Skip to main content

Anoman CodeCheck

PyPI License: MIT Python 3.9+

AI-powered codebase security and quality scanner with pre-built OWASP/NIST/ISO checklists, live CVE database lookup, supply chain scanning, and CI/CD-native output (SARIF, JUnit, GitLab, GitHub).

Uses Claude Opus via Anoman AI gateway with sovereign data routing.

Quick Start

pip install anoman-codecheck
export ANOMAN_API_KEY="anm-sk-your-key-here"
anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project

Why Anoman CodeCheck?

Traditional SAST tools and manual code reviews each solve part of the problem — but neither solves it completely. Anoman CodeCheck combines the depth of a senior security engineer's review with the speed and consistency of automation.

The Problem

Challenge Traditional SAST Manual Code Review
Setup time Hours to days (rules, exclusions, tuning) Zero tooling, but needs scheduling
False positives High — pattern matching triggers on safe code Low — human judgment filters noise
Business logic flaws Misses entirely — can't understand intent Catches — human reads context
Novel vulnerabilities Only finds known patterns Can reason about new attack vectors
Compliance mapping Basic (CWE only) Depends on reviewer's knowledge
Supply chain risks Separate tool (Snyk, Dependabot) Usually skipped
Speed at scale Fast on large codebases Bottleneck — days/weeks for large reviews
Consistency Deterministic but rigid Varies by reviewer skill and fatigue
CI/CD integration Good (SARIF, JUnit) Manual gate — blocks pipelines
Cost $50–500+/month per repo $150–300/hour for specialist reviewers
Data residency Data sent to US/EU vendor cloud In-house only

How Anoman CodeCheck Is Different

Anoman CodeCheck uses Claude Opus (one of the most capable reasoning models) to perform code review the way a senior security engineer would — reading the code, understanding business logic, tracing data flows, and reasoning about attack surfaces — but in minutes instead of days.

What you get:

  • Understands context, not just patterns. An LLM reads your code like a human reviewer. It catches business logic flaws, insecure design patterns, and subtle vulnerabilities that regex-based SAST tools miss entirely.
  • Zero configuration. Point it at a directory and scan. No rules to write, no exclusions to tune, no training data to maintain. The AI already knows what to look for.
  • Framework-aware compliance. Every finding maps to a specific OWASP, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, or CWE control ID. Your auditors get structured evidence, not a wall of text.
  • Live CVE + supply chain in one pass. Dependencies are checked against the OSV.dev database in real-time during every scan. No separate SCA tool needed.
  • Sovereign data routing. Choose where your code is processed: Singapore (PDPA compliant), Jakarta (UU PDP compliant), or US. Your source code never leaves the region you select.
  • CI/CD native. Drop it into GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or Jenkins with one command. SARIF for GitHub Code Scanning, JUnit XML for Jenkins, GitLab Code Quality for MR widgets. Exit code 1 blocks the pipeline on critical/high findings.
  • One dependency. The entire tool is httpx + Python 3.9+. No JVM, no Docker, no binary downloads.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Capability Anoman CodeCheck SonarQube / Semgrep Manual Review
Business logic analysis Yes (LLM reasoning) No Yes
Credential leak detection Yes Partial (regex) Yes
OWASP/NIST/ISO mapping 45+ checks, auto-mapped CWE only Manual
Custom checklists JSON export/import YAML rules (complex) N/A
CVE/dependency scanning Built-in (OSV.dev live) Separate tool Usually skipped
Data residency control SG / ID / US selectable Vendor cloud only In-house
Setup time 30 seconds Hours to days N/A
False positive rate Low (contextual reasoning) Medium-High Low
Cost Per-scan token cost $150-450/mo per project $150-300/hr
CI/CD output formats SARIF, JUnit, GitLab, GitHub SARIF, JSON None
Offline/air-gap mode No (needs API) Yes (self-hosted) Yes
Deterministic results No (LLM variance) Yes No

When to use SAST instead: If you need deterministic, reproducible results for audit evidence, or you're scanning 500+ files per run in a CI pipeline that runs 50x/day, traditional SAST is more cost-effective for high-frequency scans. Anoman CodeCheck is best for deep scans — pre-merge reviews, security audits, compliance checks, and catching what SAST misses.


Setup Guide

Step 1: Get an Anoman AI Account

  1. Go to https://app.anoman.io
  2. Click "Create Account"
  3. Sign up with Google, GitHub, or email + password
  4. Verify your email (check inbox for verification link)

Step 2: Create an API Key

  1. After signing in, go to API Keys in the sidebar
  2. Click "Create Key"
  3. Fill in:
    • Name: e.g. codecheck-scanner
    • Tier: Team or higher (for Bedrock sovereign access)
    • Region: sg (Singapore) or id (Indonesia)
    • Region Preference (optional):
      • any — route to any provider (fastest)
      • sg_only — data stays in Singapore (PDPA compliant)
      • id_only — data stays in Jakarta (UU PDP compliant)
  4. Click Create and copy the key (shown only once)
  5. The key looks like: anm-sk-abc123...

Step 3: Configure

Set the API key as an environment variable:

# Linux / macOS
export ANOMAN_API_KEY="anm-sk-your-key-here"

# Windows (PowerShell)
$env:ANOMAN_API_KEY = "anm-sk-your-key-here"

# Windows (CMD)
set ANOMAN_API_KEY=anm-sk-your-key-here

Or pass it directly:

anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project --api-key "anm-sk-your-key-here"

Choosing a Model and Region

The --model flag controls which AI model scans your code and where your data is processed:

Model AI Engine Data Location Compliance Best For
claude-opus-bedrock-sg Claude Opus 4.6 Singapore PDPA Recommended — most thorough, sovereign SG
claude-opus-bedrock-id Claude Opus 4.6 Jakarta UU PDP Indonesian data residency
claude-sonnet-bedrock-sg Claude Sonnet 4.6 Singapore PDPA Faster, cheaper, good accuracy
claude-haiku-bedrock-sg Claude Haiku 4.5 Singapore PDPA Fastest, cheapest, quick scans
claude-sonnet-bedrock-id Claude Sonnet 4.6 Jakarta UU PDP Fast + Indonesian residency
claude-opus Claude Opus 4.6 US (Virginia) None No data residency requirement
claude-sonnet Claude Sonnet 4.6 US (Virginia) None Fast, no residency requirement
# Sovereign scan — data stays in Singapore
anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project --model claude-opus-bedrock-sg

# Sovereign scan — data stays in Jakarta
anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project --model claude-opus-bedrock-id

# Fast scan — less thorough but 5x faster
anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project --model claude-haiku-bedrock-sg

# US processing — cheapest, no data residency
anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project --model claude-sonnet

Run Without Installing (from source)

No pip install needed — clone and run directly:

# Clone the repo
git clone https://github.com/c0denician88/anoman-codecheck
cd anoman-codecheck

# Install only the dependency (httpx)
pip install httpx

# Set your API key
export ANOMAN_API_KEY="anm-sk-your-key-here"

# Run directly with Python
python -m anoman_codecheck scan /path/to/your/project

# Or run the scanner module directly
python anoman_codecheck/scanner.py scan /path/to/your/project

# All flags work the same way
python -m anoman_codecheck scan ./my-project --type api --model claude-opus-bedrock-sg
python -m anoman_codecheck checklists
python -m anoman_codecheck checklist owasp-api --export

One-liner (no clone needed)

# Download and run in one command
pip install httpx && \
  git clone https://github.com/c0denician88/anoman-codecheck /tmp/codecheck && \
  ANOMAN_API_KEY="anm-sk-..." python -m /tmp/codecheck/anoman_codecheck scan ./my-project

Features

AI-Powered Code Analysis

  • Claude Opus reasoning — not regex matching. The LLM reads your code, traces data flows, understands business logic, and identifies vulnerabilities that pattern-based scanners miss.
  • 30+ language support — Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Rust, Ruby, PHP, C/C++, Swift, Kotlin, Scala, SQL, Shell, Terraform, Dockerfiles, YAML/JSON/TOML configs.
  • Structured findings — every issue includes severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/INFO), exact file + line, description, fix recommendation, and mapped framework control ID.

Compliance Checklists (45+ Checks)

  • OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) — Broken Object-Level Auth, Broken Authentication, Injection, SSRF, Mass Assignment, and more.
  • OWASP Web Top 10 (2021) — Broken Access Control, Cryptographic Failures, Injection, Insecure Design, Security Misconfiguration, and more.
  • NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 — Access Control, Audit & Accountability, System & Communications Protection, Incident Response.
  • ISO 27001:2022 Annex A — Access Management, Cryptography, Operations Security, Communications Security.
  • Infrastructure — Docker misconfigurations, Terraform security, secrets in IaC, exposed ports, privilege escalation.
  • Mobile (OWASP MASVS 2.0) — Insecure data storage, weak auth, insufficient crypto, code tampering, reverse engineering.
  • Custom checklists — Export any checklist to JSON, edit it, add your own checks, and scan with --custom-checklist.

Live CVE & Supply Chain Scanning

  • OSV.dev integration — queries the Open Source Vulnerability database on every scan. No stale advisory data.
  • Dependency file parsing — automatically detects and parses requirements.txt, package.json, pyproject.toml, go.mod, Gemfile.lock.
  • CVE findings merged into report — supply chain vulnerabilities appear alongside code findings with fix versions and advisory URLs.

CI/CD Integration

  • SARIF 2.1.0 — GitHub Code Scanning, Azure DevOps, VS Code SARIF Viewer.
  • JUnit XML — Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI, any JUnit-compatible runner.
  • GitLab Code Quality — native MR widget integration.
  • GitHub Annotations — inline PR comments (auto-detected in GitHub Actions).
  • CI gating — --fail-on critical|high|medium exits with code 1 to block the pipeline.

Sovereign Data Routing

  • Singapore — code processed in AWS ap-southeast-1, PDPA compliant.
  • Jakarta — code processed in AWS ap-southeast-3, UU PDP compliant.
  • US — standard routing, lowest latency for non-regulated workloads.
  • Your code stays in the region you choose. No cross-border data transfer.

Usage

anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project --type api          # Auto-select API checklists
anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project --checklist owasp-api  # Specific checklist
anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project --custom-checklist my-checks.json
anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project --output sarif --output-file results.sarif
anoman-codecheck scan ./my-project --fail-on critical   # CI gate
anoman-codecheck checklists                             # List all checklists
anoman-codecheck checklist owasp-api --export           # Export for customization

Checklists

Name Framework Items Types
owasp-api OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) 10 api, backend
owasp-web OWASP Web Top 10 (2021) 10 backend, frontend
nist NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 7 api, backend, infra
iso27001 ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 6 api, backend, frontend
infra Docker + Terraform 7 infra
mobile OWASP MASVS 2.0 5 mobile

Auto-selection: --type api = owasp-api + nist + iso27001

CI/CD Integration

GitHub Actions (SARIF)

- run: pip install anoman-codecheck
- run: anoman-codecheck scan . --output sarif --output-file results.sarif --fail-on high
  env:
    ANOMAN_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANOMAN_API_KEY }}
- uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
  with:
    sarif_file: results.sarif

GitLab CI

script:
  - pip install anoman-codecheck
  - anoman-codecheck scan . --output gitlab --output-file gl-code-quality-report.json
artifacts:
  reports:
    codequality: gl-code-quality-report.json

Jenkins (JUnit)

sh 'anoman-codecheck scan . --output junit --output-file results.xml --fail-on critical'
junit 'results.xml'

Output Formats

Format Flag CI Support
Text --output text Terminal
JSON --output json Any
SARIF 2.1.0 --output sarif GitHub, Azure DevOps, VS Code
JUnit XML --output junit Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI
GitLab Code Quality --output gitlab GitLab MR widget
GitHub Annotations --output github GitHub PR inline

Contributing

git clone https://github.com/c0denician88/anoman-codecheck
cd anoman-codecheck
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest tests/ -v

License

MIT - Built by Anoman AI

Metadata

Release files for anoman-codecheck 0.1.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for anoman-codecheck 0.1.0
File Size Uploaded
anoman_codecheck-0.1.0.tar.gz 21.8 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for anoman-codecheck 0.1.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
anoman_codecheck-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 47.1 kB

Release files / anoman_codecheck-0.1.0.tar.gz

Download URL anoman_codecheck-0.1.0.tar.gz
Size 21.8 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
8bb722892ac1cb7c413215438d889232360b4fa5f2cbcf87b2f93a30be70c078
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
03e750fb8b1a77f5c4b6cb04720e152c1553af94f8a4093c98cc06a2e4469c96
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Apr 8, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / anoman_codecheck-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL anoman_codecheck-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 25.3 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
1f5d51b77f614fdd6fde4e4a13df4b34ec1f49d2885b00e5df318ca8c79c9d80
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
8552e85f0ede599ef12b00e6e60f96e3ee17283e500104b74cb370241a023a45
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Apr 8, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

This release

0.1.0 This release

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page