Skip to main content

Python SDK for the Ambertrace neurosymbolic AI platform API

Project description

AmbertraceAI Python SDK

Python client for the Ambertrace neurosymbolic AI platform API.

Install

pip install ambertraceai

Authentication

The SDK authenticates with an Ambertrace API key (prefix at_...). Create one from the dashboard at app.ambertrace.aiSettings → API Keys, then pass it to the client:

from ambertraceai import AmbertraceAPI

api = AmbertraceAPI(base_url="https://app.ambertrace.ai", api_key="at_...")

Keep the key out of source control — read it from the environment. The SDK does this for you: set AMBERTRACE_API_KEY (and optionally AMBERTRACE_BASE_URL, which defaults to https://app.ambertrace.ai) and call from_env():

api = AmbertraceAPI.from_env()                     # reads AMBERTRACE_API_KEY / AMBERTRACE_BASE_URL
api = AmbertraceAPI.from_env(dotenv_path=".env")   # also load a .env file (real env wins)

base_url / api_key are optional on the constructor too — when omitted they fall back to those env vars (an explicit argument always wins):

api = AmbertraceAPI()                               # base_url + api_key from the environment

See Agent Keys for the user- vs. platform-scoped key model.

Quick Start

from ambertraceai import AmbertraceAPI

api = AmbertraceAPI(
    base_url="https://app.ambertrace.ai",
    api_key="at_...",
)

# Create a domain
domain = api.domains.create(
    name="Legal Contracts",
    description="Contract analysis for risk and compliance",
)

# Upload data. The returned dataset exposes its fields by attribute too
# (dataset.row_count, dataset.column_count, dataset.decision_column).
dataset = api.datasets.upload(
    domain_id=domain["id"],
    file_path="contracts.csv",
)

# Build the ontology from the domain + uploaded data (async — returns a job).
# This MUST run before building a platform: without an ontology the build fails
# server-side ("Domain has no entities. Define entities before building.").
onto = api.domains.build_ontology(domain_id=domain["id"])
api.wait_for_job(onto.job_id, timeout=600)   # raises if the ontology build fails

# Build a platform (async — returns the platform and a build job). The result
# carries a normalised, stable `id` (the platform) and `job_id` (the build job),
# so you don't unwrap `build_job.job.id` / `platform.id` by hand.
result = api.platforms.create(
    domain_id=domain["id"],
    dataset_id=dataset["id"],
)
platform_id = result.id          # == result["platform"]["id"]
build_job_id = result.job_id     # == result["build_job"]["id"]

# Wait for the build to finish
job = api.wait_for_job(build_job_id, timeout=600)

# Query the platform
answer = api.platforms.query(
    platform_id=platform_id,
    query="What are the highest-risk clauses?",
)
print(answer["answer"])
print(answer["explanation"])

Convenience methods return an AttrDict — a dict that also exposes its keys as attributes (result.id, dataset.row_count). Every result["..."] subscript, .get(), in test and json.dumps() keeps working exactly as before; the attribute access is additive (a key colliding with a dict method like items stays reachable via subscript).

Resources

Resource Methods
api.domains list, create, get, update, delete, build_ontology, eval_config, set_eval_config, delete_eval_config, suggest_eval_config, list_templates, create_template, update_template, delete_template, feedback_stats
api.datasets list, get, upload (incl. decision_column), fetch, fetch_multi, quality, clean, preview, delete
api.platforms list, create, get, delete, status, query, suggest_rules, list_suggestions, approve_suggestion, reject_suggestion, graph
api.predictions predict, list_configs, create_config, delete_config, train, list_predictions, discover_prediction_rules, discovered_prediction_rules, neurosymbolic_comparison, symbolic_forecast, residual_diagnosis (preview)
api.connectors list, test
api.usage get
api.jobs get
api.api_keys list, create, revoke
api.agent_policy (preview) author, status, examples, authorize_action, create_session, step, get_session

Agent Policy Gate (preview)

Write the rules an AI agent must obey in plain English; Ambertrace compiles them to a verified policy and proves every proposed tool-call permit/deny — fail-closed, with a machine-checked proof. The LLM only proposes; the kernel proves. You author English and read back the admitted rules (also in English) plus a permit/deny verdict with its proof; the compiled form stays internal.

The gate is feature-flagged server-side (AMBERTRACE_AGENT_POLICY_GATE) and reachable at api.agent_policy.*:

Method What it does
author(policy_text) Compile an English policy into a verified gate; returns {platform, admitted, rejected, policy_text}
status() The live gate: active policy, admitted controls (English), and the declared input_fields an action must supply
examples() The built-in example-policy library ([{id, domain_label, title, policy_text, try_hint}, ...]) — ready-to-author policies
authorize_action(platform_id, *, tool, args, context) Gate ONE proposed tool-call — permit/deny with proof
create_session(*, platform_id, goal) Open a mediated session (the gate is the sole executor) for a cumulative obligation
step(session_id, *, tool, args, context) Mediate one action in a session: gate → execute-on-permit / block-on-deny
get_session(session_id) Fetch a session and its full mediated step trace
# 1. Author the policy in English
result = api.agent_policy.author(
    "An autonomous procurement agent may place purchase orders. Each order is "
    "recorded as a row in a purchase_orders ledger with a quantity column and a "
    "unit_price column. The cumulative spend — the sum of quantity times "
    "unit_price across every row — must stay at or below 100000. Permit a "
    "purchase order only when the resulting cumulative spend stays within budget."
)
platform_id = result["platform"]["id"]
result["admitted"]   # the admitted rules, described in plain English — review these
result["rejected"]   # anything outside the verified fragment, with a reason (never silently dropped)

# 2. See exactly which facts an action must supply
api.agent_policy.status()["input_fields"]   # e.g. quantity (int), unit_price (float)

# 3. Gate one action — permit/deny WITH PROOF
v = api.agent_policy.authorize_action(platform_id, tool="place_order",
                                      args={"quantity": 100, "unit_price": 400})
v["decision"]       # "permit" | "deny" | a policy's own verb (e.g. "escalate"/"clear")
v["permitted"]      # True iff the verdict is WITHIN policy (non-restrictive) — the
                    #   binary execute/block reading when the decision is a domain verb
v["proof_checked"]  # True — the kernel certified the firing set

# For a CUMULATIVE control, mediate a session so the obligation is proven over the
# accumulated executed-action ledger (the harness is the sole executor):
s = api.agent_policy.create_session(platform_id=platform_id, goal="place orders")
step = api.agent_policy.step(s["id"], tool="place_order",
                             args={"quantity": 100, "unit_price": 400})
step["step"]["verdict"]["decision"], step["step"]["executed"]

Runnable end-to-end demos (on GitHub — the runnable examples are not bundled in the wheel, so install-from-PyPI users browse them on the repo, or read the full flow offline via help(api.agent_policy)): Agent Policy Gate quickstart (the author → status → authorize / session flow + what a 404 means), examples/27_agent_policy_gate.py gates a single action (permit one, deny another, print the proof certificate), and examples/25_agent_spend_budget.py mediates a session for a cumulative spend budget.

What the proof is — and is not. The verdict's proof certificate (decision, permitted, proof_checked, deciding_rule, certified_facts, rejected_facts) is an output the verified engine produces: it demonstrates the result — which facts were certified, which rule decided, and that the firing set was machine-checked. It does not ship or reveal the kernel / Lean formalisation that produces it; you read the certificate, the engine stays internal.

Obligation classes — the English-in authoring contract

Every policy is a set of requirements an action must satisfy. Each requirement is one of the classes below; author it in English and the compiler admits it as a verified obligation (anything outside these classes is rejected-and-surfaced in result["rejected"], never silently approximated). Always confirm a requirement landed as you intended by reading result["admitted"] and by testing a within-limit action (expect permit) and a breaching action (expect deny).

Class What it expresses Example English that compiles to it
Per-action condition A check on the proposed action's own fields "Only allow actions of type triage, schedule, or refer." / "Block any actuator command with pressure outside 2 to 8 bar." / "Require mfa_passed for privileged requests."
Cumulative count / sum limit A cap on a running count or sum over a declared ledger of prior actions (only count/sum — never average/min/max) "Each order writes a row to an order_log with a quantity column. The total quantity summed across all rows must stay at or below 1000." / "No more than 3 actions of this kind may be executed."
Cumulative exposure A cap on the running value Σ qty × price over a declared ledger; the limit is a numeric constant "Each order writes a row to an open_positions ledger with a quantity column and a price column. The cumulative exposure — the sum of quantity times price across every row — must stay at or below 100000."
Interval / band binding An exposure cap proven for every value of one as-yet-unknown factor confined to a closed interval [lo, hi] (e.g. a fill price known only to lie in a band) "For a proposed order whose fill price is not yet known but is guaranteed to be between 100 and 500, the cumulative exposure must stay at or below 100000 for every possible fill price in that range."

The cumulative / exposure / band classes operate over a ledger (a named relation of prior actions): name the ledger and its numeric column(s) in your policy, then mediate a session (create_session + step) so the gate proves the obligation over the resulting history. Browse api.agent_policy.examples() for more ready-to-author policies across domains (healthcare triage, grid dispatch, automation safety, access control, supply-chain).

Availability. The Agent Policy Gate is a preview capability; its endpoints raise AmbertraceError (404) when not enabled on your deployment. The cumulative / exposure / band classes additionally require the platform's numeric obligation checker to be enabled.

author() 404 — feature-off vs not-authorised. A 404 from author() has two possible meanings: (a) the feature isn't enabled (above), or (b) an org agent-policy gate already exists and your credentials are not its owner or an org-admin. The org has one gate; the first author creates it (you become owner) and only the owner/an org-admin may replace it thereafter. The refusal is a 404 by design (not a 403) so the gate's existence isn't revealed to an unauthorised caller — it is not a sign the feature is unavailable. To replace an existing org gate, author with the owner's credentials or an org-admin key. (status() / authorize_action() / step() against an existing gate are read/eval paths and do not require ownership.)

Neurosymbolic forecasting

Train a forecasting model, then discover explainable correction rules from its residuals and check — honestly — whether they earn their place against the neural model alone.

# Train a Time-Series config (target = GS10, the 10y Treasury yield)
config = api.predictions.create_config(platform_id, target_field="GS10",
                                       time_index_field="date", horizon=1,
                                       frequency="monthly", model_type="gbt")
api.predictions.train(platform_id, config["id"])

# 1) Discover correction rules — async; the SDK polls the job and returns the summary
summary = api.predictions.discover_prediction_rules(
    platform_id, prediction_config_id=config["id"])
summary["total_accepted"], summary["total_rejected"], summary["converged"]

# 2) Read the accepted rules WITH their fire-rate and backtest delta (why each earns its place)
rules = api.predictions.discovered_prediction_rules(
    platform_id, prediction_config_id=config["id"])["accepted_rules"]
for r in rules:
    print(r["name"], r["rule_type"], r["fire_rate"], r["delta"])
# Discovered rules are stored PENDING expert approval (is_active=False) — review,
# then activate with api.platforms.update_rule(...).

# 3) Symbolic forecast — a transparent number with its WHY (the driver-rules behind it)
fc = api.predictions.symbolic_forecast(platform_id, prediction_config_id=config["id"],
                                       include_fitted_series=True)
fc["forecast"], fc["why"]   # each why-entry: driver, direction, contribution, base_features

# 4) Neural vs neurosymbolic — does the symbolic layer earn its place? (async; polled)
cmp = api.predictions.neurosymbolic_comparison(platform_id, prediction_config_id=config["id"])
cmp["neural"]["r2"], cmp["neurosymbolic"]["r2"], cmp["delta"]   # delta = neurosymbolic − neural

discover_prediction_rules and neurosymbolic_comparison are async (HTTP 202): by default the SDK polls the background job to completion and returns its result — pass wait=False to get the raw {job_id, poll, ...} envelope and poll it yourself via api.wait_for_job(job_id). Discovery is a write operation, so it needs a user-scoped (at_...) key. A runnable end-to-end demo is in examples/26_neurosymbolic_bond_yield.py.

Connectors

Connectors pull data from external providers. List what's available, optionally test a config, then ingest it as a dataset linked to a domain:

api.connectors.list()   # discover connectors + their required config fields

# Stocks/ETFs and crypto are keyless:
api.datasets.fetch(domain_id=1, connector_type="yahoo",
                   config={"symbols": ["AAPL", "SPY"], "range": "2y"})
api.datasets.fetch(domain_id=1, connector_type="coinbase",
                   config={"product_ids": ["BTC-USD", "ETH-USD"]})

# FRED needs your own free key (https://fred.stlouisfed.org):
api.datasets.fetch(domain_id=1, connector_type="fred",
                   config={"api_key": "<your FRED key>",
                           "series_ids": ["GS10", "FEDFUNDS"], "frequency": "monthly"})

# Generic REST/CSV — bring your own auth via headers:
api.datasets.fetch(domain_id=1, connector_type="rest",
                   config={"url": "https://api.example.com/series",
                           "headers": {"Authorization": "Bearer ..."}})
Connector Config Key?
yahoo symbols, interval, range none
coinbase product_ids, granularity none
fred / fred_sentiment series_ids, frequency, api_key bring your own
rest url, format, records_path, headers, params bring your own (via headers)

Bring your own provider keys. Connectors that hit a credentialed provider require your own key, passed in config — Ambertrace never uses a shared key on your behalf.

Agent Keys

AI agents authenticate with user-scoped API keys that give full lifecycle access (domains, datasets, platforms, rules, predictions). A human creates the key from the dashboard; the agent can then create narrower platform-scoped keys for its integrations.

# Agent creates a platform-scoped key for a specific integration
platform_key = api.api_keys.create(
    scope="platform",
    platform_id=42,
    name="Slack Integration",
)

# List keys visible to this agent
keys = api.api_keys.list()

# Revoke a platform key the agent created
api.api_keys.revoke(platform_key["id"])

User-scoped keys cannot create other user-scoped keys (no self-replication). Chat, conversations, and billing remain human-only.

Job Polling

Long-running operations (platform builds, data cleaning, training) return a job_id. Use wait_for_job to poll:

job = api.wait_for_job(job_id, timeout=300, poll_interval=5)
if job["status"] == "error":
    print(f"Failed: {job.get('error_message')}")

Progress + stall detection. wait_for_job takes two optional, back-compatible hooks so you can surface progress and catch a build that hangs without hand-rolling a retry wrapper:

# Live progress on every poll:
api.wait_for_job(job_id, on_progress=lambda j: print(j.get("status"), j.get("progress")))

# Bail out if the build makes no forward progress (a change in status or
# `progress`) for 120s — even if the overall timeout hasn't elapsed:
try:
    api.wait_for_job(job_id, timeout=600, stall_timeout=120)
except TimeoutError as e:
    print("build stalled:", e)   # e.g. stuck at building_ontology progress 0

Two job types — poll the right one

GET /api/v1/jobs/{id} (and wait_for_job) returns two different job types:

  • the ontology build job (type: "ontology", created by domains.build_ontology) — its result is the ontology.
  • the platform build job (type: "build", the build_job from platforms.create) — its result.build_quality carries the customer-facing build-quality summary and its result.generation_diagnostics the decision-coverage detail below.

A consumer polling the ontology job will not see generation_diagnostics — poll the platform build job id instead.

Build diagnostics

After a platform build, job["result"]["generation_diagnostics"] reports what rule generation produced and how the rule set behaves — the quickest way to explain why a platform reaches (or never reaches) an adverse decision:

job = api.wait_for_job(build_job_id, timeout=600)
diag = job["result"].get("generation_diagnostics", {})

# verdict_conclusion_count == 0 (== `can_decide_adversely is False`) means the
# rule set classifies inputs but has no deny/block conclusion — it permits
# everything and can never refuse.
if not diag.get("can_decide_adversely", True):
    print("Platform reaches no adverse decision:")
    for w in diag.get("decision_coverage_warnings", []):
        print("  -", w)

Fields: rule_count, classifier_count, verdict_conclusion_count, connected_restrictive_count (ints); can_decide_adversely (bool); decision_coverage_warnings, non_discriminating_rules, orphan_derived (list[str]), unbound_references (list).

Error Handling

from ambertraceai import AmbertraceAPI, AmbertraceError

try:
    api.domains.get(999)
except AmbertraceError as e:
    print(e.status_code)  # 404
    print(e.code)         # "not_found"
    print(str(e))         # "Domain not found."

When a verified platforms.query fails closed (the engine could not certify a decision), the error carries machine-readable diagnostics so you don't have to string-parse the prose message:

try:
    api.platforms.query(platform_id, query="...")
except AmbertraceError as e:
    e.missing_atoms    # atoms a decision rule needed but were neither supplied nor derived
    e.deciding_rule    # the rule that stalled, if named
    e.rejected_facts   # facts the engine rejected
    e.stalled_stage    # where the chain stopped (e.g. "decision")

Each defaults to [] / None when the deployment doesn't supply it (back-compatible). This brings the query failure path to parity with agent_policy.authorize_action(), which already returns structured rejected_facts / deciding_rule.

API Documentation

Full API reference: app.ambertrace.ai/openapi/redoc

Changelog

0.17.0

  • Developer-experience ergonomics (no breaking changes).
    • AmbertraceAPI.from_env() (and env defaults on the constructor): reads AMBERTRACE_API_KEY / AMBERTRACE_BASE_URL (base URL defaults to https://app.ambertrace.ai), with optional .env loading via from_env(dotenv_path=...) — no per-project auth boilerplate. An explicit argument always wins over the environment.
    • Consistent envelopes. platforms.create and domains.build_ontology return an AttrDict stamped with a normalised, stable id / job_id regardless of the underlying shape (platform.id, build_job.job.id, ...), so callers no longer hand-roll multi-shape unwrapping. The original keys are preserved.
    • Typed dataset returns. datasets.upload / get / list return an AttrDict exposing the documented DatasetOut fields (row_count, column_count, decision_column, ...) by attribute as well as subscript — discoverable without grepping SDK source. AttrDict is a dict subclass, so every existing subscript / .get() / in / json.dumps() is unchanged.
    • Build-stall detection in wait_for_job. New optional on_progress callback (invoked with the job dict each poll) and stall_timeout (raise TimeoutError on no forward progress — a change in status or progress — for N seconds), so a hung build is caught without a hand-rolled retry wrapper. The existing two-arg signature is unchanged.
    • Structured fail-closed query errors. A verified platforms.query that can't certify now surfaces missing_atoms, deciding_rule, rejected_facts and stalled_stage on AmbertraceError (read off the error body; default [] / None when absent) — parity with agent_policy.authorize_action.
    • decision_column docstring. datasets.upload(..., decision_column=...) now documents that naming a column flips the build from features-only to label-supervised (verdict generation grounded against the labelled outcomes).

0.16.0

  • Agent Policy Gate — documented + exampled. The api.agent_policy resource (author an English governance policy, then prove every proposed agent action permit/deny against it — fail-closed, with a machine-checked proof) is now fully surfaced in the README (the Agent Policy Gate section, the method table, and the obligation-class authoring contract) and in a new single-action worked example, examples/27_agent_policy_gate.py — author a per-action policy, gate a PERMIT case and a DENY case, and print the verdict's proof certificate (decision, permitted, proof_checked, deciding_rule, certified_facts, rejected_facts, denied_reason). The proof certificate is an output demonstrating the result; it does not reveal the kernel/Lean engine that produces it. The gate is a preview capability (feature-flagged server-side; its endpoints return AmbertraceError (404) when not enabled). No client API changed — AgentPolicyResource already shipped.

0.15.0

  • Multi-source connector fetch + decision-column upload. api.datasets.fetch_multi(domain_id=..., sources=[...], join_on="date", ...) fetches from two or more connectors and merges them into ONE date-aligned panel (each value column namespaced by connector type), with optional frequency / aggregation resampling so mixed-cadence sources land on a common grid. api.datasets.upload(...) now accepts decision_column= to declare the dataset's decision/label column at upload time.

0.11.2

  • Per-period neurosymbolic-comparison series (for charting). neurosymbolic_comparison now accepts include_series=True — the completed job result then carries a series list of the per-period neural-vs-neurosymbolic head-to-head over the SAME held-out backtest points the aggregate metrics are computed from, so the comparison can be charted OVER TIME. Each entry is {index, time?, actual, neural, neurosymbolic, rule_fired} (rule_fired marks the periods where applying the rules changed the prediction). The series reconciles with the aggregate metrics and honours include_pending. Omitted by default (additive / back-compatible); timeseries configs only.

0.11.1

  • Sound neurosymbolic loop + include_pending preview. neurosymbolic_comparison now accepts include_pending=True — a read-only "what-if" that applies the accepted-but-pending discovered rules before the human approval gate (mode switches to preview_pending, with n_pending_rules); default scores active rules only. Server-side, rule discovery is corrected to score candidates in the same space they're applied (greedy forward selection through the live evaluator), so an accepted rule set never degrades the backtest, and discovery now runs on ingested-status datasets (previously it silently returned no rules). Cleaner generated module names throughout (explicit operationIds on every route).

0.11.0

  • Neurosymbolic rule discovery + neural-vs-neurosymbolic comparison. New api.predictions methods: discover_prediction_rules (async — analyse a trained model's residuals, propose corrective adjustment/constraint rules, and A/B-test each against the expanding-window backtest; accepted rules are stored pending expert approval), discovered_prediction_rules (read the accepted rules with each rule's fire_rate and backtest delta), and neurosymbolic_comparison (async — head-to-head neural vs neurosymbolic R²/RMSE so you can see whether the symbolic layer earns its place). The two async methods poll the background job by default; pass wait=False for the raw 202 envelope. New headline example examples/26_neurosymbolic_bond_yield.py walks the full 10y-Treasury-yield flow end to end.

0.10.2

  • symbolic_forecast why contract — enriched (non-breaking superset). why now surfaces the full set of materially-contributing accepted drivers the model induced and accepted on the holdout — not only the drivers firing on the most-recent row. So why is informative even when nothing fires on the latest row (the case where it used to come back []). Each entry carries fired_on_latest_row (is this driver active now?), base_features (the human-named source feature(s) behind an engineered antecedent), and standalone_holdout_skill (per-driver data-fit evidence); a new top-level max_standalone_holdout_skill reports the strongest single driver's skill. accepted_drivers is now an alias of why (same content, one source of truth). This is a non-breaking superset: the forecast value/interval, baseline, and skill_vs_persistence are unchanged — consumers reading why simply get the full driver set instead of the fired-only subset. Read the enriched why to explain a forecast even off the latest row.

0.10.1

  • Trim-forward release: IP-redacted docstrings for the public SDK.

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

ambertraceai-0.17.1.tar.gz (308.6 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

ambertraceai-0.17.1-py3-none-any.whl (283.5 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file ambertraceai-0.17.1.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: ambertraceai-0.17.1.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 308.6 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12

File hashes

Hashes for ambertraceai-0.17.1.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 2cb0fda1e788c9282a0342d540489bb5238e6b77dfa244e1ac58fd42965f16ab
MD5 0472b4dc7aa9259ea0f013575503c754
BLAKE2b-256 4c4a9c487bb53c0154275550b763d75d6972bbe5375b3a745b9807f2a7ea87a3

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for ambertraceai-0.17.1.tar.gz:

Publisher: publish.yml on Pilot-Generative-AI/ambertraceai-python

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

File details

Details for the file ambertraceai-0.17.1-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: ambertraceai-0.17.1-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 283.5 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? Yes
  • Uploaded via: twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12

File hashes

Hashes for ambertraceai-0.17.1-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 1d2321985a3b10cefdd8daf855411ef4cde9f75333f89439148b5456c0a22974
MD5 60e6b03ee7209fc8b5df24dd1715af60
BLAKE2b-256 f15ea1292d554e3bc26c4ef0af83dff5981d0aeb30a85f461d195e1f42ea0667

See more details on using hashes here.

Provenance

The following attestation bundles were made for ambertraceai-0.17.1-py3-none-any.whl:

Publisher: publish.yml on Pilot-Generative-AI/ambertraceai-python

Attestations: Values shown here reflect the state when the release was signed and may no longer be current.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page