Skip to main content

antarctic-ice-shelf-utac

GenesisAeon Package 120 — real Antarctic ice shelf mass budget, a real Holocene meltwater-release feedback mechanism, and a real, sign-flipped regional asymmetry under CMIP6 projections. Deliberately has no UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge — see DISCLAIMER.md.

For a plain-language explanation of the same topic (German, no jargon, written for general audiences), see WHITEPAPER.md.

Where this package came from

Built alongside el-nino-amplification-utac (P118) and marine-heatwave-utac (P119) from a single broad DeepResearch pass (2026-08-31). cascading-tipping-utac (P87) only references WAIS as one node in a tipping-element network, not a standalone quantified treatment — this package fills that gap.

What's real here

  • Davison et al. (2023, Science Advances) — of 162 Antarctic ice shelves studied 1997-2021, 71 lost mass (48 lost more than 30% of their initial mass), 29 gained, 62 showed no significant change. Total loss: 8.3 trillion tonnes. Basal melting was the dominant driver (68%). West Antarctica predominantly lost mass; East Antarctica predominantly stayed stable or gained.
  • Nature Geoscience (2025) — sediment-record and ocean-model evidence for a real, self-reinforcing meltwater-release feedback that drove an ice-shelf collapse ~9000 years ago: meltwater strengthens stratification, which enhances warm deep-water inflow, which accelerates melting, which releases more meltwater.
  • Muilwijk et al. (2026, The Cryosphere) — 10 CMIP6 models under a standardized meltwater perturbation show opposite-sign regional responses: East Antarctica's feedback amplifies warming (+0.16 to +0.26 degC median, up to +0.82 degC by 2100 under SSP5-8.5), while the Amundsen/Bellingshausen sectors of West Antarctica show cooling or suppressed warming (-0.5 to -1.5 degC).

Deliberately not one-sided

do_east_and_west_responses_share_the_same_sign() returns False — the CMIP6 regional finding directly complicates a naive "meltwater feedback always accelerates melting everywhere" reading of the Holocene mechanism documented alongside it. Both are real findings, kept explicit rather than smoothed into one narrative.

v2.0.0 (2026-09-03): six more real mechanisms

Following a Johann brainstorm prompted by a coral-reef article, six independent research passes each verified a real, citable mechanism:

  • Subglacial hydrology — Wilson et al. (2025, Nat. Commun.): 85 newly detected active subglacial lakes (known inventory +58%), median drainage 2.2yr / recharge 3.5yr, 6 within 8km of the grounding zone. Dow et al. (2022, Nat. Geosci.): a 460km high-pressure subglacial river system. Physically distinct from the ice-shelf basal melting above — this is water beneath the grounded ice.
  • Southern Annular Mode (SAM) — the real Antarctic analog to the Arctic polar vortex, but the "instability exports cold air" analogy does not transfer: the 2019 vortex weakening produced hot, dry conditions in Australia instead (Lim et al. 2019), a real contributor to the Black Summer bushfires. SAM does drive real, regionally asymmetric basal melt (+40 Gt/yr per +1 SD, opposite-signed in Amundsen vs. Bellingshausen/W. Pacific — Verfaillie et al. 2022), and SAM+ENSO are the two dominant decadal drivers of Antarctic ice-mass variability (King et al. 2023).
  • Sea-ice albedo feedback — Riihelä et al. (2021, Nat. Geosci.): a real, quantified feedback that flipped sign, from −0.06±0.02 W/m²/decade (1992-2015 expansion era) to +0.26 W/m² (2016-2018 sea- ice-loss reversal). Explicitly not exposed-continental-rock albedo — that mechanism was searched for and not found as a quantified Antarctica-specific result; don't conflate the two.
  • Seismic-ice interactions — real, tidally-modulated basal stick-slip icequakes on the Whillans Ice Plain (~20,000 events on record, Wiens et al. 2008); permafrost-thaw debris flows documented at Potter Peninsula since 1956, though without a quantified trend like the (non-Antarctic) Alpine literature; the 1998 Balleny Islands Mw8.1 earthquake, GIA-triggered — but GIA itself is a stabilizing feedback on West Antarctic ice, not an amplifying one.
  • Black carbon deposition — a different geography from black-carbon-albedo-utac (P105, Tibetan Plateau) — no overlap. Cordero et al. (2022, Nat. Commun.): local station/tourism emissions dominate on average. Magalhães et al. (2024, Sci. Adv.): extreme wildfire events (2019-2020 Australian megafires) can temporarily override that local baseline — both kept, not smoothed.
  • ENSO teleconnection — Paolo et al. (2018, Nat. Geosci.): during strong El Niño, Amundsen Sea shelves gain surface mass from snowfall but lose ~5x more via basal melt — "the ocean ends up winning." Ayabilah et al. (2026, The Cryosphere): on ENSO timescales, West Antarctica gains mass during El Niño — the opposite short-term sign of this package's own core Davison et al. 2023 long-term trend. Two different timescales, not a contradiction — kept as an explicit honesty-check nuance.

Installation

pip install antarctic-ice-shelf-utac

Quick start

from antarctic_ice_shelf_utac import (
    pct_shelves_losing_mass,
    is_loss_uniform_east_vs_west,
    do_east_and_west_responses_share_the_same_sign,
)

pct_shelves_losing_mass()  # 43.8
is_loss_uniform_east_vs_west()  # False
do_east_and_west_responses_share_the_same_sign()  # False -- the honesty check

License

Code: MIT. Documentation/data notes: see DISCLAIMER.md.

Citation

See CITATION.cff.

Metadata

Release files for antarctic-ice-shelf-utac 2.1.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for antarctic-ice-shelf-utac 2.1.0
File Size Uploaded Provenance
antarctic_ice_shelf_utac-2.1.0.tar.gz 31.4 kB Without provenance Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for antarctic-ice-shelf-utac 2.1.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
antarctic_ice_shelf_utac-2.1.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 61.1 kB

Release files / antarctic_ice_shelf_utac-2.1.0.tar.gz

Download URL antarctic_ice_shelf_utac-2.1.0.tar.gz
Size 31.4 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
9f57f36ae6f8b21b5d0506d734c8e46d4fbc043ba8dd09fa7e6eecdd15612ab5
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ce8325ddd2f563cfa4493109a0175b7415ab6aec70b3990e33d74df13db6cf00
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Release files / antarctic_ice_shelf_utac-2.1.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL antarctic_ice_shelf_utac-2.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 29.7 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
5b23728cb9950c84ecac12a31ee9cb436384390eb1d5bda018356ae0ef8e8ee6
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
c97ce2d5ef537e7c5902ecf5231167e5984344da5fc7db248ff78ffc4907c7e8
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Security for antarctic-ice-shelf-utac 2.1.0

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

No provenance found

None of the files in this release were uploaded with provenance metadata.

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page