Arxiv.org Agent

An LLM powered research assistant that finds, ranks, and explains recent AI papers on arxiv.org.

▶️ Watch a demo: https://youtu.be/PqJiYTvOP1M

🚀 Try it Online (no installation needed)

You can use the hosted Streamlit version here:

👉 https://arxiv-agent-atclu7bhsjhbqjk8lndeus.streamlit.app/

You'll provide your own OpenAI API key in the sidebar.
Your key is used only in memory for the session and never saved or logged.

📦 Install Locally (via PyPI)

pip install arxiv-ai-agent

Then launch the app:

arxiv-ai-agent

This will start the Streamlit interface and open it in your browser (or show you a Local URL if the browser does not auto-launch).

💻 Install from GitHub (development mode)

git clone https://github.com/nurtekinsavasai/arxiv-agent.git
cd arxiv-agent

python3 -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate

pip install -e .

Then run:

arxiv-ai-agent

🔑 OpenAI API Key

The app uses the OpenAI API for:

• Relevance classification
• Citation prediction
• Plain-English paper summaries
• Embeddings (text-embedding-3-large)

Your key is:

• Provided manually in the sidebar
• Used only for the active session
• Never saved
• Never exported
• Never written to disk

You are billed directly under your own OpenAI account.

📚 What the Agent Does

You provide:

• A short research brief in natural language
• Optional exclusions (things you don't want)
• A date range (3 days, 7 days, or 30 days)

The agent:

• Fetches recent cs.AI + cs.LG papers from arXiv
• Uses embeddings to rank semantic similarity
• Uses an LLM to classify papers as primary, secondary, or off-topic
• Selects ~20 promising papers
• Predicts 1-year citation impact using an LLM
• Ranks papers by predicted influence

Provides:

• Paper metadata
• Abstract
• PDF link
• Plain-English summary
• Explanation of the citation prediction
• Lets you download all artifacts as a ZIP

⚠️ Limitations & Ethical Notes

• Citation predictions are heuristic and approximate.
• They may reflect academic biases, trends, and popularity.
• This tool is for exploration and inspiration — not formal evaluation of researchers, institutions, or grant proposals.
• Always read the actual papers before relying on any automated ranking.

🧭 Future Work

• Expand beyond cs.AI + cs.LG
• Support more LLM providers and models
• Add multi-step agentic reasoning
• Add full background workflows for autonomous research assistants
• Enhance citation prediction framework