Skip to main content

artzain

The Python client for the ArtzAIn decision layer, and the free local guards it is built on.

Three things, in the order you will meet them:

  1. Local guards — free, offline, pure Python. System-prompt grading against the OWASP LLM Top 10, runtime injection screening, a destructive-action guard for model output, PII detection, tool-call contracts and a cooperative kill switch. No server, no network, no mandatory dependencies, Apache-2.0. The six guard modules — prompt defence, injection screening, destructive-action guard, policy enforcement, PII detection, tool-call contracts — are byte-identical to the engine's application/security/ copies and CI enforces it (scripts/check_security_sync.py); the kill switch is the SDK's own cooperative implementation.
  2. artzain.decide() — one governed decision. Ask a CogNEXUS engine whether an action may proceed and get allow, deny or review back; by the time you have the answer it is already sealed into a hash-chained, Ed25519-signed audit log. With no API key set, decide() runs the same guards locally instead (offline: true in the result, no seal).
  3. The offline verifier and the licence CLI. artzain audit verify <bundle> recomputes every leaf hash, chain link, Merkle root and signature of an exported evidence bundle with zero network — and, once the Evidence Root is pinned, zero trust in the producing server; today every verdict is SELF-ATTESTED (below). artzain licence request|install|attest|anchor-request|anchor|anchors|verify is the file-based licence flow for private, sovereign and air-gapped installs — certificates, anchors and usage attestations travel as files, and nothing phones home.
pip install artzain              # guards, decide(), the CLI
pip install 'artzain[verify]'    # adds Ed25519 signature checks to audit / licence verify
import artzain

d = artzain.decide(
    action="send_email",
    target="crm:contact:123",
    payload=draft_email_text,
    kind="model_output",
)
if d["outcome"] == "allow":
    actually_send()
artzain login                               # device-code grant → ~/.artzain/credentials.toml
artzain quickstart                          # first sealed decision
artzain audit export --profile eu-ai-act    # evidence bundle (ZIP), optionally with a framework artifact set
artzain audit verify eu-evidence.zip        # offline; exit 1 on any integrity failure

The three verdicts, honestly. FAILED — a check the bundle must pass did not. VERIFIED, SELF-ATTESTED — intact and internally consistent, but nothing ties its signing key to CogNEXUS. VERIFIED, ATTESTED — additionally, the signing key chains to the pinned CogNEXUS Evidence Root. That root fingerprint is None in this release because the root ceremony has not yet run, so every bundle currently verifies SELF-ATTESTED; the verifier says so rather than implying more. Without cryptography installed, hashes and structure still verify, signatures report as unchecked, and the verdict is capped at SELF-ATTESTED.

Putting decide() into an agent's tool loop? The next section, Gating tool calls, covers it. The rest of this README is the guard library.


Gating tool calls

artzain does not hook your LLM client, and nothing intercepts tool calls automatically. You place decide() in the gap between the model proposing a tool call and your code executing it. That gap is the control point.

user input ──► screen_user_input() ──► model ──► tool call ──► decide() ──► execute
decide() argument Comes from
action the tool name the model chose
target the resource the call touches, read out of the arguments
payload the whole call as JSON: {"tool": <name>, "arguments": {…}}
kind "tool_call": shape and contract checks on the engine, plus the destructive-action guard

Only allow runs the tool; review means a human decides first. decide() raises DecisionError on any non-2xx response or when the engine cannot be reached. Treat that as deny. The destructive-action and injection screens read the serialized call, and every string in it as the tool receives them: JSON-decoded, so an argument's text is screened as it would be on its own (one that is itself valid JSON, through its decoded strings). A line of only --- or three backticks in an argument comes back review; inline base64 or escape sequences written out as text can come back deny. Parse arguments with a strict JSON parser and send the parsed call, as the examples do. The destructive-action screen also reads a list of strings joined, as an argv list runs, but a command a tool assembles from separate fields (a cmd beside its args) is not seen whole: screen that command inside the step as well (screen_agent_action()).

OpenAI-style. Tool calls arrive as a tool_calls array and function.arguments is a JSON string. Append the assistant message before the tool results that answer it.

import json
import artzain

msg = client.chat.completions.create(model=..., messages=messages, tools=tools).choices[0].message
messages.append(msg)

for tc in msg.tool_calls or []:
    name = tc.function.name
    try:
        args = json.loads(tc.function.arguments)
    except json.JSONDecodeError:
        args = None

    if not isinstance(args, dict):
        d = {"outcome": "deny"}  # unparseable arguments: never run them
    else:
        try:
            d = artzain.decide(
                action=name,
                target=str(args.get("id") or args.get("to") or "unknown")[:300],
                payload=json.dumps({"tool": name, "arguments": args}, ensure_ascii=False),
                kind="tool_call",
            )
        except artzain.DecisionError:
            d = {"outcome": "deny"}  # the engine did not decide: fail closed

    result = dispatch(name, args) if d["outcome"] == "allow" else f"Not run ({d['outcome']})."
    messages.append({"role": "tool", "tool_call_id": tc.id, "content": str(result)})

Anthropic. Tool calls arrive as tool_use content blocks and block.input is already a dict. Answer every block with a tool_result, denied ones included: the API requires the pair, and a model told it was blocked usually re-plans instead of retrying the same call.

import json
import artzain

resp = client.messages.create(model=..., messages=messages, tools=tools, max_tokens=1024)

results = []
for block in (b for b in resp.content if b.type == "tool_use"):
    try:
        d = artzain.decide(
            action=block.name,
            target=str(block.input.get("id") or block.input.get("to") or "unknown")[:300],
            payload=json.dumps({"tool": block.name, "arguments": block.input}, ensure_ascii=False),
            kind="tool_call",
        )
    except artzain.DecisionError:
        d = {"outcome": "deny"}  # the engine did not decide: fail closed

    allowed = d["outcome"] == "allow"
    results.append({
        "type": "tool_result",
        "tool_use_id": block.id,
        "content": str(dispatch(block.name, block.input)) if allowed else f"Not run ({d['outcome']}).",
        "is_error": d["outcome"] == "deny",
    })

if resp.content:
    messages.append({"role": "assistant", "content": resp.content})
if results:
    messages.append({"role": "user", "content": results})

Serialize with ensure_ascii=False, as both examples do. Escaped, each non-ASCII character takes six characters of the payload limit (twelve above U+FFFF, as for most emoji). Offline screens before artzain 0.6.16, and engines without this change, read a run of those escapes as an encoding attack; current screens still do when the escaped characters are invisible.

Cover every tool, not every call site. Put decide() in the one function your agent dispatches tools through, so a tool added later is gated by construction. Then make forgotten tools stop: declare the known ones in your team's policy bundle and escalate the finding an undeclared tool draws.

"guard_config": {
  "tool_contracts": {
    "send_email": { "required_args": ["to"] },
    "*": { "deny_unknown_tools": true }
  },
  "resolution": { "medium": "review" }
}

Without the resolution line an undeclared tool is only an advisory finding, and the line escalates every medium vote, not just this one. reasons names the tool and says the bundle escalated the call; a batch's other findings are on the tool-call-contract vote in contributing_agents. Contracts are checked only for kind="tool_call", on a running engine with the bundle active (artzain local up is enough). Offline, with no API key, decide() runs the local guards only: offline: true, nothing sealed, no shape check, no bundle. A call allowed offline can come back review or deny once you connect.

The full guide covers decide() versus screen_agent_action(), where intent-level gating stops, and choosing what to gate: cognexuslabs.ai/install#tool-calls.


Why the guards exist

In April 2026, an AI coding agent (Cursor, powered by Claude) wiped a production database in nine seconds despite a system prompt that explicitly forbade destructive git commands. The agent admitted in its own reply: "I violated every principle I was given."

Prompt-only safety is not enough. artzain adds the missing layers around the model:

  1. Static prompt defence — graded before deployment.
  2. Runtime input screening — for what the user sends.
  3. Runtime output guard — for what the model generates (the missing layer in the Cursor incident).
  4. Kill switch — programmatic + manual stop with cooperative cancellation, persisted via your own callback.

Features

Layer What it does
Static prompt defence Grades system prompts A–F against 20 OWASP LLM Top-10 / Agentic ASI attack vectors before deployment
Runtime input injection detection Screens user input, RAG content, and tabular payloads at request time
Destructive-action guard Screens model-generated SQL / shell / git / cloud commands for catastrophic operations before execution
Agent kill switch Cooperative cancellation, automatic trip on CRITICAL signals, manual operator override, pluggable persistence
Audit events Append-only JSONL trail for every detection — no raw text stored

Static-evaluator coverage

  • Role / instruction boundary protection
  • Data-leakage / system-prompt protection
  • Output manipulation & weaponisation
  • Multi-language and unicode bypass attempts
  • Indirect injection via external data
  • Social engineering and abuse prevention
  • Input validation
  • Destructive database operations — PD-13 (DROP / DELETE / TRUNCATE / wipe)
  • Never-guess on irreversible actions — PD-14 (post-PocketOS / Claude incident)
  • Runtime kill-switch awareness — PD-15 (operator safety net)

Runtime input detector coverage

  • Direct instruction override
  • Delimiter and context-boundary attacks
  • Base64 / hex / ROT13 encoding attacks
  • Role-play and jailbreak language (DAN mode, developer mode, etc.)
  • Context manipulation ("your real instructions are…")
  • Canary-token leak detection
  • Multi-turn escalation
  • Cross-plugin / tool-chaining attacks (OWASP ASI04)
  • Markup injection (XSS gadgets in model-visible text)
  • Zero-width / token-smuggling unicode attacks
  • Credential exfiltration requests

Destructive-action guard coverage

26 patterns across SQL (DROP DATABASE, TRUNCATE, DELETE without WHERE, UPDATE without WHERE), git (push --force, reset --hard, clean -fd, filter-branch), filesystem (rm -rf /, --no-preserve-root, dd of=/dev/sd*, mkfs, fork-bombs), container/cloud (docker prune --volumes, kubectl delete --all, terraform destroy --auto-approve, aws s3 rb --force, gcloud projects delete), and the article-specific confessional patterns (I violated every principle, I just guessed).


Quick-start

from artzain import (
    augment_system_prompt,
    evaluate_system_prompt,
    screen_user_input,
    should_block,
    screen_agent_action,
    raise_if_killed,
    AgentKilledError,
)

# 1. Augment your system prompt so it scores grade A before inference
system = augment_system_prompt("You are a helpful customer support agent.")
report = evaluate_system_prompt(system)
print(report.grade)    # "A"
print(report.score)    # 100
print(report.missing)  # []

# 2. Screen every user message at request time
result = screen_user_input(user_message, source="chat")
if should_block(result):
    raise PermissionError(f"Injection blocked: {result.explanation}")

# 3. Wrap every agent tool call in the destructive-action guard + kill switch
try:
    for step in plan:
        raise_if_killed(run_id)
        screen_agent_action(
            step.payload,
            run_id=run_id,
            user_id=user.id,
            agent_id="my-agent",
            source=step.tool,
        )
        execute(step)
except AgentKilledError as kex:
    mark_run_killed_in_db(run_id, kex.reason)
    raise

With Hugging Face transformers

Install inference deps (accelerate is required for device_map="auto" on CUDA):

pip install artzain transformers accelerate torch

Augment the system role with static defences, screen the user message before tokenisation, then chat-template + generate as usual:

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

from artzain import augment_system_prompt, screen_user_input, should_block

# Gemma 4 E4B — © Google, Apache License 2.0; downloaded at runtime from
# Hugging Face, not distributed with this package.
model_name = "google/gemma-4-E4B-it"

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    model_name,
    dtype="auto",
    device_map="auto",
)

# Defence layers applied before the prompt reaches the model
system = augment_system_prompt("You are a helpful assistant.")

prompt = "Give me a short introduction to large language models."
guard = screen_user_input(prompt, source="chat")
if should_block(guard):
    raise PermissionError("Input refused by artzain runtime screening.")

messages = [
    {"role": "system", "content": system},
    {"role": "user", "content": prompt},
]
text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
    messages,
    tokenize=False,
    add_generation_prompt=True,
)
model_inputs = tokenizer([text], return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)

generated_ids = model.generate(**model_inputs, max_new_tokens=512)
output_ids = generated_ids[0][len(model_inputs.input_ids[0]) :].tolist()
content = tokenizer.decode(output_ids, skip_special_tokens=True)
print(content)

Destructive-action guard — standalone

For ad-hoc inspection of any model-generated payload (SQL, shell, tool call body, …):

from artzain import screen_action, ActionSeverity

result = screen_action("DROP DATABASE production;")

print(result.is_destructive)      # True
print(result.severity)            # ActionSeverity.CRITICAL
print(result.explanation)         # "Destructive action detected: DROP DATABASE / SCHEMA …"
for m in result.matches:
    print(m.rule_id, m.severity.value, m.excerpt)

if result.severity == ActionSeverity.CRITICAL:
    refuse_and_alert()

The guard is fail-closed: if a regex itself raises (e.g. on adversarial input), the result is escalated to CRITICAL so a buggy rule can never silently let a destructive operation through.


Kill switch — cooperative cancellation

from artzain import (
    raise_if_killed,
    is_killed,
    trip,
    trip_global,
    clear_global_panic,
    set_default_on_kill,
    AgentKilledError,
)

# Run-level checks (cooperative cancellation)
def long_running_agent(run_id):
    try:
        for step in plan:
            raise_if_killed(run_id)            # halts at next safe point
            do_work(step)
    except AgentKilledError as kex:
        log.warning("Run %s killed: %s", run_id, kex.reason)

# Programmatic trip from anywhere (e.g. anomaly detector)
trip(
    run_id=42,
    reason="auto-triggered: 3 destructive signals in 30s",
    user_id=user.id,
    agent_id="context-curator",
    raise_after_trip=False,    # caller will re-check via raise_if_killed
)

# Process-wide red button (rare; for systemic failures)
trip_global(reason="incident response: model behaviour anomaly")
# ... after investigation:
clear_global_panic()

# Pluggable persistence — fired on every trip, never blocks the trip itself
def persist_kill(record):
    db.execute(
        "UPDATE agent_runs SET status='killed', error_message=%s WHERE id=%s",
        (record.reason, record.run_id),
    )

set_default_on_kill(persist_kill)

The kill switch tracks recent activations in memory and can be queried for dashboards:

from artzain import recent_activations, is_global_panic_active

if is_global_panic_active():
    show_banner("Global agent panic flag is ACTIVE")

for rec in recent_activations(limit=20):
    print(rec["tripped_at"], rec["agent_id"], rec["reason"])

Auto-panic detection

If the destructive-action guard trips COGNEXUS_KILL_SWITCH_PANIC_THRESHOLD (default 5) CRITICAL signals inside COGNEXUS_KILL_SWITCH_PANIC_WINDOW_SECONDS (default 60s), the global panic flag is raised automatically — every running and future agent will hit raise_if_killed and stop until an operator clears it.


Screening helpers

Three input presets cover the most common LLM input surfaces:

from artzain import (
    screen_user_input,       # balanced sensitivity — direct chat messages
    screen_external_content, # strict  sensitivity — RAG / web / API content
    screen_tabular_payload,  # permissive           — CSV / dataframe blobs
    should_block,
    wrap_untrusted_content,
)

# Wrap RAG content before inserting into a prompt
safe_chunk = wrap_untrusted_content("web_search", raw_text)

# Screen it too
result = screen_external_content(raw_text, source="web_search", user_id=user.id)

Sensitivity presets

Preset Threshold Min threat flagged Use for
strict 0.3 LOW External / RAG content
balanced 0.5 LOW Direct user input
permissive 0.7 HIGH CSV / tabular payloads

Override via environment variables:

COGNEXUS_PROMPT_INJECTION_USER_SENSITIVITY=balanced
COGNEXUS_PROMPT_INJECTION_EXTERNAL_SENSITIVITY=strict
COGNEXUS_PROMPT_INJECTION_TABULAR_SENSITIVITY=permissive
COGNEXUS_PROMPT_INJECTION_BLOCK=0   # set to 1 to block any hit, not just CRITICAL

Using the core classes directly

from artzain import PromptInjectionDetector, DetectionConfig, InjectionType

detector = PromptInjectionDetector(
    config=DetectionConfig(
        sensitivity="strict",
        blocklist=["my-internal-keyword"],
        allowlist=["safe phrase"],
    )
)

result = detector.detect(text, source="api_gateway")
print(result.is_injection)       # True / False
print(result.threat_level)       # ThreatLevel.HIGH
print(result.injection_type)     # InjectionType.DIRECT_OVERRIDE
print(result.confidence)         # 0.9
print(result.matched_patterns)   # ["direct_override:..."]

Dashboard event logs (API key)

When COGNEXUS_API_KEY is set (create one under Account → API Keys in the dashboard), the package mirrors activity to your CogNEXUS account via POST /api/events. After you sign in, open Account → Event Logs or the main Events feed to review:

Event When
sdk_session First cloud post in a process (package version, Python, platform)
prompt_defense Every screen_* call — passed, flagged, or blocked, with a reason
policy_enforcement Each screen_client_policy call against document-derived tenant rules
prompt_static_audit Each maybe_log_prompt_defense / system-prompt grade check
generation Optional — call post_generation_outcome() after model inference
agent_kill_switch / destructive_action_guard Critical or destructive tool-call screening
export COGNEXUS_API_KEY="cnx_…"
export COGNEXUS_API_BASE_URL="https://your-host"   # optional; SaaS default applies
from artzain import screen_user_input, post_generation_outcome, configure

configure(api_key="cnx_…", base_url="https://your-host")

result = screen_user_input(user_message, source="chat")
# … run your model …
post_generation_outcome(
    outcome="passed",
    reason="Completion returned 42 tokens",
    model_id="gpt-4o",
)

Clean scans are posted when an API key is present. Set COGNEXUS_PROMPT_DEFENSE_CLOUD_PASSES=0 to send only detections (not passes).


Audit events

Detections are automatically written to a JSONL file (no raw input stored):

# Events go to $COGNEXUS_PROMPT_DEFENSE_EVENTS_DIR/prompt_defense_events.jsonl
# (falls back to $REPORTS_DIR, then /tmp)

from artzain.events import read_recent_events

rows = read_recent_events(user_id=42, limit=20)
# [{"ts": "...", "kind": "prompt_injection", "threat": "high", ...}, ...]

Custom event sink (database, queue, dashboard)

Pass an on_event callback to mirror records into your own store:

def save_to_db(record: dict) -> None:
    db.execute("INSERT INTO security_events ...", record)

screen_user_input(text, source="chat", user_id=user.id, on_event=save_to_db)

Static prompt defence — standalone

from artzain import PromptDefenseEvaluator, PromptDefenseConfig

evaluator = PromptDefenseEvaluator(
    config=PromptDefenseConfig(min_grade="B")
)
report = evaluator.evaluate(my_system_prompt)

print(report.grade)     # "C"
print(report.score)     # 58
print(report.missing)   # ["unicode-attack", "context-overflow"]

if report.is_blocking():
    print("System prompt is below minimum grade — fix before deploying.")

# Evaluate a file
report = evaluator.evaluate_file("prompts/assistant.txt")

# Batch evaluation
reports = evaluator.evaluate_batch({
    "chat": chat_prompt,
    "analyst": analyst_prompt,
})

Client policy enforcement (document-derived)

When Compliance Warden rule extraction is enabled, CogNEXUS indexes HR, legal, and business policy documents from Google Drive / OneDrive and derives tenant-specific enforcement rules. Use these alongside OWASP prompt defence:

from artzain import (
    configure,
    load_client_policy_rules,
    screen_client_policy,
    should_block_policy,
)

configure(api_key="cnx_…")  # optional: fetch rules from GET /api/policy-enforcement/rules

rules = load_client_policy_rules()  # or COGNEXUS_POLICY_RULES_PATH / _JSON
report = screen_client_policy(user_message, source="chat", rules=rules)
if should_block_policy(report):
    raise PermissionError("Violates organizational policy")

Rules also appear under Guidelines in the dashboard after a compliance scan.


Environment variables

Variable Default Purpose
COGNEXUS_API_KEY — Dashboard ingest secret (MYAPP_API_KEY also accepted)
COGNEXUS_API_BASE_URL SaaS default API origin for POST /api/events
COGNEXUS_PROMPT_DEFENSE_CLOUD_PASSES on when API key set POST clean scans to the dashboard
COGNEXUS_POLICY_RULES_PATH — JSON file of rules (offline / CI)
COGNEXUS_POLICY_RULES_JSON — Inline JSON rules (overrides path)
COGNEXUS_PROMPT_DEFENSE_EVENTS_DIR /tmp JSONL audit file directory
COGNEXUS_PROMPT_INJECTION_LOG 1 Log clean scans at DEBUG
COGNEXUS_PROMPT_INJECTION_BLOCK 0 Block any injection (not just CRITICAL)
COGNEXUS_PROMPT_INJECTION_USER_SENSITIVITY balanced User-input preset
COGNEXUS_PROMPT_INJECTION_EXTERNAL_SENSITIVITY strict External/RAG preset
COGNEXUS_PROMPT_INJECTION_TABULAR_SENSITIVITY permissive CSV/tabular preset
COGNEXUS_KILL_SWITCH_PANIC_THRESHOLD 5 CRITICAL trips required to auto-panic
COGNEXUS_KILL_SWITCH_PANIC_WINDOW_SECONDS 60 Rolling window for auto-panic detector

API key integration tests

Requires COGNEXUS_API_KEY

cd pypi-package
export PYTHONPATH=src
export COGNEXUS_API_KEY="your-dashboard-key"
python -m pytest tests/test_api_key_integration.py -v

Security notes

  • All detection is pure regex — deterministic, zero LLM calls, zero network access, < 5 ms per input.
  • Audit records store a SHA-256 hash and a 96-character redacted preview of the input. Raw user text is never written to disk.
  • The destructive-action guard and kill switch are fail-closed — internal exceptions escalate to CRITICAL so a buggy rule cannot silently allow destruction.
  • The package ships sample rules that cover common attack patterns. Review and extend them for your production threat model using DetectionConfig.custom_patterns, DestructiveActionGuardConfig.extra_rules, or a YAML config file loaded with load_prompt_injection_config().

License

Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE. (Versions ≤ 0.3.x were published under MIT.)

Third-party models. The examples and the artzain quickstart demo reference google/gemma-4-E4B-it (© Google, Apache License 2.0). Model weights are downloaded at runtime from Hugging Face by the user and are not distributed with this package; this package contains no model weights. Substitute any chat model you prefer — the guards are model-agnostic.

Detection rules and evaluator logic originally derived from microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit (MIT; original notices retained in the vendored files and in LICENSE's third-party section). The destructive-action guard and kill switch were added in v0.2.0 in response to the PocketOS / Cursor / Claude incident (Guardian, Apr 2026).

Release files for artzain 0.6.16

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for artzain 0.6.16
File Size Uploaded
artzain-0.6.16.tar.gz 319.9 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for artzain 0.6.16
File Interpreter ABI Platform
artzain-0.6.16-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 526.4 kB

Release files / artzain-0.6.16.tar.gz

Download URL artzain-0.6.16.tar.gz
Size 319.9 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ed2a9aad59906d5e615e80703a8a1734d6073562eafad4b67be4f695a67a0bb0
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
6d7bc83f2e07a34e00baa3d209e2257e84541c054adabf4c1fa9fe546573c2e7
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 14, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / artzain-0.6.16-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL artzain-0.6.16-py3-none-any.whl
Size 206.5 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
fd8546e6217a811bdfc057fbe611a092e11a0985f320b9d232d183604930a122
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
d0fbdbbe120a5ac22ab46b9c907e18c7428562e974306590d4551ae2594b2ecc
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 14, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

0.6.28

2 release files

0.6.27

2 release files

0.6.26

2 release files

0.6.25

2 release files

0.6.24

2 release files

0.6.23

2 release files

0.6.22

2 release files

0.6.21

2 release files

0.6.20

2 release files

0.6.19

2 release files

0.6.18

2 release files

0.6.17

2 release files

This release

0.6.16 This release

2 release files

0.6.15

2 release files

0.6.14

2 release files

0.6.13

2 release files

0.6.9

2 release files

0.6.8

2 release files

0.6.7

2 release files

0.6.6

2 release files

0.6.5

2 release files

0.6.4

2 release files

0.6.3

2 release files

0.6.2

2 release files

0.6.1

2 release files

0.6.0

2 release files

0.5.2

2 release files

0.5.1

2 release files

0.5.0

2 release files

0.4.0

2 release files

0.3.4

2 release files

0.3.3

2 release files

0.3.2

2 release files

0.3.1

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page