alfred-autoresearch 1.1.0

Alfred AutoResearch — Standalone Python SDK for autonomous experiment loops — try ideas, keep what works, discard what doesn't.

AutoResearch SDK

Standalone Python SDK for autonomous experiment loops.

Try ideas, keep what works, discard what doesn't, never stop.

Inspired by karpathy/autoresearch and the OpenClaw AutoResearch plugin.

Features

• 🔄 Experiment Loop Engine — init → run → log → improve → repeat
• 📊 Statistical Confidence — MAD-based noise floor to distinguish real improvements from noise
• 📝 Ideas Backlog — Failed experiments automatically generate ideas for future exploration
• 📈 State Persistence — JSONL results log, survives restarts
• 🛠️ CLI — Full command-line interface with rich output
• 🐍 Pure Python — Zero external dependencies required (only rich + click)
• 📦 OpenClaw Compatible — Same JSONL format as the OpenClaw AutoResearch plugin

Installation

pip install autoresearch

Quick Start

CLI

# Initialize experiment
autoresearch init --name "optimize-latency" --metric latency_ms --direction lower --unit ms

# Run baseline
autoresearch run -c "./benchmark.sh"

# Log result
autoresearch log -d "Baseline measurement"

# Make changes, run again
autoresearch run -c "./benchmark.sh"
autoresearch log -d "Added caching layer"

# Discard bad idea
autoresearch run -c "./benchmark.sh"
autoresearch log -s discard -d "Thread pool didn't help" -i "Try async I/O instead"

# Check status
autoresearch status

Python API

from autoresearch import AutoResearch

# Initialize
ar = AutoResearch(
    name="optimize-latency",
    metric="latency_ms",
    direction="lower",  # lower is better
    unit="ms",
)

ar.init()

# Run baseline
result = ar.run("./benchmark.sh")
print(f"Passed: {result.passed}, Duration: {result.duration_seconds:.1f}s")
ar.log("Baseline measurement")

# Run experiment
result = ar.run("./benchmark.sh")
if result.passed:
    ar.log("Added Redis caching")
else:
    ar.log("Crashed", status="crash")

# Discard with idea
result = ar.run("./benchmark.sh")
ar.discard_with_idea("Thread pool overhead", "Try event loop instead")

# Check confidence
print(f"Confidence: {ar.confidence}")
print(f"Best: {ar.best_metric} vs Baseline: {ar.baseline_metric}")

# Export results
import json
print(json.dumps(ar.get_status(), indent=2))

How It Works

The Loop

SCAN → HYPOTHESIS → EXPERIMENT → MEASURE → INTEGRATE → repeat

1. SCAN — Identify optimization opportunities
2. HYPOTHESIS — Form a testable hypothesis
3. EXPERIMENT — Make the change and run the benchmark
4. MEASURE — Parse metrics, compare to baseline
5. INTEGRATE — Keep if better, discard if worse, log idea for future

Confidence Scoring

AutoResearch uses Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) as the noise floor:

Confidence	Meaning
≥ 2.0x	Improvement is likely real ✅
1.0-2.0x	Above noise but marginal ⚠️
< 1.0x	Within noise, re-run to confirm ❓

This prevents false positives from natural variance.

Output Format

Your benchmark script should output METRIC name=value lines:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

# Run your benchmark
result=$(./my_benchmark)

# Output metrics
echo "METRIC latency_ms=$result"
echo "METRIC throughput_qps=$(echo '10000 / ' $result | bc)"

Persistence

All results are stored in autoresearch.results.jsonl:

{"type": "config", "name": "optimize-latency", "metricName": "latency_ms", "metricUnit": "ms", "bestDirection": "lower"}
{"run": 1, "commit": "abc1234", "metric": 142.5, "metrics": {"latency_ms": 142.5}, "status": "keep", "baseline": true, "description": "Baseline", "timestamp": 1713888000, "segment": 0, "confidence": null}

Ideas Backlog

Discarded experiments append to autoresearch.ideas.md:

- Try async I/O instead of thread pool
- Consider connection pooling for database
- Pre-compute lookup table for hot path

Architecture

autoresearch/
├── src/autoresearch/
│   ├── __init__.py        # Public API
│   ├── core/
│   │   ├── engine.py      # Experiment loop engine
│   │   ├── confidence.py  # Statistical confidence (MAD)
│   │   └── metrics.py     # METRIC name=value parser
│   ├── cli.py             # Rich CLI interface
│   ├── utils/
│   └── metrics/
├── tests/
│   └── test_autoresearch.py
├── pyproject.toml
└── README.md

Comparison with OpenClaw AutoResearch Plugin

Feature	OpenClaw Plugin	Python SDK
Experiment loop	✅ (via tools)	✅ (API + CLI)
Confidence scoring	✅ (MAD)	✅ (MAD, same algorithm)
Ideas backlog	✅	✅
State persistence	✅ (JSONL)	✅ (JSONL, compatible)
Git integration	✅ (auto checkout)	⚠️ (commit tracking only)
Session management	✅ (OpenClaw sessions)	❌ (standalone)
Rich output	✅	✅ (click + rich)
OpenClaw required	✅	❌
Python importable	❌	✅

License

MIT — Use it however you want.

Author

Jose Manuel Sabarís García (@llllJokerllll)

Acknowledgments

• karpathy/autoresearch — Original concept
• OpenClaw AutoResearch Plugin — Confidence algorithm and JSONL format