic.agent import AgentConfig, AgentMessage, BaseAgent, HumanProxy
from akgentic.core import ActorSystem, AgentCard, BaseConfig, Orchestrator
from akgentic.llm import ModelConfig, PromptTemplate

# Actor runtime + Orchestrator
actor_system = ActorSystem()
orchestrator_addr = actor_system.createActor(
    Orchestrator, config=BaseConfig(name="@Orchestrator", role="Orchestrator")
)
orchestrator_proxy = actor_system.proxy_ask(orchestrator_addr, Orchestrator)

# Define and register a role blueprint.
# NOTE: there is no `role=` keyword on AgentCard — `card.role` is a read-only
# property reading `config.role`, which is the single source of truth.
manager_card = AgentCard(
    description="Project manager who coordinates specialists",
    skills=["coordination", "delegation"],
    agent_class="akgentic.agent.BaseAgent",
    config=AgentConfig(
        name="@Manager",
        role="Manager",
        prompt=PromptTemplate(template="You are a project manager. Delegate to specialists."),
        model_cfg=ModelConfig(provider="openai", model="gpt-4.1"),
    ),
    routes_to=["Developer", "QA"],   # roles this agent can hire on demand
)
# Register role blueprints — accepts a list of AgentCard
orchestrator_proxy.register_agent_profiles([manager_card])

# Human entry point
human_addr = orchestrator_proxy.createActor(
    HumanProxy, config=BaseConfig(name="@Human", role="Human")
)
human_proxy = actor_system.proxy_tell(human_addr, HumanProxy)

# Instantiate Manager and send the first message
manager_addr = orchestrator_proxy.createActor(
    BaseAgent, config=manager_card.get_config_copy()
)

time.sleep(0.3)

# Send a message from the human to the manager
human_proxy.send(manager_addr, AgentMessage(content="Plan the next sprint."))

Communication Model

Every message in the system carries an intent — a declaration of what the sender expects from the recipient. Intent is the core abstraction that drives conversation flow between agents.

Intent: the driving concept

When an agent sends a message, it declares its intent via a message_type:

Intent	Meaning	Expected reply
request	"Do this and bring me the result"	response
instruction	"Do this (possibly for a third party)"	acknowledgment
response	"Here is what you asked for"	Optional
notification	"FYI — no action needed"	None
acknowledgment	"Got it"	None

The key distinction is who needs the result: a request means "bring it back to me", an instruction means "go do this on my behalf".

Intent flows through the system in two complementary ways:

1. When sending — The LLM chooses an intent for each outbound Request. process_message() delivers the raw request.message as an AgentMessage whose type field carries that intent unchanged. The sender does not rewrite the content.

2. When receiving — receiveMsg_AgentMessage() prepends a one-line reply protocol, keyed on the incoming type via REPLY_PROTOCOLS, to the raw content before handing it to the LLM. The guidance is therefore always the one matching the intent that agent received, and it reaches the LLM through the prompt — not through the output schema.

AgentMessage

All inter-agent communication uses a single AgentMessage type:

class AgentMessage(Message):
    type: Literal["request", "response", "notification", "instruction", "acknowledgment"] = "request"
    content: str

The type field carries the sender's intent through the system. The first message is typically sent by an external system (e.g., HumanProxy) as a request with plain content. From there, each agent's LLM decides the intent it attaches to every outbound message.

StructuredOutput and Request

Each LLM call produces a StructuredOutput with a list of outbound Request objects:

class Request(BaseModel):
    message_type: Literal[
        "request",        # ask recipient to perform a task and reply to you with the result
        "instruction",    # direct recipient to perform a task, you may ask for acknowledgement
        "response",       # respond to a previous request
        "notification",   # send information to the recipient, no reply is expected
        "acknowledgment", # confirm receipt of an instruction, no reply is expected
    ]
    message: str
    recipient: str   # "@MemberName" (existing actor) or "RoleName" (triggers hiring)

class StructuredOutput(BaseModel):
    messages: list[Request] = []

The LLM chooses both the recipient and the intent for every outbound message. Request.message_type flows directly into the delivered AgentMessage.type, so every receiver sees the sender's intent as first-class data.

An empty list means the agent has nothing more to send — but the LLM still runs. A notification or acknowledgment means the output list should be empty, not that the LLM call is skipped. The message is still processed and added to the agent's context for future interactions.

Static Schema + Prompt-Carried Reply Protocol

act() reasons against the static StructuredOutput type directly — there is no per-call subclass and no type() metaprogramming on the hot path:

output = self._react_agent.run_sync(prompt, deps=self, output_type=StructuredOutput)

Request.recipient is a plain string with no enum constraint. Recipient validity is enforced at routing time in process_message(), not in the schema:

Recipient format	Resolution
@MemberName	get_team_member(name) → direct send (skipped if not found)
RoleName	hire_member(role) → create actor → send

The reply-protocol guidance lives where the LLM actually reads it — the prompt. receiveMsg_AgentMessage() prepends a one-line protocol (keyed on the incoming message type via REPLY_PROTOCOLS) to the raw content before handing it to process_message():

You received a request from @Human. A reply is expected: respond to @Human with the result.

<raw message content>

Note: This supersedes the schema-constrained-recipient + docstring-injection mechanism from Story 5.1 / ADR-004. The intent-driven 5-type protocol is unchanged — only its enforcement moved from a per-call schema to the prompt + routing-time validation.

Routing and Delivery

process_message() resolves each Request.recipient (see the table above) and sends the raw request.message as an AgentMessage. The sender does not enrich the content — the reply-protocol prefix is added by the receiving agent's receiveMsg_AgentMessage(), so the guidance is always keyed to the intent that agent actually received:

# In the receiver's receiveMsg_AgentMessage(), before process_message():
prompt = f"You received a request from @Manager. {reply_protocol}\n\n{message.content}"

On LLMUsageLimitError, the agent escalates via notify_human() to the team's user-proxy member — found structurally through ActorAddress.is_user_proxy, so any role string works; when the team has none, the notice is logged and dropped.

HumanProxy

HumanProxy extends UserProxy from akgentic-core. It serves two roles:

• Message sink — receiveMsg_AgentMessage() logs receipt. The base implementation publishes nothing of its own; subscribers see the content through the SentMessage the sending agent emits. Override the hook to queue for a console printer, a WebSocket to a frontend, WhatsApp, email, etc.
• Human input bridge — process_human_input() routes a human's reply back to message.sender as an AgentMessage with type="response".

# Send a message from the human to an agent
human_proxy = actor_system.proxy_tell(human_addr, HumanProxy)
human_proxy.send(agent_addr, AgentMessage(content="Do X"))

# Route a human reply back to the agent that asked
human_proxy.process_human_input("My answer", original_message)

Message Protocol

The 5-type intent protocol controls conversation flow. When an incoming message is received, the matching REPLY_PROTOCOLS instruction is prepended to the user prompt (not the output schema), so the LLM reads the guidance inline with the content:

Intent	Receiver instruction (REPLY_PROTOCOLS)
request	"A reply is expected: respond to {sender} with the result."
response	"This is a reply to something you asked. Take it into account and continue."
instruction	"Carry it out; acknowledge to {sender} only if asked to."
notification	"Informational message. No reply is expected."
acknowledgment	"Receipt confirmed. No further action needed."

These lines state message mechanics only — what kind of message arrived, and whether a reply is expected. They deliberately say nothing about who should do the work or whether to delegate, because they sit at the most salient position in every agent's prompt, in every team. Team policy that is stated there is stated to everyone at once: the earlier request text read "Carry out the task, then respond to {sender}. You may also delegate to others", and that single line is what made coordinators do their specialists' work. Wording it the other way round is the same mistake with the sign flipped — it makes specialists fan out to each other. Division of labour is per-role, so it belongs in the agents' own prompts.

The protocol is soft guidance, not framework enforcement. The LLM is guided to send no further messages for notification and acknowledgment, but the framework processes whatever the LLM returns. This is intentional: LLMs are probabilistic, and rigid enforcement would be brittle.

No reply does not mean no processing. When the protocol says "return an empty list", the LLM still runs — it absorbs the message into its context, which may inform future decisions. The empty list simply means no outbound messages are sent.

Team Composition

AgentCard

Declarative role definition registered with the Orchestrator. Acts as a blueprint: agents can be instantiated from it on demand without hard-coding actor addresses.

AgentCard(
    description="Writes and reviews code",
    skills=["python", "testing"],
    agent_class="akgentic.agent.BaseAgent",   # FQCN string or class reference
    config=AgentConfig(name="@Developer", role="Developer"),
    routes_to=["Reviewer", "Tester"],         # roles this agent can hire
)

role is not a constructor keyword. AgentCard.role is a read-only property that reads config.role, so that config field is the single source of truth. Passing role= to the constructor is silently ignored by Pydantic — the card would end up with whatever config.role says, or an empty role if you set neither.

register_agent_profiles([card, ...]) stores cards in the Orchestrator so any agent can hire a role by name without knowing the class.

AgentCard.get_config_copy() returns a fresh AgentConfig suitable for createActor().

Dynamic Hiring

When process_message() sees recipient="Developer" (no @ prefix), it calls hire_member("Developer"), which resolves the registry's typed hire_member command (TeamTool) and invokes it. That command:

1. Looks up the AgentCard for "Developer" in the Orchestrator
2. Calls createActor(agent_class, config=card.get_config_copy())
3. Returns the new actor address for immediate message delivery

If no hire_member command is registered — TeamTool was removed from config.tools — the method raises RuntimeError rather than failing silently.

The LLM in the sending agent triggers this transparently by naming a role instead of a team member.

EventSubscriber

Attach an EventSubscriber to the Orchestrator to observe all messages and events:

from akgentic.core import EventSubscriber
from akgentic.core.messages import Message
from akgentic.core.messages.orchestrator import EventMessage, SentMessage
from akgentic.llm import ToolCallEvent

class MessagePrinter(EventSubscriber):
    def on_message(self, message: Message) -> None:
        if isinstance(message, SentMessage):
            print(f"[{message.sender.name}] → {message.recipient.name}: {message.message.content}")
        elif isinstance(message, EventMessage) and isinstance(message.event, ToolCallEvent):
            print(f"TOOL: {message.event.tool_name}")

orchestrator_proxy.subscribe(MessagePrinter())

Configuration

AgentConfig

Extends BaseConfig from akgentic-core:

Field	Type	Default	Description
prompt	PromptTemplate	PromptTemplate()	Agent backstory rendered into AgentState.backstory and injected as LLM system prompt
model_cfg	ModelConfig	ModelConfig()	LLM provider, model name, API settings
runtime_cfg	RuntimeConfig	RuntimeConfig()	Retries, tool-call end strategy, parallel tools, HTTP client settings
run_usage_limits	RunUsageLimits	RunUsageLimits()	Budget for one run() — token and request caps that reset every run
agent_usage_limits	AgentUsageLimits	AgentUsageLimits()	Budget for the agent's whole lifetime — runs and tokens, accumulated across every run
compaction_cfg	CompactionConfig	CompactionConfig()	Context-compaction strategy and auto-trigger (opt-in; off unless model_cfg.context_length is set)
tools	list[ToolCard]	[]	Tool cards; TeamTool is always prepended automatically

Usage limits: two tiers

The two budgets answer different questions, and both are carried into the ReactAgent that BaseAgent builds. Neither is enforced in akgentic-agent — this package configures, akgentic-llm enforces.

tier	class	bounds	enforced by
run	RunUsageLimits	one run() call — requests, tool calls and tokens within it	pydantic-ai, mid-run; counts reset every run
agent	AgentUsageLimits	the agent's whole lifetime — run() calls and cumulative tokens	ReactAgent, pre-flight before each run

from akgentic.agent.config import AgentConfig
from akgentic.llm import AgentUsageLimits, ModelConfig, RunUsageLimits

config = AgentConfig(
    name="@Manager",
    role="Manager",
    model_cfg=ModelConfig(provider="openai", model="gpt-4.1"),
    run_usage_limits=RunUsageLimits(run_request_limit=50, total_tokens_limit=100_000),
    agent_usage_limits=AgentUsageLimits(agent_request_limit=200, total_tokens_limit=2_000_000),
)

Both defaults are safe to leave alone. RunUsageLimits() keeps a 50-request-per-run brake; AgentUsageLimits() is all-None, and an all-None budget never blocks — that is why the field is never None itself, and why adding a lifetime cap is opt-in rather than a behaviour change.

The agent tier survives a resume. Its counters are not persisted and are not part of AgentState. On restore, ReactAgent recomputes them from the replayed usage events the team restorer already feeds through init_llm_context() — so an agent that has spent 180 of its 200 runs comes back with 20 left, not 200. Two consequences worth knowing:

• The lifetime token limits bound where a run may start, not where it may end. A run's cost is unknown until it completes, so the run that crosses the line finishes and only the next one is refused.
• agent_request_limit is consumed before the call executes, so a run that fails partway still counts against the lifetime budget.

A retrying tool now costs an extra model turn. Under end_strategy="exhaustive" (the default), pydantic-ai v2 suppresses an output produced in the same round as a function tool that raised ModelRetry, and keeps the run open for another model turn. Since agents here routinely emit a StructuredOutput alongside a tool call, and tools raise ModelRetry by design, that second turn is charged to both tiers — so an agent near either budget can trip a limit on a turn that previously completed. Budget for it when sizing tight limits.

Both tiers raise the same UsageLimitError, so a caller that already catches it needs no change to handle the new tier.

Migrating from usage_limits

AgentConfig.usage_limits was the single pre-split budget. It is now the run tier under a new name:

# before
AgentConfig(usage_limits=UsageLimits(request_limit=50, total_tokens_limit=100_000))

# after
AgentConfig(run_usage_limits=RunUsageLimits(run_request_limit=50, total_tokens_limit=100_000))

The old spelling still works: passing usage_limits= emits a DeprecationWarning and populates run_usage_limits, and reading config.usage_limits returns the run tier. Passing both usage_limits= and run_usage_limits= raises ValueError rather than silently picking one. Both are removed in akgentic-agent 2.0.0.

UsageLimits — the pre-split class itself — is a separate, akgentic-llm-owned deprecated alias of RunUsageLimits. It still ships and still warns; its removal is not scheduled for a named release. Only the two AgentConfig shims above carry a fixed removal target.

AgentState

Runtime state extending BaseState:

Field	Type	Description
backstory	str	config.prompt rendered at on_start(), injected as LLM system context on every call

Tool Channels

ToolFactory organises tool cards into three channels:

Channel	Consumer	Examples
TOOL_CALL	LLM via pydantic-ai tools	hire_members(), fire_members(), web_search(), workspace_read()
SYSTEM_PROMPT	LLM system prompt (per call)	team roster, role profiles, backstory, mailbox notifications
COMMAND	CommandRegistry — in-agent Python and /-prefixed messages	hire_member, fire_member, team_members, team_roles, planning_summary

TeamTool is always prepended to config.tools if not already present, ensuring every BaseAgent can hire and fire members.

The Command Registry

on_start() builds one CommandRegistry from every COMMAND-channel capability of the agent's tool cards, adds compact and clear as command-only built-ins, and announces the whole set once as a CommandsAnnouncedEvent:

self._command_registry = tool_factory.get_command_registry(
    extra_commands=[self.compact, self.clear]
)
self.notify_event(
    CommandsAnnouncedEvent(
        agent=self.myAddress,
        commands=self._command_registry.descriptors(),
    )
)

Commands are keyed by the callable's __name__. The canonical names are therefore hire_member, fire_member, team_members, … — there is no cmd_ prefix on any of them.

Two surfaces reach the same table:

Surface	Call	Returns
human / text	registry.dispatch("/hire_member Developer")	str — the result, rendered
typed / in-agent	registry.callable("hire_member")("Developer")	the command's native value (here an ActorAddress)

registry.has(name) tests availability before either call, and registry.descriptors() returns serializable discovery metadata — name, description, argument schema, and owning tool card. BaseAgent uses both surfaces itself: hire_member() resolves the typed callable, and act() expands media references the same way.

if not self._command_registry.has("hire_member"):
    raise RuntimeError("hire_member command not available — TeamTool not configured")

hire = self._command_registry.callable("hire_member")
return cast(ActorAddress, hire(role))

Slash commands: how a human drives an agent

A message whose content starts with / is intercepted in receiveMsg_AgentMessage() before the LLM path and handed to _dispatch_command(). That method dispatches the text, replies to the sender with a notification AgentMessage carrying the result, and records one human-attributed operator action in the agent's LLM context — so the agent reasons about what the human did on its next turn, without mistaking it for its own tool call.

human_addr.send(manager_addr, AgentMessage(content="/team_members"))
human_addr.send(manager_addr, AgentMessage(content="/hire_member DevOpsEngineer"))
human_addr.send(manager_addr, AgentMessage(content="/fire_member @DevOpsEngineer456"))

An unrecognised leading token raises CommandNotRecognized, which _dispatch_command() swallows so the message falls through to the normal LLM path with its original content — a sentence that happens to start with a slash is never lost, and nothing is injected into the context. Failures after a command has been identified (missing or malformed arguments, or the command body raising) are caught inside dispatch() and returned as a result string; those never fall back to the LLM.

Arguments are shlex-split and coerced against the command's signature. A token is treated as a keyword only when the text before its first = names a real parameter, so /hire_member Developer name=@Ada binds both, while a positional value containing = is left intact.

Which commands exist

The registry contents follow from the tool cards attached to the agent:

Command	Provided by	Description
hire_member(role, name=None)	TeamTool	Hire by role; native return is the new ActorAddress
fire_member(name)	TeamTool	Fire a member by name
team_members()	TeamTool	Current team roster
team_roles()	TeamTool	Available roles and descriptions
planning_summary()	PlanningTool	Full team planning text
get_planning_task(task_id)	PlanningTool	Single planning task by ID
search_planning(...)	PlanningTool	Search the shared task board
compact() / clear()	BaseAgent built-ins	Compact or clear the conversation context

Do not hand-transcribe this table into your own code: read the set from registry.descriptors(), or from the CommandsAnnouncedEvent the agent emits at start-up. Those cannot drift from the registry; a copied list can.

Methods on the Pykka proxy

Separately from the command channel, BaseAgent's own public methods are reachable through actor_system.proxy_ask(agent_addr, BaseAgent):

Method	Returns	Description
get_usage_summary(by_run)	AgentUsageSummary	Aggregated LLM usage and cost; queries the orchestrator for LlmUsageEvents and folds them via aggregate_usage() from akgentic.llm. Pass by_run=True for a per-run breakdown.

Media Expansion

When the registry carries an _expand_media_refs command — WorkspaceTool is what provides it — act() expands inline file references before the LLM call:

!!file.png               → BinaryContent injected into the prompt
!!"my screenshot.png"    → same, for paths with spaces
!!*.png                  → glob — every matching image, sorted by path
!!report.pdf             → "!!report.pdf[=> Use workspace_read tool]" forwarded to the LLM
!!nonexistent.png        → "!!nonexistent.png[Error: no image found in the workspace]"

Expansion happens in act() before run_sync(), and only when the expansion actually changed something: if the command returns the prompt unchanged, the plain string is sent as-is. Errors and document hints are forwarded to the LLM rather than silently dropped. Agents whose registry has no _expand_media_refs are unaffected — the block is a no-op.

Examples

cd packages/akgentic-agent
uv run python examples/simple_team.py

Script	Topic
simple_team.py	Three-role interactive team with search, workspace, planning, /commands, and /usage for per-agent cost reporting via EventSubscriber

See the Examples README for full descriptions and running instructions.

Documentation

• Agent Collaboration System — Collaboration model, routing mechanics, delegation patterns, and typed protocol walkthrough

Development

Prerequisites

• Python 3.12+
• uv package manager

Setup

From this repository's root — akgentic-core, akgentic-llm and akgentic-tool resolve from PyPI under the floors in pyproject.toml. This is what CI does:

uv venv
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"

To exercise this package against unreleased sibling code, work from the akgentic-framework bundle in source mode instead — see Working on the package itself.

Commands

From this repository's root:

# Run tests
uv run pytest tests/

# Run tests with coverage
uv run pytest tests/ --cov=akgentic.agent --cov-fail-under=80

# Lint
uv run ruff check src/ tests/

# Format
uv run ruff format src/ tests/

# Type check
uv run mypy src/

addopts = "-m 'not integration'" deselects the integration tests by default: they make real LLM calls (gated by OPENAI_API_KEY) and poll for actor quiescence. Run them explicitly with uv run pytest tests/ -m integration.

CI Pipeline

The package uses GitHub Actions for continuous integration. On every push, on pull requests against master, and on manual dispatch, the pipeline:

1. Checks out this repository only — no workspace, no submodules
2. Installs uv and Python 3.12, and creates a virtualenv
3. Installs the package and its dev extra with uv pip install -e ".[dev]", so the sibling akgentic packages come from PyPI at their declared floors
4. Runs mypy on src/ (strict type checking)
5. Runs ruff check on src/
6. Runs pytest on tests/ with coverage over akgentic.agent (--cov-fail-under=80)
7. Updates the coverage badge gist — only on master pushes

Because step 3 resolves the siblings from PyPI, a change that depends on an unreleased akgentic-core/llm/tool commit will be red here until that package ships, even when the workspace is green locally. That is a merge-order signal, not a defect in this package.

Note: No pre-commit hooks are configured in this package. Quality checks run exclusively in CI.

Project Structure

src/akgentic/agent/
    __init__.py          # Public API: BaseAgent, AgentConfig, HumanProxy, AgentMessage
    agent.py             # BaseAgent — actor + LLM + tool composition, routing logic
    config.py            # AgentConfig, AgentState
    human_proxy.py       # HumanProxy — human-in-the-loop bridge
    messages.py          # AgentMessage with typed protocol
    output_models.py     # StructuredOutput, Request, REPLY_PROTOCOLS
examples/                # Runnable examples with README
tests/                   # Tests organised by module
docs/
    agent-collaboration.md

License

This project is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (AGPL-3.0).

Dual licensing & CLA — Akgentic is available under the AGPL-3.0 open-source license. A commercial license is also planned for organizations that require alternative terms. Contact Yuma for more information. External contributions will be accepted once a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) is in place. Until then, please hold off on submitting pull requests.